This is a complicated bug involving two issues:
1. What do we do with phi nodes when we prove all arguments are not
live?
2. When is it safe to use value leaders to determine if we can ignore
an argumnet?
llvm-svn: 303453
This was originally reverted because it was a breaking a bunch
of bots and the breakage was not surfacing on Windows. After much
head-scratching this was ultimately traced back to a bug in the
lit test runner related to its pipe handling. Now that the bug
in lit is fixed, Windows correctly reports these test failures,
and as such I have finally (hopefully) fixed all of them in this
patch.
llvm-svn: 303446
Summary:
NewGVN: Handle equivalence between phi of ops and op of phis.
This makes our GVN mostly-complete. It would be complete, modulo some
deliberate choices we make. This means it detects roughly all herband
equivalences in polynomial time, including cases notoriously hard for
other GVN's to detect. It also detects a very large swath of the
cases we currently rely on instcombine to detect that involve folding
upwards through phis.
Fixes PR 31125, 31463, PR 31868
Reviewers: davide
Subscribers: Prazek, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32151
llvm-svn: 303444
Summary:
While this makes some case better and some case worse - so it's unclear if it is a worthy combine just by itself - this is a useful canonicalisation.
As per discussion in D32756 .
Reviewers: jyknight, nemanjai, mkuper, spatel, RKSimon, zvi, bkramer
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32916
llvm-svn: 303441
Summary:
This NFC simply refactors the return value of LoopIdiomRecognize::isLegalStore() from bool to an enumeration, and
removes the return-through-parameter mechanism that the function was using. This function is constructed such that it will
only ever recognize a single store idiom (memset, memset_pattern, or memcpy), and never a combination of these. As such it
makes much more sense for the return value to be the single idiom that the store matches, rather than
having a separate argument-return for each idiom -- it's cleaner, and makes it clearer that
only a single idiom can be matched.
Patch by Daniel Neilson!
Reviewers: anna, sanjoy, davide, haicheng
Reviewed By: anna, haicheng
Subscribers: haicheng, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33359
llvm-svn: 303434
Summary:
This patch adds udiv/sdiv/urem/srem/udivrem/sdivrem methods that can divide by a uint64_t. This makes division consistent with all the other arithmetic operations.
This modifies the interface of the divide helper method to work on raw arrays instead of APInts. This way we can pass the uint64_t in for the RHS without wrapping it in an APInt. This required moving all the Quotient and Remainder allocation handling up to the callers. For udiv/urem this was as simple as just creating the Quotient/Remainder with the right size when they were declared. For udivrem we have to rely on reallocate not changing the contents of the variable LHS or RHS is aliased with the Quotient or Remainder APInts. We also have to zero the upper bits of Remainder and Quotient that divide doesn't write to if lhsWords/rhsWords is smaller than the width.
I've update the toString method to use the new udivrem.
Reviewers: hans, dblaikie, RKSimon
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33310
llvm-svn: 303431
This patch defines the i1 type as illegal in the X86 backend for AVX512.
For DAG operations on <N x i1> types (build vector, extract vector element, ...) i8 is used, and should be truncated/extended.
This should produce better scalar code for i1 types since GPRs will be used instead of mask registers.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32273
llvm-svn: 303421
Summary:
This causes them to be re-computed more often than necessary but resolves
objections that were raised post-commit on r301750.
Reviewers: qcolombet, ab, t.p.northover, rovka, kristof.beyls
Reviewed By: qcolombet
Subscribers: igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32861
llvm-svn: 303418
This is a squash of ~5 reverts of, well, pretty much everything
I did today. Something is seriously broken with lit on Windows
right now, and as a result assertions that fire in tests are
triggering failures. I've been breaking non-Windows bots all
day which has seriously confused me because all my tests have
been passing, and after running lit with -a to view the output
even on successful runs, I find out that the tool is crashing
and yet lit is still reporting it as a success!
