This diff is a preparation for fixing FunStabs (incorrect size calculation).
std::map<uint32_t, InputSection*> (SubsectionMap) is replaced with
a sorted vector + binary search. If .subsections_via_symbols is set
this vector will contain the list of subsections, otherwise,
the offsets will be used for calculating the symbols sizes.
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98837
This diff required fixing `getEmbeddedAddend` to apply sign
extension to 32-bit values. We were previously passing around wrong
64-bit addend values that became "right" after being truncated back to
32-bit.
I've also made `getEmbeddedAddend` return a signed int, which is similar
to what LLD-ELF does for its `getImplicitAddend`.
`reportRangeError`, `checkUInt`, and `checkInt` are counterparts of similar
functions in LLD-ELF.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98387
SUBTRACTOR relocations are always paired with UNSIGNED
relocations to indicate a pair of symbols whose address difference we
want. Functionally they are like a single relocation: only one pointer
gets written / relocated. Previously, we would handle these pairs by
skipping over the SUBTRACTOR relocation and writing the pointer when
handling the UNSIGNED reloc. This diff reverses things, so we write
while handling SUBTRACTORs and skip over the UNSIGNED relocs instead.
Being able to distinguish between SUBTRACTOR and UNSIGNED relocs in the
write phase (i.e. inside `relocateOne`) is useful for the upcoming range
check diff: we want to check that SUBTRACTOR relocs write signed values,
but UNSIGNED relocs (naturally) write unsigned values.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98386
The previous implementation miscalculated the addend, resulting
in an underflow. This meant that every SIGNED_N section relocation would
be associated with the last subsection (since the addend would now be a
huge number). We were "lucky" that this mistake was typically cancelled
out -- 64-to-32-bit-truncation meant that the final value was correct,
as long as subsections were not rearranged.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98385
Previously, SyntheticSections.cpp did not have a top-level `using namespace
llvm::MachO` because it caused a naming conflict: `llvm::MachO::Symbol` would
collide with `lld::macho::Symbol`.
`MachO::Symbol` represents the symbols defined in InterfaceFiles (TBDs). By
moving the inclusion of InterfaceFile.h into our .cpp files, we can avoid this
name collision in other files where we are only dealing with LLD's own symbols.
Along the way, I removed all unnecessary "MachO::" prefixes in our code.
Cons of this approach: If TextAPI/MachO/Symbol.h gets included via some other
header file in the future, we could run into this collision again.
Alternative 1: Have either TextAPI/MachO or BinaryFormat/MachO.h use a different
namespace. Most of the benefit of `using namespace llvm::MachO` comes from being
able to use things in BinaryFormat/MachO.h conveniently; if TextAPI was under a
different (and fully-qualified) namespace like `llvm::tapi` that would solve our
problems. Cons: lots of files across llvm-project will need to be updated, and
folks who own the TextAPI code need to agree to the name change.
Alternative 2: Rename our Symbol to something like `LldSymbol`. I think this is
ugly.
Personally I think alternative #1 is ideal, but I'm not sure the effort to do it is
worthwhile, this diff's halfway solution seems good enough to me. Thoughts?
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, oontvoo, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98149
lld policy discourages `auto`. Replace it with a type name whenever reasonable. Retain `auto` to avoid ...
* redundancy, as for decls such as `auto *t = mumble_cast<TYPE *>` or similar that specifies the result type on the RHS
* verbosity, as for iterators
* gratuitous suffering, as for lambdas
Along the way, add `const` when appropriate.
Note: a future diff will ...
* add more `const` qualifiers
* remove `opt::` when we are already `using llvm::opt`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98313
clang appears to emit symbols in `__debug_aranges`, at least
for arm64... in the examples I've seen, it doesn't seem like those
symbols are referenced outside of `__DWARF`, so I think they're safe to
ignore. But hopefully @clayborg can confirm.
Reviewed By: clayborg
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98073
We'll need to properly handle object files with multiple source inputs
eventually, but remove the assert for now so we can successfully emit binaries
for testing.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98067
Since multiple dylibs can be defined in one TBD, this is
necessary to avoid confusion.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, oontvoo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97905
Previously, we were loading re-exports without checking whether
they were compatible with our target. Prior to {D97209}, it meant that
we were defining dylib symbols that were invalid -- usually a silent
failure unless our binary actually used them. D97209 exposed this as an
explicit error.
Along the way, I've extended our TAPI compatibility check to cover the
platform as well, instead of just checking the arch. To this end, I've
replaced MachO::Architecture with MachO::Target in our Config struct.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, oontvoo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97867
The reexport-nested-libs test added in D97438 was a bit wonky.
