There are many more expr types that can be a capability expr, like
CXXThisExpr, CallExpr, MemberExpr. Instead of enumerating all of them,
just check typeHasCapability for any type given.
Also add & and * operators to allowed unary operators.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41224
llvm-svn: 320753
and fold together into a single function.
In so doing, fix a handful of remaining bugs where we would report false
positives or false negatives if we promote a signed value to an unsigned type
for the comparison.
This re-commits r320122 and r320124, minus two changes:
* Comparisons between a constant and a non-constant expression of enumeration
type never warn, not even if the constant is out of range. We should be
warning about the creation of such a constant, not about its use.
* We do not use more precise bit-widths for comparisons against bit-fields.
The more precise diagnostics probably are the right thing, but we should
consider moving them under their own warning flag.
Other than the refactoring, this patch should only change the behavior for the
buggy cases (where the warnings didn't take into account that promotion from
signed to unsigned can leave a range of inaccessible values in the middle of
the promoted type).
llvm-svn: 320211
> Unify implementation of our two different flavours of -Wtautological-compare.
>
> In so doing, fix a handful of remaining bugs where we would report false
> positives or false negatives if we promote a signed value to an unsigned type
> for the comparison.
This caused a new warning in Chromium:
../../base/trace_event/trace_log.cc:1545:29: error: comparison of constant 64
with expression of type 'unsigned int' is always true
[-Werror,-Wtautological-constant-out-of-range-compare]
DCHECK(handle.event_index < TraceBufferChunk::kTraceBufferChunkSize);
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The 'unsigned int' is really a 6-bit bitfield, which is why it's always
less than 64.
I thought we didn't use to warn (with out-of-range-compare) when comparing
against the boundaries of a type?
llvm-svn: 320162
In so doing, fix a handful of remaining bugs where we would report false
positives or false negatives if we promote a signed value to an unsigned type
for the comparison.
llvm-svn: 320122
This is a follow up of r302131, in which we forgot to add SemaChecking
tests. Adding these tests revealed two problems which have been fixed:
- added missing intrinsic __qdbl,
- properly range checking ssat16 and usat16.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40888
llvm-svn: 320019
An enumeration with a fixed underlying type can have any value in its
underlying type, not just those spanned by the values of its enumerators.
llvm-svn: 319875
Fedora27 is using a new version of glibc that refers to the _Float128 type. This
patch adds that name as an alias to float128. I also added some predefined macro
values for the digits, mantissa, epilon, etc (FloatMacros). For the test case, I
copied an existing float128 test. This functionality needs work long term, but
it should be sufficient to tread water for a while. At Intel we have test
servers running our LLVM compiler with various open source workloads, the server
has been upgraded to Fedora27 so many workloads are failing due to _Float128.
Patch-By: mibintc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40673
llvm-svn: 319703
This also clarifies some terminology used by the diagnostic (methods -> Objective-C methods, fields -> non-static data members, etc).
Many of the tests needed to be updated in multiple places for the diagnostic wording tweaks. The first instance of the diagnostic for that attribute is fully specified and subsequent instances cut off the complete list (to make it easier if additional subjects are added in the future for the attribute).
llvm-svn: 319002
Basically a regression after r316268.
However the diagnostic is correct, but the test coverage is bad.
So just like rL316500, introduce yet more tests,
and adjust the release notes.
See https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35200
llvm-svn: 317421
rL316268 / D39122 has fixed PR35009, and now when in C,
these three(?) diagnostics properly use the enum's underlying
datatype.
While it was fixed, the test coverage was clearly insufficient,
because the -Wsign-compare change didn't show up in any of the
tests, until it was reported in the post-commit mail for rL316268.
So add the test for the -Wsign-compare diagnostic for enum
for C code, and while there, document this in the release notes.
The fix itself was obviously correct, so unless we want to silence
this new diagnosed case, i deem this commit to be NFC.
llvm-svn: 316500
Allow Obj-C ivars with incomplete array type but only as the last ivar.
Also add a requirement for ivars that contain a flexible array member to
be at the end of class too. It is possible to add in a subclass another
ivar at the end but we'll emit a warning in this case. Also we'll emit a
warning if a variable sized ivar is declared in class extension or in
implementation because subclasses won't know they should avoid adding
new ivars.
In ARC incomplete array objects are treated as __unsafe_unretained so
require them to be marked as such.
Prohibit synthesizing ivars with flexible array members because order of
synthesized ivars is not obvious and tricky to control. Spelling out
ivar explicitly gives control to developers and helps to avoid surprises
with unexpected ivar ordering.
For C and C++ changed diagnostic to tell explicitly a field is not the
last one and point to the next field. It is not as useful as in Obj-C
but it is an improvement and it is consistent with Obj-C. For C for
unions emit more specific err_flexible_array_union instead of generic
err_field_incomplete.
rdar://problem/21054495
Reviewers: rjmccall, theraven
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38773
llvm-svn: 316381
Summary:
As Mattias Eriksson has reported in PR35009, in C, for enums, the underlying type should
be used when checking for the tautological comparison, unlike C++, where the enumerator
values define the value range. So if not in CPlusPlus mode, use the enum underlying type.
Also, i have discovered a problem (a crash) when evaluating tautological-ness of the following comparison:
```
enum A { A_a = 0 };
if (a < 0) // expected-warning {{comparison of unsigned enum expression < 0 is always false}}
return 0;
```
This affects both the C and C++, but after the first fix, only C++ code was affected.
That was also fixed, while preserving (i think?) the proper diagnostic output.
And while there, attempt to enhance the test coverage.
Yes, some tests got moved around, sorry about that :)
Fixes PR35009
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rsmith, rjmccall
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: Rakete1111, efriedma, materi, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39122
llvm-svn: 316268
Changes behavior introduced in r298369 to only error out on
vector component invalid length access on OpenCL mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38868
rdar://problem/33568748
llvm-svn: 316016
The first attempt, rL315614 was reverted because one libcxx
test broke, and i did not know at the time how to deal with it.
Summary:
Currently, clang only diagnoses completely out-of-range comparisons (e.g. `char` and constant `300`),
and comparisons of unsigned and `0`. But gcc also does diagnose the comparisons with the
`std::numeric_limits<>::max()` / `std::numeric_limits<>::min()` so to speak
Finally Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34147
Continuation of https://reviews.llvm.org/D37565
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rtrieu, jroelofs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38101
llvm-svn: 315875
Summary:
Currently, clang only diagnoses completely out-of-range comparisons (e.g. `char` and constant `300`),
and comparisons of unsigned and `0`. But gcc also does diagnose the comparisons with the
`std::numeric_limits<>::max()` / `std::numeric_limits<>::min()` so to speak
Finally Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34147
Continuation of https://reviews.llvm.org/D37565
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: rtrieu, jroelofs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38101
llvm-svn: 315614
Move the logic for determining the `wchar_t` type information into the
driver. Rather than passing the single bit of information of
`-fshort-wchar` indicate to the frontend the desired type of `wchar_t`
through a new `-cc1` option of `-fwchar-type` and indicate the
signedness through `-f{,no-}signed-wchar`. This replicates the current
logic which was spread throughout Basic into the
`RenderCharacterOptions`.
