parameter types to be ill-formed. However, it relies on the
completeness of method parameter types when producing metadata, e.g.,
for a protocol, leading IR generating to crash in such cases.
Since there's no real way to tighten down the semantics of Objective-C
here without breaking existing code, do something safe but lame:
suppress the generation of metadata when this happens.
Fixes <rdar://problem/9123036>.
llvm-svn: 132171
behind implicit moves. We now correctly identify move constructors and
assignment operators and update bits on the record correctly. Generation
of implicit moves (declarations or definitions) is not yet supported.
llvm-svn: 132080
type that turns one type into another. This is used as the basis to
implement __underlying_type properly - with TypeSourceInfo and proper
behavior in the face of templates.
llvm-svn: 132017
that the unevaluated subexpressions of &&, ||, and ? : are not
considered when determining whether the expression is a constant
expression. Also, turn the "used in its own initializer" warning into
a runtime-behavior warning, so that it doesn't fire when a variable is
used as part of an unevaluated subexpression of its own initializer.
Fixes PR9999.
llvm-svn: 131968
The general out-of-line case (including explicit instantiation mostly
works except that the definition is being lost somewhere between the AST
and CodeGen, so the definition is never emitted.
llvm-svn: 131933
Type::isUnsignedIntegerOrEnumerationType(), which are like
Type::isSignedIntegerType() and Type::isUnsignedIntegerType() but also
consider the underlying type of a C++0x scoped enumeration type.
Audited all callers to the existing functions, switching those that
need to also handle scoped enumeration types (e.g., those that deal
with constant values) over to the new functions. Fixes PR9923 /
<rdar://problem/9447851>.
llvm-svn: 131735
placement allocation or deallocation functions. These functions cannot be
replaced by the user and are exempt from the normal requirements on
allocation functions (e.g. that they must return unaliased memory).
llvm-svn: 131386
that the destructor body is trivial and that all member variables also have either
trivial destructors or trivial destructor bodies, we don't need to initialize the
vtable pointers since no virtual member functions will be called on the destructor.
Fixes PR9181.
llvm-svn: 131368
Go through and expand the members of bases into the encoding string (and encode the VTable as well).
Unlike gcc which expands virtual bases as many times as they appear in the
hierarchy, clang will only expand them once at the end, to reflect the actual layout.
Note that there doesn't seem to be a way to indicate in the encoding that
packing/alignment of members is different that normal, in which case
the encoding will be out-of-sync with the real layout.
If the runtime switches to just consider the size of types without
taking into account alignment, we could easily make padding explicit in the
encoding (e.g. using arrays of chars). The encoding strings would be
longer then though.
Also encode a flexible array member as array of 0 size, like gcc, not as a pointer.
llvm-svn: 131365
This introduces a generic base class for the expression evaluator
classes, which handles a few common expression types which were
previously handled separately in each class. Also, the expression
evaluator now uses ConstStmtVisitor.
llvm-svn: 131281
hasTrivialDefaultConstructor() really really means it now.
Also implement a fun standards bug regarding aggregates. Doug, if you'd
like, I can un-implement that bug if you think it is truly a defect.
The bug is that non-special-member constructors are never considered
user-provided, so the following is an aggregate:
struct foo {
foo(int);
};
It's kind of bad, but the solution isn't obvious - should
struct foo {
foo (int) = delete;
};
be an aggregate or not?
Lastly, add a missing initialization to FunctionDecl.
llvm-svn: 131101
- New isDefined() function checks for deletedness
- isThisDeclarationADefinition checks for deletedness
- New doesThisDeclarationHaveABody() does what
isThisDeclarationADefinition() used to do
- The IsDeleted bit is not propagated across redeclarations
- isDeleted() now checks the canoncial declaration
- New isDeletedAsWritten() does what it says on the tin.
- isUserProvided() now correct (thanks Richard!)
This fixes the bug that we weren't catching
void foo() = delete;
void foo() {}
as being a redefinition.
llvm-svn: 131013
sense). Fixes <rdar://problem/9366066> by eliminating an inconsistency
between C++ overloading (which handled scoped enumerations correctly)
and C binary operator type-checking (which didn't).
llvm-svn: 130924
Adjacent bit fields are packed into the same 1-, 2-, or
4-byte allocation unit if the integral types are the same
size. // rdar://8823265.
llvm-svn: 130851
Like in r126648, provide (empty) default implementation for pure virtual getMemoryBufferSizes(). Not all use cases have meaningful implementations.
llvm-svn: 130838
if they match that production, i.e. if they're template type parameters
or decltypes (or, as an obvious case not yet described in the ABI document,
if they're template template parameters applied to template arguments).
llvm-svn: 130824
Decl actually found via name lookup & overload resolution when that Decl
is different from the ValueDecl which is actually referenced by the
expression.
This can be used by AST consumers to correctly attribute references to
the spelling location of a using declaration, and otherwise gain insight
into the name resolution performed by Clang.
The public interface to DRE is kept as narrow as possible: we provide
a getFoundDecl() which always returns a NamedDecl, either the ValueDecl
referenced or the new, more precise NamedDecl if present. This way AST
clients can code against getFoundDecl without know when exactly the AST
has a split representation.
For an example of the data this provides consider:
% cat x.cc
namespace N1 {
struct S {};
void f(const S&);
}
void test(N1::S s) {
f(s);
using N1::f;
f(s);
}
% ./bin/clang -fsyntax-only -Xclang -ast-dump x.cc
[...]
void test(N1::S s) (CompoundStmt 0x5b02010 <x.cc:5:20, line:9:1>
(CallExpr 0x5b01df0 <line:6:3, col:6> 'void'
(ImplicitCastExpr 0x5b01dd8 <col:3> 'void (*)(const struct N1::S &)' <FunctionToPointerDecay>
(DeclRefExpr 0x5b01d80 <col:3> 'void (const struct N1::S &)' lvalue Function 0x5b01a20 'f' 'void (const struct N1::S &)'))
(ImplicitCastExpr 0x5b01e20 <col:5> 'const struct N1::S' lvalue <NoOp>
(DeclRefExpr 0x5b01d58 <col:5> 'N1::S':'struct N1::S' lvalue ParmVar 0x5b01b60 's' 'N1::S':'struct N1::S')))
(DeclStmt 0x5b01ee0 <line:7:3, col:14>
0x5b01e40 "UsingN1::;")
(CallExpr 0x5b01fc8 <line:8:3, col:6> 'void'
(ImplicitCastExpr 0x5b01fb0 <col:3> 'void (*)(const struct N1::S &)' <FunctionToPointerDecay>
(DeclRefExpr 0x5b01f80 <col:3> 'void (const struct N1::S &)' lvalue Function 0x5b01a20 'f' 'void (const struct N1::S &)' (UsingShadow 0x5b01ea0 'f')))
(ImplicitCastExpr 0x5b01ff8 <col:5> 'const struct N1::S' lvalue <NoOp>
(DeclRefExpr 0x5b01f58 <col:5> 'N1::S':'struct N1::S' lvalue ParmVar 0x5b01b60 's' 'N1::S':'struct N1::S'))))
Now we can tell that the second call is 'using' (no pun intended) the using
declaration, and *which* using declaration it sees. Without this, we can
mistake calls that go through using declarations for ADL calls, and have no way
to attribute names looked up with using declarations to the appropriate
UsingDecl.
llvm-svn: 130670
Douglas Gregor