Remove UnaryTypeTraitExpr and switch all remaining type trait related handling
over to TypeTraitExpr.
The UTT/BTT/TT enum prefix and evaluation code is retained pending further
cleanup.
This is part of the ongoing work to unify type traits following the removal of
BinaryTypeTraitExpr in r197273.
llvm-svn: 198271
Fixes <rdar://problem/15584219> and <rdar://problem/12241361>.
This change looks large, but all it does is reuse and consolidate
the delayed diagnostic logic for deprecation warnings with unavailability
warnings. By doing so, it showed various inconsistencies between the
diagnostics, which were close, but not consistent. It also revealed
some missing "note:"'s in the deprecated diagnostics that were showing
up in the unavailable diagnostics, etc.
This change also changes the wording of the core deprecation diagnostics.
Instead of saying "function has been explicitly marked deprecated"
we now saw "'X' has been been explicitly marked deprecated". It
turns out providing a bit more context is useful, and often we
got the actual term wrong or it was not very precise
(e.g., "function" instead of "destructor"). By just saying the name
of the thing that is deprecated/deleted/unavailable we define
this issue away. This diagnostic can likely be further wordsmithed
to be shorter.
llvm-svn: 197627
The problem here is more serious than the fix implies. Adding a field
to a class updates the triviality bits for the class (among other
things). Failing to require a complete type before adding the field
meant that these updates don't happen in the well-formed case where
the capture is an uninstantiated class template specialization,
leading the lambda itself to be treated as having a trivial copy
constructor when it shouldn't. Fixes <rdar://problem/15560464>.
llvm-svn: 197623
This patch was submitted to the list for review and didn't receive a LGTM.
(In fact one explicit objection and one query were raised.)
This reverts commit r197295.
llvm-svn: 197299
There's nothing special about type traits accepting two arguments.
This commit eliminates BinaryTypeTraitExpr and switches all related handling
over to TypeTraitExpr.
Also fixes a CodeGen failure with variadic type traits appearing in a
non-constant expression.
The BTT/TT prefix and evaluation code is retained as-is for now but will soon
be further cleaned up.
This is part of the ongoing work to unify type traits.
llvm-svn: 197273
The tests were perhaps made too relaxed in r197164 when we switched to the new
MinGW ABI. This makes sure we check explicitly for an optional thiscall
attribute and nothing else.
We should still look into whether we should print these attributes at all in
these cases.
llvm-svn: 197252
Previously, a line like
// expected-error-re {{foo}}
treats the entirety of foo as a regex. This is inconvenient when matching type
names containing regex characters. For example, to match
"void *(class test8::A::*)(void)" inside such a regex, one would have to type
"void \*\(class test8::A::\*\)\(void\)".
This patch changes the semantics of expected-error-re to only treat the parts
of the directive wrapped in double curly braces as regexes. This avoids the
escaping problem and leads to nicer patterns for those cases; see e.g. the
change to test/Sema/format-strings-scanf.c.
(The balanced search for closing }} of a directive also makes us handle the
full directive in test\SemaCXX\constexpr-printing.cpp:41 and :53.)
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2388
llvm-svn: 197092
more than one such initializer in a union, make mem-initializers override
default initializers for other union members, handle anonymous unions with
anonymous struct members better. Fix a couple of semi-related bugs exposed by
the tests for same.
llvm-svn: 196892
within their namespace, and such a redeclaration isn't required to be a
definition any more.
Update DR status page to say Clang 3.4 instead of SVN and add new Clang 3.5
category (but keep Clang 3.4 yellow for now).
llvm-svn: 196481
We would fail to instantiate them when the surrounding function was
instantiated. Instantiate the class and add it's members to the list of
pending instantiations, they should be resolved when we are finished
with the function's body.
This fixes PR9685.
llvm-svn: 195827
code for handling triviality, deletedness and constexpr. Fix a few bugs in
these, particularly related to mutable members, and remove some dead code.
llvm-svn: 195809
data member definitions when the variable has an initializer
in its declaration.
For the following code:
struct S {
static const int x = 42;
};
const int S::x = 42;
This patch changes the diagnostic from:
a.cc:4:14: error: redefinition of 'x'
const int S::x = 42;
^
a.cc:2:20: note: previous definition is here
static const int x = 42;
^
to:
a.cc:4:18: error: static data member 'x' already has an initializer
const int S::x = 42;
^
a.cc:2:24: note: previous initialization is here
static const int x = 42;
^
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2235
llvm-svn: 195306
Line 559: 'long long' is a C++11 extension
Line 566: 'long long' is a C++11 extension
Line 674: 'long long' is a C++11 extension
See also PR13819.
llvm-svn: 195005
template, that member has a dependent type (even if we can see the definition
of the member of the primary template), because the array size could change in
a member specialization.
Patch by Karthik Bhat!
llvm-svn: 194740
bit fields of zero size. Warnings are generated in C++ mode and if
only such type is defined inside extern "C" block.
The patch fixed PR5065.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2151
llvm-svn: 194653
For i686 targets and LLP64 targets, we can see;
error: 'error' diagnostics seen but not expected:
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr1xx.cpp Line 761: 'check7a' declared as an array with a negative size
File clang/test/CXX/drs/dr1xx.cpp Line 765: 'check8a' declared as an array with a negative size
2 errors generated.
llvm-svn: 194246
Both Richard and I felt that the current wording in the working paper needed some tweaking - Please see http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2035 for additional context and references to core-reflector messages that discuss wording tweaks.
What is implemented is what we had intended to specify in Bristol; but, recently felt that the specification might benefit from some tweaking and fleshing.
As a rough attempt to explain the semantics: If a nested lambda with a default-capture names a variable within its body, and if the enclosing full expression that contains the name of that variable is instantiation-dependent - then an enclosing lambda that is capture-ready (i.e. within a non-dependent context) must capture that variable, if all intervening nested lambdas can potentially capture that variable if they need to, and all intervening parent lambdas of the capture-ready lambda can and do capture the variable.
