Previously, we would ignore alloca alignment when building the frame
and just use the natural alignment of the allocated type. If an alloca
is over-aligned for its IR type, this could lead to a frame entry with
inadequate alignment for the downstream uses of the alloca.
Since highly-aligned fields also tend to produce poor layouts under a
naive layout algorithm, I've also switched coroutine frames to use the
new optimal struct layout algorithm.
In order to communicate the frame size and alignment to later passes,
I needed to set align+dereferenceable attributes on the frame-pointer
parameter of the resume function. This is clearly the right thing to
do, but the align attribute currently seems to result in assumptions
being added during inlining that the optimizer cannot easily remove.
Summary:
Depends on https://reviews.llvm.org/D71901.
The fifth in a series of patches that ports the LLVM coroutines passes
to the new pass manager infrastructure.
The first 4 patches allow users to run coroutine passes by invoking, for
example `opt -passes=coro-early`. However, most of LLVM's tests for
coroutines use an option, `opt -enable-coroutines`, which adds all 4
coroutine passes to the appropriate legacy pass manager extension points.
This patch does the same, but using the new pass manager: when
coroutine features are enabled and the new pass manager is being used,
this adds the new-pass-manager-compliant coroutine passes to the pass
builder's pipeline.
This allows us to run all coroutine tests using the new pass manager
(besides those that use the coroutine retcon ABI used by the Swift
compiler, which is not yet supported in the new pass manager).
Reviewers: GorNishanov, lewissbaker, chandlerc, junparser, wenlei
Subscribers: wenlei, EricWF, Prazek, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71902
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).
This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.
llvm-svn: 358546
Summary:
The purpose of coro.end intrinsic is to allow frontends to mark the cleanup and
other code that is only relevant during the initial invocation of the coroutine
and should not be present in resume and destroy parts.
In landing pads coro.end is replaced with an appropriate instruction to unwind to
caller. The handling of coro.end differs depending on whether the target is
using landingpad or WinEH exception model.
For landingpad based exception model, it is expected that frontend uses the
`coro.end`_ intrinsic as follows:
```
ehcleanup:
%InResumePart = call i1 @llvm.coro.end(i8* null, i1 true)
br i1 %InResumePart, label %eh.resume, label %cleanup.cont
cleanup.cont:
; rest of the cleanup
eh.resume:
%exn = load i8*, i8** %exn.slot, align 8
%sel = load i32, i32* %ehselector.slot, align 4
%lpad.val = insertvalue { i8*, i32 } undef, i8* %exn, 0
%lpad.val29 = insertvalue { i8*, i32 } %lpad.val, i32 %sel, 1
resume { i8*, i32 } %lpad.val29
```
The `CoroSpit` pass replaces `coro.end` with ``True`` in the resume functions,
thus leading to immediate unwind to the caller, whereas in start function it
is replaced with ``False``, thus allowing to proceed to the rest of the cleanup
code that is only needed during initial invocation of the coroutine.
For Windows Exception handling model, a frontend should attach a funclet bundle
referring to an enclosing cleanuppad as follows:
```
ehcleanup:
%tok = cleanuppad within none []
%unused = call i1 @llvm.coro.end(i8* null, i1 true) [ "funclet"(token %tok) ]
cleanupret from %tok unwind label %RestOfTheCleanup
```
The `CoroSplit` pass, if the funclet bundle is present, will insert
``cleanupret from %tok unwind to caller`` before
the `coro.end`_ intrinsic and will remove the rest of the block.
Reviewers: majnemer
Reviewed By: majnemer
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mehdi_amini
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25543
llvm-svn: 297223
Summary:
A frontend may designate a particular suspend to be final, by setting the second argument of the coro.suspend intrinsic to true. Such a suspend point has two properties:
* it is possible to check whether a suspended coroutine is at the final suspend point via coro.done intrinsic;
* a resumption of a coroutine stopped at the final suspend point leads to undefined behavior. The only possible action for a coroutine at a final suspend point is destroying it via coro.destroy intrinsic.
This patch adds final suspend handling logic to CoroEarly and CoroSplit passes.
Now, the final suspend point example from docs\Coroutines.rst compiles and produces expected result (see test/Transform/Coroutines/ex5.ll).
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24068
llvm-svn: 280646
John McCall