Commit Graph

110 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nick Desaulniers c4f245b40a [LoopUnroll+LoopUnswitch] do not transform loops containing callbr
Summary:
There is currently a correctness issue when unrolling loops containing
callbr's where their indirect targets are being updated correctly to the
newly created labels, but their operands are not.  This manifests in
unrolled loops where the second and subsequent copies of callbr
instructions have blockaddresses of the label from the first instance of
the unrolled loop, which would result in nonsensical runtime control
flow.

For now, conservatively do not unroll the loop.  In the future, I think
we can pursue unrolling such loops provided we transform the cloned
callbr's operands correctly.

Such a transform and its legalities are being discussed in:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D64101

Link: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42489
Link: https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/clang-built-linux/z-hRWP9KqPI

Reviewers: fhahn, hfinkel, efriedma

Reviewed By: fhahn, hfinkel, efriedma

Subscribers: efriedma, hiraditya, zzheng, dmgreen, llvm-commits, pirama, kees, nathanchance, E5ten, craig.topper, chandlerc, glider, void, srhines

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64368

llvm-svn: 366130
2019-07-15 21:16:29 +00:00
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
Alina Sbirlea a496143c9e Update MemorySSA in LoopUnswitch.
Summary:
Update MemorySSA in old LoopUnswitch pass.
Actual dependency and update is disabled by default.

Subscribers: sanjoy, jlebar, Prazek, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45301

llvm-svn: 341984
2018-09-11 19:19:21 +00:00
Max Kazantsev d99f3bacb4 [LoopUnswitch] Fix SCEV invalidation in unswitching
Loop unswitching makes substantial changes to a loop that can also affect cached
SCEV info in its outer loops as well, but it only cares to invalidate SCEV cache for the
innermost loop in case of full unswitching and does not invalidate anything at all in
case of trivial unswitching. As result, we may end up with incorrect data in cache.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46045
Reviewed By: mzolotukhin

llvm-svn: 333072
2018-05-23 10:09:53 +00:00
Max Kazantsev 7790d6cbff [NFC] Use FileCheck in test
llvm-svn: 330684
2018-04-24 04:42:37 +00:00
Serguei Katkov 66182d6c38 [SimplifyCFG] Re-apply Relax restriction for folding unconditional branches
The commit rL308422 introduces a restriction for folding unconditional
branches. Specifically if empty block with unconditional branch leads to
header of the loop then elimination of this basic block is prohibited.
However it seems this condition is redundantly strict.
If elimination of this basic block does not introduce more back edges
then we can eliminate this block.

The patch implements this relax of restriction.

The test profile/Linux/counter_promo_nest.c in compiler-rt project
is updated to meet this change.

Reviewers: efriedma, mcrosier, pacxx, hsung, davidxl	
Reviewed By: pacxx
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42691

llvm-svn: 324572
2018-02-08 07:16:29 +00:00
Serguei Katkov 276b32bb14 Revert [SimplifyCFG] Relax restriction for folding unconditional branches
The patch causes the failure of the test
compiler-rt/test/profile/Linux/counter_promo_nest.c

To unblock buildbot, revert the patch while investigation is in progress.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42691

llvm-svn: 324214
2018-02-05 09:05:43 +00:00
Serguei Katkov 6e93980e82 [SimplifyCFG] Relax restriction for folding unconditional branches
The commit rL308422 introduces a restriction for folding unconditional
branches. Specifically if empty block with unconditional branch leads to
header of the loop then elimination of this basic block is prohibited.
However it seems this condition is redundantly strict.
If elimination of this basic block does not introduce more back edges
then we can eliminate this block.

The patch implements this relax of restriction.

