Summary:
This is necessary to get stats from the ThinLink printed before the
early exit when compiling in a distributed build.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: Prazek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29461
llvm-svn: 293908
Summary:
Allow non-ODR weak/linkonce non-prevailing copies to be marked
as available_externally in the index. Add support for dropping these to
declarations in the backend.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini, pcc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28806
llvm-svn: 292656
These tests are missing a target triple and the -m elf_x86_64 gold option,
which makes them fail on non-x86 targets.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28285
Reviewers: tejohnson
llvm-svn: 290965
Summary: ThinLTO needs to invoke SampleProfileLoader pass during link time in order to annotate profile correctly after module importing.
Reviewers: davidxl, mehdi_amini, tejohnson
Subscribers: pcc, davide, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27790
llvm-svn: 289957
Needed due to change to require datalayout (r289719).
Found this in my own testing, maybe there aren't any bots using a v1.12
gold yet.
llvm-svn: 289876
Also, udpate the ~60 failing tests in the tree which did
not contain a valid datalayout.
This fixes PR31123. lld will be updated in a following patch,
immediately after this is committed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27082
llvm-svn: 289719
Summary:
There is no point to importing at -O0, since we won't inline. We should
also disable other cross-module optimizations.
(Plan to backport this fix to the 3.9 branch to fix PR30774)
Reviewers: pcc
Subscribers: johanengelen, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25918
llvm-svn: 285648
Summary:
When we have an aliasee that is linkonce, while we can't convert
the non-prevailing copies to available_externally, we still need to
convert the prevailing copy to weak. If a reference to the aliasee
is exported, not converting a copy to weak will result in undefined
references when the linkonce is removed in its original module.
Add a new test and update existing tests.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26076
llvm-svn: 285512
Summary:
This test is allowed to run on non-x86 hosts and thus must use
llvm-nm rather than nm.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25473
llvm-svn: 283901
Summary:
As suggested in D24826, use different options for ThinLTO backend
parallelism from the option controlling regular LTO code gen
parallelism. They are already split in the LTO API, and this enables
controlling them with different clang options.
Reviewers: pcc, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: dexonsmith, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24873
llvm-svn: 282290
With the new LTO API in r278338, we stopped emitting the individual
index files and imports files for some modules in the distributed backend
case (thinlto-index-only plugin option).
Specifically, this is when the linker decides not to include a module in the
link, because it was in an archive library and did not have a strong
reference to it. Not creating the expected output files makes the
distributed build system implementation more difficult, in terms of
checking for the expected outputs of the thin link, and scheduling the
backend jobs. To address this, the gold-plugin will write dummy empty
.thinlto.bc and .imports files for modules not included in the link
(which LTO never sees).
Augmented a gold v1.12+ test, since that version of gold has the handling
for notifying on modules not being included in the link.
llvm-svn: 282100
Summary:
Emit an empty summary section, instead of no summary section, when
there are no global variables in the index. This ensures that LTO
will treat these files as ThinLTO inputs, instead of as regular
LTO inputs.
In addition to not being what the user likely intended when
compiling with -flto=thin, the current behavior is problematic for
distributed build systems that expect to get ThinLTO index and imports
files back for each input compiled with -flto=thin. Combining into
a single regular LTO module also reduces the backend parallelism.
And in the case where the index was suppressed due to uses in
inline assembly, combining into a single LTO module could provoke
renaming of duplicates that we were trying to prevent by suppressing
the index.
This change required a couple of fixes to handle the empty summary
section.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, pcc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24779
llvm-svn: 282037
Summary:
In runThinLTO we start the task numbering for ThinLTO backend
tasks depending on whether there was also a regular LTO object
(CombinedModule). However, the CombinedModule is moved at
the end of runRegularLTO, so we need to save this information and
pass it into runThinLTO. Otherwise the AddOutput callback to the client
will use the same task number for both the regular LTO object
and the first ThinLTO object, which in gold-plugin caused only
one to be end up in the output filename array and therefore passed
back to gold for the final native link.
Reviewers: pcc, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, kromanova
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24643
llvm-svn: 281725
I had this test sitting around for a while but always forgot to
commit. Rafael reviewed it a while ago.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D19207
llvm-svn: 281109
With r279911 I accidentally regressed the gold/X86/start-lib-common.ll
test for newer golds (v1.12+) that honor the --start-lib/--end-lib.
Remove the alignment which should not be there to make this work with
both old and new gold linkers.