Of note, 'this' capturing is also currently underspecified in the working paper for generic lambdas. What is implemented here is if the set of candidate functions in a nested generic lambda includes both static and non-static member functions (regardless of viability checking - i.e. num and type of parameters/arguments) - and if all intervening nested-inner lambdas between the capture-ready lambda and the function-call containing nested lambda can capture 'this' and if all enclosing lambdas of the capture-ready lambda can capture 'this', then 'this' is speculatively captured by that capture-ready lambda.
Hopefully a paper for the C++ committee (that Richard and I had started some preliminary work on) is forthcoming.
This essentially makes generic lambdas feature complete, except for known bugs. The more prominent ones (and the ones I am currently aware of) being:
- generic lambdas and init-captures are broken - but a patch that fixes this is already in the works ...
- nested variadic expansions such as:
auto K = [](auto ... OuterArgs) {
vp([=](auto ... Is) {
decltype(OuterArgs) OA = OuterArgs;
return 0;
}(5)...);
return 0;
};
auto M = K('a', ' ', 1, " -- ", 3.14);
currently cause crashes. I think I know how to fix this (since I had done so in my initial implementation) - but it will probably take some work and back & forth with Doug and Richard.
A warm thanks to all who provided feedback - and especially to Doug Gregor and Richard Smith for their pivotal guidance: their insight and prestidigitation in such matters is boundless!
Now let's hope this commit doesn't upset the buildbot gods ;)
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 194188
the same virtual base class multiple times (and the move assignment is used,
and the move assignment for the virtual base is not trivial).
llvm-svn: 193977
would be deleted are still declared, but are ignored by overload resolution.
Also, don't delete such members if a subobject has no corresponding move
operation and a non-trivial copy. This causes us to implicitly declare move
operations in more cases, but risks move-assigning virtual bases multiple
times in some circumstances (a warning for that is to follow).
llvm-svn: 193969
A previous attempt http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130930/090049.html resulted in PR 17476, and was reverted,
The original TransformLambdaExpr (pre generic-lambdas) transformed the TypeSourceInfo of the Call operator in its own instantiation scope via TransformType. This resulted in the parameters of the call operator being mapped to their transformed counterparts in an instantiation scope that would get popped off.
Then a call to TransformFunctionParameters would add the parameters and their transformed mappings (but newly created ones!) to the current instantiation scope. This would result in a disconnect between the new call operator's TSI parameters and those used to construct the call operator declaration. This was ok in the non-generic lambda world - but would cause issues with nested transformations (when non-generic and generics were interleaved) in the generic lambda world - that I somewhat kludged around initially - but this resulted in PR17476.
The new approach seems cleaner. We only do the transformation of the TypeSourceInfo - but we make sure to do it in the current instantiation scope so we don't lose the untransformed to transformed mappings of the ParmVarDecls when they get created.
Another attempt caused a test to fail (http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20131021/091533.html) and also had to be reverted - my apologies - in my haste, i did not run all the tests - argh!
Now all the tests seem to pass - but a Fixme has been added - since I suspect Richard will find the fix a little inelegant ;) I shall try and work on a more elegant fix once I have had a chance to discuss with Richard or Doug at a later date.
Hopefully the third time;s a charm *fingers crossed*
This does not yet include capturing.
Please see test file for examples.
This patch was LGTM'd by Doug:
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1784
llvm-svn: 193230
They were causing CodeGenCXX/mangle-exprs.cpp to fail.
Revert "Remove the circular reference to LambdaExpr in CXXRecordDecl."
Revert "Again: Teach TreeTransform and family how to transform generic lambdas nested within templates and themselves."
llvm-svn: 193226
lambdas nested within templates and themselves.
A previous attempt http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130930/090049.html resulted in PR 17476, and was reverted,
The original TransformLambdaExpr (pre generic-lambdas) transformed the TypeSourceInfo of the Call operator in its own instantiation scope via TransformType. This resulted in the parameters of the call operator being mapped to their transformed counterparts in an instantiation scope that would get popped off.
Then a call to TransformFunctionParameters would add the parameters and their transformed mappings (but newly created ones!) to the current instantiation scope. This would result in a disconnect between the new call operator's TSI parameters and those used to construct the call operator declaration. This was ok in the non-generic lambda world - but would cause issues with nested transformations (when non-generic and generics were interleaved) in the generic lambda world - that I somewhat kludged around initially - but this resulted in PR17476.
The new approach seems cleaner. We only do the transformation of the TypeSourceInfo - but we make sure to do it in the current instantiation scope so we don't lose the untransformed to transformed mappings of the ParmVarDecls when they get created.
This does not yet include capturing.
Please see test file for examples.
This patch was LGTM'd by Doug:
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1784
llvm-svn: 193216
Summary:
Enforce the rule in C++11 [temp.mem]p2 that local classes cannot have
member templates.
This fixes PR16947.
N.B. C++14 has slightly different wording to afford generic lambdas
declared inside of functions.
Fun fact: Some formulations of local classes with member templates
would cause clang to crash during Itanium mangling, such as the
following:
void outer_mem() {
struct Inner {
template <typename = void>
struct InnerTemplateClass {
static void itc_mem() {}
};
};
Inner::InnerTemplateClass<>::itc_mem();
}
Reviewers: eli.friedman, rsmith, doug.gregor, faisalv
Reviewed By: doug.gregor
CC: cfe-commits, ygao
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1866
llvm-svn: 193144
Now that CorrectTypo knows how to correctly search classes for typo
correction candidates, there is no good reason to only replace an
existing CXXScopeSpecifier if it refers to a namespace. While the actual
enablement was a matter of changing a single comparison, the fallout
from enabling the functionality required a lot more code changes
(including my two previous commits).
llvm-svn: 193020
that looks like a function declaration, except that it's missing a return type,
try typo-correcting it to the relevant constructor name.
In passing, fix a bug where the missing-type-specifier recovery codepath would
drop a preceding scope specifier on the floor, leading to follow-on diagnostics
and incorrect recovery for the auto-in-c++98 hack.
llvm-svn: 192644
An invalid decltype expression like 'decltype int' gives:
error: expected '(' after 'decltype'
This makes it so 'sizeof int' gives a similar one:
error: expected parentheses around type name in sizeof expression
llvm-svn: 192258
extension. The GCC folks have decided to support this even though the standard
committee have not yet approved this feature.