Most of the changes to the tests are to ensure that the frontend uses
the correct type. Add a new test set under `test/Driver/wchar_t.c` to
ensure that we calculate the proper types for the various cases.
llvm-svn: 315126
As reported on cfe-commits, r314262 resulted in tentatively-defined
variables not being excluded for the warning.
Patch By: Elizabeth Andrews
llvm-svn: 314939
We were injecting the function into the wrong semantic context, resulting in it
failing to be registered as a global for redeclaration lookup. As a
consequence, we accepted invalid code since r310616.
Fixing that resulted in the "out-of-scope declaration" diagnostic firing a lot
more often. It turned out that warning codepath was non-conforming, because it
did not cause us to inject the implicitly-declared function into the enclosing
block scope. We now only warn if the type of the out-of-scope declaration
doesn't match the type of an implicitly-declared function; in all other cases,
we produce the normal warning for an implicitly-declared function.
llvm-svn: 314871
In C++, such initialization of std::array<T, N> types is guaranteed to work by
the standard, is completely idiomatic, and the "suggested" alternative from
Clang was technically invalid.
llvm-svn: 314838
C11 standard refers to the unsigned counterpart of the type ptrdiff_t
in the paragraph 7.21.6.1p7 where it defines the format specifier %tu.
In Clang (in PrintfFormatString.cpp, lines 508-510) there is a FIXME for this case,
in particular, Clang didn't diagnose %tu issues at all, i.e.
it didn't emit any warnings on the code printf("%tu", 3.14).
In this diff we add a method getUnsignedPointerDiffType for getting the corresponding type
similarly to how it's already done in the other analogous cases (size_t, ssize_t, ptrdiff_t etc)
and fix -Wformat diagnostics for %tu plus the emitted fix-it as well.
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38270
llvm-svn: 314470
Currently AMDGPU inline asm only allow v and s as register names in constraints.
This patch allows the following register names in constraints: (n, m is unsigned integer, n < m)
v
s
{vn} or {v[n]}
{sn} or {s[n]}
{S} , where S is a special register name
{v[n:m]}
{s[n:m]}
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37568
llvm-svn: 314452
Currently, if _attribute_((section())) is used for extern variables,
section information is not emitted in generated IR when the variables are used.
This is expected since sections are not generated for external linkage objects.
However NiosII requires this information as it uses special GP-relative accesses
for any objects that use attribute section (.sdata). GCC keeps this attribute in
middle-end.
This change emits the section information for all targets.
Patch By: Elizabeth Andrews
Differential Revision:https://reviews.llvm.org/D36487
llvm-svn: 314262
This commit fixes a bug in the handling of storage-only __fp16 vectors
where clang didn't promote __fp16 vector operands to float vectors.
Conceptually, it performs the following transformation on the AST in
CreateBuiltinBinOp and CreateBuiltinUnaryOp:
(Before)
typedef __fp16 half4 __attribute__ ((vector_size (8)));
typedef float float4 __attribute__ ((vector_size (16)));
half4 hv0, hv1, hv2, hv3;
hv0 = hv1 + hv2 + hv3;
(After)
float4 t0 = (float4)hv1 + (float4)hv2;
float4 t1 = t0 + (float4)hv3;
hv0 = (half4)t1;
Note that this commit fixes the bug for targets that set
HalfArgsAndReturns to true (ARM and ARM64). Targets using intrinsics
such as llvm.convert.to.fp16 to handle __fp16 are still broken.
rdar://problem/20625184
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32520
llvm-svn: 314056
Fix for too aggressive error err_type_defined_in_enum introduced in
r313386. Defining tags inside enumerations is prohibited in C++ but
allowed in C.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, rnk, doug.gregor
Reviewed By: rnk
Subscribers: alberto_magni, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38109
llvm-svn: 313894
As Aaron Ballman has pointed out, that is not really correct.
So the key problem there is the invalidity of the testcase.
Revert r313747, and rework testcase in such a way, so these
details (platform-specific default enum sigdness) are
accounted for.
Also, add a C++-specific testcase.
llvm-svn: 313756
Recommit. Original commit was reverted because buildbots broke.
The error was only reproducible in the build with assertions.
The problem was that the diagnostic expected true/false as
bool, while it was provided as string "true"/"false".
Summary:
As requested by Sam McCall:
> Enums (not new I guess). Typical case: if (enum < 0 || enum > MAX)
> The warning strongly suggests that the enum < 0 check has no effect
> (for enums with nonnegative ranges).
> Clang doesn't seem to optimize such checks out though, and they seem
> likely to catch bugs in some cases. Yes, only if there's UB elsewhere,
> but I assume not optimizing out these checks indicates a deliberate
> decision to stay somewhat compatible with a technically-incorrect
> mental model.
> If this is the case, should we move these to a
> -Wtautological-compare-enum subcategory?
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman, sammccall, bkramer, djasper
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jroelofs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37629
llvm-svn: 313745
This reverts commit r313722.
It looks like compiler-rt/lib/tsan/rtl/tsan_libdispatch_mac.cc cannot be
compiled because some of the functions declared in the file do not match
the ones in the SDK headers (which are annotated with 'noescape').
llvm-svn: 313725
The attribute informs the compiler that the annotated pointer parameter
of a function cannot escape and enables IRGen to attach attribute
'nocapture' to parameters that are annotated with the attribute. That is
the only optimization that currently takes advantage of 'noescape', but
there are other optimizations that will be added later that improves
IRGen for ObjC blocks.
rdar://problem/19886775
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32210
llvm-svn: 313722
The attribute informs the compiler that the annotated pointer parameter
of a function cannot escape and enables IRGen to attach attribute
'nocapture' to parameters that are annotated with the attribute. That is
the only optimization that currently takes advantage of 'noescape', but
there are other optimizations that will be added later that improves
IRGen for ObjC blocks.
rdar://problem/19886775
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32520
llvm-svn: 313720
The recently behavior in the code that these tests were meant to be checking will be ammended as soon as a suitable change can be properly reviewed.
llvm-svn: 313684
Summary:
As requested by Sam McCall:
> Enums (not new I guess). Typical case: if (enum < 0 || enum > MAX)
> The warning strongly suggests that the enum < 0 check has no effect
> (for enums with nonnegative ranges).
> Clang doesn't seem to optimize such checks out though, and they seem
> likely to catch bugs in some cases. Yes, only if there's UB elsewhere,
> but I assume not optimizing out these checks indicates a deliberate
> decision to stay somewhat compatible with a technically-incorrect
> mental model.
> If this is the case, should we move these to a
> -Wtautological-compare-enum subcategory?
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman, sammccall, bkramer, djasper
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jroelofs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37629
llvm-svn: 313677
Summary:
According to C99 6.3.2.1p1, structs and unions with nested
const-qualified fields (that is, const-qualified fields
declared at some recursive level of the aggregate) are not
modifiable lvalues. However, Clang permits assignments of
these lvalues.
With this patch, we both prohibit the assignment of records
with const-qualified fields and emit a best-effort diagnostic.
This fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=31796 .
Committing on behalf of bevinh (Bevin Hansson).
Reviewers: rtrieu, rsmith, bjope
Reviewed By: bjope
Subscribers: Ka-Ka, rogfer01, bjope, fhahn, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37254
llvm-svn: 313628
This fixes PR28903 by avoiding access check for inner enum constant. We
are performing access check because one enum constant references another
and because enum is defined in CXXRecordDecl. But access check doesn't
work because FindDeclaringClass doesn't expect more than one EnumDecl
and because inner enum has access AS_none due to not being an immediate
child of a record.