Additionally, now that we have a subdirectory for v1.12+ gold tests,
copy this test there and check specifically for the v1.12+ behavior.
llvm-svn: 279977
Summary:
This addresses a regression in common handling from the new LTO
API in r278338. Only create a new common if the size is different.
The type comparison against an array type fails when the size is
different but not an array. GlobalMerge does not handle the
array types as well and we lose some global merging opportunities.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: junbuml, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23955
llvm-svn: 279911
Summary:
With support now in the new LTO API for caching (r279576), add
optional ThinLTO caching in the gold-plugin.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23836
llvm-svn: 279631
Summary:
The gold-plugin changes added along with the new LTO API in r278338 had
the effect of removing the management of the PluginInputFile that
ensured the files weren't released back to gold until the backend
threads were complete. Add back the old file handling.
Fixes PR29020.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, hjl.tools
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23721
llvm-svn: 279356
I had updated the output file name but not the corresponding nm based check
before submitting as r279023. This should fix the bot failures
llvm-svn: 279025
Summary:
Skip the merging of common symbols for ThinLTO modules, they will be
merged by the final native object link. Trying to merge the symbols and
add to a combined module will incorrectly enable the common symbol to be
internalized in the ThinLTO module. Additionally, we will not want to
create a combined module for ThinLTO distributed builds.
This fixes failures in 7 cpu2006 benchmarks from the new LTO API in
ThinLTO mode.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: pcc, llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23637
llvm-svn: 279023
Summary:
It does not play well with directories (end up with a bunch of hidden
files).
Also, do not strip the 0 suffix for the first task, especially since
0 can be used by ThinLTO as well now.
Reviewers: tejohnson
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, pcc, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23612
llvm-svn: 279014
This restores commit r278330, with fixes for a few bot failures:
- Fix a late change I had made to the save temps output file that I
missed due to existing files sitting on my disk
- Fix a bunch of Windows bot failures with "ambiguous call to overloaded
function" due to confusion between llvm::make_unique vs
std::make_unique (preface the new make_unique calls with "llvm::")
- Attempt to fix a modules bot failure by adding a missing include
to LTO/Config.h.
Original change:
Resolution-based LTO API.
Summary:
This introduces a resolution-based LTO API. The main advantage of this API over
existing APIs is that it allows the linker to supply a resolution for each
symbol in each object, rather than the combined object as a whole. This will
become increasingly important for use cases such as ThinLTO which require us
to process symbol resolutions in a more complicated way than just adjusting
linkage.
Patch by Peter Collingbourne.
Reviewers: rafael, tejohnson, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: lhames, tejohnson, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20268
llvm-svn: 278338
This reverts commit r278330.
I made a change to the save temps output that is causing issues with the
bots. Didn't realize this because I had older output files sitting on
disk in my test output directory.
llvm-svn: 278331
Summary:
This introduces a resolution-based LTO API. The main advantage of this API over
existing APIs is that it allows the linker to supply a resolution for each
symbol in each object, rather than the combined object as a whole. This will
become increasingly important for use cases such as ThinLTO which require us
to process symbol resolutions in a more complicated way than just adjusting
linkage.
Patch by Peter Collingbourne.
Reviewers: rafael, tejohnson, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: lhames, tejohnson, mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20268
Address review comments
llvm-svn: 278330
Summary:
As discussed in the review for D22677, added a subdirectory to
enable tests that require at least version 1.12 of gold.
Add an initial test requiring this version.
Reviewers: davidxl, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22827
llvm-svn: 276860
I am getting a bot failure from the thin archive part of this test:
From
http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/cmake-llvm-x86_64-linux/builds/40468/steps/test_llvm/logs/LLVM%20%3A%3A%20tools__gold__X86__thinlto_emit_linked_objects.ll:
Command Output (stderr):
--
/home/bb/cmake-llvm-x86_64-linux/build/./bin/llvm-ar: creating
/home/bb/cmake-llvm-x86_64-linux/build/test/tools/gold/X86/Output/thinlto_emit_linked_objects.ll.tmp2.a
/usr/bin/ld.gold: internal error in add_writer, at
../../gold/token.h:124
--
This appears to be an issue with an older version of gold. The test case
passes for me locally when I use the gold v1.12 I was testing with, but
when I tried the gold installed on my system which is v1.11 I get the
same error.