Reviewers: efriedma, mcrosier, pacxx, hsung, davidxl	
Reviewed By: pacxx
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42691

llvm-svn: 324208
2018-02-05 07:56:43 +00:00
Wei Mi ebb9327759 [LoopUnswitch] Fix a simple bug which disables loop unswitch for select statement
This is to fix PR34257. rL309059 takes an early return when FindLIVLoopCondition
fails to find a loop invariant condition. This is wrong and it will disable loop
unswitch for select. The patch fixes the bug.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36985

llvm-svn: 312045
2017-08-29 21:45:11 +00:00
Wei Mi c54b6c881b Add "REQUIRES: asserts" for test unswitch-equality-undef.ll.
llvm-svn: 309073
2017-07-26 01:34:46 +00:00
Wei Mi fc0e245464 Disable loop unswitching for some patterns containing equality comparison with undef.
This is a workaround for the bug described in PR31652 and
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-July/115497.html. The temporary
solution is to add a function EqualityPropUnSafe. In EqualityPropUnSafe, for
some simple patterns we can know the equality comparison may contains undef,
so we regard such comparison as unsafe and will not do loop-unswitching for
them. We also need to disable the select simplification when one of select
operand is undef and its result feeds into equality comparison.

The patch cannot clear the safety issue caused by the bug, but it can suppress
the issue from happening to some extent.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35811

llvm-svn: 309059
2017-07-25 23:37:17 +00:00
Balaram Makam b05a55787a [SimplifyCFG] Defer folding unconditional branches to LateSimplifyCFG if it can destroy canonical loop structure.
Summary:
When simplifying unconditional branches from empty blocks, we pre-test if the
BB belongs to a set of loop headers and keep the block to prevent passes from
destroying canonical loop structure. However, the current algorithm fails if
the destination of the branch is a loop header. Especially when such a loop's
latch block is folded into loop header it results in additional backedges and
LoopSimplify turns it into a nested loop which prevent later optimizations
from being applied (e.g., loop  unrolling and loop interleaving).

This patch augments the existing algorithm by further checking if the
destination of the branch belongs to a set of loop headers and defer
eliminating it if yes to LateSimplifyCFG.

Fixes PR33605: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33605

Reviewers: efriedma, mcrosier, pacxx, hsung, davidxl

Reviewed By: efriedma

Subscribers: ashutosh.nema, gberry, javed.absar, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35411

llvm-svn: 308422
2017-07-19 08:53:34 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 4a000883c7 [LoopSimplify] Re-instate r306081 with a bug fix w.r.t. indirectbr.
This was reverted in r306252, but I already had the bug fixed and was
just trying to form a test case.

The original commit factored the logic for forming dedicated exits
inside of LoopSimplify into a helper that could be used elsewhere and
with an approach that required fewer intermediate data structures. See
that commit for full details including the change to the statistic, etc.

The code looked fine to me and my reviewers, but in fact didn't handle
indirectbr correctly -- it left the 'InLoopPredecessors' vector dirty.

If you have code that looks *just* right, you can end up leaking these
predecessors into a subsequent rewrite, and crash deep down when trying
to update PHI nodes for predecessors that don't exist.

I've added an assert that makes the bug much more obvious, and then
changed the code to reliably clear the vector so we don't get this bug
again in some other form as the code changes.

I've also added a test case that *does* manage to catch this while also
giving some nice positive coverage in the face of indirectbr.

The real code that found this came out of what I think is CPython's
interpreter loop, but any code with really "creative" interpreter loops
mixing indirectbr and other exit paths could manage to tickle the bug.
I was hard to reduce the original test case because in addition to
having a particular pattern of IR, the whole thing depends on the order
of the predecessors which is in turn depends on use list order. The test
case added here was designed so that in multiple different predecessor
orderings it should always end up going down the same path and tripping
the same bug. I hope. At least, it tripped it for me without
manipulating the use list order which is better than anything bugpoint
could do...

llvm-svn: 306257
2017-06-25 22:45:31 +00:00
Daniel Jasper 4c6cd4ccb7 Revert "[LoopSimplify] Factor the logic to form dedicated exits into a utility."
This leads to a segfault. Chandler already has a test case and should be
able to recommit with a fix soon.

llvm-svn: 306252
2017-06-25 17:58:25 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 4ab0f4910a [LoopSimplify] Factor the logic to form dedicated exits into a utility.
I want to use the same logic as LoopSimplify to form dedicated exits in
another pass (SimpleLoopUnswitch) so I wanted to factor it out here.

