As noted by Richard in the post:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130624/082605.html, the following code should not add an entry
into PendingLocalImplicitInstantiations, since local instantiations
should only occur within the context of other instantiations:
int foo(double y) {
struct Lambda {
template<class T> T operator()(T t) const { return t; };
} lambda;
return lambda(y);
}
Hence the attached code does the following:
1) In MarkFunctionReferenced, check if ActiveInstantiations.size()
is non-zero before adding to PendingLocalImplicitInstantiations.
2) In InstantiateFunctionDefinition, we swap out/in
PendingLocalImplicitInstantiations so that only those
pending local instantiations that are added during the instantiation
of the current function are instantiated recursively.
llvm-svn: 184903
whether they replace any existing lookups in the context, rather than
accumulating a bunch of lookup results referring to the same entity.
llvm-svn: 184679
If we have something like
@class NewImage;
@compatibility_alias OldImage NewImage;
@class OldImage;
the lookup for 'OldImage' will return the 'NewImage' decl ("@class NewImage").
In such a case, when creating the decl for "@class OldImage" use the real declaration name ("NewImage"),
instead of the alias one ("OldImage"), otherwise we will break IdentifierResolver and redecls-chain invariants.
Fixes crash of rdar://14112291.
llvm-svn: 184238
In a certain code-path we were not deserializing an anonymous field initializer correctly,
leading to a crash when trying to IRGen it.
This is a simpler version of a patch by Yunzhong Gao!
llvm-svn: 182974
specialization with modules enabled. Just don't merge them at all for now;
we'll revisit this when support for template merging is added.
In passing, make Decl::dump() a little safer to use with PCH/modules, by making
it not deserialize any additional declarations. From a debugger you can call
decls_begin() or similar first if you want to dump all child decls.
llvm-svn: 182544
a FieldDecl from it, and propagate both into the closure type and the
LambdaExpr.
You can't do much useful with them yet -- you can't use them within the body
of the lambda, because we don't have a representation for "the this of the
lambda, not the this of the enclosing context". We also don't have support or a
representation for a nested capture of an init-capture yet, which was intended
to work despite not being allowed by the current standard wording.
llvm-svn: 181985
found for a receiver, note where receiver class
is declaraed (this is most common when receiver is a forward
class). // rdar://3258331
llvm-svn: 181847
Add serialization for captured statements and captured decls. Also add
a const_capture_iterator to CapturedStmt.
Test contributed by Wei Pan
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D727
llvm-svn: 181048
VerifyDiagnosticConsumer previously would not check that the diagnostic and
its matching directive referenced the same source file. Common practice was
to create directives that referenced other files but only by line number,
and this led to problems such as when the file containing the directive
didn't have enough lines to match the location of the diagnostic in the
other file, leading to bizarre file formatting and other oddities.
This patch causes VerifyDiagnosticConsumer to match source files as well as
line numbers. Therefore, a new syntax is made available for directives, for
example:
// expected-error@file:line {{diagnostic message}}
This extends the @line feature where "file" is the file where the diagnostic
is generated. The @line syntax is still available and uses the current file
for the diagnostic. "file" can be specified either as a relative or absolute
path - although the latter has less usefulness, I think! The #include search
paths will be used to locate the file and if it is not found an error will be
generated.
The new check is not optional: if the directive is in a different file to the
diagnostic, the file must be specified. Therefore, a number of test-cases
have been updated with regard to this.
This closes out PR15613.
llvm-svn: 179677
1) Driver/output-file-is-dir.c - Checks for object file which can't
be created for Hexagon since assembler is unavailable.
2) PCH/cxx-typeid.cpp - 'typeinfo' include file is unavailable for Hexagon.
llvm-svn: 179385
caching the linkage for a declaration before we set up its redeclaration chain,
when determining whether a declaration could be a redeclaration of something
from an unimported submodule. We actually want to look at the declaration as if
it were not a redeclaration here, so compute the linkage but don't cache it.
llvm-svn: 178733
until recursive loading is finished.
Otherwise we may end up with a template trying to deserialize a template
parameter that is in the process of getting loaded.
rdar://13135282
llvm-svn: 175329
since only one of them is allowed in command-line, process them separately.
Otherwise, if more than one is specified in the command-line, one is processed normally
and the others are going to be treated and included as header files.
Related to radar://13140508
llvm-svn: 174385
that redefined a macro without undef'ing it first.
Proper reconstruction of the macro info history from modules will properly fix this in subsequent commits.
rdar://13016031
llvm-svn: 173281
This change also makes the serialisation store the required semantics,
fixing an issue where PPC128 was always assumed when re-reading a
128-bit value.
llvm-svn: 173139
Previously we would serialize the macro redefinitions as a list, part of
the identifier, and try to chain them together across modules individually
without having the info that they were already chained at definition time.
Change this by serializing the macro redefinition chain and then try
to synthesize the chain parts across modules. This allows us to correctly
pinpoint when 2 different definitions are ambiguous because they came from
unrelated modules.
Fixes bogus "ambiguous expansion of macro" warning when a macro in a PCH
is redefined without undef'ing it first.
rdar://13016031
llvm-svn: 172620
the cases where we can't determine whether special members would be trivial
while building the class, we eagerly declare those special members. The impact
of this is bounded, since it does not trigger implicit declarations of special
members in classes which merely *use* those classes.
In order to determine whether we need to apply this rule, we also need to
eagerly declare move operations and destructors in cases where they might be
deleted. If a move operation were supposed to be deleted, it would instead
be suppressed, and we could need overload resolution to determine if we fall
back to a trivial copy operation. If a destructor were implicitly deleted,
it would cause the move constructor of any derived classes to be suppressed.
As discussed on cxx-abi-dev, C++11's selected constructor rules are also
retroactively applied as a defect resolution in C++03 mode, in order to
identify that class B has a non-trivial copy constructor (since it calls
A's constructor template, not A's copy constructor):
struct A { template<typename T> A(T &); };
struct B { mutable A a; };
llvm-svn: 169673
Richard Smith