class types, dependent types, and namespaces. I had previously
weakened this invariant while working on parsing pseudo-destructor
expressions, but recent work in that area has made these changes
unnecessary.
llvm-svn: 97112
type-specifier-seq. Fixes some conditional-jump-on-unitialized-value
errors in valgrind. Also counts as attempt #2 at making the MSVC
buildbot happy.
llvm-svn: 97077
pseudo-destructor expressions, and builds the CXXPseudoDestructorExpr
node directly. Currently, this only affects pseudo-destructor
expressions when they are parsed, but not after template
instantiation. That's coming next...
Improve parsing of pseudo-destructor-names. When parsing the
nested-name-specifier and we hit the sequence of tokens X :: ~, query
the actual module to determine whether X is a type-name (in which case
the X :: is part of the pseudo-destructor-name but not the
nested-name-specifier) or not (in which case the X :: is part of the
nested-name-specifier).
llvm-svn: 97058
destructor calls, e.g.,
p->T::~T
We now detect when the member access that we've parsed, e.g.,
p-> or x.
may be a pseudo-destructor expression, either because the type of p or
x is a scalar or because it is dependent (and, therefore, may become a
scalar at template instantiation time).
We then parse the pseudo-destructor grammar specifically:
::[opt] nested-name-specifier[opt] type-name :: ∼ type-name
and hand those results to a new action, ActOnPseudoDestructorExpr,
which will cope with both dependent member accesses of destructors and
with pseudo-destructor expressions.
This commit affects the parsing of pseudo-destructors, only; the
semantic actions still go through the semantic actions for member
access expressions. That will change soon.
llvm-svn: 97045
typedef int Int;
int *p;
p->Int::~Int();
This weakens the invariant that the only types in nested-name-specifiers are tag types (restricted to class types in C++98/03). However, we weaken this invariant as little as possible, accepting arbitrary types in nested-name-specifiers only when we're in a member access expression that looks like a pseudo-destructor expression.
llvm-svn: 96743
now cope with the destruction of types named as dependent templates,
e.g.,
y->template Y<T>::~Y()
Nominally, we implement C++0x [basic.lookup.qual]p6. However, we don't
follow the letter of the standard here because that would fail to
parse
template<typename T, typename U>
X0<T, U>::~X0() { }
properly. The problem is captured in core issue 339, which gives some
(but not enough!) guidance. I expect to revisit this code when the
resolution of 339 is clear, and/or we start capturing better source
information for DeclarationNames.
Fixes PR6152.
llvm-svn: 96367
or that's been hidden by a non-type (in C++).
The ideal C++ diagnostic here would note the hiding declaration, but this
is a good start.
llvm-svn: 96141
we would just leak them all over the place, with no clear ownership of
these objects at all. AttributeList objects would get leaked on both
error and non-error paths.
Note: I introduced the usage of llvm::OwningPtr<AttributeList> to
manage these objects, which is particularly useful for methods with
multiple return sites. In at least one method I used them even when
they weren't strictly necessary because it clarified the ownership
semantics and made the code easier to read. Should the excessive
'take()' and 'reset()' calls become a performance issue we can always
re-evaluate.
Note+1: I believe I have not introduced any double-frees, but it would
be nice for someone to review this.
This fixes <rdar://problem/7635046>.
llvm-svn: 95847
declaration, we can end up with template-id annotation tokens for
types that have not been converted into type annotation tokens. When
this is the case, translate the template-id into a type and parse as
an expression.
llvm-svn: 95404
forgetting a ';' at the end of a struct. For something like:
class c {
}
void foo() {}
we now produce:
t.cc:3:2: error: expected ';' after class
}
^
;
instead of:
t.cc:4:1: error: cannot combine with previous 'class' declaration specifier
void foo() {}
^
t.cc:2:7: error: 'class c' can not be defined in the result type of a function
class c {
^
GCC produces:
t.cc:4: error: new types may not be defined in a return type
t.cc:4: note: (perhaps a semicolon is missing after the definition of ‘c’)
t.cc:4: error: two or more data types in declaration of ‘foo’
I *think* I got the follow set right, but if I forgot anything, we'll start
getting spurious "expected ';' after class" errors, let me know if you see
any.