Patch by Hristo Venev!
llvm-svn: 192128
This does not yet include capturing (that is next).
Please see test file for examples.
This patch was LGTM'd by Doug:
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1784http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/cfe-commits/Week-of-Mon-20130930/090048.html
When I first committed this patch - a bunch of buildbots were unable to compile the code that VS2010 seemed to compile. Seems like there was a dependency on Sema/Template.h which VS did not seem to need, but I have now added for the other compilers. It still compiles on Visual Studio 2010 - lets hope the buildbots remain quiet (please!)
llvm-svn: 191879
This does not yet include capturing (that is next).
Please see test file for examples.
This patch was LGTM'd by Doug:
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1784
llvm-svn: 191875
The general strategy is to create template versions of the conversion function and static invoker and then during template argument deduction of the conversion function, create the corresponding call-operator and static invoker specializations, and when the conversion function is marked referenced generate the body of the conversion function using the corresponding static-invoker specialization. Similarly, Codegen does something similar - when asked to emit the IR for a specialized static invoker of a generic lambda, it forwards emission to the corresponding call operator.
This patch has been reviewed in person both by Doug and Richard. Richard gave me the LGTM.
A few minor changes:
- per Richard's request i added a simple check to gracefully inform that captures (init, explicit or default) have not been added to generic lambdas just yet (instead of the assertion violation).
- I removed a few lines of code that added the call operators instantiated parameters to the currentinstantiationscope. Not only did it not handle parameter packs, but it is more relevant in the patch for nested lambdas which will follow this one, and fix that problem more comprehensively.
- Doug had commented that the original implementation strategy of using the TypeSourceInfo of the call operator to create the static-invoker was flawed and allowed const as a member qualifier to creep into the type of the static-invoker. I currently kludge around it - but after my initial discussion with Doug, with a follow up session with Richard, I have added a FIXME so that a more elegant solution that involves the use of TrivialTypeSourceInfo call followed by the correct wiring of the template parameters to the functionprototypeloc is forthcoming.
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 191634
This motion appears to have consensus in the C++ committee and is
expected to be voted into the C++14 draft tomorrow during the formal
vote.
No extension warning in C++11 as attributes not specified in the
standard using the standard syntax in C++11 have implementation defined
meaning, and we define the meaning proposed for C++14.
There is one bug exposed as we do not warn on a deprecated template
specialization. I've left a FIXME in the test case and will dig into
that next.
Also, I will add a few more exhaustive test cases of the other features
specified for this attribute in a follow-up commit.
llvm-svn: 191550
Specifically, the following features are not included in this commit:
- any sort of capturing within generic lambdas
- generic lambdas within template functions and nested
within other generic lambdas
- conversion operator for captureless lambdas
- ensuring all visitors are generic lambda aware
(Although I have gotten some useful feedback on my patches of the above and will be incorporating that as I submit those patches for commit)
As an example of what compiles through this commit:
template <class F1, class F2>
struct overload : F1, F2 {
using F1::operator();
using F2::operator();
overload(F1 f1, F2 f2) : F1(f1), F2(f2) { }
};
auto Recursive = [](auto Self, auto h, auto ... rest) {
return 1 + Self(Self, rest...);
};
auto Base = [](auto Self, auto h) {
return 1;
};
overload<decltype(Base), decltype(Recursive)> O(Base, Recursive);
int num_params = O(O, 5, 3, "abc", 3.14, 'a');
Please see attached tests for more examples.
This patch has been reviewed by Doug and Richard. Minor changes (non-functionality affecting) have been made since both of them formally looked at it, but the changes involve removal of supernumerary return type deduction changes (since they are now redundant, with richard having committed a recent patch to address return type deduction for C++11 lambdas using C++14 semantics).
Some implementation notes:
- Add a new Declarator context => LambdaExprParameterContext to
clang::Declarator to allow the use of 'auto' in declaring generic
lambda parameters
- Add various helpers to CXXRecordDecl to facilitate identifying
and querying a closure class
- LambdaScopeInfo (which maintains the current lambda's Sema state)
was augmented to house the current depth of the template being
parsed (id est the Parser calls Sema::RecordParsingTemplateParameterDepth)
so that SemaType.cpp::ConvertDeclSpecToType may use it to immediately
generate a template-parameter-type when 'auto' is parsed in a generic
lambda parameter context. (i.e we do NOT use AutoType deduced to
a template parameter type - Richard seemed ok with this approach).
We encode that this template type was generated from an auto by simply
adding $auto to the name which can be used for better diagnostics if needed.
- SemaLambda.h was added to hold some common lambda utility
functions (this file is likely to grow ...)
- Teach Sema::ActOnStartOfFunctionDef to check whether it
is being called to instantiate a generic lambda's call
operator, and if so, push an appropriately prepared
LambdaScopeInfo object on the stack.
- various tests were added - but much more will be needed.
There is obviously more work to be done, and both Richard (weakly) and Doug (strongly)
have requested that LambdaExpr be removed form the CXXRecordDecl LambdaDefinitionaData
in a future patch which is forthcoming.
A greatful thanks to all reviewers including Eli Friedman, James Dennett,
and especially the two gracious wizards (Richard Smith and Doug Gregor)
who spent hours providing feedback (in person in Chicago and on the mailing lists).
And yet I am certain that I have allowed unidentified bugs to creep in; bugs, that I will do my best to slay, once identified!
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 191453
Unlike with namespaces, searching inside of classes requires also
checking the access to correction candidates (i.e. don't suggest a
correction to a private class member for a correction occurring outside
that class and its methods or friends).
Included is a small (one line) fix for a bug, that was uncovered while
cleaning up the unit tests, where the decls from a TypoCorrection candidate
were preserved in new TypoCorrection candidates that are derived (copied)
from the old TypoCorrection--notably when creating a new candidate by
changing the NestedNameSpecifier associated with the base idenitifer.
llvm-svn: 191449
fields in the class. This allows a better checking of member intiailizers and
in class initializers in regards to initialization ordering.
