Summary: Honoring no signed zeroes is also available as a user control through clang separately regardless of fastmath or UnsafeFPMath context, DAG guards should reflect this context.
Reviewers: spatel, arsenm, hfinkel, wristow, craig.topper
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: rampitec, foad, nhaehnle, wuzish, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, javed.absar, MaskRay, jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65170
llvm-svn: 367486
In PowerPC, there is instruction to load vector in big endian element order when it's in little endian target.
So we can combine vector load + reverse into big endian load to eliminate the swap instruction.
Also combine vector reverse + store into big endian store.
llvm-svn: 367382
Addresses number of comment made on D64652 after commiting:
- Reorders function decls in the TargetLoweringObjectFileXCOFF class.
- Fix comment in MCSectionXCOFF to include description of external reference
csects.
- Convert several llvm_unreachables to report_fatal_error
- Convert several dyn_casts to casts as they are expected not to fail.
- Avoid copying DataLayout object.
llvm-svn: 367324
Adds machine operand lowering for MCSymbolSDNodes to the PowerPC
backend. This is needed to produce call instructions in assembly for AIX
because the callee operand is a MCSymbolSDNode. The test is XFAIL'ed for
asserts due to a (valid) assertion in PEI that the AIX ABI isn't supported yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63738
llvm-svn: 367133
Summary:
In `block-placement` pass, it will create some patterns for unconditional we can do the simple early retrun.
But the `early-ret` pass is before `block-placement`, we don't want to run it again.
This patch is to do the simple early return to optimize the blocks at the last of `block-placement`.
Below is an example
```
BB: | BB:
XOR 3, 3, 4 | XOR 3, 3, 4
B TBB | B ChainBB
... | ...
ChainBB: | ChainBB:
B TBB | ADD 3, 3, 4
... | BLR
TBB: |
ADD 3, 3, 4 |
BLR |
```
Reviewed By: efriedma
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63972
llvm-svn: 367080
Currently, stack protector loads and stores are resolved during
LocalStackSlotAllocation (if the pass needs to run). When this is the
case, the base register assigned to the frame access is going to be one
of the vregs created during LocalStackSlotAllocation. This means that we
are keeping a pointer to the stack protector slot, and we're using this
pointer to load and store to it.
In case register pressure goes up, we may end up spilling this pointer
to the stack, which can be a security concern.
Instead, leave it to PEI to resolve the frame accesses. In order to do
that, we make all stack protector accesses go through frame index
operands, then PEI will resolve this using an offset from sp/fp/bp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64759
llvm-svn: 367068
Summary:
This was originally reported in D62818.
https://rise4fun.com/Alive/oPH
InstCombine does the opposite fold, in hope that `C l>>/<< Y` expression
will be hoisted out of a loop if `Y` is invariant and `X` is not.
But as it is seen from the diffs here, if it didn't get hoisted,
the produced assembly is almost universally worse.
Much like with my recent "hoist add/sub by/from const" patches,
we should get almost universal win if we hoist constant,
there is almost always an "and/test by imm" instruction,
but "shift of imm" not so much, so we may avoid having to
materialize the immediate, and thus need one less register.
And since we now shift not by constant, but by something else,
the live-range of that something else may reduce.
Special care needs to be applied not to disturb x86 `BT` / hexagon `tstbit`
instruction pattern. And to not get into endless combine loop.
Reviewers: RKSimon, efriedma, t.p.northover, craig.topper, spatel, arsenm
Reviewed By: spatel
Subscribers: hiraditya, MaskRay, wuzish, xbolva00, nikic, nemanjai, jvesely, wdng, nhaehnle, javed.absar, tpr, kristof.beyls, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62871
llvm-svn: 366955
Currently PowerPC backend emits code like this:
r3 = li 0
std r3, 264(r1)
r3 = li 0
std r3, 272(r1)
This patch fixes that and other cases where a register already contains a value that is loaded so we will get:
r3 = li 0
std r3, 264(r1)
std r3, 272(r1)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64220
llvm-svn: 366840
Replace float load/store pair with integer load/store pair when it's only used in load/store,
because float load/store instructions cost more cycles then integer load/store.
