with a prior UsingDecl -- those should not even really be found by the lookup
here, except that we use the same lookup results for two different checks, and
the other check needs them.
This happens to work in *almost all* cases, because either the lookup results
list the UsingDecl first (and the NonTag result gets replaced by something
else) or because the problematic declaration is a function (which causes us to
use different logic to detect conflicts). This can also be triggered from a
state only reachable through modules (where the name lookup results can contain
multiple UsingDecls in the same scope).
llvm-svn: 262105
If the availability context is `FunctionTemplateDecl`, we should look
through it to the `FunctionDecl`. This prevents a diagnostic in the
following case:
class C __attribute__((unavailable));
template <class T> void foo(C&) __attribute__((unavailable));
This adds tests for availability in templates in many other cases, but
that was the only case that failed before this patch.
I added a feature `__has_feature(attribute_availability_in_templates)`
so users can test for this.
rdar://problem/24561029
llvm-svn: 262050
A member expression's base doesn't always have an impact on what the
member decl would evaluate to. In such a case, the base is used as a
poor man's scope qualifier.
This fixes PR26738.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17619
llvm-svn: 261975
r261297 called hasUserProvidedDefaultConstructor() to check if defining a
const object is ok. This is incorrect for this example:
struct X { template<typename ...T> X(T...); int n; };
const X x; // formerly OK, now bogus error
Instead, track if a class has a defaulted default constructor, and disallow
a const object for classes that either have defaulted default constructors or
if they need an implicit constructor.
Bug report and fix approach by Richard Smith, thanks!
llvm-svn: 261770
C++11 requires const objects to have a user-provided constructor, even for
classes without any fields. DR 253 relaxes this to say "If the implicit default
constructor initializes all subobjects, no initializer should be required."
clang is currently the only compiler that implements this C++11 rule, and e.g.
libstdc++ relies on something like DR 253 to compile in newer versions. This
change makes it possible to build code that says `const vector<int> v;' again
when using libstdc++5.2 and _GLIBCXX_DEBUG
(https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60284).
Fixes PR23381.
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16552
llvm-svn: 261297
Fixes crash referenced in PR25181 where dyn_cast is called on a null
instance of LM.Method.
Reviewers: majnemer, rnk
Patch by Don Hinton
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17072
llvm-svn: 261292
-Wcomma will detect and warn on most uses of the builtin comma operator. It
currently whitelists the first and third statements of the for-loop. For other
cases, the warning can be silenced by casting the first operand of the comma
operator to void.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D3976
llvm-svn: 261278
Previously we would leave behind the old name specifier prefix, which
creates an invalid AST. Other callers of CorrectTypo update their
CXXScopeSpec objects with the correction specifier if one is present.
llvm-svn: 260993
In my previous commit (rL260881) I forget to svn add tests. This commit adds
them.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16846
llvm-svn: 260882
In the case that the array indexing itself is within a type dependent context,
bail out of the evaluation. We would previously try to symbolically evaluate
the expression which would then try to evaluate a non-address expression as an
address, triggering an assertion in Asserts builds.
We only need to consider the array subscript expression itself as in the case
that the base itself being type dependent is handled appropriately in EvalAddr.
Resolves PR26599.
llvm-svn: 260867
When a null constant is used in a macro, walk through the macro stack to
determine where the null constant is written and where the context is located.
Only warn if both locations are within the same macro expansion. This helps
function-like macros which involve pointers be treated as if they were
functions.
llvm-svn: 260776
Fix a crash while parsing this code:
struct X {
friend constexpr int foo(X*) { return 12; }
static constexpr int j = foo(static_cast<X*>(nullptr));
};
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16973
llvm-svn: 260675
If the typo happens after a successful deduction for an earlier
return statement, we should check if the deduced type is null
before using it.
The typo correction happens after we try to deduce the return
type and we ignore the deduction from the typo and continue
to typo correction.
rdar://24342247
llvm-svn: 259820
When performing a cast from an __unknown_anytype function call to a
non-void type, we need to make sure that type is complete. Fixes
rdar://problem/23959960.
llvm-svn: 259681
C++14 generic lambdas. It conflicts with the C++14 return type deduction
mechanism, and results in us failing to actually deduce the lambda's return
type in some cases.
llvm-svn: 259609
Allow "mode" attribute for enum types, except for vector modes, for compatibility with GCC.
Support "mode" attribute with dependent types.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16219
llvm-svn: 259497
Move the function to get a macro name from DiagnosticRenderer.cpp to Lexer.cpp
so that other files can use it. Lexer now has two functions to get the
immediate macro name, the newly added one is better for diagnostic purposes.
Make -Wnull-conversion use this function for better NULL macro detection.
llvm-svn: 258778
Per C++14 [class.virtual]p8, it is OK for the return type's class type
to be incomplete so long as the return type is the same between the base
and complete classes.
This fixes PR26297.
llvm-svn: 258768
-Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor warns if A is a type with virtual functions but
without virtual dtor has its constructor called via `delete a`. This makes the
warning also fire if the dtor is called via `a->~A()`. This would've found a
security bug in Chromium at compile time. Fixes PR26137.
To fix the warning, add a virtual destructor, make the class final, or remove
its other virtual methods. If you want to silence the warning, there's also
a fixit that shows how:
test.cc:12:3: warning: destructor called on 'B' ... [-Wdelete-non-virtual-dtor]
b->~B();
^
test.cc:12:6: note: qualify call to silence this warning
b->~B();
^
B::
http://reviews.llvm.org/D16206
llvm-svn: 257939
This attribute may be attached to a function definition and instructs the backend to generate appropriate function entry/exit code so that
it can be used directly as an interrupt handler.
