Introduce the boolean ento::shouldRegister##CHECKERNAME(const LangOptions &LO)
function very similarly to ento::register##CHECKERNAME. This will force every
checker to implement this function, but maybe it isn't that bad: I saw a lot of
ObjC or C++ specific checkers that should probably not register themselves based
on some LangOptions (mine too), but they do anyways.
A big benefit of this is that all registry functions now register their checker,
once it is called, registration is guaranteed.
This patch is a part of a greater effort to reinvent checker registration, more
info here: D54438#1315953
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55424
llvm-svn: 352277
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
ClangCheckerRegistry is a very non-obvious, poorly documented, weird concept.
It derives from CheckerRegistry, and is placed in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Frontend,
whereas it's base is located in lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core. It was, from what I can
imagine, used to circumvent the problem that the registry functions of the
checkers are located in the clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers library, but that
library depends on clangStaticAnalyzerCore. However, clangStaticAnalyzerFrontend
depends on both of those libraries.
One can make the observation however, that CheckerRegistry has no place in Core,
it isn't used there at all! The only place where it is used is Frontend, which
is where it ultimately belongs.
This move implies that since
include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/ClangCheckers.h only contained a single function:
class CheckerRegistry;
void registerBuiltinCheckers(CheckerRegistry ®istry);
it had to re purposed, as CheckerRegistry is no longer available to
clangStaticAnalyzerCheckers. It was renamed to BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h,
which actually describes it a lot better -- it does not contain the registration
functions for checkers, but only those generated by the tblgen files.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54436
llvm-svn: 349275
It seems the two failing tests can be simply fixed after r348037
Fix 3 cases in Analysis/builtin-functions.cpp
Delete the bad CodeGen/builtin-constant-p.c for now
llvm-svn: 348053
Kept the "indirect_builtin_constant_p" test case in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx1y.cpp
while we are investigating why the following snippet fails:
extern char extern_var;
struct { int a; } a = {__builtin_constant_p(extern_var)};
llvm-svn: 348039
This was reverted in r347656 due to me thinking it caused a miscompile of
Chromium. Turns out it was the Chromium code that was broken.
llvm-svn: 347756
This caused a miscompile in Chrome (see crbug.com/908372) that's
illustrated by this small reduction:
static bool f(int *a, int *b) {
return !__builtin_constant_p(b - a) || (!(b - a));
}
int arr[] = {1,2,3};
bool g() {
return f(arr, arr + 3);
}
$ clang -O2 -S -emit-llvm a.cc -o -
g() should return true, but after r347417 it became false for some reason.
This also reverts the follow-up commits.
r347417:
> Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.
>
> Don't try to emit a scalar expression for a non-scalar argument to
> __builtin_constant_p().
>
> Third time's a charm!
r347446:
> The result of is.constant() is unsigned.
r347480:
> A __builtin_constant_p() returns 0 with a function type.
r347512:
> isEvaluatable() implies a constant context.
>
> Assume that we're in a constant context if we're asking if the expression can
> be compiled into a constant initializer. This fixes the issue where a
> __builtin_constant_p() in a compound literal was diagnosed as not being
> constant, even though it's always possible to convert the builtin into a
> constant.
r347531:
> A "constexpr" is evaluated in a constant context. Make sure this is reflected
> if a __builtin_constant_p() is a part of a constexpr.
llvm-svn: 347656
One of the reasons why AnalyzerOptions is so chaotic is that options can be
retrieved from the command line whenever and wherever. This allowed for some
options to be forgotten for a looooooong time. Have you ever heard of
"region-store-small-struct-limit"? In order to prevent this in the future, I'm
proposing to restrict AnalyzerOptions' interface so that only checker options
can be retrieved without special getters. I would like to make every option be
accessible only through a getter, but checkers from plugins are a thing, so I'll
have to figure something out for that.
This also forces developers who'd like to add a new option to register it
properly in the .def file.
This is done by
* making the third checker pointer parameter non-optional, and checked by an
assert to be non-null.
* I added new, but private non-checkers option initializers, meant only for
internal use,
* Renamed these methods accordingly (mind the consistent name for once with
getBooleanOption!):
- getOptionAsString -> getCheckerStringOption,
- getOptionAsInteger -> getCheckerIntegerOption
* The 3 functions meant for initializing data members (with the not very
descriptive getBooleanOption, getOptionAsString and getOptionAsUInt names)
were renamed to be overloads of the getAndInitOption function name.
* All options were in some way retrieved via getCheckerOption. I removed it, and
moved the logic to getStringOption and getCheckerStringOption. This did cause
some code duplication, but that's the only way I could do it, now that checker
and non-checker options are separated. Note that the non-checker version
inserts the new option to the ConfigTable with the default value, but the
checker version only attempts to find already existing entries. This is how
it always worked, but this is clunky and I might end reworking that too, so we
can eventually get a ConfigTable that contains the entire configuration of the
analyzer.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53483
llvm-svn: 346113
```
if (NSNumber* x = ...)
```
is a reasonable pattern in objc++, we should not warn on it.
rdar://35152234
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44044
llvm-svn: 326619
A combination of C++ modules, variadic functions with more than one argument,
and const globals in headers (all three being necessary) causes some releases
of clang to misplace the matcher objects, which causes the linker to fail.
No functional change - the extra allOf() matcher is no-op here.
llvm-svn: 287045
Support CFNumberRef and OSNumber objects, which may also be accidentally
converted to plain integers or booleans.
Enable explicit boolean casts by default in non-pedantic mode.
Improve handling for warnings inside macros.
Improve error messages.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25731
llvm-svn: 285533
When dealing with objects that represent numbers, such as Objective-C NSNumber,
the language provides little protection from accidentally interpreting
the value of a pointer to such object as the value of the number represented
by the object. Results of such mis-interpretation may be unexpected.
The checker attempts to fill this gap in cases when the code is obviously
incorrect.
With "Pedantic" option enabled, this checker enforces a coding style to
completely prevent errors of this kind (off by default).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22968
llvm-svn: 284473
Kristof Umann