Summary:
Analyze the range of values produced by ashr/lshr cst, %V when it is
being used in an icmp.
Reviewers: nicholas
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3774
llvm-svn: 209000
Summary:
The dividend in an sdiv tells us the largest and smallest possible
results. Use this fact to optimize comparisons against an sdiv with a
constant dividend.
Reviewers: nicholas
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3795
llvm-svn: 208999
Now the only method to configure ELF section's content and size is to assign
a hexadecimal string to the `Content` field. Unfortunately this way is
completely useless when you need to declare a really large section.
To solve this problem this patch adds one more optional field `Size`
to the `RawContentSection` structure. When yaml2obj generates an ELF file
it uses the following algorithm:
1. If both `Content` and `Size` fields are missed create an empty section.
2. If only `Content` field is missed take section length from the `Size`
field and fill the section by zero.
3. If only `Size` field is missed create a section using data from
the `Content` field.
4. If both `Content` and `Size` fields are provided validate that the `Size`
value is not less than size of `Content` data. Than take section length
from the `Size`, fill beginning of the section by `Content` and the rest
by zero.
Examples
--------
* Create a section 0x10000 bytes long filled by zero
Name: .data
Type: SHT_PROGBITS
Flags: [ SHF_ALLOC ]
Size: 0x10000
* Create a section 0x10000 bytes long starting from 'CA' 'FE' 'BA' 'BE'
Name: .data
Type: SHT_PROGBITS
Flags: [ SHF_ALLOC ]
Content: CAFEBABE
Size: 0x10000
The patch reviewed by Michael Spencer.
llvm-svn: 208995
This reverts commit r208934.
The patch depends on aliases to GEPs with non zero offsets. That is not
supported and fairly broken.
The good news is that GlobalAlias is being redesigned and will have support
for offsets, so this patch should be a nice match for it.
llvm-svn: 208978
Patch replaces old isEquivalentGEP implementation, and changes type of
comparison result from bool (equal or not) to {-1, 0, 1} (less, equal, greater).
This patch belongs to patch series that improves MergeFunctions
performance time from O(N*N) to O(N*log(N)).
llvm-svn: 208976
Patch replaces old isEquivalentOperation implementation, and changes type of
comparison result from bool (equal or not) to {-1, 0, 1} (less, equal, greater).
This patch belongs to patch series that improves MergeFunctions
performance time from O(N*N) to O(N*log(N)).
llvm-svn: 208973
- Tested with Eclipse, likely to work with other GDB/MI compatible GUIs.
- Some but not all MI commands have been implemented. See MIReadme.txt for more info.
- Written from scratch, no GPL code, based on LLDB Public API.
- Built for Linux, Windows and OSX. Tested on Linux and Windows.
- GDB/MI Command Reference, https://sourceware.org/gdb/onlinedocs/gdb/GDB_002fMI.html
llvm-svn: 208972
TableGen has a fairly dubious heuristic to decide whether an alias should be
printed: does the alias have lest operands than the real instruction. This is
bad enough (particularly with no way to override it), but it should at least be
calculated consistently for both strings.
This patch implements that logic: first get the *correct* string for the
variant, in the same way as the Matcher, without guessing; then count the
number of whitespace chars.
There are basically 4 changes this brings about after the previous
commits; all of these appear to be good, so I have changed the tests:
+ ARM64: we print "neg X, Y" instead of "sub X, xzr, Y".
+ ARM64: we skip implicit "uxtx" and "uxtw" modifiers.
+ Sparc: we print "mov A, B" instead of "or %g0, A, B".
+ Sparc: we print "fcmpX A, B" instead of "fcmpX %fcc0, A, B"
llvm-svn: 208969
The canonical syntax is "fcmXY ..., #0.0".
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias" heuristic is
fixed (very soon).
llvm-svn: 208968
This alias appears not to have an appropriate PrintMethod. Normally, I'd look
into it, but since AArch64 is disappearing soon it's probably not worth it.
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias" heuristic is
fixed (very soon).
llvm-svn: 208967
These aliases are handled entirely in C++ and only having TableGen InstAliases
for some of them was confusing LLVM.
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias" heuristic is
fixed (very soon).
llvm-svn: 208966
Certainly not without having a custom PrintMethod to invert the immediate
beforehand. But probably not at all.
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias" heuristic is
fixed (very soon).
llvm-svn: 208964
In AT&T syntax, we should probably print the full "movl" or "movw". TableGen
used to ignore these aliases because it was miscounting the number of operands.
This fixes the issue.
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias"
heuristic is fixed (very soon).
llvm-svn: 208963
Actually, MOV sometimes is canonical, but for now this is a better
approximation than what's there.
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias" heuristic is
fixed (very soon).
llvm-svn: 208962
You can perform (say) an fcmle operation by swapping the operands on an fcmge,
but it shouldn't be printed like that.
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias" heuristic is
fixed (very soon).
llvm-svn: 208961
We accept "ldr w3, [x1, #-1]" as a convenience, but we should still print the
canonical "ldur" form.
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias" heuristic is
fixed (very soon).
llvm-svn: 208960
If an ANDS instruction has Rd == ZR it should be printed as TST since
its only effect is on the flags register NZCV.
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias"
heuristic is fixed (very soon).
llvm-svn: 208959
MOV is almost always the right thing to print if possile. People understand it.
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias" heuristic is
fixed (very soon).
llvm-svn: 208958
For example, the full instruction "sub w0, wzr, w1, uxtw" could print as either
"neg w0, w1" or "sub w0, wzr, w1". The former is better.
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias" heuristic is
fixed (very soon).
llvm-svn: 208957
You can write "lslv w0, w1, w2" (probably for legacy reasons), but it should be
printed as simply "lsl".
This will be tested when the TableGen "should I print this Alias" heuristic is
fixed (very soon).
llvm-svn: 208956
Chad Rosier