Summary:
Languages can have different ways of formatting special characters.
E.g. when debugging C++ code a string might look like "\b", but when
debugging Swift code the same string would look like "\u{8}".
To make this work, plugins override GetStringPrinterEscapingHelper.
However, because there's a large amount of subtly divergent work done in
each override, we end up with large amounts of duplicated code. And all
the memory smashers fixed in one copy of the logic (see D73860) don't
get fixed in the others.
IMO the GetStringPrinterEscapingHelper is overly general and hard to
use. I propose deleting it and replacing it with an EscapeStyle enum,
which can be set as needed by each plugin.
A fix for some swift-lldb memory smashers falls out fairly naturally
from this deletion (https://github.com/apple/llvm-project/pull/1046). As
the swift logic becomes really tiny, I propose moving it upstream as
part of this change. I've added unit tests to cover it.
rdar://61419673
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide
Subscribers: mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77843
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
This is a half-implemented feature that as far as we can tell was
never used by anything since its original inclusion in 2014. This
patch removes it to make remaining the code easier to understand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71310
This patch is also motivated by the Swift branch and is effectively NFC for the single-TypeSystem llvm.org branch.
In multi-language projects it is extremely common to have, e.g., a
Clang type and a similarly-named rendition of that same type in
another language. When searching for a type It is much cheaper to pass
a set of supported languages to the SymbolFile than having it
materialize every result and then rejecting the materialized types
that have the wrong language.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66546
<rdar://problem/54471165>
This reapplies r369690 with a previously missing constructor for LanguageSet.
llvm-svn: 369710
This patch is also motivated by the Swift branch and is effectively NFC for the single-TypeSystem llvm.org branch.
In multi-language projects it is extremely common to have, e.g., a
Clang type and a similarly-named rendition of that same type in
another language. When searching for a type It is much cheaper to pass
a set of supported languages to the SymbolFile than having it
materialize every result and then rejecting the materialized types
that have the wrong language.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66546
<rdar://problem/54471165>
llvm-svn: 369690
Summary:
Currently there's not really a good way to iterate over the language runtimes a
process has. This is sometimes desirable (as seen in my change to Thread).
Additionally, there's not really a good reason to iterate over every available
language, but rather only over languages for which we have a plugin loaded.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62562
llvm-svn: 361999
A lot of comments in LLDB are surrounded by an ASCII line to delimit the
begging and end of the comment.
Its use is not really consistent across the code base, sometimes the
lines are longer, sometimes they are shorter and sometimes they are
omitted. Furthermore, it looks kind of weird with the 80 column limit,
where the comment actually extends past the line, but not by much.
Furthermore, when /// is used for Doxygen comments, it looks
particularly odd. And when // is used, it incorrectly gives the
impression that it's actually a Doxygen comment.
I assume these lines were added to improve distinguishing between
comments and code. However, given that todays editors and IDEs do a
great job at highlighting comments, I think it's worth to drop this for
the sake of consistency. The alternative is fixing all the
inconsistencies, which would create a lot more churn.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60508
llvm-svn: 358135
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
This parameter was only ever used with the Module set, and
since a SymbolFile is tied to a module, the parameter turns
out to be entirely unnecessary. Furthermore, it doesn't make
a lot of sense to ask a caller to ask SymbolFile which is tied
to Module X to find types for Module Y, but that possibility
was open with the previous interface. By removing this
parameter from the API, it makes it harder to use incorrectly
as well as easier for an implementor to understand what it
needs to do.
llvm-svn: 351133
Summary:
This patch adds syntax highlighting support to LLDB. When enabled (and lldb is allowed
to use colors), printed source code is annotated with the ANSI color escape sequences.
So far we have only one highlighter which is based on Clang and is responsible for all
languages that are supported by Clang. It essentially just runs the raw lexer over the input
and then surrounds the specific tokens with the configured escape sequences.
Reviewers: zturner, davide
Reviewed By: davide
Subscribers: labath, teemperor, llvm-commits, mgorny, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49334
llvm-svn: 338662
This renames the LLDB error class to Status, as discussed
on the lldb-dev mailing list.
A change of this magnitude cannot easily be done without
find and replace, but that has potential to catch unwanted
occurrences of common strings such as "Error". Every effort
was made to find all the obvious things such as the word "Error"
appearing in a string, etc, but it's possible there are still
some lingering occurences left around. Hopefully nothing too
serious.
llvm-svn: 302872
Summary:
The std::call_once implementation in libstdc++ has problems on few systems: NetBSD, OpenBSD and Linux PPC. LLVM ships with a homegrown implementation llvm::call_once to help on these platforms.
This change is required in the NetBSD LLDB port. std::call_once with libstdc++ results with crashing the debugger.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: labath, joerg, emaste, mehdi_amini, clayborg
Reviewed By: labath, clayborg
Subscribers: #lldb
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29288
llvm-svn: 294202
This moves the following classes from Core -> Utility.
ConstString
Error
RegularExpression
Stream
StreamString
The goal here is to get lldbUtility into a state where it has
no dependendencies except on itself and LLVM, so it can be the
starting point at which to start untangling LLDB's dependencies.
