to cope with non-type templates by providing appropriate
errors. Previously, we would either assert, crash, or silently build a
dependent type when we shouldn't. Fixes PR9226.
llvm-svn: 127037
template template parameter pack that cannot be fully expanded because
its enclosing pack expansion could not be expanded. This form of
TemplateName plays the same role as SubstTemplateTypeParmPackType and
SubstNonTypeTemplateParmPackExpr do for template type parameter packs
and non-type template parameter packs, respectively.
We should now handle these multi-level pack expansion substitutions
anywhere. The largest remaining gap in our variadic-templates support
is that we cannot cope with non-type template parameter packs whose
type is a pack expansion.
llvm-svn: 123521
and TemplateArgument with an operation that determines whether there
are any unexpanded parameter packs within that construct. Use this
information to diagnose the appearance of the names of parameter packs
that have not been expanded (C++ [temp.variadic]p5). Since this
property is checked often (every declaration, ever expression
statement, etc.), we extend Type and Expr with a bit storing the
result of this computation, rather than walking the AST each time to
determine whether any unexpanded parameter packs occur.
This commit is deficient in several ways, which will be remedied with
future commits:
- Expr has a bit to store the presence of an unexpanded parameter
pack, but it is never set.
- The error messages don't point out where the unexpanded parameter
packs were named in the type/expression, but they should.
- We don't check for unexpanded parameter packs in all of the places
where we should.
- Testing is sparse, pending the resolution of the above three
issues.
llvm-svn: 121724
PCH got a severe beating by the boost-using test case reported here: http://llvm.org/PR8099
Fix issues like:
-When PCH reading, make sure Decl's getASTContext() doesn't get called since a Decl in the parent hierarchy may be initializing.
-In ASTDeclReader::VisitFunctionDecl VisitRedeclarable should be called before using FunctionDecl's isCanonicalDecl()
-In ASTDeclReader::VisitRedeclarableTemplateDecl CommonOrPrev must be initialized before anything else.
llvm-svn: 113391
parameter, explicitly ask the user to give it arguments. We used to
complain that it wasn't a type and expect the user to figure it out.
llvm-svn: 100729
templates, e.g.,
x.template get<T>
We can now parse these, represent them within an UnresolvedMemberExpr
expression, then instantiate that expression node in simple cases.
This allows us to stumble through parsing LLVM's Casting.h.
llvm-svn: 81300
A template name can refer to a set of overloaded function
templates. Model this in TemplateName, which can now refer to an
OverloadedFunctionDecl that contains function templates. This removes
an unspeakable hack in Sema::isTemplateName.
llvm-svn: 77488
This is simple enough, but then I thought it would be nice to make PrintingPolicy
get a LangOptions so that various things can key off "bool" and "C++" independently.
This spiraled out of control. There are many fixme's, but I think things are slightly
better than they were before.
One thing that can be improved: CFG should probably have an ASTContext pointer in it,
which would simplify its clients.
llvm-svn: 74493
printing logic to help customize the output. For now, we use this
rather than a special flag to suppress the "struct" when printing
"struct X" and to print the Boolean type as "bool" in C++ but "_Bool"
in C.
llvm-svn: 72590
template template parameters and dependent template names. For
example, the oft-mentioned
typename MetaFun::template apply<T1, T2>::type
can now be instantiated, with the appropriate name lookup for "apply".
llvm-svn: 68128
representation handles the various ways in which one can name a
template, including unqualified references ("vector"), qualified
references ("std::vector"), and dependent template names
("MetaFun::template apply").
One immediate effect of this change is that the representation of
nested-name-specifiers in type names for class template
specializations (e.g., std::vector<int>) is more accurate. Rather than
representing std::vector<int> as
std::(vector<int>)
we represent it as
(std::vector)<int>
which more closely follows the C++ grammar.
Additionally, templates are no longer represented as declarations
(DeclPtrTy) in Parse-Sema interactions. Instead, I've introduced a new
OpaquePtr type (TemplateTy) that holds the representation of a
TemplateName. This will simplify the handling of dependent
template-names, once we get there.
llvm-svn: 68074
Douglas Gregor