Summary:
CodeCompletion was not being triggered after successfully parsed
initializer lists, e.g.
```cpp
void foo(int, bool);
void bar() {
foo({1}^, false);
}
```
CodeCompletion would suggest the function foo as an overload candidate up until
the point marked with `^` but after that point we do not trigger signature help
since parsing succeeds.
This patch handles that case by failing in parsing expression lists whenever we
see a codecompletion token, in addition to getting an invalid subexpression.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73177
Summary:
Printing policy was not propogated to functiondecls when creating a
completion string which resulted in canonical template parameters like
`foo<type-parameter-0-0>`. This patch propogates printing policy to those as
well.
Fixes https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/76
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: jkorous, arphaman, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72715
The original bug report can be found
[here](https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/85)
Given the following code:
```c++
void function() {
auto Lambda = [](int a, double &b) {return 1.f;};
La^
}
```
Triggering the completion at `^` would show `(lambda)` before this patch
and would show signature `(int a, double &b) const`, build a snippet etc
with this patch.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed by: sammccall
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70445
Summary:
This is shorter, shouldn't be confusing (is consistent with how they're declared),
and avoids messy cases that are printed as myclass<type-param-0-0>(int) in the
case of partial specialization.
Fixes part of https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/76
Reviewers: hokein, lh123
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70307
Summary:
This fixes a regression that led to size() not being available in clangd
when completing 'deque().^' and using libc++.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, usaxena95, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68335
llvm-svn: 373710
Summary:
- when a method is not available because of the target value kind (e.g. an &&
method on a Foo& variable), then don't offer it.
- when a method is effectively shadowed by another method from the same class
with a) an identical argument list and b) superior qualifiers, then don't
offer it.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62582
llvm-svn: 362785
Summary:
To allow filtering on any of the words in the editors.
In particular, the following completions were changed:
- 'using namespace <#name#>'
Typed text before: 'using', after: 'using namespace'.
- 'else if (#<condition#>)'
Before: 'else', after: 'else if'.
- 'using typename <#qualifier#>::<#name#>'
Before: 'using', after: 'using typename'.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62615
llvm-svn: 362479
Summary:
E.g. we now turn `while(<#cond#>){` into `while (<#cond#>) {`
This slightly improves the final output. Should not affect clients that
format the result on their own.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Reviewed By: gribozavr
Subscribers: jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62616
llvm-svn: 362363
Summary:
Completion can return multi-line patterns in some cases, e.g.
for (<#init#>; <#cond#>; <#inc#>) {
<#body#>
}
However, most patterns break the line only before closing brace,
resulting in code like:
namespace <#name#> { <#decls#>
}
While some (e.g. the 'for' example above) are breaking lines after the
opening brace too.
This change ensures all patterns consistently break after the opening
brace, this leads to nicer UX when using those in an actual editor.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Reviewed By: gribozavr
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62405
llvm-svn: 361829
Summary:
We put only part of the signature starting with a function name into "typed text"
chunks now, previously the whole signature was "typed text".
This leads to meaningful fuzzy match scores, giving better signals to
compare with other completion items.
Ideally, we would not display the result type to the user, but that requires adding
a new kind of completion chunk.
Reviewers: kadircet
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62298
llvm-svn: 361623
Summary:
Where semicolon is required in any case. Here's a list of completions
that now have a semicolon:
- namespace <name> = <target>;
- using namespace <name>;
- using <qualifier>::<name>;
- continue;
- break;
- goto <label>;
- return;
- return <expression>;
Reviewers: gribozavr
Reviewed By: gribozavr
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61589
llvm-svn: 360042
Frameworks filesystem representations:
UIKit.framework/Headers/%header%
Framework import format:
#import <UIKit/%header%>
Thus the completion code must map the input format of <UIKit/> to
the path of UIKit.framework/Headers as well as strip the
".framework" suffix when auto-completing the framework name.
llvm-svn: 355008
When Clang/LLVM is built with the CLANG_DEFAULT_STD_CXX CMake macro that sets
the default standard to something other than C++14, there are a number of lit
tests that fail as they rely on the C++14 default.
This patch just adds the language standard option explicitly to such test cases.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57581
llvm-svn: 353163
Rather than sprinkle calls to DiagnoseUnusedExprResult() around in places where we want diagnostics, we now diagnose unused expression statements and full expressions in a more generic way when acting on the final expression statement. This results in more appropriate diagnostics for [[nodiscard]] where we were previously lacking them, such as when the body of a for loop is not a compound statement.
This patch fixes PR39837.
llvm-svn: 350404
Summary:
The clang used to pick up the qualifiers of the lamba's call operator
(which is always const) and fail to show non-const methods of 'this' in
completion results.
Reviewers: kadircet
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55885
llvm-svn: 349655
Summary:
...that fires when running completion inside an argument of
UnresolvedMemberExpr (see the added test).
The assertion that fires is from Sema::TryObjectArgumentInitialization:
assert(FromClassification.isLValue());
This happens because Sema::AddFunctionCandidates does not account for
object types which are pointers. It ends up classifying them incorrectly.
All usages of the function outside code completion are used to run
overload resolution for operators. In those cases the object type being
passed is always a non-pointer type, so it's not surprising the function
did not expect a pointer in the object argument.