These are all low level and very widely used classes, and
previously lldbUtility had dependencies up to lldbCore in order
to use these classes. So moving then down to lldbUtility makes
sense from both the short term and long term perspective in
solving this problem.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29427
llvm-svn: 293941
Implement the C++ type lookup support in terms of this general scavenger
The idea is that we may want other languages to do debug info based search (exclusively, or as an add-on to runtime/module based searching) and it makes sense to avoid duplicating this functionality
llvm-svn: 285727
Where possible, remove the const char* version. To keep the
risk and impact here minimal, I've only done the simplest
functions.
In the process, I found a few opportunities for adding some
unit tests, so I added those as well.
Tested on Windows, Linux, and OSX.
llvm-svn: 281799
*** to conform to clang-format’s LLVM style. This kind of mass change has
*** two obvious implications:
Firstly, merging this particular commit into a downstream fork may be a huge
effort. Alternatively, it may be worth merging all changes up to this commit,
performing the same reformatting operation locally, and then discarding the
merge for this particular commit. The commands used to accomplish this
reformatting were as follows (with current working directory as the root of
the repository):
find . \( -iname "*.c" -or -iname "*.cpp" -or -iname "*.h" -or -iname "*.mm" \) -exec clang-format -i {} +
find . -iname "*.py" -exec autopep8 --in-place --aggressive --aggressive {} + ;
The version of clang-format used was 3.9.0, and autopep8 was 1.2.4.
Secondly, “blame” style tools will generally point to this commit instead of
a meaningful prior commit. There are alternatives available that will attempt
to look through this change and find the appropriate prior commit. YMMV.
llvm-svn: 280751
This is a pretty straightforward first pass over removing a number of uses of
Mutex in favor of std::mutex or std::recursive_mutex. The problem is that there
are interfaces which take Mutex::Locker & to lock internal locks. This patch
cleans up most of the easy cases. The only non-trivial change is in
CommandObjectTarget.cpp where a Mutex::Locker was split into two.
llvm-svn: 269877
This patch reworks the breakpoint filter-by-language patch to use the
symbol context instead of trying to guess the language solely from the
symbol's name. This has the advantage that symbols compiled with debug
info will have their actual language known. Symbols without debug info
will still do the same "guess"ing because Symbol::GetLanguage() is
implemented using Mangled::GuessLanguage(). The recognition of ObjC
names was merged into Mangled::GuessLanguage.
Reviewed by: jingham, clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15326
llvm-svn: 255808
This latter determination may or may not be possible on a per-language basis; and neither is mandatory to implement for any language
Use this knowledge in the ValueObjectPrinter to generalize the notion of IsObjCNil() and the respective printout
llvm-svn: 252663
Introduce the notion of Language-based formatter prefix/suffix
This is meant for languages that share certain data types but present them in syntatically different ways, such that LLDB can now have language-based awareness of which of the syntax variations it has to present to the user when formatting those values
This is goodness for new languages and interoperability, but is NFC for existing languages. As such, existing tests cover this
llvm-svn: 249587
Currently, it only supports Objective-C - C++ types can be looked up through debug info via 'image lookup -t', whereas ObjC types via this command are looked up by runtime introspection
This behavior is in line with type lookup's behavior in Xcode 7, but I am definitely open to feedback as to what makes the most sense here
llvm-svn: 249047
This is meant to support languages that have a scripting mode with top-level code that acts as global
For now, this flag only controls whether 'frame variable' will attempt to treat globals as locals when within such a function
llvm-svn: 248960
This used to be hardcoded in the FormatManager, but in a pluginized world that is not the right way to go
So, move this step to the Language plugin such that appropriate language plugins for a type get a say about adding candidates to the formatters lookup tables
llvm-svn: 247112
Historically, data formatters all exist in a global repository (the category map)
On top of that, some formatters can be "hardcoded" when the conditions under which they apply are not expressible as a typename (or typename regex)
This change paves the way to move formatters into per-language buckets such that the C++ plugin is responsible for ownership of the C++ formatters, and so on
The advantages of this are:
a) language formatters only get created when they might apply
b) formatters for a language are clearly owned by the matching language plugin
The current model is one of static instantiation, that is a language knows the full set of formatters it vends and that is only asked-for once, and then handed off to the FormatManager
In a future revision it might be interesting to add similar ability to the language runtimes, and monitor for certain shared library events to add even more library-specific formatters
No formatters are moved as part of this change, so practically speaking this is NFC
llvm-svn: 246568
Historically, data formatters all exist in a global repository (the category map)
On top of that, some formatters can be "hardcoded" when the conditions under which they apply are not expressible as a typename (or typename regex)
This change paves the way to move formatters into per-language buckets such that the C++ plugin is responsible for ownership of the C++ formatters, and so on
The advantages of this are:
a) language formatters only get created when they might apply
b) formatters for a language are clearly owned by the matching language plugin
The current model is one of static instantiation, that is a language knows the full set of formatters it vends and that is only asked-for once, and then handed off to the FormatManager
In a future revision it might be interesting to add similar ability to the language runtimes, and monitor for certain shared library events to add even more library-specific formatters
No formatters are moved as part of this change, so practically speaking this is NFC
llvm-svn: 246515
The Language plugin is menat to answer language-specific questions that are not bound to the existence of a process. Those are still the domain of the LanguageRuntime plugin
The Language plugin will, instead, answer questions such as providing language-specific data formatters or expression evaluation
At the moment, the interface is hollowed out, and empty do-nothing plugins have been setup for ObjC, C++ and ObjC++
llvm-svn: 246212
Vedant Kumar