I also noticed that there is a pretty significantly more efficient way
to implement this than the way the code in LoopSimplify worked. We don't
need to actually retain the set of unique exit blocks, we can just
rewrite them as we find them and use only a set to deduplicate.

This did require changing one part of LoopSimplify to not re-use the
unique set of exits, but it only used it to check that there was
a single unique exit. That part of the code is about to walk the exiting
blocks anyways, so it seemed better to rewrite it to use those exiting
blocks to compute this property on-demand.

I also had to ditch a statistic, but it doesn't seem terribly valuable.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34049

llvm-svn: 306081
2017-06-23 04:03:04 +00:00
Davide Italiano 534e314356 [LoopUnswitch] Don't remove instructions with side effects.
This fixes PR32818.

Differential Revision:  https://reviews.llvm.org/D32664

llvm-svn: 301722
2017-04-29 00:12:18 +00:00
Sanjoy Das 0cdcdf018e Revert "[SCEV] Enable SCEV verification by default in EXPENSIVE_CHECKS builds"
This reverts commit r301150.  It breaks CodeGen/Hexagon/hwloop-wrap2.ll, reverting
while I investigate.

llvm-svn: 301154
2017-04-24 02:35:19 +00:00
Sanjoy Das 8919303b0a [SCEV] Enable SCEV verification by default in EXPENSIVE_CHECKS builds
llvm-svn: 301150
2017-04-24 00:41:58 +00:00
Sanjoy Das 92ce1e76c5 [LoopUnswitch] Fix a test case
(h/t to Chandler for pointing this out)

The test in question was not at all testing what it was supposed to
test.  We do not //care// about placing `!make.implicit` in inner
constant branch (since it will be folded away anyway).  We care about
placing `!make.implicit` in the outer branch that switches between
either version of the loop.

Having said that, it is _correct_ to leave behind the `!make.implicit`
in the inner branch, but there is no need to do so.

llvm-svn: 299912
2017-04-11 04:11:47 +00:00
Matt Arsenault 3dbeefa978 AMDGPU: Mark all unspecified CC functions in tests as amdgpu_kernel
Currently the default C calling convention functions are treated
the same as compute kernels. Make this explicit so the default
calling convention can be changed to a non-kernel.

Converted with perl -pi -e 's/define void/define amdgpu_kernel void/'
on the relevant test directories (and undoing in one place that actually
wanted a non-kernel).

llvm-svn: 298444
2017-03-21 21:39:51 +00:00
Xin Tong 967e313078 Remove unused arguments. NFCI
llvm-svn: 298218
2017-03-19 15:31:16 +00:00
Stanislav Mekhanoshin ee2dd785f6 Only unswitch loops with uniform conditions
Loop unswitching can be extremely harmful for a SIMT target. In case
if hoisted condition is not uniform a SIMT machine will execute both
clones of a loop sequentially. Therefor LoopUnswitch checks if the
condition is non-divergent.

Since DivergenceAnalysis adds an expensive PostDominatorTree analysis
not needed for non-SIMT targets a new option is added to avoid unneded
analysis initialization. The method getAnalysisUsage is called when
TargetTransformInfo is not yet available and we cannot use it here.
For that reason a new field DivergentTarget is added to PassManagerBuilder
to control the behavior and set this field from a target.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30796

llvm-svn: 298104
2017-03-17 17:13:41 +00:00
Xin Tong 16b85a6601 Fix a bug when unswitching on partial LIV for SwitchInst
Summary: Fix a bug when unswitching on partial LIV for SwitchInst.

Reviewers: hfinkel, efriedma, sanjoy

Reviewed By: sanjoy

Subscribers: david2050, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29107

llvm-svn: 296363
2017-02-27 18:00:13 +00:00
Xin Tong ec6f90bec9 LoopUnswitch - Simplify based on known not to a be constant.
Summary: In case we do not know what the condition is in an unswitched loop, but we know its definitely NOT a known constant. We can perform simplifcations based on this information.

