Commit Graph

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Mitch Phillips a95edb9dc1 [GWP-ASan] Core Guarded Pool Allocator [4].
Summary:
See D60593 for further information.

This patch introduces the core of GWP-ASan, being the guarded pool allocator. This class contains the logic for creating and maintaining allocations in the guarded pool. Its public interface is to be utilised by supporting allocators in order to provide sampled guarded allocation behaviour.

This patch also contains basic functionality tests of the allocator as unittests. The error-catching behaviour will be tested in upcoming patches that use Scudo as an implementing allocator.

Reviewers: vlad.tsyrklevich, eugenis, jfb

Reviewed By: vlad.tsyrklevich

Subscribers: dexonsmith, kubamracek, mgorny, cryptoad, jfb, #sanitizers, llvm-commits, morehouse

Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62872

llvm-svn: 362636
2019-06-05 19:42:48 +00:00
Mitch Phillips 9bd9a03ad0 Attempt to fix 'mutex.h' not found when building mutex_posix.
llvm-svn: 362149
2019-05-30 20:48:05 +00:00
Mitch Phillips 5f0f4e3ae0 [GWP-ASan] Mutex implementation [2].
Summary:
See D60593 for further information.
This patch pulls out the mutex implementation and the required definitions file.

We implement our own mutex for GWP-ASan currently, because:

1. We must be compatible with the sum of the most restrictive elements of the supporting allocator's build system. Current targets for GWP-ASan include Scudo (on Linux and Fuchsia), and bionic (on Android).
2. Scudo specifies `-nostdlib++ -nonodefaultlibs`, meaning we can't use `std::mutex` or `mtx_t`.
3. We can't use `sanitizer_common`'s mutex, as the supporting allocators cannot afford the extra maintenance (Android, Fuchsia) and code size (Fuchsia) overheads that this would incur.

In future, we would like to implement a shared base mutex for GWP-ASan, Scudo and sanitizer_common. This will likely happen when both GWP-ASan and Scudo standalone are not in the development phase, at which point they will have stable requirements.

Reviewers: vlad.tsyrklevich, morehouse, jfb

Reviewed By: morehouse

Subscribers: dexonsmith, srhines, cfe-commits, kubamracek, mgorny, cryptoad, jfb, #sanitizers, llvm-commits, vitalybuka, eugenis

Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm, #clang

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61923

llvm-svn: 362138
2019-05-30 19:45:32 +00:00