At this point I don't even know where to start, so rather than
leave the tree broken for who knows how long, I will get this
back to green, and then once lit is fixed on Windows, hopefully
hopefully fix the remaining set of problems for real.
llvm-svn: 303409
We were using a BumpPtrAllocator to allocate stable storage for
a record, then trying to insert that into a hash table. If a
collision occurred, the bytes were never inserted and the
allocation was unnecessary. At the cost of an extra hash
computation, check first if it exists, and only if it does do
we allocate and insert.
llvm-svn: 303407
Apparently this was always broken, but previously we were more
graceful about it and we would print "unknown udt" if we couldn't
find the type index, whereas now we just segfault because we
assume it's valid. But this exposed a real bug, which is that
we weren't looking in the right place. So fix that, and also
fix this crash at the same time.
llvm-svn: 303397
pruneSubRegValues() needs to remove subregister ranges starting at
instructions that later get removed by eraseInstrs(). It missed to check
one case in which eraseInstrs() would remove an instruction.
Fixes http://llvm.org/PR32688
llvm-svn: 303396
We can have cycles between PHIs and this causes singleReachablePhi()
to call itself indefintely (until we run out of stack). The proper
solution would be that of computing SCCs, but it's not worth for
now, so just keep a visited set and give up when we find a cycle.
Thanks to Dan for the discussion/help with this.
Fixes PR33014.
llvm-svn: 303393
Merging PDBs is a feature that will be used heavily by
the linker. The functionality already exists but does not
have deep test coverage because it's not easily exposed through
any tools. This patch aims to address that by adding the
ability to merge PDBs via llvm-pdbdump. It takes arbitrarily
many PDBs and outputs a single PDB.
Using this new functionality, a test is added for merging
type records. Future patches will add the ability to merge
symbol records, module information, etc.
llvm-svn: 303389
Right now we have multiple notions of things that represent collections of
types. Most commonly used are TypeDatabase, which is supposed to keep
mappings from TypeIndex to type name when reading a type stream, which
happens when reading PDBs. And also TypeTableBuilder, which is used to
build up a collection of types dynamically which we will later serialize
(i.e. when writing PDBs).
But often you just want to do some operation on a collection of types, and
you may want to do the same operation on any kind of collection. For
example, you might want to merge two TypeTableBuilders or you might want
to merge two type streams that you loaded from various files.
This dichotomy between reading and writing is responsible for a lot of the
existing code duplication and overlapping responsibilities in the existing
CodeView library classes. For example, after building up a
TypeTableBuilder with a bunch of type records, if we want to dump it we
have to re-invent a bunch of extra glue because our dumper takes a
TypeDatabase or a CVTypeArray, which are both incompatible with
TypeTableBuilder.
This patch introduces an abstract base class called TypeCollection which
is shared between the various type collection like things. Wherever we
previously stored a TypeDatabase& in some common class, we now store a
TypeCollection&.
The advantage of this is that all the details of how the collection are
implemented, such as lazy deserialization of partial type streams, is
completely transparent and you can just treat any collection of types the
same regardless of where it came from.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33293
llvm-svn: 303388
Also, fix the old-style capitalization of the related functions
and move them to the 'private' section of the class since they
are just helpers of the visit* functions.
As shown in the post-commit comments for D32143, we are missing
folds for xor-of-icmps.
llvm-svn: 303381
This also reverts follow-ups r303292 and r303298.
It broke some Chromium tests under MSan, and apparently also internal
tests at Google.
llvm-svn: 303369
Summary:
Implements PR889
Removing the virtual table pointer from Value saves 1% of RSS when doing
LTO of llc on Linux. The impact on time was positive, but too noisy to
conclusively say that performance improved. Here is a link to the
spreadsheet with the original data:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1F4FHir0qYnV0MEp2sYYp_BuvnJgWlWPhWOwZ6LbW7W4/edit?usp=sharing
This change makes it invalid to directly delete a Value, User, or
Instruction pointer. Instead, such code can be rewritten to a null check
and a call Value::deleteValue(). Value objects tend to have their
lifetimes managed through iplist, so for the most part, this isn't a big
deal. However, there are some places where LLVM deletes values, and
those places had to be migrated to deleteValue. I have also created
llvm::unique_value, which has a custom deleter, so it can be used in
place of std::unique_ptr<Value>.