For instance, this code will now produce warnings:
class A {
int x;
int y;
A() : x(y) {} // y is initialized after x, warn here
A(int): y(x) {} // default initialization of leaves x uninitialized, warn here
};
Several test cases were updated with -Wno-uninitialized to silence this warning.
llvm-svn: 191068
variable from being the function to being the enclosing namespace scope (in
C++) or the TU (in C). This allows us to fix a selection of related issues
where we would build incorrect redeclaration chains for such declarations, and
fail to notice type mismatches.
Such declarations are put into a new IdentifierNamespace, IDNS_LocalExtern,
which is only found when searching scopes, and not found when searching
DeclContexts. Such a declaration is only made visible in its DeclContext if
there are no non-LocalExtern declarations.
llvm-svn: 191064
non-member function, the number of arguments in the two candidate calls
will be different (the non-member call will have one extra argument).
We used to get confused by this, and fail to compare the last argument
when testing whether the member is better, resulting in us always
thinking it is, even if the non-member is more specialized in the last
argument.
llvm-svn: 190470
Exception specs are not part of the canonical type, but we shouldn't
drop them just because we merged a noreturn attribute.
Fixes PR17110.
llvm-svn: 190206
Consider something like the following:
struct X {
virtual void foo(float x);
};
struct Y : X {
void foo(double x) override;
};
The error is almost certainly that Y::foo() has the wrong signature,
rather than incorrect usage of the override keyword. This patch
adds an appropriate diagnostic for that case.
Fixes <rdar://problem/14785106>.
llvm-svn: 190109
been an oversight, as it definitely works. Every test which changed had
the const written on the LHS of the auto already.
Notably, this also makes things like cpp11-migrate's formation of 'const
auto &' variables much more familiar.
Yes, many people feel that 'const' and other qualifiers belong on the
RHS of the type. I'm not going to argue about that because Clang already
*overwhelming* places the qualifiers on the LHS when it can and on the
RHS when it must. We shouldn't diverge for auto. We should add a tool to
clang-tidy that fixes this in either direction, and then wire up
clang-tidy to tools like cpp11-migrate to fix their placement after
transforms.
llvm-svn: 189769
Specifically, the following features are not included in this commit:
- any sort of capturing within generic lambdas
- nested lambdas
- conversion operator for captureless lambdas
- ensuring all visitors are generic lambda aware
As an example of what compiles:
template <class F1, class F2>
struct overload : F1, F2 {
using F1::operator();
using F2::operator();
overload(F1 f1, F2 f2) : F1(f1), F2(f2) { }
};
auto Recursive = [](auto Self, auto h, auto ... rest) {
return 1 + Self(Self, rest...);
};
auto Base = [](auto Self, auto h) {
return 1;
};
overload<decltype(Base), decltype(Recursive)> O(Base, Recursive);
int num_params = O(O, 5, 3, "abc", 3.14, 'a');
Please see attached tests for more examples.
Some implementation notes:
- Add a new Declarator context => LambdaExprParameterContext to
clang::Declarator to allow the use of 'auto' in declaring generic
lambda parameters
- Augment AutoType's constructor (similar to how variadic
template-type-parameters ala TemplateTypeParmDecl are implemented) to
accept an IsParameterPack to encode a generic lambda parameter pack.
- Add various helpers to CXXRecordDecl to facilitate identifying
and querying a closure class
- LambdaScopeInfo (which maintains the current lambda's Sema state)
was augmented to house the current depth of the template being
parsed (id est the Parser calls Sema::RecordParsingTemplateParameterDepth)
so that Sema::ActOnLambdaAutoParameter may use it to create the
appropriate list of corresponding TemplateTypeParmDecl for each
auto parameter identified within the generic lambda (also stored
within the current LambdaScopeInfo). Additionally,
a TemplateParameterList data-member was added to hold the invented
TemplateParameterList AST node which will be much more useful
once we teach TreeTransform how to transform generic lambdas.
- SemaLambda.h was added to hold some common lambda utility
functions (this file is likely to grow ...)
- Teach Sema::ActOnStartOfFunctionDef to check whether it
is being called to instantiate a generic lambda's call
operator, and if so, push an appropriately prepared
LambdaScopeInfo object on the stack.
- Teach Sema::ActOnStartOfLambdaDefinition to set the
return type of a lambda without a trailing return type
to 'auto' in C++1y mode, and teach the return type
deduction machinery in SemaStmt.cpp to process either
C++11 and C++14 lambda's correctly depending on the flag.
- various tests were added - but much more will be needed.
A greatful thanks to all reviewers including Eli Friedman,
James Dennett and the ever illuminating Richard Smith. And
yet I am certain that I have allowed unidentified bugs to creep in;
bugs, that I will do my best to slay, once identified!
Thanks!
llvm-svn: 188977
When a local extern declaration redeclares some other entity, the type of that
entity is merged with the prior type if the prior declaration is visible (in C)
or is declared in the same scope (in C++).
- Make LookupRedeclarationWithLinkage actually work in C++, use it in the right
set of cases, and make it track whether it found a shadowed declaration.
- Track whether we found a declaration in the same scope (for C++) including
across serialization and template instantiation.
llvm-svn: 188307
of local classes. We were previously handling this by performing qualified
lookup within a function declaration(!!); replace it with the proper scope
lookup.
llvm-svn: 188050
function: it can't be 'void' and it can't be an initializer list. We give a
hard error for these rather than treating them as undefined behavior (we can
and probably should do the same for non-POD types in C++11, but as of this
change we don't).
Slightly rework the checking of variadic arguments in a function with a format
attribute to ensure that certain kinds of format string problem (non-literal
string, too many/too few arguments, ...) don't suppress this error.
llvm-svn: 187735
We would disallow the case where the overloaded member expression is
coming from an address-of operator but we wouldn't issue any diagnostics
when the overloaded member expression comes by way of a function to
pointer decay cast.
