Commit 6a2ea84600 ("BPF: Add more relocation kinds")
added new relocations R_BPF_64_ABS64 and R_BPF_64_ABS32
for normal 64-bit and 32-bit data relocations.
This is to replace some of functionalities with
R_BPF_64_64 and R_BPF_64_32 so that new R_BPF_64_64
and R_BPF_64_32 semantics are for ld_imm64 and
call instructions only.
The BPF support in lib/Object/RelocationResolver.cpp
is used to perform normal data relocations for
the case like DWARFObjInMemory with an object file
(search function getRelocationResolver() in file
DebugInfo/DWARF/DWARFContext.cpp) or llvm-readobj
to dump ".stack_sizes" section data.
In all these casees, normal 64-bit and 32-bit relocations
are performed and such resolution resolution
is exactly what implemented in RelocationResolver.cpp.
But Commit 6a2ea84600 missed to change
R_BPF_64_64/R_BPF_64_32 to R_BPF_64_ABS64/R_BPF_64_ABS32.
This patch fixed the issue and added a test for it
with llvm-readobj dumping ".stack_sizes" section.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103864
It causes libraries whose names start with "swift" to be force-loaded.
Note that unlike the more general `-force_load`, this flag only applies
to libraries specified via LC_LINKER_OPTIONS, and not those passed on
the command-line. This is what ld64 does.
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, thakis
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103709
Our implementation draws heavily from LLD-ELF's, which in turn delegates
its string deduplication to llvm-mc's StringTableBuilder. The messiness of
this diff is largely due to the fact that we've previously assumed that
all InputSections get concatenated together to form the output. This is
no longer true with CStringInputSections, which split their contents into
StringPieces. StringPieces are much more lightweight than InputSections,
which is important as we create a lot of them. They may also overlap in
the output, which makes it possible for strings to be tail-merged. In
fact, the initial version of this diff implemented tail merging, but
I've dropped it for reasons I'll explain later.
**Alignment Issues**
Mergeable cstring literals are found under the `__TEXT,__cstring`
section. In contrast to ELF, which puts strings that need different
alignments into different sections, clang's Mach-O backend puts them all
in one section. Strings that need to be aligned have the `.p2align`
directive emitted before them, which simply translates into zero padding
in the object file.
I *think* ld64 extracts the desired per-string alignment from this data
by preserving each string's offset from the last section-aligned
address. I'm not entirely certain since it doesn't seem consistent about
doing this; but perhaps this can be chalked up to cases where ld64 has
to deduplicate strings with different offset/alignment combos -- it
seems to pick one of their alignments to preserve. This doesn't seem
correct in general; we can in fact can induce ld64 to produce a crashing
binary just by linking in an additional object file that only contains
cstrings and no code. See PR50563 for details.
Moreover, this scheme seems rather inefficient: since unaligned and
aligned strings are all put in the same section, which has a single
alignment value, it doesn't seem possible to tell whether a given string
doesn't have any alignment requirements. Preserving offset+alignments
for strings that don't need it is wasteful.
In practice, the crashes seen so far seem to stem from x86_64 SIMD
operations on cstrings. X86_64 requires SIMD accesses to be
16-byte-aligned. So for now, I'm thinking of just aligning all strings
to 16 bytes on x86_64. This is indeed wasteful, but implementation-wise
it's simpler than preserving per-string alignment+offsets. It also
avoids the aforementioned crash after deduplication of
differently-aligned strings. Finally, the overhead is not huge: using
16-byte alignment (vs no alignment) is only a 0.5% size overhead when
linking chromium_framework.
With these alignment requirements, it doesn't make sense to attempt tail
merging -- most strings will not be eligible since their overlaps aren't
likely to start at a 16-byte boundary. Tail-merging (with alignment) for
chromium_framework only improves size by 0.3%.
It's worth noting that LLD-ELF only does tail merging at `-O2`. By
default (at `-O1`), it just deduplicates w/o tail merging. @thakis has
also mentioned that they saw it regress compressed size in some cases
and therefore turned it off. `ld64` does not seem to do tail merging at
all.
**Performance Numbers**
CString deduplication reduces chromium_framework from 250MB to 242MB, or
about a 3.2% reduction.
Numbers for linking chromium_framework on my 3.2 GHz 16-Core Intel Xeon W:
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 20 3.91 4.03 3.935 3.95 0.034641016
+ 20 3.99 4.14 4.015 4.0365 0.0492336
Difference at 95.0% confidence
0.0865 +/- 0.027245
2.18987% +/- 0.689746%
(Student's t, pooled s = 0.0425673)
As expected, cstring merging incurs some non-trivial overhead.