Reviewers: sanjoy, hfinkel, chenli, efriedma

Reviewed By: efriedma

Subscribers: david2050, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28968

llvm-svn: 296041
2017-02-23 23:42:19 +00:00
Philip Reames 578dafbd8b [LoopUnswitch] Remove BFI usage (dead code)
Chandler mentioned at the last social that the need for BFI in the new pass manager was causing a slight hiccup for this pass.  Given this code has been checked in, but off for over a year, it makes sense to just remove it for now.

Note that there's nothing wrong with the general idea - it's actually a quite good one - and once we have the infrastructure in place to implement this without the full recompuation on every loop, we absolutely should.

llvm-svn: 294715
2017-02-10 06:12:06 +00:00
Xin Tong e5f8d643d4 Constant fold switch inst when looking for trivial conditions to unswitch on.
Summary: Constant fold switch inst when looking for trivial conditions to unswitch on.

Reviewers: sanjoy, chenli, hfinkel, efriedma

Subscribers: llvm-commits, mzolotukhin

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29037

llvm-svn: 293250
2017-01-27 01:42:20 +00:00
Abhilash Bhandari 54e5a1a4da [Loop Unswitch] Patch to selective unswitch only the reachable branch instructions.
Summary:
The iterative algorithm for Loop Unswitching may render some of the branches unreachable in the unswitched loops.
Given the exponential nature of the algorithm, this is quite an overhead.
This patch fixes this problem by selectively unswitching only those branches within a loop that are reachable from the loop header.

Reviewers: Michael Zolothukin, Anna Thomas, Weiming Zhao.
Subscribers: llvm-commits.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D26299

llvm-svn: 287925
2016-11-25 14:07:44 +00:00
Sanjoy Das a37bb4a65d [LoopUnswitch] Unswitch on conditions feeding into guards
Summary:
This is a straightforward extension of what LoopUnswitch does to
branches to guards.  That is, we unswitch

```
for (;;) {
  ...
  guard(loop_invariant_cond);
  ...
}
```

into

```
if (loop_invariant_cond) {
  for (;;) {
    ...
    // There is no need to emit guard(true)
    ...
  }
} else {
  for (;;) {
    ...
    guard(false);
    // SimplifyCFG will clean this up by adding an
    // unreachable after the guard(false)
    ...
  }
}
```

Reviewers: majnemer

Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21725

llvm-svn: 273801
2016-06-26 05:10:45 +00:00
Sanjoy Das d850068282 [LoopUnswitch] Avoid exponential behavior
Summary: (No semantic change intended).

Reviewers: majnemer, bogner, mzolotukhin

Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits, mzolotukhin

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21707

llvm-svn: 273763
2016-06-25 01:14:19 +00:00
David Majnemer cbf614a93b Remove the ScalarReplAggregates pass
Nearly all the changes to this pass have been done while maintaining and
updating other parts of LLVM.  LLVM has had another pass, SROA, which
has superseded ScalarReplAggregates for quite some time.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21316

llvm-svn: 272737
2016-06-15 00:19:09 +00:00
Evgeniy Stepanov 0be3cf1d35 Add a missing test.
This is a test for r272421: Disable MSan-hostile loop unswitching.

llvm-svn: 272713
2016-06-14 21:24:13 +00:00
Hyojin Sung 4673f10568 [SimlifyCFG] Prevent passes from destroying canonical loop structure, especially for nested loops
When eliminating or merging almost empty basic blocks, the existence of non-trivial PHI nodes
is currently used to recognize potential loops of which the block is the header and keep the block.
However, the current algorithm fails if the loops' exit condition is evaluated only with volatile
values hence no PHI nodes in the header. Especially when such a loop is an outer loop of a nested
loop, the loop is collapsed into a single loop which prevent later optimizations from being
applied (e.g., transforming nested loops into simplified forms and loop vectorization).
    
The patch augments the existing PHI node-based check by adding a pre-test if the BB actually
belongs to a set of loop headers and not eliminating it if yes.

llvm-svn: 264697
2016-03-29 04:08:57 +00:00
Reid Kleckner ba85781f58 Revert "[SimlifyCFG] Prevent passes from destroying canonical loop structure, especially for nested loops"
This reverts commit r264596.

