This code is completely wrong. It is also dead, as if it were to *ever*
run, it would crash. Fortunately, after my work to the combiner, it is
at least *possible* to reach the code, and llvm-stress has found a test
case. Thanks to Patrick for reporting.
It would be really good if anyone who remembers how this code works and
what it was intended to do could add some more obvious test coverage
instead of my completely contrived and reduced test case. My test case
was so brittle I left a bread crumb comment in it to help the next
person to stumble on it and not know what it was actually testing for.
llvm-svn: 214785
to recognize an epilogue that ends with a jmp to
objc_retainAutoreleaseReturnValue instead of a ret instruction.
<rdar://problem/17889928>
llvm-svn: 214783
scalar integer instruction pass.
This is a patch I had lying around from a few months ago. The pass is
currently disabled by default, so nothing to interesting.
llvm-svn: 214779
When the last instruction prior to a function epilogue is a call, we
need to emit a nop so that the return address is not in the epilogue IP
range. This is consistent with MSVC's behavior, and may be a workaround
for a bug in the Win64 unwinder.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4751
Patch by Vadim Chugunov!
llvm-svn: 214775
This matches MSVC's logic, which seems to be that when the friend
declaration is qualified, it cannot be a declaration of a new symbol
and so the dll linkage doesn't change.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4764
llvm-svn: 214774
Originally reverted in r213432 with flakey failures on an ASan self-host
build. After reduction it seems to be the same issue fixed in r213805
(ArgPromo + DebugInfo: Handle updating debug info over multiple
applications of argument promotion) and r213952 (by having
LiveDebugVariables strip dbg_value intrinsics in functions that are not
described by debug info). Though I cannot explain why this failure was
flakey...
llvm-svn: 214761
Linux has a lot of failures caused by not having support for certain
locales. Since these come out as a lot of noise in the test results,
have lit.cfg detect the presence of the various locales used in the
tests and add them to config.available_features as locale.LOCALE_NAME.
This patch also adds REQUIRES: locale.REQUIRED_LOCALE to every test that
I saw failing in this manner. We probably need to add more for all the
tests requiring en_US.UTF-8, but we can do that on an as-needed basis.
One thing that concerns me is how many tests get skipped because of
missing locales (especially in regex/). We should make a point of
splitting up any tests that test default behavior _and_ behavior under a
given locale so that we aren't losing coverage for default behavior.
llvm-svn: 214753
This patch adds the '-fcoverage-mapping' option which
allows clang to generate the coverage mapping information
that can be used to provide code coverage analysis using
the execution counts obtained from the instrumentation
based profiling (-fprofile-instr-generate).
llvm-svn: 214752
This flag will be used by the coverage tool to help
compute the execution counts for each line in a source file.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4746
llvm-svn: 214740
path::const_iterator claims that it's a bidirectional iterator, but it
doesn't satisfy all of the contracts for a bidirectional iterator.
For example, n3376 24.2.5 p6 says "If a and b are both dereferenceable,
then a == b if and only if *a and *b are bound to the same object",
but this doesn't work with how we stash and recreate Components.
This means that our use of reverse_iterator on this type is invalid
and leads to many of the valgrind errors we're hitting, as explained
by Tilmann Scheller here:
http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-commits/Week-of-Mon-20140728/228654.html
Instead, we admit that path::const_iterator is only an input_iterator,
and implement a second input_iterator for path::reverse_iterator (by
changing const_iterator::operator-- to reverse_iterator::operator++).
All of the uses of this just traverse once over the path in one
direction or the other anyway.
llvm-svn: 214737
This is a regression from clang 3.4
Set the result to ExprError and returns true, rather than simply
returns false because errors have been reported already and returning
false show a confusing error
llvm-svn: 214734
Eric Christopher