The IRET instruction, instead of the RET instruction, is used to return from interrupt or exception handlers. All registers, except for the EFLAGS register which is restored by the IRET instruction, are preserved by the compiler.
Any interruptible-without-stack-switch code must be compiled with -mno-red-zone since interrupt handlers can and will, because of the hardware design, touch
the red zone.
interrupt handler must be declared with a mandatory pointer argument:
struct interrupt_frame;
__attribute__ ((interrupt))
void f (struct interrupt_frame *frame) {
...
}
and user must properly define the structure the pointer pointing to.
exception handler:
The exception handler is very similar to the interrupt handler with a different mandatory function signature:
#ifdef __x86_64__
typedef unsigned long long int uword_t;
#else
typedef unsigned int uword_t;
#endif
struct interrupt_frame;
__attribute__ ((interrupt))
void f (struct interrupt_frame *frame, uword_t error_code) {
...
}
and compiler pops the error code off stack before the IRET instruction.
The exception handler should only be used for exceptions which push an error code and all other exceptions must use the interrupt handler.
The system will crash if the wrong handler is used.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15709
llvm-svn: 257867
-Wnull-conversion warning.
These functions are basically equivalent to other pointer returning fuctions
which are already excluded by -Wnull-conversion.
llvm-svn: 257231
Given an expression like `(&Foo)();`, we perform overload resolution as
if we are calling `Foo` directly. This causes problems if `Foo` is a
function that can't have its address taken. This patch teaches overload
resolution to ignore functions that can't have their address taken in
such cases.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15590
llvm-svn: 257016
By storing the instantiated expression back in the ParmVarDecl,
we remove the last need for separately storing the sub-expression
of a CXXDefaultArgExpr. This makes PCH/Modules merging quite
simple: CXXDefaultArgExpr records are serialized as references
to the ParmVarDecl, and we ignore redundant attempts to overwrite
the instantiated expression.
This has some extremely marginal impact on user-facing semantics.
However, the major effect is that it avoids IRGen errors about
conflicting definitions due to lambdas in the argument being
instantiated multiple times while sharing the same mangling.
It should also slightly improve memory usage and module file size.
rdar://23810407
llvm-svn: 256983
When the condition in an if statement, while statement, or for loop is created
during template instantiation, it calls MakeFullExpr with only the condition
expression. However, when these conditions are created for non-templated
code in the Parser, an additional SourceLocation is passed to MakeFullExpr.
The impact of this was that non-dependent templated code could produce
diagnostics that the same code outside templates would not. Adding the missing
SourceLocation makes diagnostics consistent between templated and non-templated
code.
llvm-svn: 256976
Summary:
There are a number of files in the tree which have been accidentally checked in with DOS line endings. Convert these to native line endings.
There are also a few files which have DOS line endings on purpose, and I have set the svn:eol-style property to 'CRLF' on those.
Reviewers: joerg, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: aaron.ballman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15849
llvm-svn: 256704
The MS ABI emits a special default constructor closure thunk if a
default constructor has a weird calling convention or default arguments.
The MS ABI has a quirk: there can be only one such thunk because the
mangling scheme does not have room for distinct manglings. We must
raise a diagnostic in this eventuality.
N.B. MSVC sorta gets this right. Multiple default constructors result
in the default constructor closure getting emitted but they seem to
get confused by which default constructors are reasonable to reference
from the closure. We try to be a little more careful which results in
mild differences in behavior.
llvm-svn: 256661
declaration. This fixes an issue where we would reject (due to a claimed
ambiguity) a case where lookup finds multiple NamespaceAliasDecls from
different scopes that nominate the same namespace.
The C++ standard doesn't make it clear that such a case is in fact valid (which
I'm working on fixing), but there are no relevant rules that distinguish using
declarations and namespace alias declarations here, so it makes sense to treat
them the same way.
llvm-svn: 256601
underlying decls. Preserve the found declaration throughout, and only map to
the underlying declaration when we want to check whether it's the right kind.
This allows us to provide the right source location for the found declaration,
and prepares for the possibility of underlying decls with a different name
from the found decl.
llvm-svn: 256575
This patch fixes PR16677. The latter represents the case when due to
misprinted character class definition occurs in the scope of template
arguments. Base class of this class depends on the template parameter in the
same scope and cannot be resolved, it causes crash. Right behavior is to
make semantic processing even if the definition is wrong, as the code
that emits appropriate message is called after the processing.
llvm-svn: 256511
Given the following code:
int *_Nullable ptr;
int *_Nonnull nn = ptr;
...In C, clang will warn you about `nn = ptr`, because you're assigning
a nonnull pointer to a nullable pointer. In C++, clang issues no such
warning. This patch helps ensure that clang doesn't ever miss an
opportunity to complain about C++ code.
N.B. Though this patch has a differential revision link, the actual
review took place over email.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14938
llvm-svn: 255556
All problems described in http://llvm.org/PR25636 are implemented except for return value of the 'put' property. This patch fixes this problem with the indexed properties
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D15174
llvm-svn: 255218
This is the 5th Lit test patch.
Expanded expected diagnostics to vary by C++ dialect.
Expanded RUN line to: default, C++98/03 and C++11.
llvm-svn: 255196
Richard Smith