It does not compile.

llvm-svn: 264604
2016-03-28 18:07:40 +00:00
Hyojin Sung 0ada5b0d14 [SimlifyCFG] Prevent passes from destroying canonical loop structure, especially for nested loops
When eliminating or merging almost empty basic blocks, the existence of non-trivial PHI nodes
is currently used to recognize potential loops of which the block is the header and keep the block.
However, the current algorithm fails if the loops' exit condition is evaluated only with volatile
values hence no PHI nodes in the header. Especially when such a loop is an outer loop of a nested
loop, the loop is collapsed into a single loop which prevent later optimizations from being 
applied (e.g., transforming nested loops into simplified forms and loop vectorization).

The patch augments the existing PHI node-based check by adding a pre-test if the BB actually 
belongs to a set of loop headers and not eliminating it if yes. 

llvm-svn: 264596
2016-03-28 17:22:25 +00:00
David Majnemer 8a1c45d6e8 [IR] Reformulate LLVM's EH funclet IR
While we have successfully implemented a funclet-oriented EH scheme on
top of LLVM IR, our scheme has some notable deficiencies:
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are necessary in the current design
  but they are difficult to explain to others, even to seasoned LLVM
  experts.
- catchendpad and cleanupendpad are optimization barriers.  They cannot
  be split and force all potentially throwing call-sites to be invokes.
  This has a noticable effect on the quality of our code generation.
- catchpad, while similar in some aspects to invoke, is fairly awkward.
  It is unsplittable, starts a funclet, and has control flow to other
  funclets.
- The nesting relationship between funclets is currently a property of
  control flow edges.  Because of this, we are forced to carefully
  analyze the flow graph to see if there might potentially exist illegal
  nesting among funclets.  While we have logic to clone funclets when
  they are illegally nested, it would be nicer if we had a
  representation which forbade them upfront.

Let's clean this up a bit by doing the following:
- Instead, make catchpad more like cleanuppad and landingpad: no control
  flow, just a bunch of simple operands;  catchpad would be splittable.
- Introduce catchswitch, a control flow instruction designed to model
  the constraints of funclet oriented EH.
- Make funclet scoping explicit by having funclet instructions consume
  the token produced by the funclet which contains them.
- Remove catchendpad and cleanupendpad.  Their presence can be inferred
  implicitly using coloring information.

N.B.  The state numbering code for the CLR has been updated but the
veracity of it's output cannot be spoken for.  An expert should take a
look to make sure the results are reasonable.

Reviewers: rnk, JosephTremoulet, andrew.w.kaylor

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15139

llvm-svn: 255422
2015-12-12 05:38:55 +00:00
Rafael Espindola d1beb07d39 Have a single way for creating unique value names.
We had two code paths. One would create names like "foo.1" and the other
names like "foo1".

For globals it is important to use "foo.1" to help C++ name demangling.
For locals there is no strong reason to go one way or the other so I
kept the most common mangling (foo1).

llvm-svn: 253804
2015-11-22 00:16:24 +00:00
Owen Anderson 2c9978b12b Teach LoopUnswitch not to perform non-trivial unswitching on loops containing convergent operations.
Doing so could cause the post-unswitching convergent ops to be
control-dependent on the unswitch condition where they were not before.
This check could be refined to allow unswitching where the convergent
operation was already control-dependent on the unswitch condition.

llvm-svn: 249874
2015-10-09 18:40:20 +00:00
Chen Li 9f27fc0599 [LoopUnswitch] Add block frequency analysis to recognize hot/cold regions
Summary: This patch adds block frequency analysis to LoopUnswitch pass to recognize hot/cold regions. For cold regions the pass only performs trivial unswitches since they do not increase code size, and for hot regions everything works as before. This helps to minimize code growth in cold regions and be more aggressive in hot regions. Currently the default cold regions are blocks with frequencies below 20% of function entry frequency, and it can be adjusted via -loop-unswitch-cold-block-frequency flag. The entire feature is controlled via -loop-unswitch-with-block-frequency flag and it is off by default.