The change detects an enum is defined in wrong place and allows to skip
parsing its body. Access check is skipped together with body parsing.
There was no crash in C, added test case to cover the new error.
rdar://problem/28530809
Reviewers: rnk, doug.gregor, rsmith
Reviewed By: doug.gregor
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37089
llvm-svn: 313386
Summary:
This is a first half(?) of a fix for the following bug:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34147 (gcc -Wtype-limits)
GCC's -Wtype-limits does warn on comparison of unsigned value
with signed zero (as in, with 0), but clang only warns if the
zero is unsigned (i.e. 0U).
Also, be careful not to double-warn, or falsely warn on
comparison of signed/fp variable and signed 0.
Yes, all these testcases are needed.
Testing: $ ninja check-clang-sema check-clang-semacxx
Also, no new warnings for clang stage-2 build.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37565
llvm-svn: 312750
This makes -Wunreachable-code work for programs containing SEH (except for
__finally, which is still missing for now).
__try is modeled like try (but simpler since it can only have a single __except
or __finally), __except is fairly similar to catch (but simpler, since it can't
contain declarations). __leave is implemented similarly to break / continue.
Use the existing addTryDispatchBlock infrastructure (which
FindUnreachableCode() in ReachableCode.cpp uses via cfg->try_blocks_begin()) to
mark things in the __except blocks as reachable.
Re-use TryTerminatedBlock. This means we add EH edges from calls to the __try
block, but not from all other statements. While this is incomplete, it matches
LLVM's SEH codegen support. Also, in practice, BuildOpts.AddEHEdges is always
false in practice from what I can tell, so we never even insert the call EH
edges either.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D36914
llvm-svn: 311561
This reverts commit rL310403, which caused spurious warnings in libc++,
because it didn't properly handle templated scoped lockable types.
llvm-svn: 310698
This patch adds support for __builtin_cpu_is. I've tried to match the strings supported to the latest version of gcc.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35449
llvm-svn: 310657
Such implicitly declared functions behave as if the enclosing block
contained the declaration extern int name() (C90, 6.3.3.2 Function calls),
thus their names should have block scope (C90, 6.1.2.1 Scope of identifiers).
This patch fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33224
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33676
llvm-svn: 310616
Add warnings in cases where an implicit `this` argument is expected to
attributes because either `this` doesn't exist because the attribute is
on a free function, or because `this` is on a type that doesn't have a
corresponding capability/lockable/scoped_lockable attribute.
Reviewers: delesley, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36237
llvm-svn: 310403
Delete the test that was broken by rL309725, and add it back in a
follow up commit. Also, improve the tests a bit.
Reviewers: delesley, aaron.ballman
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36237
llvm-svn: 310402
An ABI change was introduced in r254596 that modified structure layouts when the 'packed' attribute was used on one-byte bitfields. Since the PS4 target needs to maintain backwards compatibility for all structure layouts, this change reintroduces the old behavior for PS4 targets only. It also introduces PS4 specific cases to the relevant test.
Patch by Matthew Voss.
llvm-svn: 310388
r282968 introduced a regression due to the lack of proper testing.
Re-add lax conversion support between non ext vectors for compound
assignments and add a test for that.
rdar://problem/28639467
llvm-svn: 309722
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The second recommit (r309106) was reverted because the "non-default #pragma
pack value chages the alignment of struct or union members in the included file"
warning proved to be too aggressive for external projects like Chromium
(https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=749197). This recommit
makes the problematic warning a non-default one, and gives it the
-Wpragma-pack-suspicious-include warning option.
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309386
The warning fires on non-suspicious code in Chromium. Reverting until a
solution is figured out.
> Recommit r308327 2nd time: Add a warning for missing
> '#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
>
> The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
> change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
> in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
> #includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
> alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
>
> Original message:
>
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309186
'#pragma pack (pop)' and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
The first recommit (r308441) caused a "non-default #pragma pack value might
change the alignment of struct or union members in the included file" warning
in LLVM itself. This recommit tweaks the added warning to avoid warnings for
#includes that don't have any records that are affected by the non-default
alignment. This tweak avoids the previously emitted warning in LLVM.
Original message:
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 309106
MIPS gcc supports `long_call/far/near` attributes only, but other
targets have the `short_call` attribut, so let's support it for MIPS
for consistency.
llvm-svn: 308719
This patch adds support for the `long_call`, `far`, and `near` attributes
for MIPS targets. The `long_call` and `far` attributes are synonyms. All
these attributes override `-mlong-calls` / `-mno-long-calls` command
line options for particular function.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35479
llvm-svn: 308667
This diff addresses FIXMEs in lib/Analysis/ScanfFormatString.cpp
for the case of ssize_t format specifier and adds tests.
In particular, this change enables Clang to emit a warning
on incorrect using of "%zd"/"%zn".
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35652
llvm-svn: 308662
This seems to have broken the sanitizer-x86_64-linux buildbot. Reverting until
it's fixed, especially since this landed just before the 5.0 branch.
> This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
>
> - When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
> - When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
> by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
> - When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
> value.
>
> rdar://10184173
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308455
and suspicious uses of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308441
of '#pragma pack' in included files
This commit adds a new -Wpragma-pack warning. It warns in the following cases:
- When a translation unit is missing terminating #pragma pack (pop) directives.
- When entering an included file if the current alignment value as determined
by '#pragma pack' directives is different from the default alignment value.
- When leaving an included file that changed the state of the current alignment
value.
rdar://10184173
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35484
llvm-svn: 308327
Move builtins from the x86 specific scope into the global
scope. Their use is still limited to x86_64 and aarch64 though.
This allows wine on aarch64 to properly handle variadic functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34475
llvm-svn: 308218
This patch extends the -fzvector language feature to enable the new
"vector float" data type when compiling at -march=z14. This matches
the updated extension definition implemented by other compilers for
the platform, which is indicated to applications by pre-defining
__VEC__ to 10302 (instead of 10301).
llvm-svn: 308198
Summary:
This way, the behavior of that warning flag
more closely resembles that of GCC.
Do note that there is at least one false-negative (see FIXME in tests).
Fixes PR4802.
Testing:
```
ninja check-clang-sema check-clang-semacxx
```
Reviewers: dblaikie, majnemer, rnk
Reviewed By: dblaikie, rnk
Subscribers: mclow.lists, cfe-commits, alexfh, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33102
llvm-svn: 307045
This patch extends the `overloadable` attribute to allow for one
function with a given name to not be marked with the `overloadable`
attribute. The overload without the `overloadable` attribute will not
have its name mangled.
So, the following code is now legal:
void foo(void) __attribute__((overloadable));
void foo(int);
void foo(float) __attribute__((overloadable));
In addition, this patch fixes a bug where we'd accept code with
`__attribute__((overloadable))` inconsistently applied. In other words,
we used to accept:
void foo(void);
void foo(void) __attribute__((overloadable));
But we will do this no longer, since it defeats the original purpose of
requiring `__attribute__((overloadable))` on all redeclarations of a
function.