A typical scenario is when there is a call with more than 13 float arguments passing, we need pass them by stack.
So we need a load/store pair to do such memory operation if the variable is global variable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64195
llvm-svn: 366775
Summary:
Since we are planning to add ADDIStocHA for 32bit in later patch, we decided
to change 64bit one first to follow naming convention with 8 behind opcode.
Patch by: Xiangling_L
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64814
llvm-svn: 366731
Stubs out a TargetLoweringObjectFileXCOFF class, implementing only
SelectSectionForGlobal for common symbols. Also adds an override of
EmitGlobalVariable in PPCAIXAsmPrinter which adds a number of defensive errors
and adds support for emitting common globals.
llvm-svn: 366727
Summary:
Current PRE hoists common computations into
CMBB = DT->findNearestCommonDominator(MBB, MBB1).
However, if CMBB is in a hot loop body, we might get performance
degradation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64394
llvm-svn: 366570
The LocalStackSlotPass pre-allocates a stack protector and makes sure
that it comes before the local variables on the stack.
We need to make sure that later during PEI we don't re-allocate a new
stack protector slot. If that happens, the new stack protector slot will
end up being **after** the local variables that it should be protecting.
Therefore, we would have two slots assigned for two different stack
protectors, one at the top of the stack, and one at the bottom. Since
PEI will overwrite the assigned slot for the stack protector, the load
that is used to compare the value of the stack protector will use the
slot assigned by PEI, which is wrong.
For this, we need to check if the object is pre-allocated, and re-use
that pre-allocated slot.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64757
llvm-svn: 366371
Summary:
Pointed out in a comment for D49754, register spilling will currently
spill SPE registers at almost any offset. However, the instructions
`evstdd` and `evldd` require a) 8-byte alignment, and b) a limit of 256
(unsigned) bytes from the base register, as the offset must fix into a
5-bit offset, which ranges from 0-31 (indexed in double-words).
The update to the register spill test is taken partially from the test
case shown in D49754.
Additionally, pointed out by Kei Thomsen, globals will currently use
evldd/evstdd, though the offset isn't known at compile time, so may
exceed the 8-bit (unsigned) offset permitted. This fixes that as well,
by forcing it to always use evlddx/evstddx when accessing globals.
Part of the patch contributed by Kei Thomsen.
Reviewers: nemanjai, hfinkel, joerg
Subscribers: kbarton, jsji, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54409
llvm-svn: 366318
Summary:
This is exposed by our internal testing.
The reduced testcase will assert with "Impossible reg-to-reg copy"
We can't use COPY to do 32-bit to 64-bit conversion.
Reviewers: kbarton, hfinkel, nemanjai
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: hiraditya, MaskRay, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64499
llvm-svn: 366255
Summary:
Problem exposed in PowerPC functional testing.
We did not consider Anti dependence for nodes in same cycle,
so we may end up generating bad machine code.
eg: the reduced test won't verify.
*** Bad machine code: Using an undefined physical register ***
- function: lame_encode_buffer_interleaved
- basic block: %bb.4 (0x4bde4e12928)
- instruction: %29:gprc = ADDZE %27:gprc, implicit-def dead $carry, implicit $carry
- operand 3: implicit $carry
Reviewers: bcahoon, kparzysz, hfinkel
Subscribers: MaskRay, wuzish, nemanjai, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64192
llvm-svn: 365859
Stubs out a number of the classes needed to produce a new object file format
(XCOFF) for the powerpc-aix target. For testing input is an empty module which
produces an object file with just a file header.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61694
llvm-svn: 365541
Summary:
`extsw` and `sldi` are supposed to be combined if they are in the same
BB in instruction selection phase. This patch handles the case where
extsw and sldi are not in the same BB.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63806
llvm-svn: 365430
Summary:
This is exposed by functional testing on PowerPC.
