This avoids having to define additional macros in the cmake file, and
and also makes the logic in the cpp files more compact. It is also
easily extendible to other plugin types (instruction emulation?) that
should only be initialized if the corresponding llvm target is built.
Thanks to Ilya Birukov for pointing me to this file.
llvm-svn: 372952
Summary:
I was recently surprised to learn that there is a total of 2 (two) users
of the register info definitions contained in the ABI plugins. Yet, the
defitions themselves span nearly 10kLOC.
The two users are:
- dwarf expression pretty printer
- the mechanism for augmenting the register info definitions obtained
over gdb-remote protocol (AugmentRegisterInfoViaABI)
Both of these uses need the DWARF an EH register numbers, which is
information that is already available in LLVM. This patch makes it
possible to do so.
It adds a GetMCRegisterInfo method to the ABI class, which every class
is expected to implement. Normally, it should be sufficient to obtain
the definitions from the appropriate llvm::Target object (for which I
provide a utility function), but the subclasses are free to construct it
in any way they deem fit.
We should be able to always get the MCRegisterInfo object from llvm,
with one important exception: if the relevant llvm target was disabled
at compile time. To handle this, I add a mechanism to disable the
compilation of ABI plugins based on the value of LLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD
cmake setting. This ensures all our existing are able to create their
MCRegisterInfo objects.
The new MCRegisterInfo api is not used yet, but the intention is to make
use of it in follow-up patches.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, aprantl, JDevlieghere, tatyana-krasnukha
Subscribers: wuzish, nemanjai, mgorny, kbarton, atanasyan, lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67965
llvm-svn: 372862
This is basically a proof-of-concept and starting point for having a
testing-centric tool in LLDB. I'm sure this leaves a lot of room to be
desired, but this at least allows us to have something to build on.
Right now there is only one command, the `module-sections` command, and I
created this command not because it was particularly special, but
because it addressed an immediate use case and was extremely simple.
Run the tool as `lldb-test module-sections <path-to-object>`.
Feel free to add testing related stuff to your heart's content after
this goes in. Implementing the commands themselves takes some work, but
once they're there they can be reused without writing any code and
result in very easy to use and maintain tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40636
llvm-svn: 319504
Pavel Labath