This breakage seems to not be an issue in practice, since the only code
I could find that had this pattern often looked like:
void foo(void);
void foo(void) __attribute__((overloadable)) __asm__("foo");
void foo(int) __attribute__((overloadable));
...Which can now be simplified by simply removing the asm label and
overloadable attribute from the redeclaration of `void foo(void);`
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32332
llvm-svn: 306467
Also add testcases for a bunch of expression forms that cause our evaluator to
crash. See PR33140 and PR32864 for crashes that this was causing.
This reverts r305287, which reverted r305239, which reverted r301742. The
previous revert claimed that buildbots were broken, but did not add any
testcases and the buildbots have lost all memory of what was wrong here.
Changes to test/OpenMP are not reverted; another change has triggered those
tests to change their output in the same way that r301742 did.
llvm-svn: 306346
Summary:
Before this change, we couldn't capture the `this` pointer that's
implicitly the first argument of class member functions. There are some
interesting things we can do with capturing even just this single
argument for zero-argument member functions.
Reviewers: rnk, pelikan
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D34052
llvm-svn: 305544
Summary:
This way, the behavior of that warning flag
more closely resembles that of GCC.
Do note that there is at least one false-negative (see FIXME in tests).
Fixes PR4802.
Testing:
```
ninja check-clang-sema check-clang-semacxx
```
Reviewers: dblaikie, majnemer, rnk
Reviewed By: dblaikie, rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits, alexfh, rnk
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33102
llvm-svn: 305147
This test was silently failing since a long time because it failed to include
stdlib.h (as it's running in a freestanding environment). However, because we
used just not clang_cc1 instead of the verify mode, this regression was never
noticed and the test was just always passing.
This adds -ffreestanding to the invocation, so that tmmintrin.h doesn't
indirectly include mm_malloc.h, which in turns includes the unavailable stdlib.h.
We also run now in the -verify mode to prevent that we silently regress again.
I've also updated the test to no longer check the return value of _mm_alignr_epi8
as this is also causing it to fail (and it's not really the job of this test to
test this).
Patch by Raphael Isemann (D34022)
llvm-svn: 305089
Bitwise complement applied to vector of floats described with
attribute `ext_vector_type` is not diagnosed as error. Attempt to
compile such construct causes assertion violation in Instruction.cpp.
With this change the complement is treated similar to the case of
vector type described with attribute `vector_size`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33732
llvm-svn: 304963
This patch provides a means to specify section-names for global variables,
functions and static variables, using #pragma directives.
This feature is only defined to work sensibly for ELF targets.
One can specify section names as:
#pragma clang section bss="myBSS" data="myData" rodata="myRodata" text="myText"
One can "unspecify" a section name with empty string e.g.
#pragma clang section bss="" data="" text="" rodata=""
Reviewers: Roger Ferrer, Jonathan Roelofs, Reid Kleckner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33412
llvm-svn: 304705
Print "this block declaration is not a prototype" for non-prototype
declarations of blocks instead of "this function declaration ...".
rdar://problem/32461723
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33739
llvm-svn: 304507
A recent change requires opencl triple environment for compiling OpenCL
program, which causes regressions in libclc.
This patch fixes that. Instead of deducing language based on triple
environment, it checks LangOptions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33445
llvm-svn: 303644
This patch adds support for the `micromips` and `nomicromips` attributes
for MIPS targets.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33363
llvm-svn: 303546
Alloca always returns a pointer in alloca address space, which may
be different from the type defined by the language. For example,
in C++ the auto variables are in the default address space. Therefore
cast alloca to the expected address space when necessary.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32248
llvm-svn: 303370
This patch teaches clang to perform implicit scalar to vector conversions
when one of the operands of a binary vector expression is a scalar which
can be converted to the element type of the vector without truncation
following GCC's implementation.
If the (constant) scalar is can be casted safely, it is implicitly casted to the
vector elements type and splatted to produce a vector of the same type.
Contributions from: Petar Jovanovic
Reviewers: bruno, vkalintiris
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25866
llvm-svn: 302935
Diagnostics related to redefinition errors that point to the same header
file do not provide much information that helps users fixing the issue.
- In the modules context, it usually happens because of non modular
includes.
- When modules aren't involved it might happen because of the lack of
header guards.
Enhance diagnostics in these scenarios.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28832
rdar://problem/31669175
llvm-svn: 302765
We were sometimes doing a function->pointer conversion in
Sema::CheckPlaceholderExpr, which isn't the job of CheckPlaceholderExpr.
So, when we saw typeof(OverloadedFunctionName), where
OverloadedFunctionName referenced a name with only one function that
could have its address taken, we'd give back a function pointer type
instead of a function type. This is incorrect.
I kept the logic for doing the function pointer conversion in
resolveAndFixAddressOfOnlyViableOverloadCandidate because it was more
consistent with existing ResolveAndFix* methods.
llvm-svn: 302506
In C typos in arguments in a call of an overloadable function lead
to a failure of construction of CallExpr and following recovery does
not handle created delayed typos. This causes an assertion fail in
Sema::~Sema since Sema::DelayedTypos remains not empty.
The patch fixes that behavior by handling a call with arguments
having dependant types in the way that C++ does.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31764
Patch by Dmitry Borisenkov!
llvm-svn: 302435
Summary:
When the function is compiled with soft-float or on CPU with no FPU, we
don't need to diagnose for a call from an ISR to a regular function.
Reviewers: jroelofs, eli.friedman
Reviewed By: jroelofs
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, javed.absar, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32918
llvm-svn: 302274
This patch adds a fix-it for the -Wunguarded-availability warning. This fix-it
is similar to the Swift one: it suggests that you wrap the statement in an
`if (@available)` check. The produced fixits are indented (just like the Swift
ones) to make them look nice in Xcode's fix-it preview.
rdar://31680358
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32424
llvm-svn: 302253
Combine the logic doing the ms_abi/sysv_abi checks into one function so
that each check and its logical opposite are near each other. Now we
don't need two Sema entry points for MS va_start and regular va_start.
Refactor the code that checks if the va_start caller is a function,
block, or obj-c method. We do this in three places, and they are all
buggy for variadic lambdas (PR32737). After this change, I have one
place to apply the functional fix.
NFC
llvm-svn: 301968
The fix is that ExprEvaluatorBase::VisitInitListExpr should handle transparent exprs instead of exprs with one element. Fixing that uncovers one testcase failure because the AST for "constexpr _Complex float test2 = {1};" is wrong (the _Complex prvalue should not be const-qualified), and a number of test failures in test/OpenMP where the captured stmt contains an InitListExpr that is in syntactic form.
llvm-svn: 301891
CheckForIntOverflow used to implement a whitelist of top-level expressions to
send to the constant expression evaluator, which handled many more expressions
than the CheckForIntOverflow whitelist did.
llvm-svn: 301742
function/block pointer properties
The commit r300981 allowed @param/@return commands for function/block
pointer property declarations. This meant that -Wdocumentation started warning
about @return that was used to document properties whose function/block type
returned void. However, prior to that commit, we allowed @return for all
property declarations, because it can be used to document the value that's
returned by the property getter. This commit restores the previous behaviour:
now the @return command can be used to document all properties without warnings.
rdar://24978538
llvm-svn: 301402
loc
Prior to this commit -Wdocumentation crashed when checking the @returns command
for declarations whose function/block pointer type included an attribute like
_Nullable.
rdar://31818195
llvm-svn: 301400
that have a function/block pointer type
This commit improves the -Wdocumentation warning by making sure that @param and
@returns commands won't trigger warnings when used for fields, variables,
or properties whose type is a function/block pointer type. The
function/block pointer type must be specified directly with the declaration,
and when a typedef is used the warning is still emitted.