Reviewers: broune, silvas, dnovillo, reames

Subscribers: davidxl, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11605

llvm-svn: 248777
2015-09-29 05:03:32 +00:00
Philip Reames d63df5107e Remove handling of AddrSpaceCast in stripAndAccumulateInBoundsConstantOffsets
Patch by: simoncook

Unlike BitCasts, AddrSpaceCasts do not always produce an output the same size as its input, which was previously assumed. This fixes cases where two address spaces do not have the same size pointer, as an assertion failure would occur when trying to prove deferenceability.  LoopUnswitch is used in the particular test, but LICM also exhibits the same problem.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13008

llvm-svn: 248422
2015-09-23 19:48:43 +00:00
Chen Li 50efd9220a [LoopUnswitch] Preserve make.implicit metadata for unswitched conditions
Summary: This patch adds support to preserve make.implicit metadata for unswitched conditions in loop pre-header.

Reviewers: sanjoy, weimingz

Subscribers: mcrosier, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11769

llvm-svn: 244132
2015-08-05 21:13:26 +00:00
Chen Li 145c2f57ae [LoopUnswitch] Improve loop unswitch pass to find trivial unswitch conditions more effectively
Summary:
This patch improves trivial loop unswitch. 

The current trivial loop unswitch only checks if loop header's terminator contains a trivial unswitch condition. But if the loop header only has one reachable successor (due to intentionally or unintentionally missed code simplification), we should consider the successor as part of the loop header. Therefore, instead of stopping at loop header's terminator, we should keep traversing its successors within loop until reach a *real* conditional branch or switch (whose condition can not be constant folded). This change will enable a single -loop-unswitch pass to unswitch multiple trivial conditions (unswitch one trivial condition could open opportunity to unswitch another one in the same loop), while the old implementation can unswitch only one per pass. 

Reviewers: reames, broune

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11481

llvm-svn: 243203
2015-07-25 03:21:06 +00:00
Chen Li c0f3a158f0 [LoopUnswitch] Code refactoring to separate trivial loop unswitch and non-trivial loop unswitch in processCurrentLoop()
Summary: The current code in LoopUnswtich::processCurrentLoop() mixes trivial loop unswitch and non-trivial loop unswitch together. It goes over all basic blocks in the loop and checks if a condition is trivial or non-trivial unswitch condition. However, trivial unswitch condition can only occur in the loop header basic block (where it controls whether or not the loop does something at all). This refactoring separate trivial loop unswitch and non-trivial loop unswitch. Before going over all basic blocks in the loop, it checks if the loop header contains a trivial unswitch condition. If so, unswitch it. Otherwise, go over all blocks like before but don't check trivial condition any more since they are not possible to be in the other blocks. This code has no functionality change.

Reviewers: meheff, reames, broune

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11276

llvm-svn: 242873
2015-07-22 05:26:29 +00:00
Weiming Zhao f1abad57da Fix PR13851: Preserve metadata for the unswitched branch
This patch copies the metadata of the unswitched branch to the newly
crreated branch in loop unswitch pass.

llvm-svn: 240378
2015-06-23 05:31:09 +00:00
David Majnemer 7fddeccb8b Move the personality function from LandingPadInst to Function
The personality routine currently lives in the LandingPadInst.

This isn't desirable because:
- All LandingPadInsts in the same function must have the same
  personality routine.  This means that each LandingPadInst beyond the
  first has an operand which produces no additional information.

- There is ongoing work to introduce EH IR constructs other than
  LandingPadInst.  Moving the personality routine off of any one
  particular Instruction and onto the parent function seems a lot better
  than have N different places a personality function can sneak onto an
  exceptional function.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10429

llvm-svn: 239940
2015-06-17 20:52:32 +00:00
Sunil Srivastava d79dfcbc37 Changed renaming of local symbols by inserting a dot vefore the numeric suffix.
One code change and several test changes to match that
details in http://reviews.llvm.org/D9481

llvm-svn: 237150
2015-05-12 16:47:30 +00:00
David Blaikie 23af64846f [opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to the call instruction
See r230786 and r230794 for similar changes to gep and load
respectively.

