Also rearrange how we list DR motions: rather than listing them as part of some
later standard, list them against the feature they are a DR against. Explicitly
add a description of how we handle DRs.
llvm-svn: 327769
The patch adds nocf_check target independent attribute for disabling checks that were enabled by cf-protection flag.
The attribute can be appertained to functions and function pointers.
Attribute name follows GCC's similar attribute name.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41880
llvm-svn: 327768
X86 Supports Indirect Branch Tracking (IBT) as part of Control-Flow Enforcement Technology (CET).
IBT instruments ENDBR instructions used to specify valid targets of indirect call / jmp.
The `nocf_check` attribute has two roles in the context of X86 IBT technology:
1. Appertains to a function - do not add ENDBR instruction at the beginning of the function.
2. Appertains to a function pointer - do not track the target function of this pointer by adding nocf_check prefix to the indirect-call instruction.
This patch implements `nocf_check` context for Indirect Branch Tracking.
It also auto generates `nocf_check` prefixes before indirect branchs to jump tables that are guarded by range checks.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41879
llvm-svn: 327767
Improve/implement these methods to improve DAG combining. This mainly
concerns intrinsics.
Some constant operands to SystemZISD nodes have been marked Opaque to avoid
transforming back and forth between generic and target nodes infinitely.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
llvm-svn: 327765
The BITCAST handling in computeKnownBits() previously only worked for little
endian.
This patch reverses the iteration over elements for a big endian target which
allows this to work in this case also.
SystemZ test case.
Review: Eli Friedman
https://reviews.llvm.org/D44249
llvm-svn: 327764
a long time.
The key thing is that we need to create value handles for every function
that we create a `FunctionInfo` object around. Without this, when that
function is deleted we can end up creating a new function that collides
with its address and look up a stale AA result. With that AA result we
can in turn miscompile code in ways that break.
This is seriously one of the most absurd miscompiles I've seen. It only
reproduced for us recently and only when building a very large server
with both ThinLTO and PGO.
A *HUGE* shout out to Wei Mi who tracked all of this down and came up
with this patch. I'm just landing it because I happened to still by at
a computer.
He or I can work on crafting a test case to hit this (now that we know
what to target) but it'll take a while, and we've been chasing this for
a long time and need it fix Right Now.
llvm-svn: 327761
At the point the outliner runs, KILLs don't impact anything, but they're still
considered unique instructions. This commit makes them invisible like
DebugValues so that they can still be outlined without impacting outlining
decisions.
llvm-svn: 327760
This is needed otherwise we'll get undefined references when trying
to use the libFuzzer built for Fuchsia.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44590
llvm-svn: 327759
Summary:
One forgotten file change + reordering one header due to clang-format
Patch by David CARLIER
Reviewers: vitalybuka, vsk
Subscribers: kubamracek, fedor.sergeev, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44556
llvm-svn: 327758
Summary:
vfork is not ASan-friendly because it modifies stack shadow in the
parent process address space. While it is possible to compensate for that with, for example,
__asan_handle_no_return before each call to _exit or execve and friends, simply replacing
vfork with fork looks like by far the easiest solution.
Posix compliant programs can not detect the difference between vfork and fork.
Fixes https://github.com/google/sanitizers/issues/925
Reviewers: kcc, vitalybuka
Subscribers: kubamracek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44587
llvm-svn: 327752
Summary:
When in a gmodules-like debugging scenario, you can have a parent decl context
that gets imported from an external AST. When this happens, we must be careful
to complete this type before adding children to it, otherwise it sometimes
results in a crash.
Reviewers: clayborg, jingham
Subscribers: aprantl, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43592
llvm-svn: 327750
Summary: Following-up the refactoring of mmap interceptors, adding a new common option to detect PROT_WRITE|PROT_EXEC pages request.
Patch by David CARLIER
Reviewers: vitalybuka, vsk
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: krytarowski, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44194
llvm-svn: 327747
This prevents a crash in SelectionDAGDumper with -debug when trying to print mem operands if one of the registers in the addressing mode comes from a load.
llvm-svn: 327744
Avoid scheduling two loads in such a way that they would end up in the
same packet. If there is a load in a packet, try to schedule a non-load
next.
Patch by Brendon Cahoon.
llvm-svn: 327742
Reid pointed out the string table for supporting long section names is a
BFD extension and the comments should reflect that. Explicitly spell out
link.exe's and binutil's behavior around section names and the rationale
for LLD's behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42659
llvm-svn: 327736
Now the Windows mangling modes ('w' and 'x') do not do any mangling for
symbols starting with '?'. This means that clang can stop adding the
hideous '\01' leading escape. This means LLVM debug logs are less likely
to contain ASCII escape characters and it will be easier to copy and
paste MS symbol names from IR.
Finally.
For non-Windows platforms, names starting with '?' still get IR
mangling, so once clang stops escaping MS C++ names, we will get extra
'_' prefixing on MachO. That's fine, since it is currently impossible to
construct a triple that uses the MS C++ ABI in clang and emits macho
object files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D7775
llvm-svn: 327734
Summary:
Previously we tried too hard to uphold the fiction that destructor
variants work like they do on Itanium throughout the ABI-neutral parts
of clang. This lead to MS C++ ABI incompatiblities and other bugs. Now,
-mconstructor-aliases will no longer control this ABI detail, and clang
-cc1's LLVM IR output will be this much closer to the clang driver's.
Based on a patch by Zahira Ammarguellat:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D39063
I've tried to move the logic that Zahira added into MicrosoftCXXABI.cpp.
There is only one ABI-specific detail sticking out, and that is in
CodeGenModule::getAddrOfCXXStructor, where we collapse complete dtors to
base dtors in the MS ABI.
This fixes PR32990.
Reviewers: erichkeane, zahiraam, majnemer, rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44505
llvm-svn: 327732
Previously, we called the same functions twice with a bool flag determining whether we should look for ADDSUB or SUBADD. It would be more efficient to run the code once and detect either pattern with a flag to tell which type it found.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44540
llvm-svn: 327730
For other regions, the error message contains a good indication of the
problem, and there, in general, nothing helpful we can print.
Error pointer to the problematic expression seems enough.
rdar://37323555
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44409
llvm-svn: 327727
I should have done it in rL327558 / D43162, but forgot..
I'm not 100% sure about the text, but i don't think
it warrants a whole new differential revision.
llvm-svn: 327725
We previously avoided inserting these moves during isel in a few cases which is implemented using a whitelist of opcodes. But it's too difficult to generate a perfect list of opcodes to whitelist. Especially with AVX512F without AVX512VL using 512 bit vectors to implement some 128/256 bit operations. Since isel is done bottoms up, we'd have to check the VT and opcode and subtarget in order to determine whether an EXTRACT_SUBREG would be generated for some operations.
So instead of doing that, this patch adds a post processing step that detects when the moves are unnecesssary after isel. At that point any EXTRACT_SUBREGs would have already been created and appear in the DAG. So then we just need to ensure the input to the move isn't one.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44289
llvm-svn: 327724
This builds on the work from https://reviews.llvm.org/D44287. It turned out supporting fcmp was much easier than I realized, so let's do that now.
As an aside, our -O3 handling of a floating point IVs leaves a lot to be desired. We do convert the float IV to an integer IV, but do so late enough that many other optimizations are missed (e.g. we don't vectorize).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44542
llvm-svn: 327722
Summary:
When parser backtracks, we might receive multiple code completion
callbacks.
Previously we had a failing assertion there, now we take first results
and hope they are good enough.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: klimek, jkorous-apple, ioeric, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44567
llvm-svn: 327717
Richard Smith