In the future we might also want to handle the std::function type as well.
rdar://24978538
llvm-svn: 300981
Summary:
Libc++ currently implements the `ATOMIC_<TYPE>_LOCK_FREE` macros using the `__GCC_ATOMIC_<TYPE>_LOCK_FREE` macros. However these are not available when MSVC compatibility is enabled even though C11 `_Atomic` is. This prevents libc++ from correctly implementing `ATOMIC_<TYPE>_LOCK_FREE`.
This patch adds an alternative spelling `__CLANG_ATOMIC_<TYPE>_LOCK_FREE` that is enabled with `-fms-compatibility`.
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman, majnemer, zturner, compnerd, jfb, rnk
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: BillyONeal, smeenai, jfb, cfe-commits, dschuff
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32265
llvm-svn: 300914
Prior to this commit the external_source_symbol attribute wasn't supported by
#pragma clang attribute for the following two reasons:
- The Named attribute subject hasn't been supported by TableGen.
- There was no way to specify a subject match rule for #pragma clang attribute
that could operate on a set of attribute subjects (e.g. the ones that derive
from NamedDecl).
This commit fixes the two issues and thus adds external_source_symbol support to
#pragma clang attribute.
rdar://31169028
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32176
llvm-svn: 300712
This is a recommit of r300539 that was reverted in r300543 due to test failures.
The original commit message is displayed below:
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
llvm-svn: 300556
The new '#pragma clang attribute' directive can be used to apply attributes to
multiple declarations. An attribute must satisfy the following conditions to
be supported by the pragma:
- It must have a subject list that's defined in the TableGen file.
- It must be documented.
- It must not be late parsed.
- It must have a GNU/C++11 spelling.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30009
llvm-svn: 300539
For OpenCL, the private address space qualifier is 0 in AST. Before this change, 0 address space qualifier
is always mapped to target address space 0. As now target private address space is specified by
alloca address space in data layout, address space qualifier 0 needs to be mapped to alloca addr space specified by the data layout.
This change has no impact on targets whose alloca addr space is 0.
With contributions from Matt Arsenault, Tony Tye and Wen-Heng (Jack) Chung
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31404
llvm-svn: 299965
MSDN (https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/h5w10wxs.aspx) indicates
that `__declspec(naked)` is only permitted on x86 and ARM targets.
Testing with cl does confirm this behaviour. Provide a warning for use
of `__declspec(naked)` on x64.
llvm-svn: 299774
Attempt to satisfy llvm-clang-x86_64-expensive-checks-win by targeting
x86_64-apple-darwin10 for Sema/vector-ops.c. The underlying failure is
due to datatype differences between platforms.
llvm-svn: 299643
This improves some error messages which would otherwise refer to
ext_vector_type types in contexts where there are no such types.
Factored out from D25866 at reviewer's request.
Reviewers: bruno
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31667
llvm-svn: 299641
Our _MM_HINT_T0/T1 constant values are 3/2 which matches gcc, but not icc or Intel documentation. Interestingly gcc had this same bug on their implementation of the gather/scatter builtins at one point too.
Fixes PR32411.
llvm-svn: 299233
GCC has the alloc_align attribute, which is similar to assume_aligned, except the attribute's parameter is the index of the integer parameter that needs aligning to.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29599
llvm-svn: 299117
Correct class-template deprecation behavior
Based on the comment in the test, and my reading of the standard, a deprecated warning should be issued in the following case:
template<typename T> [[deprecated]] class Foo{}; Foo<int> f;
This was not the case, because the ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl creation did not also copy the deprecated attribute.
Note: I did NOT audit the complete set of attributes to see WHICH ones should be copied, so instead I simply copy ONLY the deprecated attribute.
Previous DiffRev: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27486, was reverted.
This patch fixes the issues brought up here by the reverter: https://reviews.llvm.org/rL298410
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31245
llvm-svn: 298634
The alias was only ever used on darwin and had some issues there,
and isn't used in practice much. Also fixes a problem with -mno-altivec
not turning off -maltivec.
Also add a diagnostic for faltivec/fno-altivec that directs users to use
maltivec options and include the altivec.h file explicitly.
llvm-svn: 298449
Based on the comment in the test, and my reading of the standard, a deprecated warning should be issued in the following case:
template<typename T> [[deprecated]] class Foo{}; Foo<int> f;
This was not the case, because the ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl creation did not also copy the deprecated attribute.
Note: I did NOT audit the complete set of attributes to see WHICH ones should be copied, so instead I simply copy ONLY the deprecated attribute.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27486
llvm-svn: 298410
This commit adds support for a new attribute that will be used to
distinguish between extensible and inextensible enums. There are three
main purposes of this attribute:
1. Give better control over when enum-related warnings are issued.
For example, in the code below, clang will not issue a -Wassign-enum
warning if the enum is marked "open":
enum __attribute__((enum_extensibility(closed))) EnumClosed {
B0 = 1, B1 = 10
};
enum __attribute__((enum_extensibility(open))) EnumOpen {
C0 = 1, C1 = 10
};
enum EnumClosed ec = 100; // warning issued
enum EnumOpen eo = 100; // no warning
2. Enable code-completion and debugging tools to offer better
suggestions.
3. Make it easier for swift's clang importer to determine which swift
type an enum should be mapped to.
For more details, see the discussion I started on cfe-dev:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2017-February/052748.html
rdar://problem/12764379
rdar://problem/23145650
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30766
llvm-svn: 298332
The only valid values for scale immediate of scatter/gather builtins are 1, 2, 4, or 8. This patch enforces this in the frontend otherwise we generate invalid instruction encodings in the backend.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30875
llvm-svn: 297642
Given that we have already explicitly stated in the qualifier that the
expression is __unaligned, it makes little sense to diagnose that the address
of the packed member may not be aligned.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30884
llvm-svn: 297620
Summary:
Functions with the "xray_log_args" attribute will tell LLVM to emit a special
XRay sled for compiler-rt to copy any call arguments to your logging handler.
Reviewers: dberris
Reviewed By: dberris
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29704
llvm-svn: 296999
and the nature of a declaration
This commit adds an external_source_symbol attribute to Clang. This attribute
specifies that a declaration originates from an external source and describes
the nature of that source. This attribute will be used to improve IDE features
like 'jump-to-definition' for mixed-language projects or project that use
auto-generated code.
rdar://30423368
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29819
llvm-svn: 296649
Fix an assertion that is hit when a redeclaration with differing types only
differs in the unaligned type-qualifier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29986
llvm-svn: 296099
These attributes effectively turn a non-defining declaration into a
definition, so the case when the declaration already has a body must
be diagnosed properly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30032
llvm-svn: 295541
Summary: Previously the cleanups (e.g. dtor calls) are inserted into the
outer scope (e.g. function body scope), instead of it's own scope. After
the fix, the cleanups are inserted right after getting the size value.