When passing `--no-literal-merge`, it seems that performance is the
same, i.e. the refactoring in this diff didn't cost us.
N Min Max Median Avg Stddev
x 20 3.91 4.03 3.935 3.95 0.034641016
+ 20 3.89 4.02 3.935 3.9435 0.043197831
No difference proven at 95.0% confidence
Reviewed By: #lld-macho, gkm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102964
As a follow up to D103672, we should allow vaddr to be larger than
required when assembling GFX10 MIMG instructions.
Reviewed By: dp
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103733
Avoid having to round up to v8f32/VReg_256 when only 5 VGPRs are
required for a MIMG address operand.
Maintain _V8 instruction variants of pseudo instructions allowing
assembly prior to GFX10 to work as-is. Currently the validator
can tell for GFX10 what the correct size is, so will disallow
oversize address registers.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103672
Complete support for fast8:
- amend shadow size and mapping in runtime
- remove fast16 mode and -dfsan-fast-16-labels flag
- remove legacy mode and make fast8 mode the default
- remove dfsan-fast-8-labels flag
- remove functions in dfsan interface only applicable to legacy
- remove legacy-related instrumentation code and tests
- update documentation.
Reviewed By: stephan.yichao.zhao, browneee
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103745
This patch optimizes (and r i) to
(BCLRI (BCLRI r, i0), i1) in which i = ~((1<<i0) | (1<<i1)).
or
(BCLRI (ANDI r, i0), i1) in which i = i0 & ~(1<<i1).
Reviewed By: craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103743
Needs to be discussed more.
This reverts commit 255a5c1baa6020c009934b4fa342f9f6dbbcc46
This reverts commit df2056ff3730316f376f29d9986c9913b95ceb1
This reverts commit faff79b7ca144e505da6bc74aa2b2f7cffbbf23
This reverts commit d2a9020785c6e02afebc876aa2778fa64c5cafd
This uses 3 bits of data instead of 7. I'm wondering if we can use
bitfields for the lookup table key where this would matter.
I also name the shift_amount template to log2 since it is used
with more than just an srl now.
This allows to lower an LDS variable into a kernel structure
even if there is a constant expression used from different
kernels.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103655
In the situation where we need to replace a constant operand C from a constant expression CE
by an instruction NI, it not possible without converting CE itself into an instruction. This
utility helps to convert the given set of constant expression operands from an instruction I
into a corresponding set of instructions.
The current use-case for this utility is from the patches - https://reviews.llvm.org/D103225
and https://reviews.llvm.org/D103655.
Reviewed By: rampitec
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103661
Noticed via code inspection. We changed the semantics of the IR when we added mustprogress, and we appear to have not updated this location.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103834
Fix a bug introduced by f6f6f6375d.
Now for empty PHIs, instead of crashing on assert(hasVal()) in
Optional's internals, we'll return NoAlias, as we did before that patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103831
We were accidentally only using the first found reference, instead of all of them. This revision fixes this by properly tracking all references to a symbol.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103730
For now the hover simply shows the same information as hovering on the operation
name. If necessary this can be tweaked to something symbol specific later.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103728
This revision adds support for hover on region operations, by temporarily removing the regions during printing. This revision also tweaks the hover format for operations to include symbol information, now that FuncOp can be shown in the hover.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103727
When a library "host"'s reexports change their installName with
`$ld$os10.11$install_name$host`, we used to write a load command for "host" but
write the version numbers of the reexport instead of "host". This fixes that.
I first thought that the rule is to take the version numbers from the library
that originally had that install name (implemented in D103819), but that's not
what ld64 seems to be doing: It takes the version number from the first dylib
with that install name it loads, and it loads the reexporting library before
the reexports. We already did most of that, we just added reexports before the
reexporter. After this change, we add the reexporter before the reexports.
Addresses https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49800#c11 part 1.
(ld64 seems to add reexports after processing _all_ files on the command line,
while we add them right after the reexporter. For the common case of reexport +
$ld$ symbol changing back to the exporter name, this doesn't make a difference,
but you can construct a case where it does. I expect this to not make a
difference in practice though.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103821
getRelocatedSection interface should not check that the object file is
relocatable, as executable files may have relocations preserved with
`--emit-relocs` linker flag. The relocations are useful in context of post-link
binary analysis for function reference identification. For example, BOLT relies
on relocations to perform function reordering.