First, it was linking against libReexportSystem.tbd which targets the
iOS simulator, and which in turn attempted to re-export the iOS
simulator's libSystem. However, due to the way `-syslibroot` works, it
was actually re-exporting the macOS libSystem.
As a result, the test was not actually able to resolve the symbols in
the desired libSystem. I'm guessing that @oontvoo was confused by this
and therefore included those symbols in libReexportSystem.tbd itself.
But this means that the test wasn't actually testing the resolution of
re-exported symbols (though it did at least verify that the re-exported
libraries could be located).
After some consideration, I figured that stub-link.s could be extended
to cover what reexport-nested-libs.s was attempting to do. The test
targets macOS, so we only have one `-syslibroot` and no chance of
confusion.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, oontvoo
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97866
Suppose we are linking against libFoo, which re-exports the
implicitly-bound libSystem, which in turn re-exports some
non-explicitly-bound library like `/usr/lib/system/libsystem_c.dylib`.
Then any bindings we have to a symbol in libsystem_c should use
libSystem (and not libFoo) as the umbrella library.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97865
We previously defaulted to x86_64 and an unknown platform, which was fine when
we only supported one arch and did no platform checks, but that will no longer
be true going ahead. Therefore, we should require those flags to be specified
whenever the linker is invoked.
Note that LLD-ELF and ld64 both infer the arch from their input object files,
but the usefulness of that is questionable since clang will always specify these
flags, and most of the time `lld` will be invoked via clang.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97799
This reverts diff D97610 (commit 0223ab035c) and adds a one-line fix to verify that a `MemoryBufferRef` has sufficient length before reading a 4-byte magic number.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97757
Currently, it was delibrately impleneted to not handle this case, but as it has turnt out, we need this feature.
The concrete use case is
`System/Library/Frameworks/Cocoa.framework/Versions/A/Cocoa` reexports
/System/Library/Frameworks/AppKit.framework/Versions/C/AppKit , which then rexports
/System/Library/PrivateFrameworks/UIFoundation.framework/Versions/A/UIFoundation
The current implemention uses a global currentTopLevelTapi, which is not reset until it finishes loading the whole tree.
This is a problem because if the top-level is set to Cocoa, then when we get to UIFoundation, it will try to find UIFoundation in the current top level, which is Cocoa and will not find it.
The right thing should be:
- When loading a library from a TBD file, re-exports need to be looked up in the auxiliary documents within the same TBD.
- When loading from an actual dylib, no additional TBD documents need to be examined.
- In no case does a re-export mentioned in one TBD file need to be looked up in a document in an auxiliary document from a different TBD file
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97438
-flat_namespace makes lld emit binaries that use name lookup that's more in
line with other POSIX systems: Instead of looking up symbols as (dylib,name)
pairs by dyld, they're instead looked up just by name.
-flat_namespace has three effects:
1. MH_TWOLEVEL and MH_NNOUNDEFS are no longer set in the Mach-O header
2. All symbols use BIND_SPECIAL_DYLIB_FLAT_LOOKUP as ordinal
3. When a dylib is added to the link, its dependent dylibs are also added,
so that lld can verify that no undefined symbols remain at the end of
a link with -flat_namespace. These transitive dylibs are added for symbol
resolution, but they are not emitted in LC_LOAD_COMMANDs.
-undefined with -flat_namespace still isn't implemented. Before this change,
it was impossible to hit that combination because -flat_namespace caused a
diagnostic. Now that it no longer does, emit a dedicated temporary diagnostic
when both flags are used.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97641
There was initially some concern around the correct handling of pcrel
section relocations with r_length != 2. But it looks like there are no such
relocations in practice -- x86_64's pcrel section relocs all have r_length == 2,
and ARM64 doesn't even have pcrel section relocs. So we can replace the TODO
with an assert.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97576
Bifurcate the `readFile()` API into ...
* `readRawFile()` which performs no checks, and
* `readLinkableFile()` which enforces minimum length of 20 bytes, same as ld64
There are no new tests because tweaks to existing tests are sufficient.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97610
On arm64, UNSIGNED relocs are the only ones that use embedded addends
instead of the ADDEND relocation.
Also ensure that the addend works when UNSIGNED is part of a SUBTRACTOR
pair.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, alexshap
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97105
Also add a few asserts to verify that we are indeed handling an
UNSIGNED relocation as the minued. I haven't made it an actual
user-facing error since I don't think llvm-mc is capable of generating
SUBTRACTOR relocations without an associated UNSIGNED.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97103
When parsing bitcode, convert LTO Symbols to LLD Symbols in order to perform
resolution. The "winning" symbol will then be marked as Prevailing at LTO
compilation time. This is similar to what the other LLD ports do.
