This requires a number of steps.
1) Move value_use_iterator into the Value class as an implementation
detail
2) Change it to actually be a *Use* iterator rather than a *User*
iterator.
3) Add an adaptor which is a User iterator that always looks through the
Use to the User.
4) Wrap these in Value::use_iterator and Value::user_iterator typedefs.
5) Add the range adaptors as Value::uses() and Value::users().
6) Update *all* of the callers to correctly distinguish between whether
they wanted a use_iterator (and to explicitly dig out the User when
needed), or a user_iterator which makes the Use itself totally
opaque.
Because #6 requires churning essentially everything that walked the
Use-Def chains, I went ahead and added all of the range adaptors and
switched them to range-based loops where appropriate. Also because the
renaming requires at least churning every line of code, it didn't make
any sense to split these up into multiple commits -- all of which would
touch all of the same lies of code.
The result is still not quite optimal. The Value::use_iterator is a nice
regular iterator, but Value::user_iterator is an iterator over User*s
rather than over the User objects themselves. As a consequence, it fits
a bit awkwardly into the range-based world and it has the weird
extra-dereferencing 'operator->' that so many of our iterators have.
I think this could be fixed by providing something which transforms
a range of T&s into a range of T*s, but that *can* be separated into
another patch, and it isn't yet 100% clear whether this is the right
move.
However, this change gets us most of the benefit and cleans up
a substantial amount of code around Use and User. =]
llvm-svn: 203364
Move the test for this class into the IR unittests as well.
This uncovers that ValueMap too is in the IR library. Ironically, the
unittest for ValueMap is useless in the Support library (honestly, so
was the ValueHandle test) and so it already lives in the IR unittests.
Mmmm, tasty layering.
llvm-svn: 202821
subsequent changes are easier to review. About to fix some layering
issues, and wanted to separate out the necessary churn.
Also comment and sink the include of "Windows.h" in three .inc files to
match the usage in Memory.inc.
llvm-svn: 198685
When a ConstantExpr which uses a thread local is part of a PHI node
instruction, the insruction that replaces the ConstantExpr must
be inserted in the predecessor block, in front of the terminator instruction.
If the predecessor block has multiple successors, the edge is first split.
llvm-svn: 192432
Fix XCoreLowerThreadLocal trying to initialise globals
which have no initializer.
Add handling of const expressions containing thread local variables.
These need to be replaced with instructions, as the thread ID is
used to access the thread local variable.
llvm-svn: 190300
Thread local storage is not supported by the XMOS linker so we handle
thread local variables by lowering the variable to an array of n elements
(where n is the number of hardware threads per core, currently 8
for all XMOS devices) indexed by the the current thread ID.
Previously this lowering was spread across the XCoreISelLowering and the
XCoreAsmPrinter classes. Moving this to a separate pass should be much
cleaner.
llvm-svn: 181124
Chandler Carruth