Summary:
Following r263086, we are now relying on a flag on the Context to
discard Value names in release builds.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18023
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 263258
Summary:
Following r263086, we are replacing this by a runtime check.
More cleanup will follow on the IRBuilder itself, but I submitted
this patch separately as SROA has a fancy "prefixInserter" class
that needs extra-love.
Reviewers: chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18022
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 263256
The truncation was causing the sorting algorithm to behave oddly when comparing
positive and negative offsets. Fortunately, this doesn't currently happen in
practice and was exposed by a WIP. Thus, I can't test this change now, but the
follow on patch will.
llvm-svn: 263255
member type.
Because of how this type is used by the ValueTable, it cannot actually
have hidden visibility. GCC actually nicely warns about this but Clang
just silently ... I don't even know. =/ We should do a better job either
way though.
This should resolve a bunch of the GCC warnings about visibility that
the port of GVN triggered and make the visibility story a bit more
correct.
llvm-svn: 263250
Added new string conversion wrappers that convert between `std::string` (of UTF-8 bytes) and `std::wstring`, which is particularly useful for Win32 interop. Also fixed a missing string conversion for `getenv` on Win32, using these new wrappers.
The motivation behind this is to provide the support functions required for LLDB to work properly on Windows with non-ASCII data; however, the functions are not LLDB specific.
Patch by cameron314
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17549
llvm-svn: 263247
Its not enough that we test for SSSE3 - that's only OK for 128-bit vectors - we also need to test for AVX2 / AVX512BW for 256/512 bit vector cases.
llvm-svn: 263239
This doesn't change how many times we construct domtrees in the normal
pipeline, and it removes fragility and instability where basic-aa may
not be run in time to see domtrees because they happen to be constructed
afterward.
This isn't quite as clean as the change to memdep because there is
a mode where basic-aa specifically runs without domtrees -- in the
hacking version used by function-attrs with the legacy pass manager.
llvm-svn: 263234
This doesn't cause us to construct dominator trees any more often in the
normal pipeline, and removes an entire mode of memdep that needed to be
reasoned about and maintained. Perhaps more importantly, it removes the
ability for the results of memdep to be different because of accidental
pass scheduling goofs or the order of evaluation of 'getResult' calls.
Essentially, 'getCachedResult', unless across IR-unit boundaries, is
extremely dangerous. We need to work much harder to avoid it (or its
analog in the old pass manager).
llvm-svn: 263232
much to my horror, so use variables to fix it in place.
This terrifies me. Both basic-aa and memdep will provide more precise
information when the domtree and/or the loop info is available. Because
of this, if your pass (like GVN) requires domtree, and then queries
memdep or basic-aa, it will get more precise results. If it does this in
the other order, it gets less precise results.
All of the ideas I have for fixing this are, essentially, terrible. Here
I've just caused us to stop having unspecified behavior as different
implementations evaluate the order of these arguments differently. I'm
actually rather glad that they do, or the fragility of memdep and
basic-aa would have gone on unnoticed. I've left comments so we don't
immediately break this again. This should fix bots whose host compilers
evaluate the order of arguments differently from Clang.
llvm-svn: 263231
This was originally a pointer to support pass managers which didn't use
AnalysisManagers. However, that doesn't realistically come up much and
the complexity of supporting it doesn't really make sense.
In fact, *many* parts of the pass manager were just assuming the pointer
was never null already. This at least makes it much more explicit and
clear.
llvm-svn: 263219
clarify their purpose.
Firstly, call them "...Mixin" types so it is clear that there is no
type hierarchy being formed here. Secondly, use the term 'Info' to
clarify that they aren't adding any interesting *semantics* to the
passes or analyses, just exposing APIs used by the management layer to
get information about the pass or analysis.
Thanks to Manuel for helping pin down the naming confusion here and come
up with effective names to address it.
In case you already have some out-of-tree stuff, the following should be
roughly what you want to update:
perl -pi -e 's/\b(Pass|Analysis)Base\b/\1InfoMixin/g'
llvm-svn: 263217
work in the face of the limitations of DLLs and templated static
variables.