This change allows us to handle `linkonce` symbols correctly, and to deal with
duplicate bitcode symbols gracefully. Previously, both scenarios would result in
an assertion failure inside the LTO code, complaining that multiple Prevailing
definitions are not allowed.
While at it, I also added basic logic around visibility. We don't do anything
useful with it yet, but we do check that its value is valid. LLD-ELF appears to
use it only to set FinalDefinitionInLinkageUnit for LTO, which I think is just a
performance optimization.
From my local experimentation, the linker itself doesn't seem to do anything
differently when encountering linkonce / linkonce_odr / weak / weak_odr. So I've
only written a test for one of them. LLD-ELF has more, but they seem to mostly
be testing the intermediate bitcode output of their LTO backend...? I'm far from
an expert here though, so I might very well be missing things.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, MaskRay, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94342
The silent failures had confused me a few times.
I haven't added a similar check for platform yet as we don't yet have logic to
infer the platform automatically, and so adding that check would require
updating dozens of test files.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis, alexshap
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97209
I've adjusted the RelocAttrBits to better fit the semantics of
the relocations. In particular:
1. *_UNSIGNED relocations are no longer marked with the `TLV` bit, even
though they can occur within TLV sections. Instead the `TLV` bit is
reserved for relocations that can reference thread-local symbols, and
*_UNSIGNED relocations have their own `UNSIGNED` bit. The previous
implementation caused TLV and regular UNSIGNED semantics to be
conflated, resulting in rebase opcodes being incorrectly emitted for TLV
relocations.
2. I've added a new `POINTER` bit to denote non-relaxable GOT
relocations. This distinction isn't important on x86 -- the GOT
relocations there are either relaxable or non-relaxable loads -- but
arm64 has `GOT_LOAD_PAGE21` which loads the page that the referent
symbol is in (regardless of whether the symbol ends up in the GOT). This
relocation must reference a GOT symbol (so must have the `GOT` bit set)
but isn't itself relaxable (so must not have the `LOAD` bit). The
`POINTER` bit is used for relocations that *must* reference a GOT
slot.
3. A similar situation occurs for TLV relocations.
4. ld64 supports both a pcrel and an absolute version of
ARM64_RELOC_POINTER_TO_GOT. But the semantics of the absolute version
are pretty weird -- it results in the value of the GOT slot being
written, rather than the address. (That means a reference to a
dynamically-bound slot will result in zeroes being written.) The
programs I've tried linking don't use this form of the relocation, so
I've dropped our partial support for it by removing the relevant
RelocAttrBits.
Reviewed By: alexshap
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97031
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95913
Usage: -bundle_loader <executable>
This option specifies the executable that will load the build output file being linked.
When building a bundle, users can use the --bundle_loader to specify an executable
that contains symbols referenced, but not implemented in the bundle.
This is an initial base commit for ARM64 target arch support. I don't represent that it complete or bug-free, but wish to put it out for review now that some basic things like branch target & load/store address relocs are working.
I can add more tests to this base commit, or add them in follow-up commits.
It is not entirely clear whether I use the "ARM64" (Apple) or "AArch64" (non-Apple) naming convention. Guidance is appreciated.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D88629
This extends {D92539} to work even when we are loading archive
members via `-force_load`. I uncovered this issue while trying to
force-load archives containing bitcode -- we were segfaulting.
In addition to fixing the `-force_load` case, this diff also addresses
the behavior of `-ObjC` when LTO bitcode is involved -- we need to
force-load those archive members if they contain ObjC categories.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95265
This makes our error messages more informative. But the bigger motivation is for
LTO symbol resolution, which will be in an upcoming diff. The changes in this
one are largely mechanical.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D94316
Add per-reloc-type attribute bits and migrate code from per-target file into target independent code, driven by reloc attributes.
Many cleanups
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D95121
Private extern symbols are used for things scoped to the linkage unit.
They cause duplicate symbol errors (so they're in the symbol table,
unlike TU-scoped truly local symbols), but they don't make it into the
export trie. They are created e.g. by compiling with
-fvisibility=hidden.
If two weak symbols have differing privateness, the combined symbol is
non-private external. (Example: inline functions and some TUs that
include the header defining it were built with
-fvisibility-inlines-hidden and some weren't).
A weak private external symbol implicitly has its "weak" dropped and
behaves like a regular strong private external symbol: Weak is an export
trie concept, and private symbols are not in the export trie.
If a weak and a strong symbol have different privateness, the strong
symbol wins.
If two common symbols have differing privateness, the larger symbol
wins. If they have the same size, the privateness of the symbol seen
later during the link wins (!) -- this is a bit lame, but it matches
ld64 and this behavior takes 2 lines less to implement than the less
surprising "result is non-private external), so match ld64.
