Commit Graph

4 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Reid Kleckner 0404605dda Expand aggregate arguments more often on 32-bit Windows
Before this change, we would pass all non-HFA record arguments on
Windows with byval. Byval often blocks optimizations and results in bad
code generation. Windows now uses the existing workaround that other
x86_32 platforms use.

I also expanded the workaround to handle C++ records with constructors
on Windows. On non-Windows platforms, we have to keep generating the
same LLVM IR prototypes if we want our bitcode to be ABI compatible.
Otherwise we will encounter mismatch issues like PR21573.

Essentially fixes PR27522 in Clang instead of LLVM.

Reviewers: hans

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19756

llvm-svn: 268261
2016-05-02 17:41:07 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 677539d0af MS ABI: Fix __fastcall methods that return structs
The sret paramater consumes the register after the implicit 'this'
parameter, as with other calling conventions.

Fixes PR20278, which turned out to be very easy.

llvm-svn: 212669
2014-07-10 01:58:55 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 37abaca3c2 MS ABI: Pass 'sret' as the second parameter of instance methods
Summary:
MSVC always passes 'sret' after 'this', unlike GCC.  This required
changing a number of places in Clang that assumed the sret parameter was
always first in LLVM IR.

This fixes win64 MSVC ABI compatibility for methods returning structs.

Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer

Subscribers: cfe-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3618

llvm-svn: 208458
2014-05-09 22:46:15 +00:00
Reid Kleckner 4982b82b73 [ms-cxxabi] Use x86_cdeclmethodcc for __cdecl methods on win32
This fixes PR15768, where the sret parameter and the 'this' parameter
are in the wrong order.

Instance methods compiled by MSVC never return records in registers,
they always return indirectly through an sret pointer.  That sret
pointer always comes after the 'this' parameter, for both __cdecl and
__thiscall methods.

Unfortunately, the same is true for other calling conventions, so we'll
have to change the overall approach here relatively soon.

Reviewers: rsmith

Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2664

llvm-svn: 200587
2014-01-31 22:54:50 +00:00