This requires passes that use the AnalysisBase mixin provide a static
variable themselves. So as to keep their APIs clean, I've made these
private and befriended the CRTP base class (which is the common
practice).
I've added documentation to AnalysisBase for why this is necessary and
at what point we can go back to the much simpler system.
This is clearly a better pattern than the extern template as it caught
*numerous* places where the template magic hadn't been applied and
things were "just working" but would eventually have broken
mysteriously.
llvm-svn: 263216
Since the names are used in a loop this does more work in debug builds. In
release builds value names are generally discarded so we don't have to do
the concatenation at all. It's also simpler code, no functional change
intended.
llvm-svn: 263215
The constant is now at source operand 1 (previously at 2).
This is also how it is in legacy AMD sp3 assembler.
Update tests.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17984
llvm-svn: 263212
tests to run GVN in both modes.
This is mostly the boring refactoring just like SROA and other complex
transformation passes. There is some trickiness in that GVN's
ValueNumber class requires hand holding to get to compile cleanly. I'm
open to suggestions about a better pattern there, but I tried several
before settling on this. I was trying to balance my desire to sink as
much implementation detail into the source file as possible without
introducing overly many layers of abstraction.
Much like with SROA, the design of this system is made somewhat more
cumbersome by the need to support both pass managers without duplicating
the significant state and logic of the pass. The same compromise is
struck here.
I've also left a FIXME in a doxygen comment as the GVN pass seems to
have pretty woeful documentation within it. I'd like to submit this with
the FIXME and let those more deeply familiar backfill the information
here now that we have a nice place in an interface to put that kind of
documentaiton.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18019
llvm-svn: 263208
Frontend authors are strongly encouraged to keep allocas
in the entry block, so don't bother visiting every instruction
in the other blocks of the function.
llvm-svn: 263206
llvm::getDISubprogram walks the instructions in a function, looking for one in the scope of the current function, so that it can find the !dbg entry for the subprogram itself.
Now that !dbg is attached to functions, this should not be necessary. This patch changes all uses to just query the subprogram directly on the function.
Ideally this should be NFC, but in reality its possible that a function:
has no !dbg (in which case there's likely a bug somewhere in an opt pass), or
that none of the instructions had a scope referencing the function, so we used to not find the !dbg on the function but now we will
Reviewed by Duncan Exon Smith.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18074
llvm-svn: 263184
The code assumed that we always had a preheader without making the pass
dependent on LoopSimplify.
Thanks to Mattias Eriksson V for reporting this.
llvm-svn: 263173
Looking at the IR definition of a masked load made me realize
there was no reason to use a shuffle here, so we don't need
to convert the format of the mask at all.
llvm-svn: 263167
Generalise the existing SIGN_EXTEND to SIGN_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG combine to support zero extension as well and get rid of a lot of unnecessary ANY_EXTEND + mask patterns.
Reapplied with a fix for PR26870 (avoid premature use of TargetConstant in ZERO_EXTEND_VECTOR_INREG expansion).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17691
llvm-svn: 263159
This patch fixes the problem which occurs when loop-vectorize tries to use @llvm.masked.load/store intrinsic for a non-default addrspace pointer. It fails with "Calling a function with a bad signature!" assertion in CallInst constructor because it tries to pass a non-default addrspace pointer to the pointer argument which has default addrspace.
The fix is to add pointer type as another overloaded type to @llvm.masked.load/store intrinsics.
Reviewed By: reames
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17270
llvm-svn: 263158
Summary:
Unless we plan to do later postpass metadata linking (ThinLTO special mode),
always invoke metadata materialization at the start of IRLinker::run().
This avoids the need for clients who use lazy metadata loading to
explicitly invoke materializeMetadata before the IRMover, which in
turn invokes IRLinker::run and needs materialized metadata for mapping.
Came up in the context of an LLD issue (D17982).
Reviewers: rafael
Subscribers: silvas, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17992
llvm-svn: 263143
Summary:
They correspond to BUFFER_LOAD/STORE_FORMAT_XYZW and will be used by Mesa
to implement the GL_ARB_shader_image_load_store extension.