(Example: `int a` in two .c files, both built with -fcommon,
one built with -fvisibility=hidden and one without.)
This also makes `__dyld_private` a true TU-local symbol, matching ld64.
To make this work, make the `const char*` StringRefZ ctor to correctly
set `size` (without this, writing the string table crashed when calling
getName() on the __dyld_private symbol).
Mention in CommonSymbol's comment that common symbols are now disabled
by default in clang.
Mention in -keep_private_externs's HelpText that the flag only has an
effect with `-r` (which we don't implement yet -- so this patch here
doesn't regress any behavior around -r + -keep_private_externs)). ld64
doesn't explicitly document it, but the commit text of
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL216146 does, and ld64's
OutputFile::buildSymbolTable() checks `_options.outputKind() ==
Options::kObjectFile` before calling `_options.keepPrivateExterns()`
(the only reference to that function).
Fixes PR48536.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93609
This is a refactor to pave the way for supporting paired-ADDEND for ARM64. The only paired reloc type for X86_64 is SUBTRACTOR. In a later diff, I will add SUBTRACTOR for both X86_64 and ARM64.
* s/`getImplicitAddend`/`getAddend`/ because it handles all forms of addend: implicit, explicit, paired.
* add predicate `bool isPairedReloc()`
* check range of `relInfo.r_symbolnum` is internal, unrelated to user-input, so use `assert()`, not `error()`
* minor cleanups & rearrangements in `InputFile::parseRelocations()`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90614
Note that dylibs without *any* refs will still be loaded in the usual
(strong) fashion.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93435
Weak references need not necessarily be satisfied at runtime (but they must
still be satisfied at link time). So symbol resolution still works as per usual,
but we now pass around a flag -- ultimately emitting it in the bind table -- to
indicate if a given dylib symbol is a weak reference.
ld64's behavior for symbols that have both weak and strong references is
a bit bizarre. For non-function symbols, it will emit a weak import. For
function symbols (those referenced by BRANCH relocs), it will emit a
regular import. I'm not sure what value there is in that behavior, and
since emulating it will make our implementation more complex, I've
decided to treat regular weakrefs like function symbol ones for now.
Fixes PR48511.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93369
We were not setting forceWeakImport for file paths given by
`-weak_library` if we had already loaded the file. This diff fixes that
by having `loadDylib` return a cached DylibFile instance even if we have
already loaded that file.
We still avoid emitting multiple LC_LOAD_DYLIBs, but we achieve this by
making inputFiles a SetVector instead of relying on the `loadedDylibs`
cache.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, smeenai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93255
Dylibs that are "public" -- i.e. top-level system libraries -- are considered
implicitly linked when another library re-exports them. That is, we should load
them & bind directly to their symbols instead of via their re-exporting
umbrella library. This diff implements that behavior by default, as well as an
opt-out flag.
In theory, this is just a performance optimization, but in practice it seems
that it's needed for correctness.
Fixes llvm.org/PR48395.
Reviewed By: thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93000
This was causing a crash as we were attempting to look up the
nonexistent parent OutputSection of the debug sections. We didn't detect
it earlier because there was no test for PIEs with debug info (PIEs
require us to emit rebases for X86_64_RELOC_UNSIGNED).
This diff filters out the debug sections while loading the ObjFiles. In
addition to fixing the above problem, it also lets us avoid doing
redundant work -- we no longer parse / apply relocations / attempt to
emit dyld opcodes for these sections that we don't emit.
Fixes llvm.org/PR48392.
Reviewed By: thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92904
Also error out if we find anything other than an object or bitcode file
in the archive.
Note that we were previously inserting the symbols and sections of the
unpacked ObjFile into the containing ArchiveFile. This was actually
unnecessary -- we can just insert the ObjectFile (or BitcodeFile) into
the `inputFiles` vector. This is the approach taken by LLD-ELF.
Reviewed By: thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92539
Additionally:
1. Move the helper functions in InputSection.h below the definition of
`InputSection`, so the important stuff is on top
2. Remove unnecessary `explicit`
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, compnerd
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92453
clang puts `-framework CoreFoundation` in this load command for files
that use @available / __builtin_available. Without support for this,
binaries that don't explicitly link to CoreFoundation fail to link.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92624
The problem was that `sym` became replaced in the call
to make<ObjFile> and referring to it afer that read memory that now
stored a different kind of symbol (a Defined instead of a LazySymbol).
Since this happens only once per archive, just copy the symbol to the
stack before make<ObjFile> and read the copy instead.
Originally reviewed at https://reviews.llvm.org/D92496
Alexander Shaposhnikov