Clang's implementation of DR61 is now seemingly complete.
llvm-svn: 187559
Switch some warnings over to errors which should never have been warnings
in the first place. (Also, a minor fix to the preprocessor rules for
integer literals while I'm here.)
llvm-svn: 186903
This patch essentially removes all the FIXMEs following calls to DeduceTemplateArguments() that want to keep track of deduction failure info.
llvm-svn: 186730
r186331).
Original commit log:
If we friend a declaration twice, that should not make it visible to
name lookup in the surrounding context. Slightly rework how we handle
friend declarations to inherit the visibility of the prior
declaration, rather than setting a friend declaration to be visible
whenever there was a prior declaration.
llvm-svn: 186546
This breaks the build of basic patterns with repeated friend
declarations. See the added test case in SemaCXX/friend.cpp or the test
case reported to the original commit log.
Original commit log:
If we friend a declaration twice, that should not make it visible to
name lookup in the surrounding context. Slightly rework how we handle
friend declarations to inherit the visibility of the prior
declaration, rather than setting a friend declaration to be visible
whenever there was a prior declaration.
llvm-svn: 186331
does not substitute a sizeof-pack expression.
The solution is proposed by Richard Smith.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D869
llvm-svn: 186306
Test coverage for non-dependent pack expansions doesn't demonstrate a
failure prior to this patch (a follow-up commit improving debug info
will cover this commit specifically) but covers a related hole in our
test coverage.
Reviewed by Richard Smith & Eli Friedman.
llvm-svn: 186261
Original commit log:
If we friend a declaration twice, that should not make it visible to
name lookup in the surrounding context. Slightly rework how we handle
friend declarations to inherit the visibility of the prior
declaration, rather than setting a friend declaration to be visible
whenever there was a prior declaration.
llvm-svn: 186199
fix is.
Original commit log:
If we friend a declaration twice, that should not make it visible to
name lookup in the surrounding context. Slightly rework how we handle
friend declarations to inherit the visibility of the prior
declaration, rather than setting a friend declaration to be visible
whenever there was a prior declaration.
llvm-svn: 186185
lookup in the surrounding context. Slightly rework how we handle friend
declarations to inherit the visibility of the prior declaration, rather
than setting a friend declaration to be visible whenever there was a prior
declaration.
llvm-svn: 186040
Sema::MergeFunctionDecl attempts merging two decls even if the old decl
is invalid. This can lead to interesting circumstances where we
successfully merge the decls but the result makes no sense.
Take the following for example:
template <typename T>
int main(void);
int main(void);
Sema will not consider these to be overloads of the same name because
main can't be overloaded, which means that this must be a redeclaration.
In this case the templated decl is compatible with the non-templated
decl allowing the Sema::CheckFunctionDeclaration machinery to move on
and do bizarre things like setting the previous decl of a non-templated
decl to a templated decl!
The way I see it, we should just bail from MergeFunctionDecl if the old
decl is invalid.
This fixes PR16531.
llvm-svn: 185779
This boils down to us sending invalid function decls to
CheckFunctionDeclaration becauswe we did not consider that CheckMain
could cause the decl to be invalid. Instead, interogate the new decl's
main-validity and *then* send it over to get CheckFunctionDeclaration'd
if it was still valid after calling CheckMain.
llvm-svn: 185745
The test was passing because clang would still print the ast before exiting
with an error. Since that didn't seem to be the intent of the test, I change
the test instead of adding 'not' to the command line.
llvm-svn: 185634
The removal is tried by retrying the failed lookup of a correction
candidate with either the MemberContext or SS (CXXScopeSpecifier) or
both set to NULL if they weren't already. If the candidate identifier
is then looked up successfully, make a note in the candidate that the
SourceRange should include any existing nested name specifier even if
the candidate isn't adding a different one (i.e. the candidate has a
NULL NestedNameSpecifier).
Also tweak the diagnostic messages to differentiate between a suggestion
that just replaces the identifer but leaves the existing nested name
specifier intact and one that replaces the entire qualified identifier,
in cases where the suggested replacement is unqualified.
llvm-svn: 185487
Make sure we properly treat names defined inside a block as local
names. There are basically three fixes here. One, correctly
treat blocks as a context where we need to use local-name mangling using
the new isLocalContainerContext helper. Two, make
CXXNameMangler::manglePrefix handle local names in a consistent way.
Three, extend CXXNameMangler::mangleLocalName so it can mangle a block
correctly.
llvm-svn: 185450
This commit rearranges the logic in CXXNameMangler::mangleLocalName and
GetLocalClassDecl so that it doesn't accidentally skip over lambdas. It
also reduces code duplication a bit.
llvm-svn: 185402
Blocks, like lambdas, can be written in contexts which are required to be
treated as the same under ODR. Unlike lambdas, it isn't possible to actually
take the address of a block, so the mangling of the block itself doesn't
matter. However, objects like static variables inside a block do need to
be mangled in a consistent way.
There are basically three components here. One, block literals need a
consistent numbering. Two, objects/types inside a block literal need
to be mangled using it. Three, objects/types inside a block literal need
to have their linkage computed correctly.
llvm-svn: 185372
standard's rule that an extern "C" declaration conflicts with any entity in the
global scope with the same name. Now we only care if the global scope entity is
a variable declaration (and so might have the same mangled name as the extern
"C" declaration). This has been reported as a standard defect.
Original commit message:
PR7927, PR16247: Reimplement handling of matching extern "C" declarations
across scopes.
When we declare an extern "C" name that is not a redeclaration of an entity in
the same scope, check whether it redeclares some extern "C" entity from another
scope, and if not, check whether it conflicts with a (non-extern-"C") entity in
the translation unit.
When we declare a name in the translation unit that is not a redeclaration,
check whether it conflicts with any extern "C" entities (possibly from other
scopes).
llvm-svn: 185281
across scopes.
When we declare an extern "C" name that is not a redeclaration of an entity in
the same scope, check whether it redeclares some extern "C" entity from another
scope, and if not, check whether it conflicts with a (non-extern-"C") entity in
the translation unit.
When we declare a name in the translation unit that is not a redeclaration,
check whether it conflicts with any extern "C" entities (possibly from other
scopes).
llvm-svn: 185229
A default template-argument shall not be specified in a friend template
declaration.