llvm-svn: 95042
t.cc:4:3: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int y;
^
t.cc:6:1: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
};
^
After:
t.cc:3:8: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int x
^
;
t.cc:5:8: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int z
^
;
llvm-svn: 95039
t.c:4:3: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int y;
^
t.c:4:8: warning: extra ';' inside a struct or union
int y;
^
t.c:6:1: warning: expected ';' at end of declaration list
};
^
After:
t.c:3:8: error: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int x // expected-error {{expected ';' at end of declaration list}}
^
;
t.c:5:8: warning: expected ';' at end of declaration list
int z
^
;
llvm-svn: 95038
(necessarily simultaneous) changes:
- CXXBaseOrMemberInitializer now contains only a single initializer
rather than a set of initialiation arguments + a constructor. The
single initializer covers all aspects of initialization, including
constructor calls as necessary but also cleanup of temporaries
created by the initializer (which we never handled
before!).
- Rework + simplify code generation for CXXBaseOrMemberInitializers,
since we can now just emit the initializer as an initializer.
- Switched base and member initialization over to the new
initialization code (InitializationSequence), so that it
- Improved diagnostics for the new initialization code when
initializing bases and members, to match the diagnostics produced
by the previous (special-purpose) code.
- Simplify the representation of type-checked constructor initializers in
templates; instead of keeping the fully-type-checked AST, which is
rather hard to undo at template instantiation time, throw away the
type-checked AST and store the raw expressions in the AST. This
simplifies instantiation, but loses a little but of information in
the AST.
- When type-checking implicit base or member initializers within a
dependent context, don't add the generated initializers into the
AST, because they'll look like they were explicit.
- Record in CXXConstructExpr when the constructor call is to
initialize a base class, so that CodeGen does not have to infer it
from context. This ensures that we call the right kind of
constructor.
There are also a few "opportunity" fixes here that were needed to not
regress, for example:
- Diagnose default-initialization of a const-qualified class that
does not have a user-declared default constructor. We had this
diagnostic specifically for bases and members, but missed it for
variables. That's fixed now.
- When defining the implicit constructors, destructor, and
copy-assignment operator, set the CurContext to that constructor
when we're defining the body.
llvm-svn: 94952
the tag kind (union, struct, class, enum) over to the name of the tag,
if there is a name, since most clients want to point at the name.
llvm-svn: 94424
distinguish between nested classes (whose member functions cannot be
parsed until the innermost non-nested class is complete) and local
classes (that are defined within a function but are not necessarily
nested). The upshot of this change, which fixes PR5764, is that the
bodies of member functions of local (non-nested) classes need to be
parsed when the local class is complete (and no later), since they may
refer to function-local static variables, typedefs, enums, etc.
llvm-svn: 93653
Objective-C classes, protocol definitions, forward protocol
declarations, and categories. This information isn't actually used
yet; that's coming next.
llvm-svn: 93636
provide completions for @ keywords. Previously, we only provided
@-completions after an @ was actually typed, which is useful but
probably not the common case.
Also, make sure a few Objective-C 2.0 completions only show up when
Objective-C 2.0 support is enabled (the default).
llvm-svn: 93354
that name constructors, the endless joys of out-of-line constructor
definitions, and various other corner cases that the previous hack
never imagined. Fixes PR5688 and tightens up semantic analysis for
constructor names.
Additionally, fixed a problem where we wouldn't properly enter the
declarator scope of a parenthesized declarator. We were entering the
scope, then leaving it when we saw the ")"; now, we re-enter the
declarator scope before parsing the parameter list.
