This breaks the code which saves and restores LR, so we can't outline
without doing something more complicated for stack adjustment.
Found by inspection; we get lucky in most cases because getMemOpInfo
only handles STRWpost, not any other pre/post-increment forms. But it
hits a couple of artificial testcases in the tree.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46920
llvm-svn: 332529
It doesn't matter much this late in the pipeline, but one place that
does check for it is the function alignment code.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46373
llvm-svn: 332415
The program might have unusual expectations for functions; for example,
the Linux kernel's build system warns if it finds references from .text
to .init.data.
I'm not sure this is something we actually want to make any guarantees
about (there isn't any explicit rule that would disallow outlining
in this case), but we might want to be conservative anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46091
llvm-svn: 331007
First off, this is more correct than having the B. Second off, this was making
a bot upset. This fixes that.
Update the test to include -verify-machineinstrs as well to prevent stuff like
this slipping by non debug/assert builds in the future.
llvm-svn: 330459
The linkage type on outlined functions was private before. This meant that if
you set a breakpoint in an outlined function, the debugger wouldn't be able to
give a sane name to the outlined function.
This commit changes the linkage type to internal and updates any tests that
relied on the prefixes on the names of outlined functions.
llvm-svn: 329116
Say you have two identical linkonceodr functions, one in M1 and one in M2.
Say that the outliner outlines A,B,C from one function, and D,E,F from another
function (where letters are instructions). Now those functions are not
identical, and cannot be deduped. Locally to M1 and M2, these outlining
choices would be good-- to the whole program, however, this might not be true!
To mitigate this, this commit makes it so that the outliner sees linkonceodr
functions as unsafe to outline from. It also adds a flag,
-enable-linkonceodr-outlining, which allows the user to specify that they
want to outline from such functions when they know what they're doing.
Changing this handles most code size regressions in the test suite caused by
competing with linker dedupe. It also doesn't have a huge impact on the code
size improvements from the outliner. There are 6 tests that regress > 5% from
outlining WITH linkonceodrs to outlining WITHOUT linkonceodrs. Overall, most
tests either improve or are not impacted.
Not outlined vs outlined without linkonceodrs:
https://hastebin.com/raw/qeguxavuda
Not outlined vs outlined with linkonceodrs:
https://hastebin.com/raw/edepoqoqic
Outlined with linkonceodrs vs outlined without linkonceodrs:
https://hastebin.com/raw/awiqifiheb
Numbers generated using compare.py with -m size.__text. Tests run for AArch64
with -Oz -mllvm -enable-machine-outliner -mno-red-zone.
llvm-svn: 315136
This commit adds the necessary target hooks for outlining in AArch64. It also
refactors the switch statement used in `getMemOpBaseRegImmOfsWidth` into a
more general function, `getMemOpInfo`. This allows the outliner to share that
code without copying and pasting it.
The AArch64 outliner can be run using -mllvm -enable-machine-outliner, as with
the X86-64 outliner.
The test for this pass verifies that the outliner does, in fact outline
functions, fixes up the stack accesses properly, and can correctly generate a
tail call. In the future, this test should be replaced with a MIR test, so that
we can properly test immediate offset overflows in fixed-up instructions.
llvm-svn: 298162
Eli Friedman