Interestingly, we properly handled default template arguments on friend
class members but not on just friend classes.
llvm-svn: 184882
This changes the mangling of local static variables/etc. inside blocks
to do something simple and sane. This avoids depending on the way we mangle
blocks, which isn't really appropriate here.
John, please take a look at this to make sure the mangling I chose is sane.
Fixes <rdar://problem/14074423>.
llvm-svn: 184780
The problem with r183462 was that we assumed that a diagnostic id of
zero would be silent.
This small correction to CheckDerivedToBaseConversion changes it's
behavior to omit the diagnostic when given a diagnostic id of zero.
This fix passes the test case added in r184402.
llvm-svn: 184631
the result of a cast-to-reference-type lifetime-extends the object to which the
reference inside the cast binds.
This requires us to look for subobject adjustments on both the inside and the
outside of the MaterializeTemporaryExpr when looking for a temporary to
lifetime-extend (which we also need for core issue 616, and possibly 1213).
llvm-svn: 184024
- 'register' storage class
- dynamic exception specifications
Only the former check is enabled by default for now (the latter might be quite noisy).
llvm-svn: 183881
Introduce CXXStdInitializerListExpr node, representing the implicit
construction of a std::initializer_list<T> object from its underlying array.
The AST representation of such an expression goes from an InitListExpr with a
flag set, to a CXXStdInitializerListExpr containing a MaterializeTemporaryExpr
containing an InitListExpr (possibly wrapped in a CXXBindTemporaryExpr).
This more detailed representation has several advantages, the most important of
which is that the new MaterializeTemporaryExpr allows us to directly model
lifetime extension of the underlying temporary array. Using that, this patch
*drastically* simplifies the IR generation of this construct, provides IR
generation support for nested global initializer_list objects, fixes several
bugs where the destructors for the underlying array would accidentally not get
invoked, and provides constant expression evaluation support for
std::initializer_list objects.
llvm-svn: 183872
CXXCtorInitializers to the point where we perform the questionable lifetime
extension. This exposed a selection of false negatives in the warning.
llvm-svn: 183869
places which weren't setting it up properly. This allows us to get the right
cv-qualifiers for 'this' when it appears outside a method body in a class
template.
llvm-svn: 183483
Disallowing deriving from classes that have private virtual base classes
except in instances where the deriving class would be able to cast
itself to the private virtual base via a different derivation.
llvm-svn: 183462
Still missing cases for templates, but this is a step in the right
direction. Also omits suggestions that would be ambiguous (eg: void
func(int = 0); + void func(float = 0); func;)
llvm-svn: 183173
materialized temporary with the corresponding MaterializeTemporaryExpr. This is
groundwork for providing C++11's guaranteed static initialization for global
references bound to lifetime-extended temporaries (if the initialization is a
constant expression).
In passing, fix a couple of bugs where some evaluation failures didn't trigger
diagnostics, and a rejects-valid where potential constant expression testing
would assume that it knew the dynamic type of *this and would reject programs
which relied on it being some derived type.
llvm-svn: 183093
a FieldDecl from it, and propagate both into the closure type and the
LambdaExpr.
You can't do much useful with them yet -- you can't use them within the body
of the lambda, because we don't have a representation for "the this of the
lambda, not the this of the enclosing context". We also don't have support or a
representation for a nested capture of an init-capture yet, which was intended
to work despite not being allowed by the current standard wording.
llvm-svn: 181985
- References to ObjC bit-field ivars are bit-field lvalues;
fixes rdar://13794269, which got me started down this.
- Introduce Expr::refersToBitField, switch a couple users to
it where semantically important, and comment the difference
between this and the existing API.
- Discourage Expr::getBitField by making it a bit longer and
less general-sounding.
- Lock down on const_casts of bit-field gl-values until we
hear back from the committee as to whether they're allowed.
llvm-svn: 181252
to use. This makes very little difference right now (other than suppressing
follow-on errors in some cases), but will matter more once we support deduced
return types (we don't want expressions with undeduced return types in the
AST).
llvm-svn: 181107
Instead, we check for one line extern "C" context in linkage computation and
when deciding if a variable is a definition.
This hopefully completes the transition to having "as written" semantics for
hasExternalStorage.
llvm-svn: 180258
statement in constexpr functions. Everything which doesn't require variable
mutation is also allowed as an extension in C++11. 'void' becomes a literal
type to support constexpr functions which return 'void'.
llvm-svn: 180022
C++1y, so stop adding the 'const' there. Provide a compatibility warning for
code relying on this in C++11, with a fix-it hint. Update our lazily-written
tests to add the const, except for those ones which were testing our
implementation of this rule.
llvm-svn: 179969
Add a CXXDefaultInitExpr, analogous to CXXDefaultArgExpr, and use it both in
CXXCtorInitializers and in InitListExprs to represent a default initializer.
There's an additional complication here: because the default initializer can
refer to the initialized object via its 'this' pointer, we need to make sure
that 'this' points to the right thing within the evaluation.
llvm-svn: 179958
For this source:
const int &ref = someStruct.bitfield;
We used to generate this AST:
DeclStmt [...]
`-VarDecl [...] ref 'const int &'
`-MaterializeTemporaryExpr [...] 'const int' lvalue
`-ImplicitCastExpr [...] 'const int' lvalue <NoOp>
`-MemberExpr [...] 'int' lvalue bitfield .bitfield [...]
`-DeclRefExpr [...] 'struct X' lvalue ParmVar [...] 'someStruct' 'struct X'
Notice the lvalue inside the MaterializeTemporaryExpr, which is very
confusing (and caused an assertion to fire in the analyzer - PR15694).
We now generate this:
DeclStmt [...]
`-VarDecl [...] ref 'const int &'
`-MaterializeTemporaryExpr [...] 'const int' lvalue
`-ImplicitCastExpr [...] 'int' <LValueToRValue>
`-MemberExpr [...] 'int' lvalue bitfield .bitfield [...]
