Summary:
This is now the same as the behaviour of the GNU assembler. This was done
as it is required in order to build the Linux kernel with the integrated
assembler enabled.
Reviewers: dsanders, vkalintiris
Subscribers: dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13594
llvm-svn: 258400
Summary: The result register is the second operand as per the other mt* instructions.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Subscribers: llvm-commits, dsanders
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15993
llvm-svn: 257478
Summary:
It actually takes an offset into the current PC-region.
This fixes the 'expr' command in lldb.
Reviewers: vkalintiris, jaydeep, bhushan
Subscribers: dsanders, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16054
llvm-svn: 257339
These days relocations are created and stored in a deterministic way.
The order they are created is also suitable for the .o file, so we don't
need an explicit sort.
The last remaining exception is MIPS.
llvm-svn: 255902
This patch adds some missing calls to MBB::normalizeSuccProbs() in several
locations where it should be called. Those places are found by checking if the
sum of successors' probabilities is approximate one in MachineBlockPlacement
pass with some instrumented code (not in this patch).
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15259
llvm-svn: 255455
Summary:
Although the multiclass for i32 selects might seem redundant as it has
only one instantiation, we will use it to replace the correspondent
patterns in Mips64r6InstrInfo.td in follow-up commits.
Reviewers: dsanders
Subscribers: llvm-commits, dsanders
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14612
llvm-svn: 255110
Commited patch was intended to implement LH, LHE, LHU and LHUE instructions.
After commit test-suite failed with error message in the form of:
fatal error: error in backend: Cannot select: t124: i32,ch = load<LD2[%d](tbaa=<0x94acc48>), sext from i16> t0, t2, undef:i32
For that reason I decided to revert commit r254897 and make new patch which besides implementation and standard regression tests will also have dedicated tests (CodeGen) for the above error.
llvm-svn: 255109
Summary:
We don't check the size operand on ext/dext*/ins/dins* yet because the
permitted range depends on the pos argument and we can't check that using
this mechanism.
The bug was that dextu/dinsu accepted 0..31 in the pos operand instead of 32..63.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Subscribers: llvm-commits, dsanders
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15190
llvm-svn: 255015
(This is the second attempt to submit this patch. The first caused two assertion
failures and was reverted. See https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25687)
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254377
and the follow-up r254356: "Fix a bug in MachineBlockPlacement that may cause assertion failure during BranchProbability construction."
Asserts were firing in Chromium builds. See PR25687.
llvm-svn: 254366
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes (http://reviews.llvm.org/D13908).
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights (http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361).
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This patch is 3+4 above. In this patch, MBB won't provide weight-based
interfaces any more, which are totally replaced by probability-based ones.
The interface addSuccessor() is redesigned so that the default probability is
unknown. We allow unknown probabilities but don't allow using it together
with known probabilities in successor list. That is to say, we either have a
list of successors with all known probabilities, or all unknown
probabilities. In the latter case, we assume each successor has 1/N
probability where N is the number of successors. An assertion checks if the
user is attempting to add a successor with the disallowed mixed use as stated
above. This can help us catch many misuses.
All uses of weight-based interfaces are now updated to use probability-based
ones.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14973
llvm-svn: 254348
Value of offset operand for microMIPS BALC and BC instructions is currently shifted 2 bits, but it should be 1 bit.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14770
llvm-svn: 254296
Summary:
The bugs were:
* append, prepend, and balign were not tested
* balign takes a uimm2 not a uimm5.
* drotr32 was correctly implemented with a uimm5 but the tests expected
'52' to be valid.
* li/la were implemented with a uimm5 instead of simm32. simm32 isn't
completely correct either but I'll fix that when I get to simm32.
A notable omission are some of the shift instructions. Several of these
have been implemented using a single uimm6 instruction (rather than two
uimm5 instructions and a CodeGen-only uimm6 pseudo). These will be updated
in the uimm6 patch.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Subscribers: llvm-commits, dsanders
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14712
llvm-svn: 254164
The patch in http://reviews.llvm.org/D13745 is broken into four parts:
1. New interfaces without functional changes.
2. Use new interfaces in SelectionDAG, while in other passes treat probabilities
as weights.
3. Use new interfaces in all other passes.
4. Remove old interfaces.
This the second patch above. In this patch SelectionDAG starts to use
probability-based interfaces in MBB to add successors but other MC passes are
still using weight-based interfaces. Therefore, we need to maintain correct
weight list in MBB even when probability-based interfaces are used. This is
done by updating weight list in probability-based interfaces by treating the
numerator of probabilities as weights. This change affects many test cases
that check successor weight values. I will update those test cases once this
patch looks good to you.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14361
llvm-svn: 253965
Note, this was reviewed (and more details are in) http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20151109/312083.html
These intrinsics currently have an explicit alignment argument which is
required to be a constant integer. It represents the alignment of the
source and dest, and so must be the minimum of those.
This change allows source and dest to each have their own alignments
by using the alignment attribute on their arguments. The alignment
argument itself is removed.
There are a few places in the code for which the code needs to be
checked by an expert as to whether using only src/dest alignment is
safe. For those places, they currently take the minimum of src/dest
alignments which matches the current behaviour.
For example, code which used to read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* %dest, i8* %src, i32 500, i32 8, i1 false)
will now read:
call void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i32(i8* align 8 %dest, i8* align 8 %src, i32 500, i1 false)
For out of tree owners, I was able to strip alignment from calls using sed by replacing:
(call.*llvm\.memset.*)i32\ [0-9]*\,\ i1 false\)
with:
$1i1 false)
and similarly for memmove and memcpy.
I then added back in alignment to test cases which needed it.
A similar commit will be made to clang which actually has many differences in alignment as now
IRBuilder can generate different source/dest alignments on calls.
In IRBuilder itself, a new argument was added. Instead of calling:
CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
you now call
CreateMemCpy(Dst, Src, getInt64(Size), DstAlign, SrcAlign, /* isVolatile */ false)
There is a temporary class (IntegerAlignment) which takes the source alignment and rejects
implicit conversion from bool. This is to prevent isVolatile here from passing its default
parameter to the source alignment.
Note, changes in future can now be made to codegen. I didn't change anything here, but this
change should enable better memcpy code sequences.
Reviewed by Hal Finkel.
llvm-svn: 253511
If a section is rw, it is irrelevant if the dynamic linker will write to
it or not.
It looks like llvm implemented this because gcc was doing it. It looks
like gcc implemented this in the hope that it would put all the
relocated items close together and speed up the dynamic linker.
There are two problem with this:
* It doesn't work. Both bfd and gold will map .data.rel to .data and
concatenate the input sections in the order they are seen.
* If we want a feature like that, it can be implemented directly in the
linker since it knowns where the dynamic relocations are.
llvm-svn: 253436
Currently, if the assembler encounters an error after parsing (such as an
out-of-range fixup), it reports this as a fatal error, and so stops after the
first error. However, for most of these there is an obvious way to recover
after emitting the error, such as emitting the fixup with a value of zero. This
means that we can report on all of the errors in a file, not just the first
one. MCContext::reportError records the fact that an error was encountered, so
we won't actually emit an object file with the incorrect contents.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14717
llvm-svn: 253328
Benjamin Kramer