Note that we are forced to perform some tentative parsing within a
class (call it C) to tell the difference between
C(int); // constructor
and
C (f)(int); // member function
which is rather unfortunate. And, although it isn't necessary for
correctness, we use the same tentative-parsing mechanism for
out-of-line constructors to improve diagnostics in icky cases like:
C::C C::f(int); // error: C::C refers to the constructor name, but
// we complain nicely and recover by treating it as
// a type.
llvm-svn: 93322
name a template, when they occur in a base-specifier. This is one of
the (few) places where we know for sure that an identifier followed by
a '<' must be a template name, so we can diagnose and recover well:
test/SemaTemplate/dependent-base-classes.cpp:9:16: error: missing
'template'
keyword prior to dependent template name 'T::apply'
struct X1 : T::apply<U> { }; // expected-error{{missing 'template' ...
^
template
test/SemaTemplate/dependent-base-classes.cpp:12:13: error: unknown
template name
'vector'
struct X2 : vector<T> { }; // expected-error{{unknown template name
'vector'}}
^
2 diagnostics generated.
llvm-svn: 93257
initializers. This isn't actually in the C++ grammar (in any version),
but that's clearly an oversight: both GCC and EDG support this syntax,
and it's used within Boost code. I'll file a core issue proposing
precisely the change made here. Fixes PR6008.
llvm-svn: 93243
were performing name lookup for template names in C/ObjC and always
finding nothing. Turn off such lookup unless we're in C++ mode, along
with the check that determines whether the given identifier is a
"current class name", and assert that we don't make this mistake
again.
llvm-svn: 93207
C++ grammatical constructs that show up in top-level (namespace-level)
declarations, member declarations, template declarations, statements,
expressions, conditions, etc. For example, we now provide a pattern
for
static_cast<type>(expr)
when we can have an expression, or
using namespace identifier;
when we can have a using directive.
Also, improves the results of code completion at the beginning of a
top-level declaration. Previously, we would see value names (function
names, global variables, etc.); now we see types, namespace names,
etc., but no values.
llvm-svn: 93134
as a type or scope token if the next token requires it.
This eliminates a lot of redundant lookups in C++, but there's room for
improvement; a better solution would do a single lookup whose kind and
results would be passed through the parser.
llvm-svn: 92930
piece of the declaration. The '@' and the 'end' are separate tokens,
and require two SourceLocations to accurately track.
This change was motivated because ObjCContainerDecl::getSourceRange()
would previously not return the entire range of the declaration (the
'end' would be left off).
llvm-svn: 92891
Because of the rules of base-class lookup* and the restrictions on typedefs, it
was actually impossible for this to cause any problems more serious than the
spurious acceptance of
template <class T> class A : B<A> { ... };
instead of
template <class T> class A : B<A<T> > { ... };
but I'm sure we can all agree that that is a very important restriction which
is well worth making another Parser->Sema call for.
(*) n.b. clang++ does not implement these rules correctly; we are not ignoring
non-type names
llvm-svn: 91792
the redeclaration problems in the [temp.explicit]p3 testcase worse, but I can
live with that; they'll need to be fixed more holistically anyhow.
llvm-svn: 91771
Magically fixes all the terrible lookup problems associated with not pushing
a new scope. Resolves an ancient xfail and an LLVM misparse.
llvm-svn: 91769
is difficult because they're so terribly, terribly ambiguous.
We implement access declarations in terms of using declarations, which is
quite reasonable. However, we should really persist the access/using
distinction in the AST and use the appropriate name in diagnostics. This
isn't a priority, so I'll just file a PR and hope someone else does it. :)
llvm-svn: 91095
intended. On the first testcase in the bug, we now produce:
cxx-decl.cpp:12:2: error: unexpected ':' in nested name specifier
y:a a2;
^
::
instead of:
t.cc:8:1: error: C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations
x:a a2;
^
t.cc:8:2: error: invalid token after top level declarator
x:a a2;
^
;
t.cc:9:11: error: use of undeclared identifier 'a2'
x::a a3 = a2;
^
llvm-svn: 90713
Douglas Gregor