The intention is that for llvm.amdgcn.buffer.load.format, LLVM will decide
whether one of the _X/_XY/_XYZ opcodes can be used (similar to image sampling
and loads). However, this is not currently implemented.
For llvm.amdgcn.buffer.store, LLVM cannot decide to use one of the "smaller"
opcodes and therefore the intrinsic is overloaded. Currently, only the v4f32
is actually implemented since GLSL also only has a vec4 variant of the store
instructions, although it's conceivable that Mesa will want to be smarter
about this in the future.
BUFFER_LOAD_FORMAT_XYZW is already exposed via llvm.SI.vs.load.input, which
has a legacy name, pretends not to access memory, and does not capture the
full flexibility of the instruction.
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, mareko
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17277
llvm-svn: 263140
When trying to replace an add to esp with pops, we need to choose dead
registers to pop into. Registers clobbered by the call and not imp-def'd
by it should be safe. Except that it's not enough to check the register
itself isn't defined, we also need to make sure no overlapping registers
are defined either.
This fixes PR26711.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18029
llvm-svn: 263139
Summary:
Peephole optimization that generates a single TBZ/TBNZ instruction
for test and branch sequences like in the example below. This handles
the cases that miss folding of AND into TBZ/TBNZ during ISelLowering of BR_CC
Examples:
and w8, w8, #0x400
cbnz w8, L1
to
tbnz w8, #10, L1
Reviewers: MatzeB, jmolloy, mcrosier, t.p.northover
Subscribers: aemerson, rengolin, mcrosier, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17942
llvm-svn: 263136
This patch adds Cortex-R8 to Target Parser and TableGen.
It also adds CodeGen tests for the build attributes.
Patch by Pablo Barrio.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17925
llvm-svn: 263132
This is avoiding a naming conflict with opt and llc.
While opt and llc don't link to LTO usually, users that are building a
monolithic libLLVM.dylib and linking the tools to it would have a
runtime error because of the duplicate cl::opt registration.
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 263127
The initial change was insufficiently complete for always getting the semantics
of __builtin_longjmp correct. The builtin is translated into a
`tInt_eh_sjlj_longjmp` DAG node. This node set R7 as clobbered. However, the
code would then follow up with a clobber of R11. I had failed to notice the
imp-def,kill on R7 in the isel. Unfortunately, it seems that it is not possible
to conditionalise the Defs list via an !if. Instead, construct a new parallel
WIN node and prefer that when targeting windows. This ensures that we now both
correctly model the __builtin_longjmp as well as construct the frame in a more
ABI conformant manner.
llvm-svn: 263123
of, and I misdiagnosed for months and months.
Andrea has had a patch for this forever, but I just couldn't see how
it was fixing the root cause of the problem. It didn't make sense to me,
even though the patch was perfectly good and the analysis of the actual
failure event was *fantastic*.
Well, I came back to it today because the patch has sat for *far* too
long and needs attention and decided I wouldn't let it go until I really
understood what was going on. After quite some time in the debugger,
I finally realized that in fact I had just missed an important case with
my previous attempt to fix PR22093 in r225149. Not only do we need to
handle loads that won't be split, but stores-of-loads that we won't
split. We *do* actually have enough logic in the presplitting to form
new slices for split stores.... *unless* we decided not to split them!
I'm so sorry that it took me this long to come to the realization that
this is the issue. It seems so obvious in hind sight (of course).
Anyways, the fix becomes *much* smaller and more focused. The fact that
we're left doing integer smashing is related to the FIXME in my original
commit: fundamentally, we're not aggressive about pre-splitting for
loads and stores to the same alloca. If we want to get aggressive about
this, it'll need both what Andrea had put into the proposed fix, but
also a *lot* more logic to essentially iteratively pre-split the alloca
until we can't do any more. As I said in that commit log, its really
unclear that this is the right call. Instead, the integer blending and
letting targets lower this to narrower stores seems slightly better. But
we definitely shouldn't really go down that path just to fix this bug.
Again, tons of thanks are owed to Andrea and others at Sony for working
on this bug. I really should have seen what was going on here and
re-directed them sooner. =////
llvm-svn: 263121
Simon Pilgrim