llvm-project

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Fangrui Song	898896836d	[ELF][X86] Fix R_RELAX_TLS_GD_TO_LE_NEG and R_NEG_TLS after D62059 After D62059, we don't align p_memsz of PT_TLS to p_align. The getRelocTargetVA formula should align it instead. It becomes clear that R_NEG_TLS and R_TLS are opposite from each other. In i386-tls-le-align.s, I put ret after call ___tls_get_addr@plt as otherwise ld.bfd would reject the relaxation: TLS transition from R_386_TLS_GD to R_386_TLS_LE_32 against `a' at 0x3 in section `.text' failed llvm-svn: 361088	2019-05-18 01:58:40 +00:00
Fangrui Song	db5cb0fce7	[ELF] Add {i386,x86-64}-tls-le-align.s to test TP offsets for TLS Variant 2 I forgot to add them in rLLD361084. I made another mistake, rLLD361084 fixed Variant 2, not Variant 1. llvm-svn: 361085	2019-05-18 00:57:30 +00:00

Author

SHA1

Message

Date

Fangrui Song

898896836d

[ELF][X86] Fix R_RELAX_TLS_GD_TO_LE_NEG and R_NEG_TLS after D62059

After D62059, we don't align p_memsz of PT_TLS to p_align. The
getRelocTargetVA formula should align it instead.

It becomes clear that R_NEG_TLS and R_TLS are opposite from each other.

In i386-tls-le-align.s, I put ret after call ___tls_get_addr@plt as
otherwise ld.bfd would reject the relaxation:
TLS transition from R_386_TLS_GD to R_386_TLS_LE_32 against `a' at 0x3 in section `.text' failed

llvm-svn: 361088

2019-05-18 01:58:40 +00:00

Fangrui Song

db5cb0fce7

[ELF] Add {i386,x86-64}-tls-le-align.s to test TP offsets for TLS Variant 2

I forgot to add them in rLLD361084. I made another mistake, rLLD361084 fixed Variant 2, not Variant 1.

llvm-svn: 361085

2019-05-18 00:57:30 +00:00

2 Commits