Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO)
function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. This will force every
checker to implement this function, but maybe it isn't that bad: I saw a lot of
ObjC or C++ specific checkers that should probably not register themselves based
on some LangOptions (mine too), but they do anyways.
A big benefit of this is that all registry functions now register their checker,
once it is called, registration is guaranteed.
This patch is a part of a greater effort to reinvent checker registration, more
info here: D54438#1315953
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55424
llvm-svn: 352277
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept.
It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend,
whereas it's base is located in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core. It was, from what I can
imagine, used to circumvent the problem that the registry functions of the
checkers are located in the clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers library, but that
library depends on clangStaticAnalyzerCore. However, clangStaticAnalyzerFrontend
depends on both of those libraries.
One can make the observation however, that CheckerRegistry has no place in Core,
it isn't used there at all! The only place where it is used is Frontend, which
is where it ultimately belongs.
This move implies that since
include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ClangCheckers.h only contained a single function:
class CheckerRegistry;
void registerBuiltinCheckers(CheckerRegistry ®istry);
it had to re purposed, as CheckerRegistry is no longer available to
clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers. It was renamed to BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h,
which actually describes it a lot better -- it does not contain the registration
functions for checkers, but only those generated by the tblgen files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54436
llvm-svn: 349275
One of the reasons why AnalyzerOptions is so chaotic is that options can be
retrieved from the command line whenever and wherever. This allowed for some
options to be forgotten for a looooooong time. Have you ever heard of
"region-store-small-struct-limit"? In order to prevent this in the future, I'm
proposing to restrict AnalyzerOptions' interface so that only checker options
can be retrieved without special getters. I would like to make every option be
accessible only through a getter, but checkers from plugins are a thing, so I'll
have to figure something out for that.
This also forces developers who'd like to add a new option to register it
properly in the .def file.
This is done by
* making the third checker pointer parameter non-optional, and checked by an
assert to be non-null.
* I added new, but private non-checkers option initializers, meant only for
internal use,
* Renamed these methods accordingly (mind the consistent name for once with
getBooleanOption!):
- getOptionAsString -> getCheckerStringOption,
- getOptionAsInteger -> getCheckerIntegerOption
* The 3 functions meant for initializing data members (with the not very
descriptive getBooleanOption, getOptionAsString and getOptionAsUInt names)
were renamed to be overloads of the getAndInitOption function name.
* All options were in some way retrieved via getCheckerOption. I removed it, and
moved the logic to getStringOption and getCheckerStringOption. This did cause
some code duplication, but that's the only way I could do it, now that checker
and non-checker options are separated. Note that the non-checker version
inserts the new option to the ConfigTable with the default value, but the
checker version only attempts to find already existing entries. This is how
it always worked, but this is clunky and I might end reworking that too, so we
can eventually get a ConfigTable that contains the entire configuration of the
analyzer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53483
llvm-svn: 346113
The existing padding checker skips classes that have any base classes.
This patch allows the checker to traverse very simple cases:
classes that have no fields and have exactly one base class.
This is important mostly in the case of array declarations.
Patch by Max Bernstein!
Test plan: make check-all
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53206
llvm-svn: 345558
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
Summary:
Clean carriage returns from lib/ and include/. NFC.
(I have to make this change locally in order for `git diff` to show sane output after I edit a file, so I might as well ask for it to be committed. I don't have commit privs myself.)
(Without this patch, `git rebase`ing any change involving SemaDeclCXX.cpp is a real nightmare. :( So while I have no right to ask for this to be committed, geez would it make my workflow easier if it were.)
Here's the command I used to reformat things. (Requires bash and OSX/FreeBSD sed.)
git grep -l $'\r' lib include | xargs sed -i -e $'s/\r//'
find lib include -name '*-e' -delete
Reviewers: malcolm.parsons
Reviewed By: malcolm.parsons
Subscribers: emaste, krytarowski, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45591
Patch by Arthur O'Dwyer.
llvm-svn: 330112
r327219 added wrappers to std::sort which randomly shuffle the container before
sorting. This will help in uncovering non-determinism caused due to undefined
sorting order of objects having the same key.
To make use of that infrastructure we need to invoke llvm::sort instead of
std::sort.
llvm-svn: 328636
This allows you to dump C++ code that spells bool instead of _Bool, leaves off the elaborated type specifiers when printing struct or class names, and other C-isms.
Fixes the -Wreorder issue and fixes the ast-dump-color.cpp test.
llvm-svn: 321310
This allows you to dump C++ code that spells bool instead of _Bool, leaves off the elaborated type specifiers when printing struct or class names, and other C-isms.
llvm-svn: 321223
The range here isn't over references, so using `auto &` here incites a
copy. Switching to `auto *` would do, but we might as well list an
explicit type for clarity.
Found by -Wrange-loop-analysis.
llvm-svn: 264071
The intent of this checker is to generate a report for any class / structure
that could reduce its padding by reordering the fields. This results in a very
noisy checker. To reduce the noise, this checker will currently only warn when
the number of bytes over "optimal" is more than 24. This value is configurable
with -analyzer-config performance.Padding:AllowedPad=N. Small values of
AllowedPad have the potential to generate hundreds of reports, and gigabytes
of HTML reports.
The checker searches for padding violations in two main ways. First, it goes
record by record. A report is generated if the fields could be reordered in a
way that reduces the padding by more than AllowedPad bytes. Second, the
checker will generate a report if an array will cause more than AllowedPad
padding bytes to be generated.
The record checker currently skips many ABI specific cases. Classes with base
classes are skipped because base class tail padding is ABI specific. Bitfields
are just plain hard, and duplicating that code seems like a bad idea. VLAs are
both uncommon and non-trivial to fix.
The array checker isn't very thorough right now. It only checks to see if the
element type's fields could be reordered, and it doesn't recursively check to
see if any of the fields' fields could be reordered. At some point in the
future, it would be nice if "arrays" could also look at array new usages and
malloc patterns that appear to be creating arrays.
llvm-svn: 255545
Kristof Umann