`-DeclRefExpr [...] 'struct X' lvalue ParmVar [...] 'someStruct' 'struct X'
Which makes a lot more sense. This allows us to remove code in both
CodeGen and AST that hacked around this special case.
The commit also makes Clang accept this (legal) C++11 code:
int &&ref = std::move(someStruct).bitfield
PR15694 / <rdar://problem/13600396>
llvm-svn: 179250
constructor. This isn't quite perfect (as usual, we don't handle default
arguments correctly yet, and we don't deal with copy/move constructors for
arguments correctly either, but this will be fixed when we implement core issue
1351.
This completes our support for inheriting constructors.
llvm-svn: 179154
We were assuming that any expression used as a converted constant
expression would either not have a folded constant value or would be
an integer, which is not the case for some ill-formed constant
expressions. Because converted constant expressions are only used
where integral values are expected, we can simply treat this as an
error path. If that ever changes, we'll need to widen the interface of
Sema::CheckConvertedConstantExpression() anyway.
llvm-svn: 179068
This fixes a regression I introduced in r178136, where we would not
consider the using directives from the semantic declaration contexts
that aren't represented by the lexical scopes (Scope) when performing
unqualified name lookup. This lead to horribly funny diagnostics like
"no identifier named 'foo'; did you mean 'foo'?".
llvm-svn: 179067
overriding a non-deleted virtual function. The existing check for this doesn't
catch this case, because it fires before we mark the method as deleted.
llvm-svn: 178563
visible. There's a lot of potential badness in how we're modelling
these things, but getting this much correct is reasonably easy.
rdar://13535367
llvm-svn: 178488
the normal attribute-merging path, because we can't merge alignment attributes
without knowing the complete set of alignment attributes which apply to a
particular declaration.
llvm-svn: 175861
accessible in its declaring class; otherwise we might
fail to apply [class.protected] when considering
accessibility in derived classes.
Noticed by inspection; <rdar://13270329>.
I had an existing test wrong. Here's why it's wrong:
Follow the rules (and notation) of [class.access]p5.
The naming class (N) is B and the context (R) is D::getX.
- 'x' as a member of B is protected, but R does not occur
in a member or friend of a class derived from B.
- There does exist a base class of B, A, which is accessible
from R, and 'x' is accessible at R when named in A because
'x' as a member of A is protected and R occurs in a member
of a class, D, that is derived from A; however, by
[class.protected], the class of the object expression must
be equal to or derived from that class, and A does not
derive from D.
llvm-svn: 175858
MSVC accepts this:
class A {
A::A();
};
Clang accepts regular member functions with extra qualification as an MS
extension, but not constructors. This changes the parser to defer rejecting
qualified constructors so that the same Sema logic can apply to constructors as
regular member functions. This also improves the error message when MS
extensions are disabled (in my opinion). Before it was:
/Users/jason/Desktop/test.cpp:2:8: error: expected member name or ';' after declaration specifiers
A::A();
~~~~ ^
1 error generated.
After:
/Users/jason/Desktop/test.cpp:2:6: error: extra qualification on member 'A'
A::A();
~~~^
1 error generated.
Patch by Jason Haslam.
llvm-svn: 174980
have a direct mismatch between some component of the template and some
component of the argument. The diagnostic now says what the mismatch was, but
doesn't yet say which part of the template doesn't match.
llvm-svn: 174039
If the member has an initializer, assume it was probably intended to be static
and suggest/recover with that.
If the member doesn't have an initializer, assume it was probably intended to
be const instead of constexpr and suggest that.
(if the attempt to apply these changes fails, don't make any suggestion &
produce the same diagnostic experience as before. The only case where this can
come up that I know of is with a mutable constexpr with an initializer, since
mutable is incompatible with static (but it's already incompatible with
const anyway))
llvm-svn: 173873
This required plumbing through a new flag to determine whether a ParmVarDecl is
actually a parameter of a function declaration (as opposed to a function
typedef etc, where the attribute is prohibited). Weirdly, this attribute (just
like [[noreturn]]) cannot be applied to a function type, just to a function
declaration (and its parameters).
llvm-svn: 173726
and split it out of -Wgnu into its own warning flag.
* In C++11, this is now a hard error (GCC has no extension here in C++11 mode).
The error can be disabled with -Wno-static-float-init, and has a fixit to
add 'constexpr'.
* In C++98, this is still an ExtWarn, but is now controlled by
-Wstatic-float-init as well as -Wgnu.
llvm-svn: 173414
This is a missing piece for C99 conformance.
This patch handles UCNs by adding a '\\' case to LexTokenInternal and
LexIdentifier -- if we see a backslash, we tentatively try to read in a UCN.
If the UCN is not syntactically well-formed, we fall back to the old
treatment: a backslash followed by an identifier beginning with 'u' (or 'U').
Because the spelling of an identifier with UCNs still has the UCN in it, we
need to convert that to UTF-8 in Preprocessor::LookUpIdentifierInfo.
Of course, valid code that does *not* use UCNs will see only a very minimal
performance hit (checks after each identifier for non-ASCII characters,
checks when converting raw_identifiers to identifiers that they do not
contain UCNs, and checks when getting the spelling of an identifier that it
does not contain a UCN).
This patch also adds basic support for actual UTF-8 in the source. This is
treated almost exactly the same as UCNs except that we consider stray
Unicode characters to be mistakes and offer a fixit to remove them.
llvm-svn: 173369
partially-substituted parameter pack in a template, forget about the
partially-substituted parameter pack: it is now completed. Fixes
<rdar://problem/12176336>.
llvm-svn: 172859
it apart from [[gnu::noreturn]] / __attribute__((noreturn)), since their
semantics are not equivalent (for instance, we treat [[gnu::noreturn]] as
affecting the function type, whereas [[noreturn]] does not).
llvm-svn: 172691
ActOnFinishFullExpr that some of its checks only apply to discarded-value
expressions. This adds missing checks for unexpanded variadic template
parameter packs to a handful of constructs.
llvm-svn: 172485
Set invalid type of declarator after emitting error diagnostics,
so that it won't be later considered when instantiating the template.
