In the coverage report, the line and count columns have been swapped to make it more readable.
A follow-up commit in compiler-rt is needed
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23281
llvm-svn: 278152
This enables users to export coverage information as portable JSON for use by
analysis tools and storage in document based databases.
The export sub-command is invoked just like the others:
llvm-cov export -instr-profile path/to/foo.profdata path/to/foo.binary
The resulting JSON contains a list of files and functions. Every file object
contains a list of segments, expansions, and a summary of the file's region,
function, and line coverage. Every function object contains the function's name
and regions. There is also a total summary for the entire object file.
Changes since the initial commit (r276813):
- Fixed the regexes in the tests to handle Windows filepaths.
Patch by Eddie Hurtig!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22651
llvm-svn: 276818
This enables users to export coverage information as portable JSON for use by
analysis tools and storage in document based databases.
The export sub-command is invoked just like the others:
llvm-cov export -instr-profile path/to/foo.profdata path/to/foo.binary
The resulting JSON contains a list of files and functions. Every file object
contains a list of segments, expansions, and a summary of the file's region,
function, and line coverage. Every function object contains the function's name
and regions. There is also a total summary for the entire object file.
Patch by Eddie Hurtig!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22651
llvm-svn: 276813
Summary:
When giving the following command:
% llvm-cov report -instr-profile=default.profraw
llvm-cov will give the following error message:
>llvm-cov report: Not enough positional command line arguments specified!
>Must specify at least 1 positional arguments: See: orbis-llvm-cov report -help
This patch changes the error message from '1 positional arguments'
to '1 positional argument'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22621
llvm-svn: 276404
This still doesn't actually work correctly for big endian input files,
but since these tests all use little endian input files they don't
actually fail. I'll be committing a real fix for big endian soon, but
I don't have proper tests for it yet.
llvm-svn: 232354
As of r231908, the test I added in r231902 actually gets run - but I'd
checked in a stale version of the input so it didn't pass. Fix the
input and un-xfail the test.
llvm-svn: 231911
There were also errors in the CHECK line which I fixed and the test
doesn't actually pass as the "100" is in the wrong line. Not sure
whether this is a test failure or a coverage failure so making the test
XFAIL for now.
llvm-svn: 231908
Vedant Kumar