Change Hexagon so that the setting for fp-contract is the default setting.
This makes Hexagon consistent with all other targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49999
llvm-svn: 342078
Found by opening config.h.cmake in vim, finding all defined macros with
/define\(01\)\? \zs[A-Za-z0-9_]*<cr>
:%s//\=setreg('A', submatch(0), 'V')/gn<cr>
:put A<cr>
and then joining them all with |, and passing that to
git grep -E that_pattern 'clang/*.h' 'clang/*.cpp' 'clang/*.c'
and diffing that output with the result of
git grep Config/config.h 'clang/*.h' 'clang/*.cpp' 'clang/*.c'
No intended behavior change.
llvm-svn: 331124
This patch has the following changes
A new flag "-mhvx-length={64B|128B}" is introduced to specify the length of the vector.
Previously we have used "-mhvx-double" for 128 Bytes. This adds the target-feature "+hvx-length{64|128}b"
The "-mhvx" flag must be provided on command line to enable HVX for Hexagon. If no -mhvx-length flag
is specified, a default length is picked from the arch mentioned in this priority order from either -mhvx=vxx
or -mcpu. For v60 and v62 the default length is 64 Byte. For unknown versions, the length is 128 Byte. The
-mhvx flag adds the target-feature "+hvxv{hvx_version}"
The 64 Byte mode is soon going to be deprecated. A warning is emitted if 64 Byte is enabled. A warning is
still emitted for the default 64 Byte as well. This warning can be suppressed with a -Wno flag.
The "-mhvx-double" and "-mno-hvx-double" flags are deprecated. A warning is emitted if the driver sees
them on commandline. "-mhvx-double" is an alias to "-mhvx-length=128B"
The compilation will error out if -mhvx-length is specified with out an -mhvx/-mhvx= flag
The macro HVX_LENGTH is defined and is set to the length of the vector.
Eg: #define HVX_LENGTH 64
The macro HVX_ARCH is defined and is set to the version of the HVX.
Eg: #define HVX_ARCH 62
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38852
llvm-svn: 316102
Projects that want to statically link their own C++ standard library currently
need to pass -nostdlib or -nodefaultlibs, which also disables linking of the
builtins library, -lm, and so on. Alternatively, they could use `clang` instead
of `clang++`, but that already disables implicit addition of -lm on some
toolchains.
Add a dedicated flag -nostdlib++ that disables just linking of libc++ /
libstdc++. This is analogous to -nostdinc++.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D35780
llvm-svn: 308997
Summary: Pass the type of the device offloading when building the tool chain for a particular target architecture. This is required when supporting multiple tool chains that target a single device type. In our particular use case, the OpenMP and CUDA tool chains will use the same ```addClangTargetOptions ``` method. This enables the reuse of common options and ensures control over options only supported by a particular tool chain.
Reviewers: arpith-jacob, caomhin, carlo.bertolli, ABataev, jlebar, hfinkel, tstellar, Hahnfeld
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: jgravelle-google, aheejin, rengolin, jfb, dschuff, sbc100, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29647
llvm-svn: 307272
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
Brendon Cahoon