Remove the thin archive version of the test, since there isn't a way to
predicate it on gold version.
llvm-svn: 276453
Summary:
In the distributed backend case, the ThinLink step and the final native
object link are separate processes. This can be problematic when archive
libraries are involved in the link (e.g. via --start-lib/--end-lib
pairs). The linker only includes objects from libraries when
there is a strong reference to them, and depending on the intervening
ThinLTO backend processes' importing/inlining, the strong references
may appear different in the two link steps. See D22356 and D22467
for two scenarios where this causes issues.
To ensure that the final link includes the same objects, this patch
adds support for an "=filename" form of the thinlto-index-only plugin
option, in which case objects gold included in the link are emitted to
the given filename. This should be used as input to the final link (e.g.
via the @filename option to gold), instead of listing all the objects
within --start-lib/--end-lib pairs again.
Note that the support for the gold callback that identifies included
objects was added in gold version 1.12.
Reviewers: davidxl, mehdi_amini
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22677
llvm-svn: 276450
Summary:
Invoke the weak/linkonce symbol resolution support (already used by
libLTO) that operates via the summary index.
This ensures prevailing linkonce are kept, by making them weak, and
marks preempted copies as available_externally when possible.
With this change, the older support for keeping the prevailing linkonce
(by changing their symbol resolution) is removed.
Reviewers: mehdi_amini
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D22302
llvm-svn: 275474
While testing a follow-on change to enable index-based symbol resolution
and internalization in the distributed backends, I realized that a test
case change I made in r275247 was only required because we were not
analyzing symbols in the claimed files in thinlto-index-only mode.
In the fixed test case there should be no internalization because we are
linking in -shared mode, so f() is in fact exported, which is detected
properly when we analyze symbols in thinlto-index-only mode. Note that
this is not (yet) a correctness issue (because we are not yet performing
the index-based linkage optimizations in the distributed backends -
that's coming in a follow-on patch).
llvm-svn: 275277
Internalization was missing cases where we originally had a local symbol
that was promoted eagerly but not actually exported. This is because we
were only internalizing the set of global (non-local) symbols that were
PREVAILAING_DEF_IRONLY. Instead, collect the set of global symbols that
are referenced outside of a single IR file, and skip internalization for
those.
llvm-svn: 275247
The bitset metadata currently used in LLVM has a few problems:
1. It has the wrong name. The name "bitset" refers to an implementation
detail of one use of the metadata (i.e. its original use case, CFI).
This makes it harder to understand, as the name makes no sense in the
context of virtual call optimization.
2. It is represented using a global named metadata node, rather than
being directly associated with a global. This makes it harder to
manipulate the metadata when rebuilding global variables, summarise it
as part of ThinLTO and drop unused metadata when associated globals are
dropped. For this reason, CFI does not currently work correctly when
both CFI and vcall opt are enabled, as vcall opt needs to rebuild vtable
globals, and fails to associate metadata with the rebuilt globals. As I
understand it, the same problem could also affect ASan, which rebuilds
globals with a red zone.
This patch solves both of those problems in the following way:
1. Rename the metadata to "type metadata". This new name reflects how
the metadata is currently being used (i.e. to represent type information
for CFI and vtable opt). The new name is reflected in the name for the
associated intrinsic (llvm.type.test) and pass (LowerTypeTests).
2. Attach metadata directly to the globals that it pertains to, rather
than using the "llvm.bitsets" global metadata node as we are doing now.
This is done using the newly introduced capability to attach
metadata to global variables (r271348 and r271358).
See also: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-June/100462.html
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21053
llvm-svn: 273729
If a local_unnamed_addr attribute is attached to a global, the address
is known to be insignificant within the module. It is distinct from the
existing unnamed_addr attribute in that it only describes a local property
of the module rather than a global property of the symbol.
This attribute is intended to be used by the code generator and LTO to allow
the linker to decide whether the global needs to be in the symbol table. It is
possible to exclude a global from the symbol table if three things are true:
- This attribute is present on every instance of the global (which means that
the normal rule that the global must have a unique address can be broken without
being observable by the program by performing comparisons against the global's
address)
- The global has linkonce_odr linkage (which means that each linkage unit must have
its own copy of the global if it requires one, and the copy in each linkage unit
must be the same)
- It is a constant or a function (which means that the program cannot observe that
the unique-address rule has been broken by writing to the global)
Although this attribute could in principle be computed from the module
contents, LTO clients (i.e. linkers) will normally need to be able to compute
this property as part of symbol resolution, and it would be inefficient to
materialize every module just to compute it.
See:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160509/356401.htmlhttp://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20160516/356738.html
for earlier discussion.
Part of the fix for PR27553.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20348
llvm-svn: 272709
Peter Collingbourne