Call is a bit different because it often doesn't have a single explicit
type - usually the type is deduced from the arguments, and just the
return type is explicit. In those cases there's no need to change the
IR.

When that's not the case, the IR usually contains the pointer type of
the first operand - but since typed pointers are going away, that
representation is insufficient so I'm just stripping the "pointerness"
of the explicit type away.

This does make the IR a bit weird - it /sort of/ reads like the type of
the first operand: "call void () %x(" but %x is actually of type "void
()*" and will eventually be just of type "ptr". But this seems not too
bad and I don't think it would benefit from repeating the type
("void (), void () * %x(" and then eventually "void (), ptr %x(") as has
been done with gep and load.

This also has a side benefit: since the explicit type is no longer a
pointer, there's no ambiguity between an explicit type and a function
that returns a function pointer. Previously this case needed an explicit
type (eg: a function returning a void() function was written as
"call void () () * @x(" rather than "call void () * @x(" because of the
ambiguity between a function returning a pointer to a void() function
and a function returning void).

No ambiguity means even function pointer return types can just be
written alone, without writing the whole function's type.

This leaves /only/ the varargs case where the explicit type is required.

Given the special type syntax in call instructions, the regex-fu used
for migration was a bit more involved in its own unique way (as every
one of these is) so here it is. Use it in conjunction with the apply.sh
script and associated find/xargs commands I've provided in rr230786 to
migrate your out of tree tests. Do let me know if any of this doesn't
cover your cases & we can iterate on a more general script/regexes to
help others with out of tree tests.

About 9 test cases couldn't be automatically migrated - half of those
were functions returning function pointers, where I just had to manually
delete the function argument types now that we didn't need an explicit
function type there. The other half were typedefs of function types used
in calls - just had to manually drop the * from those.

import fileinput
import sys
import re

pat = re.compile(r'((?:=|:|^|\s)call\s(?:[^@]*?))(\s*$|\s*(?:(?:\[\[[a-zA-Z0-9_]+\]\]|[@%](?:(")?[\\\?@a-zA-Z0-9_.]*?(?(3)"|)|{{.*}}))(?:\(|$)|undef|inttoptr|bitcast|null|asm).*$)')
addrspace_end = re.compile(r"addrspace\(\d+\)\s*\*$")
func_end = re.compile("(?:void.*|\)\s*)\*$")

def conv(match, line):
  if not match or re.search(addrspace_end, match.group(1)) or not re.search(func_end, match.group(1)):
    return line
  return line[:match.start()] + match.group(1)[:match.group(1).rfind('*')].rstrip() + match.group(2) + line[match.end():]

for line in sys.stdin:
  sys.stdout.write(conv(re.search(pat, line), line))

llvm-svn: 235145
2015-04-16 23:24:18 +00:00
David Blaikie f72d05bc7b [opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to gep operator
Similar to gep (r230786) and load (r230794) changes.

Similar migration script can be used to update test cases, which
successfully migrated all of LLVM and Polly, but about 4 test cases
needed manually changes in Clang.

(this script will read the contents of stdin and massage it into stdout
- wrap it in the 'apply.sh' script shown in previous commits + xargs to
apply it over a large set of test cases)

import fileinput
import sys
import re

rep = re.compile(r"(getelementptr(?:\s+inbounds)?\s*\()((<\d*\s+x\s+)?([^@]*?)(|\s*addrspace\(\d+\))\s*\*(?(3)>)\s*)(?=$|%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|zeroinitializer|<|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{)", re.MULTILINE | re.DOTALL)

def conv(match):
  line = match.group(1)
  line += match.group(4)
  line += ", "
  line += match.group(2)
  return line

line = sys.stdin.read()
off = 0
for match in re.finditer(rep, line):
  sys.stdout.write(line[off:match.start()])
  sys.stdout.write(conv(match))
  off = match.end()
sys.stdout.write(line[off:])

llvm-svn: 232184
2015-03-13 18:20:45 +00:00
David Blaikie a79ac14fa6 [opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to load instruction
Essentially the same as the GEP change in r230786.