Reviewed By: MaskRay, jhenderson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D102296
So far, support for x86_64-linux-gnux32 has been handled by explicit
comparisons of Triple.getEnvironment() to GNUX32. This worked as long as
x86_64-linux-gnux32 was the only X32 environment to worry about, but we
now have x86_64-linux-muslx32 as well. To support this, this change adds
an isX32() function and uses it. It replaces all checks for GNUX32 or
MuslX32 by isX32(), except for the following:
- Triple::isGNUEnvironment() and Triple::isMusl() are supposed to treat
GNUX32 and MuslX32 differently.
- computeTargetTriple() needs to be able to transform triples to add or
remove X32 from the environment and needs to map GNU to GNUX32, and
Musl to MuslX32.
- getMultiarchTriple() completely lacks any Musl support and retains the
explicit check for GNUX32 as it can only return x86_64-linux-gnux32.
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103777
On x86_64 mingw, long doubles are always passed indirectly as
arguments (see an existing case in WinX86_64ABIInfo::classify);
generalize the existing code for reading varargs - any non-aggregate
type that is larger than 64 bits (which would be both long double
in mingw, and __int128) are passed indirectly too.
This makes reading varargs consistent with how they're passed,
fixing interop with both gcc and clang callers, for long double
and __int128.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103452
Unrolling with more iterations than MaxTripCount is pointless, as
those iterations can never be executed. As such, we clamp ULO.Count
to MaxTripCount if it is known. This means we no longer need to
consider iterations after MaxTripCount for exit folding, and the
CompletelyUnroll flag becomes independent of ULO.TripCount.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103748
Refactored code of dependence processing and added new inoutset dependence type.
Compiler can set dependence flag to 0x8 when call __kmpc_omp_task_with_deps.
Size of type of the dependence flag changed from 1 to 4 bytes in clang.
All dependence flags library gets so far and corresponding dependence types:
1 - IN, 2 - OUT, 3 - INOUT, 4 - MUTEXINOUTSET, 8 - INOUTSET.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D97085
The motivation here is simple loops with unsigned induction variables w/non-one steps. A toy example would be:
for (unsigned i = 0; i < N; i += 2) { body; }
Given C/C++ semantics, we do not get the nuw flag on the induction variable. Given that lack, we currently can't compute a bound for this loop. We can do better for many cases, depending on the contents of "body".
The basic intuition behind this patch is as follows:
* A step which evenly divides the iteration space must wrap through the same numbers repeatedly. And thus, we can ignore potential cornercases where we exit after the n-th wrap through uint32_max.
* Per C++ rules, infinite loops without side effects are UB. We already have code in SCEV which relies on this. In LLVM, this is tied to the mustprogress attribute.
Together, these let us conclude that the trip count of this loop must come before unsigned overflow unless the body would form a well defined infinite loop.
A couple notes for those reading along:
* I reused the loop properties code which is overly conservative for this case. I may follow up in another patch to generalize it for the actual UB rules.
* We could cache the n(s/u)w facts. I left that out because doing a pre-patch which cached existing inference showed a lot of diffs I had trouble fully explaining. I plan to get back to this, but I don't want it on the critical path.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103118
Our behavior here already matched ld64, now we have a test for it.
(ld64 even strips the library here if you also pass -needed_library bar.dylib.
That seems wrong to me, and lld honors needed_library in that case.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103812
In an operation in the true/false dest of a branch,
one can assume that the operation itself was true/false if
only that edge can reach the operation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D101709
Include known bits support so we know we don't need to zext the
output if the input was already zero extended.
Reviewed By: luismarques
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103757
This is a modified version of a patch by tolziplohu with a style change, and most importantly, a revised commit message.
inttoptr for a non-integral address space is currently ill defined in the LangRef. Figuring out exactly what the dynamic semantics of such a cast would be is hard, and not yet settled. Despite that, we still need to go ahead and implement something in RS4GC for a couple of reasons.
First, as a simple consistency argument. We're apparently added support for constexpr inttoptrs a while back, and even have tests which exercised them. Having a lack of constant folding trigger a crash during lowering is non-ideal.
Second, and more fundementally, the optimizer is allowed to insert undefined constructs in unreachable code. At the same time, we can't assume that dynamically dead code is always pruned before lowering. As a result, we must assume that inttoptrs can occur (even if completely ill defined) along dead paths. We need the lowering to not crash. The stackmaps produced can be garbage (as the assumption is the code is dynamically dead), but the lowering itself can't crash.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D103492
Add in the ability of parsing symbol table for 64 bit object.
Reviewed By: jhenderson, DiggerLin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D85774
We need to adjust the FMF propagation on at least
one of these transforms as discussed in:
https://llvm.org/PR49654
...so this should make it easier to intersect flags.
Craig Topper