* if, switch, range-based for: warn if semicolon is on the same line.
* for, while: warn if semicolon is on the same line and either next
statement is compound statement or next statement has more
indentation.
Replacing the semicolon with {} or moving the semicolon to the next
line will always silence the warning.
Tests from SemaCXX/if-empty-body.cpp merged into SemaCXX/warn-empty-body.cpp.
llvm-svn: 150515
This is a great warning, but it was observed that a ton of real world code violates
it all the time for (semi-)legitimate reasons. This warnings is fairly pedantic, which is good,
but not for everyone. For example, there is a fair amount of idiomatic code out there
that does "default: abort()", and similar idioms.
Addresses <rdar://problem/10814651>.
llvm-svn: 150055
value of class type, look for a unique conversion operator converting to
integral or unscoped enumeration type and use that. Implements [expr.const]p5.
Sema::VerifyIntegerConstantExpression now performs the conversion and returns
the converted result. Some important callers of Expr::isIntegralConstantExpr
have been switched over to using it (including all of those required for C++11
conformance); this switch brings a side-benefit of improved diagnostics and, in
several cases, simpler code. However, some language extensions and attributes
have not been moved across and will not perform implicit conversions on
constant expressions of literal class type where an ICE is required.
In passing, fix static_assert to perform a contextual conversion to bool on its
argument.
llvm-svn: 149776
Rewording the diagnostic to be more precise/correct: "default label in switch
which covers all enumeration values" and changed the switch to
-Wcovered-switch-default
llvm-svn: 148783
Changing wording to include the word "explicitly" (as in "enumeration value ...
not /explicitly/ handled by switch"), as suggested by Richard Smith.
Also, now that the diagnostic text differs between -Wswitch and -Wswitch-enum,
I've simplified the test cases a bit.
llvm-svn: 148781
For consistency with GCC & reasonable sanity. The FIXME suggests that the
original author was perhaps using the default check for some other purpose,
not realizing the more obvious limitation/false-negatives it creates, but this
doesn't seem to produce any regressions & fixes the included test.
llvm-svn: 148649
This warning acts as the complement to the main -Wswitch-enum warning (which
warns whenever a switch over enum without a default doesn't cover all values of
the enum) & has been an an-doc coding convention in LLVM and Clang in my
experience. The purpose is to ensure there's never a "dead" default in a
switch-over-enum because this would hide future -Wswitch-enum errors.
The name warning has a separate flag name so it can be disabled but it's grouped
under -Wswitch-enum & is on-by-default because of this.
The existing violations of this rule in test cases have had the warning disabled
& I've added a specific test for the new behavior (many negative cases already
exist in the same test file - and none regressed - so I didn't add more).
Reviewed by Ted Kremenek ( http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20120116/051690.html )
llvm-svn: 148640
whether an expression is a (core) constant expression as a side-effect of
evaluation. This takes us from accepting far too few expressions as ICEs to
accepting slightly too many -- fixes for the remaining cases are coming next.
The diagnostics produced when an expression is found to be non-constant are
currently quite poor (with generic wording but reasonable source locations),
and will be improved in subsequent commits.
llvm-svn: 146289
solely based on the names it sees, rather than actual declarations it
gets. In essence, we determine the set of names that are "close
enough" to the typo'd name. Then, we perform name lookup for each of
those names, filtering out those that aren't actually visible, and
typo-correct from the remaining results.
Overall, there isn't much of a change in the behavior of typo
correction here. The only test-suite change comes from the fact that
we make good on our promise to require that the user type 3 characters
for each 1 character corrected.
The real intent behind this change is to set the stage for an
optimization to typo correction (so that we don't need to deserialize
all declarations in a translation unit) and future work in finding
missing qualification ("'vector' isn't in scope; did you mean
'std::vector'?). Plus, the code is cleaner this way.
llvm-svn: 116511
when the RHS of the ||/&& is ever 0 or 1. This handles a variety of
creative idioms for "true" used in C programs and fixes many false
positives at the expense of a few false negatives. This fixes
rdar://8230351.
llvm-svn: 109314
t2.c:2:12: warning: use of logical && with constant operand; switch to bitwise &
or remove constant [-Wlogical-bitwise-confusion]
return x && 4;
^ ~
wording improvement suggestions are welcome.
llvm-svn: 108260
larger unsigned value, since this is implementation-defined
behavior. (We previously suppressed this warning when converting from
a signed value to an unsigned value of the same size).
llvm-svn: 97430
we look into a Scope that corresponds to a compound statement whose
scope was combined with the scope of the function that owns it. This
improves typo correction in many common cases.
llvm-svn: 92879
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
using "-parse-ast -verify".
Updated all test cases (using a sed script) that invoked -parse-ast-check to
now use -parse-ast -verify.
Fixed a bug where using "-verify" instead of "-parse-ast-check" would not
correctly create the DiagClient needed to accumulate diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 42365
Dmitri Gribenko