This fixes pr30306.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24333
llvm-svn: 295123
...function type with a redeclaration having the same attribute. Fixing this
introduced a secondary problem where we were assuming that K&R functions
could not be attributed types when reporting old-style function definitions
that are not preceded by a prototype."
Also Revert "Hopefully fixes a compile error introduced by r294861."
This reverts commit r294862, r294861, as they bork the ARM builds and
haven't fix it back.
Also, please, short commit titles, long commit decsriptions...
llvm-svn: 294910
What we want to actually control this behavior is something more local
than an EvalutationMode. Please see the linked revision for more
discussion on why/etc.
This fixes PR31843.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29469
llvm-svn: 294800
Summary:
This teaches clang how to parse and lower the 'interrupt' and 'naked'
attributes.
This allows interrupt signal handlers to be written.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: malcolm.parsons, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28451
llvm-svn: 294402
My original warning was very conservative and I never revisited the
heuristics that were used.
This would have caught http://crbug.com/687251 at compile time.
llvm-svn: 293677
Don't try to map an APSInt addend to an int64_t in pointer arithmetic before
bounds-checking it. This gives more consistent behavior (outside C++11, we
consistently use 2s complement semantics for both pointer and integer overflow
in constant expressions) and fixes some cases where in C++11 we would fail to
properly check for out-of-bounds pointer arithmetic (if the 2s complement
64-bit overflow landed us back in-bounds).
In passing, also fix some cases where we'd perform possibly-overflowing
arithmetic on CharUnits (which have a signed underlying type) during constant
expression evaluation.
llvm-svn: 293595
This fixes various ways to tickle an assertion in constant expression
evaluation when using __int128. Longer term, we need to figure out what should
happen here: either any kind of overflow in offset calculation should result in
a non-constant value or we should truncate to 64 bits. In C++11 onwards, we're
effectively already checking for overflow because we strictly enforce array
bounds checks, but even there some forms of overflow can slip past undetected.
llvm-svn: 293568
This patch changes how we handle argument-dependent `diagnose_if`
attributes. In particular, we now check them in the same place that we
check for things like passing NULL to Nonnull args, etc. This is
basically better in every way than how we were handling them before. :)
This fixes PR31638, PR31639, and PR31640.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28889
llvm-svn: 293360
The idea for this originated from a really tricky bug: ISRs on ARM don't
automatically save off the VFP regs, so if say, memcpy gets interrupted and the
ISR itself calls memcpy, the regs are left clobbered when the ISR is done.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D28820
llvm-svn: 292375
Summary: In order for libc++ to meaningfully use `diagnose_if` warnings they need to be emitted from system headers by default. This patch changes the `diagnose_if` warning diagnostic to be shown in system headers.
Reviewers: george.burgess.iv, rsmith, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28703
llvm-svn: 291963
the same source range and use the unary operator fixit only when it
actually silences the warning.
rdar://24570531
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28231
llvm-svn: 291757
Correct the logic used to set ATOMIC_*_LOCK_FREE preprocessor macros not
to rely on the ABI alignment of types. Instead, just assume all those
types are aligned correctly by default since clang uses safe alignment
for _Atomic types even if the underlying types are aligned to a lower
boundary by default.
For example, the 'long long' and 'double' types on x86 are aligned to
32-bit boundary by default. However, '_Atomic long long' and '_Atomic
double' are aligned to 64-bit boundary, therefore satisfying
the requirements of lock-free atomic operations.
This fixes PR #19355 by correcting the value of
__GCC_ATOMIC_LLONG_LOCK_FREE on x86, and therefore also fixing
the assumption made in libc++ tests. This also fixes PR #30581 by
applying a consistent logic between the functions used to implement
both interfaces.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28213
llvm-svn: 291477
`diagnose_if` can be used to have clang emit either warnings or errors
for function calls that meet user-specified conditions. For example:
```
constexpr int foo(int a)
__attribute__((diagnose_if(a > 10, "configurations with a > 10 are "
"expensive.", "warning")));
int f1 = foo(9);
int f2 = foo(10); // warning: configuration with a > 10 are expensive.
int f3 = foo(f2);
```
It currently only emits diagnostics in cases where the condition is
guaranteed to always be true. So, the following code will emit no
warnings:
```
constexpr int bar(int a) {
foo(a);
return 0;
}
constexpr int i = bar(10);
```
We hope to support optionally emitting diagnostics for cases like that
(and emitting runtime checks) in the future.
Release notes will appear shortly. :)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27424
llvm-svn: 291418
FunctionDecls.
This commit silences an incorrect warning that is issued when a function
pointer is cast to another function pointer type. The warning gets
issued because alignments of the source and destination do not match in
Sema::CheckCastAlign, which happens because ASTContext::getTypeInfoImpl
and ASTContext::getDeclAlign return different values for functions (the
former returns 4 while the latter returns 1).
This should fix PR31558.
rdar://problem/29533528
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27478
llvm-svn: 291253
This change avoids the -Wstrict-prototypes warning for block literals with an
empty argument list or without argument lists.
rdar://15060615
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28296
llvm-svn: 291231
Without this, we drop everything after the first late-parsed attribute
in a single __attribute__. (Where "drop" means "stuff everything into
LA->Toks.")
llvm-svn: 291020
Previously, -Wtautological-overlap-compare did not warn on cases where the
boolean expression was in an assignment or return statement. This patch
should cause all boolean statements to be passed to the tautological compare
checks in the CFG analysis.
This is one of the issues from PR13101
llvm-svn: 290920
According to extended asm syntax, a case where the clobber list includes a variable from the inputs or outputs should be an error - conflict.
for example:
const long double a = 0.0;
int main()
{
char b;
double t1 = a;
__asm__ ("fucompp": "=a" (b) : "u" (t1), "t" (t1) : "cc", "st", "st(1)");
return 0;
}
This should conflict with the output - t1 which is st, and st which is st aswell.
The patch fixes it.
Commit on behald of Ziv Izhar.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D15075
llvm-svn: 290539
I don't remember why I didn't make alloc_size only applicable to
Functions a year ago, but I can't see any compelling reason not to do
so now.
Fixes PR31453.
llvm-svn: 290353
This is a recommit of r290149, which was reverted in r290169 due to msan
failures. msan was failing because we were calling
`isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray` on an invalid designator, which caused us
to read uninitialized memory. To fix this, the logic of the caller of
said function was simplified, and we now have a `!Invalid` assert in
`isMostDerivedAnUnsizedArray`, so we can catch this particular bug more
easily in the future.
Fingers crossed that this patch sticks this time. :)
Original commit message:
This patch does three things:
- Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the
number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user
functions that act in a similar manner.
- Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables
is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in
test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly
unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in
person.
- Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at
D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when
combined with our new eagerness in the face of const.
llvm-svn: 290297
This commit fails MSan when running test/CodeGen/object-size.c in
a confusing way. After some discussion with George, it isn't really
clear what is going on here. We can make the MSan failure go away by
testing for the invalid bit, but *why* things are invalid isn't clear.
And yet, other code in the surrounding area is doing precisely this and
testing for invalid.
George is going to take a closer look at this to better understand the
nature of the failure and recommit it, for now backing it out to clean
up MSan builds.
llvm-svn: 290169
This patch does three things:
- Gives us the alloc_size attribute in clang, which lets us infer the
number of bytes handed back to us by malloc/realloc/calloc/any user
functions that act in a similar manner.