However, code completion reuses the same function and calls it with the
object argument coming from UnresolvedMemberExpr, which can be a pointer
if the member expr is an arrow ('->') access.
Extending AddFunctionCandidates to allow pointer object types does not
seem too crazy since all the functions down the call chain can properly
handle pointer object types if we properly classify the object argument
as an l-value, i.e. the classification of the implicitly dereferenced
pointer.
Reviewers: kadircet
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55331
llvm-svn: 348590
Summary:
Similar to auto-completion for ObjC methods, inherited properties
should be penalized / direct class and category properties should
be prioritized.
Note that currently, the penalty for using a result from a base class
(CCD_InBaseClass) is equal to the penalty for using a method as a
property (CCD_MethodAsProperty).
Reviewers: jkorous, sammccall, akyrtzi, arphaman, benlangmuir
Reviewed By: sammccall, akyrtzi
Subscribers: arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53900
llvm-svn: 347352
Summary:
Removes references to initialized variable from the following completions:
int x = ^;
Handles only the trivial cases where the variable name is completed
immediately at the start of initializer or assignment, more complicated
cases aren't covered, e.g. these completions still contain 'x':
// More complicated expressions.
int x = foo(^);
int x = 10 + ^;
// Other kinds of initialization.
int x{^};
int x(^);
// Constructor initializers.
struct Foo {
Foo() : x(^) {}
int x;
};
We should address those in the future, but they are outside of the scope of
this initial change.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54156
llvm-svn: 346301
Summary:
Instead of providing generic "args" for member and base class
initializers, tries to fetch relevant constructors and show their signatures.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ZaMaZaN4iK, eraman, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53654
llvm-svn: 345844
Summary:
No new tests as the existing tests for result priority should give us
coverage. Also as the new flag is trivial enough, I'm reluctant to plumb the
flag to c-index-test output.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53635
llvm-svn: 345135
Summary:
In a decl like `int AA(BB cc)` where BB isn't defined, we end up trying to
parse `BB cc` as an expression (vexing parse) and end up triggering the
parser's "recovery-in-function" completion with no actual function
scope.
This patch avoids the assumption that such a scope exists in this context.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53070
llvm-svn: 344133
Summary:
In clangd we had a new type of completion suggestions for cpp
class/struct/unions that will show override signatures for virtual methods in
base classes. This patch implements it in sema because it is hard to deduce more
info about completion token outside of Sema and handle itchy cases.
See the patch D50898 for more info on the functionality.
In addition to above patch this one also converts the suggestion into a
CK_Pattern with whole insertion text as the name of the suggestion and factors
out CodeCompletionString generation for declerations so that it can be re-used
by others.
Reviewers: ioeric, ilya-biryukov
Reviewed By: ioeric
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52225
llvm-svn: 343568
Current completion fix-its approach does not provide OtherOpBase for C code.
But we can easily proceed in this case taking the original Base type.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52261
llvm-svn: 342721
Summary:
The dir component ("somedir" in #include <somedir/fo...>) is considered fixed.
We append "foo" to each directory on the include path, and then list its files.
Completions are of the forms:
#include <somedir/fo^
foo.h>
fox/
The filter is set to the filename part ("fo"), so fuzzy matching can be
applied to the filename only.
No fancy scoring/priorities are set, and no information is added to
CodeCompleteResult to make smart scoring possible. Could be in future.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52076
llvm-svn: 342449
Summary:
Factors out member decleration gathering and uses it in parsing to call signature
help. Doesn't support signature help for base class constructors, the code was too
coupled with diagnostic handling, but still can be factored out but just needs
more afford.
Reviewers: sammccall, ilya-biryukov, ioeric
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51917
llvm-svn: 341949
Summary:
Currently CodeCompleteCall only gets called after a comma or parantheses. This
patch makes sure it is called even at the cases like:
```foo(1^);```
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, hokein
Reviewed By: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51038
llvm-svn: 341824
Summary:
Code completion in clang is actually a mix of two features:
- Code completion is a familiar feature. Results are exposed via the
CodeCompleteConsumer::ProcessCodeCompleteResults callback.
- Signature help figures out if the current expression is an argument of
some function call and shows corresponding signatures if so.
Results are exposed via CodeCompleteConsumer::ProcessOverloadCandidates.
This patch refactors the implementation to untangle those two from each
other and makes some naming tweaks to avoid confusion when reading the
code.
The refactoring is required for signature help fixes, see D51038.
The only intended behavior change is the order of callbacks.
ProcessOverloadCandidates is now called before ProcessCodeCompleteResults.
Reviewers: sammccall, kadircet
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51782
llvm-svn: 341660
From a follow-up discussion in D44480.
New tests check that function bodies are not skipped:
- In presence of ptr declarators, e.g. `auto**`.
- When `decltype(auto)` is used in return type, only `auto` was checked before.
llvm-svn: 333735
Summary:
Skipping them was clearly not intentional. It's impossible to
guarantee correctness if the bodies are skipped.
Also adds a test case for r327504, now that it does not produce
invalid errors that made the test fail.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, sammccall, rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rayglover-ibm, rwols, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44480
llvm-svn: 333538
Currently getting such completions requires source correction, reparsing
and calling completion again. And if it shows no results and rollback is
required then it costs one more reparse.
With this change it's possible to get all results which can be later
filtered to split changes which require correction.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41537
llvm-svn: 333272
Kadir Cetinkaya