This commit adds the flag '-via-file-asm' to the clang driver. The
purpose of this flag is to have a way to test that clang can consume
the assembly code that it outputs. When passed this flag, clang will
generate a temporary file that contains the assembly output from the
compile step. This assembly file will then be consumed by either the
integrated assembler or the external assembler. To test that the
integrated assembler can consume its own output compile with:
$ clang -integrated-assembler -via-file-asm
Without the '-via-file-asm' flag, clang would directly create the
object file when using the integrated assembler. With the flag it
will first create the temporary assembly file and then read that
file and assemble it with the integrated assembler.
The flow is similar to -save-temps, except that it only effects
the assembly input and the temporary file is not saved.
llvm-svn: 196606
MS-ABI adds padding before *every* vbase if the last field in a record
is a bit-field. This changes clangs behavior to match. I also fix some
windows-style line endings in the test file.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2277
llvm-svn: 196605
Adds padding between bases or virtual bases in an attempt to avoid
aliasing of zero-sized sub-objects. The approach used by the ABI adds
two more bits of state. Detailed comments are in the code. Test cases
included.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2258
llvm-svn: 196602
This is another regression fixed by reverting r189090.
In this case, the problem is not live variables but the approach that was taken in r189090. This regression was caused by explicitly binding "true" to the condition when we take the true branch. Normally that's okay, but in this case we're planning to reuse that condition as the value of the expression.
llvm-svn: 196599
This reverts commit r189090.
The original patch introduced regressions (see the added live-variables.* tests). The patch depends on the correctness of live variable analyses, which are not computed correctly. I've opened PR18159 to track the proper resolution to this problem.
The patch was a stepping block to r189746. This is why part of the patch reverts temporary destructor tests that started crashing. The temporary destructors feature is disabled by default.
llvm-svn: 196593
Summary:
GCC uses -fauto-profile to enable sample-based PGO. This patch
adds it to Clang as an alias for -fprofile-sample-use.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2353
llvm-svn: 196589
In order to make the migration to modules easier, it seems to be helpful
to allow a 1:1 mapping between target names of a current build system
and the corresponding C++ modules. As such targets commonly contain
characters like "-". ":" and "/", allowing arbitrary quote-escaped
strings seems to be a straightforward option.
After several offline discussions, the precise mechanisms for C++
module names especially regarding submodules and import statements has
yet to be determined. Thus, this patch only enables string literals as
names inside the module map files which can be used by automatic module
import (through #include).
Also improve the error message on missing use-declarations.
llvm-svn: 196573
Use internal links to provide easier access to recent and ongoing work.
Also shift up the order of standards in the page title in order to avoid web
search results focusing on C++98 in the summary.
This is done to highlight the modern standards support in clang that was
previously languishing at the bottom of the page.
"C++98/03 is sooooo yesterday" - dgregor
llvm-svn: 196565
__declspec(align())
This patch implements required alignment in a way that makes
__declspec(align()) and #pragma pack play correctly together. In the
MS-ABI, __declspec(align()) is a hard rule and cannot be overridden by
#pragma pack. This cases each record to have two interesting alignments
"preferred alignment" (which matches Itanium's concept of alignment) and
"required alignment" which is an alignment that must never be violated,
even in the case of #pragma pack. This patch introduces the concept of
Required Alignment to the record builder and tracks/uses it
appropriately. Test cases are included.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2283
llvm-svn: 196549
This commit changes -Wassign-enum to compare unqualified types. One could
think that this does not matter much, because who wants a value of enum type
that is const-qualified? But this breaks the intended pattern to silence this
warning with an explicit cast:
static const enum Foo z = (enum Foo) 42;
In this case, source type is 'enum Foo', and destination type is 'const enum
Foo', and if we compare qualified types, they don't match, so we used warn.
llvm-svn: 196548
the following pattern.
If 'case' expression refers to a static const variable of the correct enum
type, then we count this as a sufficient declaration of intent by the user,
so we silence the warning.
llvm-svn: 196546
category is declared in category's primary
class's super class. Because the super class is
expected to implemented the method. // rdar://15580969
llvm-svn: 196531
I happened to notice this while trying to write a test for an iOS simulator
target. I suspect we just missed this when we added separate "macosx" and "ios"
triples instead of the generic "darwin" OS.
llvm-svn: 196527
as the location for grabbing clang-format.exe, and also output the .vsix here.
This allows us to find clang-format.exe when building from a MSVC Solution.
llvm-svn: 196512
within their namespace, and such a redeclaration isn't required to be a
definition any more.
Update DR status page to say Clang 3.4 instead of SVN and add new Clang 3.5
category (but keep Clang 3.4 yellow for now).
llvm-svn: 196481
don't assume that it inherits the designated initializers from the super class.
If the assumption was wrong because a new initializer was a designated one that was not marked as such,
we will emit misleading warnings for subclasses of the interface.
llvm-svn: 196476
Use FunctionTypeUnwrapper like we do in AttributedType to try to keep
some sugar. We can actually do one better here in the future by
avoiding the AdjustedType node altogether when no sugar would be lost.
llvm-svn: 196455
For an init capture, process the initialization expression
right away. For lambda init-captures such as the following:
const int x = 10;
auto L = [i = x+1](int a) {
return [j = x+2,
&k = x](char b) { };
};
keep in mind that each lambda init-capture has to have:
- its initialization expression executed in the context
of the enclosing/parent decl-context.
- but the variable itself has to be 'injected' into the
decl-context of its lambda's call-operator (which has
not yet been created).
Each init-expression is a full-expression that has to get
Sema-analyzed (for capturing etc.) before its lambda's
call-operator's decl-context, scope & scopeinfo are pushed on their
respective stacks. Thus if any variable is odr-used in the init-capture
it will correctly get captured in the enclosing lambda, if one exists.
The init-variables above are created later once the lambdascope and
call-operators decl-context is pushed onto its respective stack.
Since the lambda init-capture's initializer expression occurs in the
context of the enclosing function or lambda, therefore we can not wait
till a lambda scope has been pushed on before deciding whether the
variable needs to be captured. We also need to process all
lvalue-to-rvalue conversions and discarded-value conversions,
so that we can avoid capturing certain constant variables.
For e.g.,
void test() {
const int x = 10;
auto L = [&z = x](char a) { <-- don't capture by the current lambda
return [y = x](int i) { <-- don't capture by enclosing lambda
return y;
}
};
If x was not const, the second use would require 'L' to capture, and
that would be an error.
Make sure TranformLambdaExpr is also aware of this.
Patch approved by Richard (Thanks!!)
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2092
llvm-svn: 196454
We would skip until the next comma, hoping good things whould lie there,
however this would fail when we have such things as this:
struct A {};
template <typename>
struct D;
template <>
struct D<C> : B, A::D;
Once this happens, we would believe that D with a nested namespace
specifier of A was a variable that was being declared. We would go on
to complain that there was an extraneous 'template <>' on their variable
declaration.
Crashes would happen when 'A' gets defined as 'enum class A {}' as
various asserts would fire.
Instead, we should skip up until the semicolon if we see that we are in
the middle of a definition and the current token is a ':'
This fixes PR17084.
llvm-svn: 196453
Summary:
In general, this type node can be used to represent any type adjustment
that occurs implicitly without losing type sugar. The immediate use of
this is to adjust the calling conventions of member function pointer
types without breaking template instantiation.
Fixes PR17996.
Reviewers: rsmith
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2332
llvm-svn: 196451
David Peixotto