- Teaches our constexpr evaluator that evaluating some `const` variables
is OK sometimes. This is why we have a change in
test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx11.cpp and other seemingly
unrelated tests. Richard Smith okay'ed this idea some time ago in
person.
- Uniques some Blocks in CodeGen, which was reviewed separately at
D26410. Lack of uniquing only really shows up as a problem when
combined with our new eagerness in the face of const.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D14274
llvm-svn: 290149
* In C++, never create a FunctionNoProtoType for a builtin (fixes C++1z
crasher from r289754).
* Fix type of __sync_synchronize to be a no-parameter function rather than a
varargs function. This matches GCC.
* Fix type of vfprintf to match its actual type. We gave it a wrong type due
to PR4290 (apparently autoconf generates invalid code and expects compilers
to choke it down or it miscompiles the program; the relevant error in clang
was downgraded to a warning in r122744 to fix other occurrences of this
autoconf brokenness, so we don't need this workaround any more).
* Turn off vararg argument checking for __noop, since it's not *really* a
varargs function. Alternatively we could add custom type checking for it
and synthesize parameter types matching the actual arguments in each call,
but that seemed like overkill.
llvm-svn: 290146
r289225 broke AST invariants by reparenting enumerators into function
decl contexts. This improves things by only reparenting TagDecls while
also attempting to preserve the lexical declcontext chain. The
interesting example here is:
int f(struct S { enum E { a = 1 } b; } c);
The semantic contexts of E and S should be f, and the lexical context of
S should be f and the lexical context of E should be S. We didn't do
that with r289225, but now we should.
This change should also improve our behavior on this example:
void f() {
extern void ext(struct S { } o);
// S injected here
}
Before r289225 we would only remove 'S' from the surrounding tag
injection context if it was the TU, but now we properly reparent S from
f to ext.
Fixes PR31366
llvm-svn: 289678
This saves two pointers from FunctionDecl that were being used for some
rare and questionable C-only functionality. The DeclsInPrototypeScope
ArrayRef was added in r151712 in order to parse this kind of C code:
enum e {x, y};
int f(enum {y, x} n) {
return x; // should return 1, not 0
}
The challenge is that we parse 'int f(enum {y, x} n)' it its own
function prototype scope that gets popped before we build the
FunctionDecl for 'f'. The original change was doing two questionable
things:
1. Saving all tag decls introduced in prototype scope on a TU-global
Sema variable. This is problematic when you have cases like this, where
'x' and 'y' shouldn't be visible in 'f':
void f(void (*fp)(enum { x, y } e)) { /* no x */ }
This patch fixes that, so now 'f' can't see 'x', which is consistent
with GCC.
2. Storing the decls in FunctionDecl in ActOnFunctionDeclarator so that
they could be used in ActOnStartOfFunctionDef. This is just an
inefficient way to move information around. The AST lives forever, but
the list of non-parameter decls in prototype scope is short lived.
Moving these things to the Declarator solves both of these issues.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: jmolloy, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27279
llvm-svn: 289225
This commit fixes PR20796. It implements the C only -Wstrict-prototypes warning.
Clang now emits a warning for function declarations which have no parameters
specified and for K&R function definitions with more than 0 parameters that are
not preceded by a previous prototype declaration.
The patch was originally submitted by Paul Titei!
rdar://15060615
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D16533
llvm-svn: 288896
We should complain about the following:
```
void foo() __attribute__((unavailable("a", "b")));
```
Instead, we currently just ignore "b". (...We also end up ignoring "a",
because we assume elsewhere that this attribute can only have 1 or 0
args.)
This happens because `unavailable` has a fake enum arg, and
`AttributeList::{getMinArgs,getMaxArgs}` include fake args in their
counts.
llvm-svn: 288388
declared variables.
Teach Sema to check the aligned attribute attached to variable
declarations so that it doesn't issue spurious warnings.
rdar://problem/26517471
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D21099
llvm-svn: 288267
This commit teaches clang that is has to emit a warning when NULL is passed
as the 'expected' pointer parameter into an atomic compare exchange call.
rdar://18926650
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26978
llvm-svn: 287776
Summary:
This is a simple sema check patch for arguments of `__builtin_arm_rsr` and the related builtins, which currently do not allow special registers with indexes >7.
Some of the possible register name formats these builtins accept are:
```
{c}p<coprocessor>:<op1>:c<CRn>:c<CRm>:<op2>
```
```
o0:op1:CRn:CRm:op2
```
where `op1` / `op2` are integers in the range [0, 7] and `CRn` / `CRm` are integers in the range [0, 15].
The current sema check does not allow `CRn` > 7 and accepts `op2` up to 15.
Reviewers: LukeCheeseman, rengolin
Subscribers: asl, aemerson, rengolin, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26464
llvm-svn: 287378
ExpectedFunctionGlobalVarMethodOrProperty
would previously say "functions and global variables"
instead of "functions, methods, properties, and global variables"
The newly added ExpectedFunctionOrGlobalVariable
says "functions and global variables"
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26459
llvm-svn: 286599
Since array parameters decay to pointers, '_Nullable' and friends
should be available for use there as well. This is especially
important for parameters that are typedefs of arrays. The unsugared
syntax for this follows the syntax for 'static'-sized arrays in C:
void test(int values[_Nullable]);
This syntax was previously accepted but the '_Nullable' (and any other
attributes) were silently discarded. However, applying '_Nullable' to
a typedef was previously rejected and is now accepted; therefore, it
may be necessary to test for the presence of this feature:
#if __has_feature(nullability_on_arrays)
One important change here is that DecayedTypes don't always
immediately contain PointerTypes anymore; they may contain an
AttributedType instead. This only affected one place in-tree, so I
would guess it's not likely to cause problems elsewhere.
This commit does not change -Wnullability-completeness just yet. I
want to think about whether it's worth doing something special to
avoid breaking existing clients that compile with -Werror. It also
doesn't change '#pragma clang assume_nonnull' behavior, which
currently treats the following two declarations as equivalent:
#pragma clang assume_nonnull begin
void test(void *pointers[]);
#pragma clang assume_nonnull end
void test(void * _Nonnull pointers[]);
This is not the desired behavior, but changing it would break
backwards-compatibility. Most likely the best answer is going to be
adding a new warning.
Part of rdar://problem/25846421
llvm-svn: 286519
the body of a function for the purposes of computing its storage
duration and deciding whether its initializer must be constant.
There are a number of problems in our current treatment of compound
literals. C specifies that a compound literal yields an l-value
referring to an object with either static or automatic storage
duration, depending on where it was written; in the latter case,
the literal object has a lifetime tied to the enclosing scope (much
like an ObjC block), not the enclosing full-expression. To get these
semantics fully correct in our current design, we would need to
collect compound literals on the ExprWithCleanups, just like we do
with ObjC blocks; we would probably also want to identify literals
like we do with materialized temporaries. But it gets stranger;
GCC adds compound literals to C++ as an extension, but makes them
r-values, which are generally assumed to have temporary storage
duration. Ignoring destructor ordering, the difference only matters
if the object's address escapes the full-expression, which for an
r-value can only happen with reference binding (which extends
temporaries) or array-to-pointer decay (which does not). GCC then
attempts to lock down on array-to-pointer decay in ad hoc ways.