In some pipelined loops, Phi refer to phi did not get value defined by
the Phi, hence getting wrong value later.
As the comment mentioned, we should "use the value defined by the Phi,
unless we're generating the firstepilog and the Phi refers to a Phi
in a different stage.", so Phi refering to same stage Phi should use
the value defined by the Phi here.
Reviewers: bcahoon, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: MaskRay, wuzish, nemanjai, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64035
llvm-svn: 365428
The indirect call sequence on PPC requires that the TOC base register be saved
prior to the indirect call and restored after the call since the indirect call
may branch to a global entry point in another DSO which will update the TOC
base. Over the last couple of years, we have improved this to:
- be able to hoist TOC saves from loops (with changes to MachineLICM)
- avoid multiple saves when one dominates the other[s]
However, it is still possible to have multiple TOC saves dynamically in the
execution path if there is no dominance relationship between them.
This patch moves the TOC save to the prologue when one of the TOC saves is in a
block that post-dominates entry (i.e. it cannot be avoided) or if it is in a
block that is hotter than entry.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63803
llvm-svn: 365232
Summary:
"ww" and "ws" are both constraint codes for VSX vector registers that
hold scalar double data. "ww" is preferred for float while "ws" is
preferred for double.
Reviewed By: jsji
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64119
llvm-svn: 365106
Summary:
This is the backend part of [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42457 | PR42457 ]].
In middle-end, we'd want to prefer the form with two adds - D63992,
but as this diff shows, not every target will prefer that pattern.
Out of 4 targets for which i added tests all seem to be ok with inc-of-add for scalars,
but only X86 prefer that same pattern for vectors.
Here i'm adding a new TLI hook, always defaulting to the inc-of-add,
but adding AArch64,ARM,PowerPC overrides to prefer inc-of-add only for scalars.
Reviewers: spatel, RKSimon, efriedma, t.p.northover, hfinkel
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: nemanjai, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, kbarton, jsji, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64090
llvm-svn: 365010
I initially committed it with --check-prefix instead of --check-prefixes
(again, shame on me, and utils/update_*.py not complaining!)
and did not have a moment to understand the failure,
so i reverted it initially in rL64939.
llvm-svn: 364945
As it is pointed out in https://reviews.llvm.org/D63992,
before we get to pick canonical variant in middle-end
we should ensure best codegen in backend.
llvm-svn: 364930
After implemented this hook, we will model the memory dependency in the scheduling dependency graph more precise,
and will have more opportunity to reorder the load/stores, as they didn't have the dependency at some condition
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63804
llvm-svn: 364886
Summary:
SCRUB_LOOP_COMMENT_RE was introduced in https://reviews.llvm.org/D31285
This works for some loops.
However, we may generate lines with loop comments only.
And since we don't scrub leading white spaces, this will leave an empty
line there, and FileCheck will complain it.
eg: llvm/test/CodeGen/PowerPC/PR35812-neg-cmpxchg.ll:27:15:
error: found empty check string with prefix 'CHECK:'
; CHECK-NEXT:
This prevented us from using the `update_llc_test_checks.py` for quite some cases.
We should still keep the comment token there, so that we can safely
scrub the loop comment without breaking FileCheck.
Reviewers: timshen, hfinkel, lebedev.ri, RKSimon
Subscribers: nemanjai, jfb, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D63957
llvm-svn: 364775
This was reported in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41751
llvm-mc aborted when disassembling tabortdc.
This patch try to clean up TM related DAGs.
* Fixes the problem by remove explicit output of cr0, and put it as implicit def.
* Update int_ppc_tbegin pattern to accommodate the implicit def of cr0.
* Update the TCHECK operand and int_ppc_tcheck accordingly.
* Add some builtin test and disassembly tests.
* Remove unused CRRC0/crrc0
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61935
llvm-svn: 364544
Michael Berg