A similar migration script can be used to update test cases, though a few more
test case improvements/changes were required this time around: (r229269-r229278)

import fileinput
import sys
import re

pat = re.compile(r"((?:=|:|^)\s*load (?:atomic )?(?:volatile )?(.*?))(| addrspace\(\d+\) *)\*($| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$)")

for line in sys.stdin:
  sys.stdout.write(re.sub(pat, r"\1, \2\3*\4", line))

Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7649

llvm-svn: 230794
2015-02-27 21:17:42 +00:00
David Blaikie 79e6c74981 [opaque pointer type] Add textual IR support for explicit type parameter to getelementptr instruction
One of several parallel first steps to remove the target type of pointers,
replacing them with a single opaque pointer type.

This adds an explicit type parameter to the gep instruction so that when the
first parameter becomes an opaque pointer type, the type to gep through is
still available to the instructions.

* This doesn't modify gep operators, only instructions (operators will be
  handled separately)

* Textual IR changes only. Bitcode (including upgrade) and changing the
  in-memory representation will be in separate changes.

* geps of vectors are transformed as:
    getelementptr <4 x float*> %x, ...
  ->getelementptr float, <4 x float*> %x, ...
  Then, once the opaque pointer type is introduced, this will ultimately look
  like:
    getelementptr float, <4 x ptr> %x
  with the unambiguous interpretation that it is a vector of pointers to float.

* address spaces remain on the pointer, not the type:
    getelementptr float addrspace(1)* %x
  ->getelementptr float, float addrspace(1)* %x
  Then, eventually:
    getelementptr float, ptr addrspace(1) %x

Importantly, the massive amount of test case churn has been automated by
same crappy python code. I had to manually update a few test cases that
wouldn't fit the script's model (r228970,r229196,r229197,r229198). The
python script just massages stdin and writes the result to stdout, I
then wrapped that in a shell script to handle replacing files, then
using the usual find+xargs to migrate all the files.

update.py:
import fileinput
import sys
import re

ibrep = re.compile(r"(^.*?[^%\w]getelementptr inbounds )(((?:<\d* x )?)(.*?)(| addrspace\(\d\)) *\*(|>)(?:$| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$))")
normrep = re.compile(       r"(^.*?[^%\w]getelementptr )(((?:<\d* x )?)(.*?)(| addrspace\(\d\)) *\*(|>)(?:$| *(?:%|@|null|undef|blockaddress|getelementptr|addrspacecast|bitcast|inttoptr|\[\[[a-zA-Z]|\{\{).*$))")

def conv(match, line):
  if not match:
    return line
  line = match.groups()[0]
  if len(match.groups()[5]) == 0:
    line += match.groups()[2]
  line += match.groups()[3]
  line += ", "
  line += match.groups()[1]
  line += "\n"
  return line

for line in sys.stdin:
  if line.find("getelementptr ") == line.find("getelementptr inbounds"):
    if line.find("getelementptr inbounds") != line.find("getelementptr inbounds ("):
      line = conv(re.match(ibrep, line), line)
  elif line.find("getelementptr ") != line.find("getelementptr ("):
    line = conv(re.match(normrep, line), line)
  sys.stdout.write(line)

apply.sh:
for name in "$@"
do
  python3 `dirname "$0"`/update.py < "$name" > "$name.tmp" && mv "$name.tmp" "$name"
  rm -f "$name.tmp"
done

The actual commands:
From llvm/src:
find test/ -name *.ll | xargs ./apply.sh
From llvm/src/tools/clang:
find test/ -name *.mm -o -name *.m -o -name *.cpp -o -name *.c | xargs -I '{}' ../../apply.sh "{}"
From llvm/src/tools/polly:
find test/ -name *.ll | xargs ./apply.sh

After that, check-all (with llvm, clang, clang-tools-extra, lld,
compiler-rt, and polly all checked out).

The extra 'rm' in the apply.sh script is due to a few files in clang's test
suite using interesting unicode stuff that my python script was throwing
exceptions on. None of those files needed to be migrated, so it seemed
sufficient to ignore those cases.

Reviewers: rafael, dexonsmith, grosser

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7636

llvm-svn: 230786
2015-02-27 19:29:02 +00:00