Arguably a far superior language solution for C++ (and perhaps even
array r-values in C, which can occur in other ways) would be to
propagate lifetime extension through array-to-pointer decay, so
that initializing a pointer object to a decayed r-value array
extends the lifetime of the complete object containing the array.
But this would be a major change in semantics which arguably ought
to be blessed by the committee(s).
Anyway, I'm not fixing any of that in this patch; I did try, but
it got out of hand.
Fixes rdar://28949016.
llvm-svn: 285643
The second argument to __builtin_alloca_with_align is supposed to be in
bits, not bytes. Using alignof there would be indicative of a bug.
llvm-svn: 285609
__builtin_alloca always uses __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__ for the alignment of
the allocation. __builtin_alloca_with_align allows the programmer to
specify the alignment of the allocation.
This fixes PR30658.
llvm-svn: 285544
If we pass a header to libclang, e.g. because it's open in an editor in
an IDE, warnings about unused const vars are not useful: other files
that include the header might use those constants. So when -x *-header
is passed as command-line option, suppress this warning.
llvm-svn: 285386
Warnings generated by -Wdocumentation-unknown-command did only have a
start location, not a full source range. This resulted in only the
"carret" being show in messages, and IDEs highlighting only the single
initial character.
llvm-svn: 285056
Gcc prints error if elements of left and right parts of a shift have different
sizes. This patch is provided the GCC compatibility.
Patch by Vladimir Yakovlev.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24669
llvm-svn: 284579
swift_error/swift_context parameter
We need to be able to decelare witness functions which append the self type and
the self witness tables at the end of the parameter list.
rdar://28720996
llvm-svn: 283933
This commit fixes a crash that happens when clang is analyzing a
transparent_union attribute on a union which has a field with incomplete type.
rdar://28630028
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25273
llvm-svn: 283432
This commit improves the packed member warning by showing the name of the
anonymous structure/union when it was defined within a typedef declaration.
rdar://28498901
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25106
llvm-svn: 283304
Summary: We need x86-64-specific builtins if we want to implement some of the MS intrinsics - winnt.h contains definitions of some functions for i386, but not for x86-64 (for example _InterlockedOr64), which means that we cannot treat them as builtins for both i386 and x86-64, because then we have definitions of builtin functions in winnt.h on i386.
Reviewers: thakis, majnemer, hans, rnk
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24598
llvm-svn: 283264
Support lax convertions on compound assignment expressions like:
typedef __attribute__((vector_size(8))) double float64x1_t;
typedef __attribute__((vector_size(16))) double float64x2_t;
float64x1_t vget_low_f64(float64x2_t __p0);
double c = 3.0;
float64x2_t v = {0.0, 1.0};
c += vget_low_f64(v);
This restores one more valid behavior pre r266366, and is a incremental
follow up from work committed in r274646.
While here, make the check more strict, add FIXMEs, clean up variable
names to match what they can actually be and update testcases to reflect
that. We now reject:
typedef float float2 __attribute__ ((vector_size (8)));
double d;
f2 += d;
which doesn't fit as a direct bitcast anyway.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24472
rdar://problem/28033929
llvm-svn: 282968
The backend can't encode all possible values of the argument and will fail isel. Checking in the frontend presents a friendlier experience to the user.
I started with builtins that can only take _MM_CUR_DIRECTION or _MM_NO_EXC. More builtins coming in the future.
llvm-svn: 282228
Summary:
The diagnostic did not handle ~ well. An expression such as ~0 is often used when 'all ones' is needed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24232
llvm-svn: 282156
Summary:
The warning for a format string not being a string literal and therefore
being potentially insecure is overly strict for indices into string
literals. This fix checks if the index into the string literal is
precomputable. If that's the case it will check if the suffix of that
string literal is a valid format string string literal. It will still
issue the aforementioned warning for out of range indices into the
string literal.
Patch by Meike Baumgärtner (meikeb)
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: srhines, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24584
llvm-svn: 281686
r278501 inadvertently introduced a bug in which it disallowed shifting
scalar operands by vector operands when not compiling for OpenCL. This
commit fixes it.
Patch by Vladimir Yakovlev.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24467
llvm-svn: 281669
The underlying type for an enumeration in C is either char, signed int, or unsigned int. In the case the underlying type is chosen to be char (such as when passing -fshort-enums or using __attribute__((packed)) on the enum declaration), the enumeration can result in undefined behavior. However, when the underlying type is signed int or unsigned int (or long long as an extension), there is no undefined behavior because the types are compatible. This patch silences diagnostics for the latter while retaining the diagnostics for the former.
This patch addresses PR29140.
llvm-svn: 281632
The ARM-specific C attributes (currently just interrupt) need to check
for both the big- and little-endian versions of the triples, so that
they are accepted for both big and little endian targets.
TargetWindows and TargetMicrosoftCXXABI also only use the little-endian
triples, but this is correct as windows is not supported on big-endian
ARM targets (and this is asserted in lib/Basic/Targets.cpp).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24245
llvm-svn: 281596
Summary: This reverts r281527 because I messed up the attribution.
Reviewers: srhines
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24579
llvm-svn: 281530
Summary:
The warning for a format string not being a sting literal and therefore
being potentially insecure is overly strict for indecies into sting
literals. This fix checks if the index into the string literal is
precomputable. If thats the case it will check if the suffix of that
sting literal is a valid format string string literal. It will still
issue the aforementioned warning for out of range indecies into the
string literal.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: srhines, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23820
llvm-svn: 281527
Some Windows SDK classes, for example
Windows::Storage::Streams::IBufferByteAccess, use the ATL way of spelling
attributes:
[uuid("....")] class IBufferByteAccess {};
To be able to use __uuidof() to grab the uuid off these types, clang needs to
support uuid as a Microsoft attribute. There was already code to skip Microsoft
attributes, extend that to look for uuid and parse it. Use the new "Microsoft"
attribute type added in r280575 (and r280574, r280576) for this.
Final part of https://reviews.llvm.org/D23895
llvm-svn: 280578
This patch allows us to perform incompatible pointer conversions when
resolving overloads in C. So, the following code will no longer fail to
compile (though it will still emit warnings, assuming the user hasn't
opted out of them):
```
void foo(char *) __attribute__((overloadable));
void foo(int) __attribute__((overloadable));
void callFoo() {
unsigned char bar[128];
foo(bar); // selects the char* overload.
}
```
These conversions are ranked below all others, so:
A. Any other viable conversion will win out
B. If we had another incompatible pointer conversion in the example
above (e.g. `void foo(int *)`), we would complain about
an ambiguity.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24113
llvm-svn: 280553
Emit proper diagnostics when -Wdocumentation is used with constructs such as:
template<typename T>
using fn = int(T aaa, int ccc);
Previously clang wouldn't recognize the function and complain with
'comment that is not attached to a function declaration'.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23860
rdar://problem/27300695
llvm-svn: 279754
Give appropriate warnings with -Wdocumentation for @param comments
that refer to function aliases defined with 'using'. Very similar
to typedef's behavior. This does not add support for
TypeAliasTemplateDecl yet.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23783
rdar://problem/27300695
llvm-svn: 279662
Yi Kong