I had to add the "DerivedUser" Deleter escape hatch for MemorySSA, which
derives from User outside of lib/IR. Code in IR cannot include MemorySSA
headers or call the MemoryAccess object destructors without introducing
a circular dependency, so we need some level of indirection.
Unfortunately, no class derived from User may have any virtual methods,
because adding a virtual method would break User::getHungOffOperands(),
which assumes that it can find the use list immediately prior to the
User object. I've added a static_assert to the appropriate OperandTraits
templates to help people avoid this trap.
Reviewers: chandlerc, mehdi_amini, pete, dberlin, george.burgess.iv
Reviewed By: chandlerc
Subscribers: krytarowski, eraman, george.burgess.iv, mzolotukhin, Prazek, nlewycky, hans, inglorion, pcc, tejohnson, dberlin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31261
llvm-svn: 303362
The testcase in PR33077 generates a LSR Use Formula with two SCEVAddRecExprs for the same
loop. Such uncommon formula will become non-canonical after GenerateTruncates adds sign
extension to the ScaledReg of the Formula, and it will break the assertion that every
Formula to be inserted is canonical.
The fix is to call canonicalize for the raw Formula generated by GenerateTruncates
before inserting it.
llvm-svn: 303361
This provides a new way to access the TargetMachine through
TargetPassConfig, as a dependency.
The patterns replaced here are:
* Passes handling a null TargetMachine call
`getAnalysisIfAvailable<TargetPassConfig>`.
* Passes not handling a null TargetMachine
`addRequired<TargetPassConfig>` and call
`getAnalysis<TargetPassConfig>`.
* MachineFunctionPasses now use MF.getTarget().
* Remove all the TargetMachine constructors.
* Remove INITIALIZE_TM_PASS.
This fixes a crash when running `llc -start-before prologepilog`.
PEI needs StackProtector, which gets constructed without a TargetMachine
by the pass manager. The StackProtector pass doesn't handle the case
where there is no TargetMachine, so it segfaults.
Related to PR30324.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33222
llvm-svn: 303360
1) Until now I'd never seen a valid PDB where the DBI stream and
the PDB Stream disagreed on the "Age" field. Because of that,
we had code to assert that they matched. Recently though I was
given a PDB where they disagreed, so this assumption has proven
to be incorrect. Remove this check.
2) We were walking the entire list of hash values for types up front
and then throwing away the values. For large PDBs this was a
significant slow down. Remove this.
With this patch, I can dump the list of all compilands from a
1.5GB PDB file in just a few seconds.
llvm-svn: 303351
Summary:
We have a bug when RAUWing the condition if experimental.guard or assumes is a use of that
condition. This is because LazyValueInfo may have used the guards/assumes to identify the
value of the condition at the end of the block. RAUW replaces the uses
at the guard/assume as well as uses before the guard/assume. Both of
these are incorrect.
For now, disable RAUW for conditions and fix the logic as a next
step: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33257
Reviewers: sanjoy, reames, trentxintong
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D33279
llvm-svn: 303349
Summary:
There should be no intesection between SDWA operands and potential MIs. E.g.:
```
v_and_b32 v0, 0xff, v1 -> src:v1 sel:BYTE_0
v_and_b32 v2, 0xff, v0 -> src:v0 sel:BYTE_0
v_add_u32 v3, v4, v2
```
In that example it is possible that we would fold 2nd instruction into 3rd (v_add_u32_sdwa) and then try to fold 1st instruction into 2nd (that was already destroyed). So if SDWAOperand is also a potential MI then do not apply it.
Reviewers: vpykhtin, arsenm
Subscribers: kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, tpr, t-tye
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32804
llvm-svn: 303347
Galina Kistanova