Added test5_inst in test/SemaCXX/condition.cpp for non-regression.
llvm-svn: 172201
definition, rather than at the end of the definition of the set of nested
classes. We still defer checking of the user-specified exception specification
to the end of the nesting -- we can't check that until we've parsed the
in-class initializers for non-static data members.
llvm-svn: 169805
the cases where we can't determine whether special members would be trivial
while building the class, we eagerly declare those special members. The impact
of this is bounded, since it does not trigger implicit declarations of special
members in classes which merely *use* those classes.
In order to determine whether we need to apply this rule, we also need to
eagerly declare move operations and destructors in cases where they might be
deleted. If a move operation were supposed to be deleted, it would instead
be suppressed, and we could need overload resolution to determine if we fall
back to a trivial copy operation. If a destructor were implicitly deleted,
it would cause the move constructor of any derived classes to be suppressed.
As discussed on cxx-abi-dev, C++11's selected constructor rules are also
retroactively applied as a defect resolution in C++03 mode, in order to
identify that class B has a non-trivial copy constructor (since it calls
A's constructor template, not A's copy constructor):
struct A { template<typename T> A(T &); };
struct B { mutable A a; };
llvm-svn: 169673
Remove pre-standard restriction on explicitly-defaulted copy constructors with
'incorrect' parameter types, and instead just make those special members
non-trivial as the standard requires.
This required making CXXRecordDecl correctly handle classes which have both a
trivial and a non-trivial special member of the same kind.
This also fixes PR13217 by reimplementing DiagnoseNontrivial in terms of the
new triviality computation technology.
llvm-svn: 169667
properly, rather than faking it up by pretending that a reference member makes
the default constructor non-trivial. That leads to rejects-valids when putting
such types inside unions.
llvm-svn: 169662
Don't require that, during template deduction, a template specialization type
as a function parameter has at least as many template arguments as one used in
a function argument (not even if the argument has been resolved to an exact
type); the additional parameters might be provided by default template
arguments in the template. We don't need this check, since we now implement
[temp.deduct.call]p4 with an additional check after deduction.
llvm-svn: 169475
string literal needs cleaning (because it contains line-splicing in the
encoding prefix or in the ud-suffix), do not clean the section between the
double-quotes -- that's the "raw" bit!
llvm-svn: 168776
constructor/assignment operator with a const-qualified parameter type. The
prior method for determining this incorrectly used overload resolution.
llvm-svn: 168775
a special member" diagnostic from warning to error, and fix the cases where it
produced diagnostics with incorrect wording.
We don't support this as an extension, and we ban it even in C++98 mode. This
breaks too much (for instance, the ABI-specified calling convention for a type
can change if it acquires a copy constructor through the addition of a default
argument).
llvm-svn: 168769
and defined within the current instantiation, but which are not part of the
current instantiation. Previously, it would look at bases which could be
specialized separately from the current template.
llvm-svn: 168477
- In C++11, perform overload resolution over all assignment operators, rather than just looking for copy/move assignment operators.
- Clean up after temporaries produced by operator= immediately, rather than accumulating them until the end of the function.
llvm-svn: 167798
C++11 3.3.3/2 "A parameter name shall not be redeclared in the outermost block
of the function definition nor in the outermost block of any handler associated
with a function-try-block."
It's not totally clear to me whether the "FIXME" case is covered by this, but
Richard Smith thinks it probably should be. It's just a bit more involved to
fix that case.
llvm-svn: 167650
We don't support any C++11 attributes that appertain to declaration specifiers so reject
the attributes in parser until we support them; this also conforms to what g++ 4.8 is doing.
llvm-svn: 167481
since it also has an implicit exception specification. Downgrade the error to
an extwarn, since at least for operator delete, system headers like to declare
it as 'noexcept' whereas the implicit definition does not have an explicit
exception specification. Move the exception specification for user-declared
'operator delete' functions from the type-as-written into the type, to reflect
reality and to allow us to detect whether there was an implicit exception spec
or not.
llvm-svn: 166372
This implementation doesn't warn on anything that GCC doesn't warn on with the
exception of templates specializations (GCC doesn't warn, Clang does). The
specific skipped cases (boolean, constant expressions, enums) are open for
debate/adjustment if anyone wants to demonstrate that GCC is being overly
conservative here. The only really obvious false positive I found was in the
Clang regression suite's MPI test - apparently MPI uses specific flag values in
pointer constants. (eg: #define FOO (void*)~0)
llvm-svn: 166039
a non-inline namespace, then reopens it as inline to try to add its symbols to
the surrounding namespace. In this one special case, permit the namespace to be
reopened as inline, and patch up the name lookup tables to match.
llvm-svn: 165263
- General C++11 attributes were previously parsed and ignored. Now they are parsed and stored in AST.
- Add support to parse arguments of attributes that in 'gnu' namespace.
- Differentiate unknown attributes and known attributes that can't be applied to statements when emitting diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 165082
This test behavior differs depending (at least) on whether
sizeof(wchar_t) == sizeof(int) or not.
When they are equal, the first redeclaration will fail because decltype(+L'x')
is unsigned int instead of the expected int. This occurs on ARM.
llvm-svn: 164315
integral promotions to both its underlying type and to its underlying type's
promoted type. This matters now that boolean conversions aren't permitted in
converted constant expressions (a la DR1407): an enumerator with a fixed
underlying type of bool still can be.
llvm-svn: 163841
warning to an error. C++ bans it, and both GCC and EDG diagnose it as
an error. Microsoft allows it, so we still warn in Microsoft
mode. Fixes <rdar://problem/11135644>.
llvm-svn: 163831
unexpanded parameter pack is a pack expansion. Thus, as with a non-type template
parameter which is a pack expansion, it needs to be expanded early into a fixed
list of template parameters.
Since the expanded list of template parameters is not itself a parameter pack,
it is permitted to appear before the end of the template parameter list, so also
remove that restriction (for both template template parameter pack expansions and
non-type template parameter pack expansions).
llvm-svn: 163369
make sure we walk up the DC chain for the current context,
rather than allowing ourselves to get switched over to the
canonical DC chain. Fixes PR13642.
llvm-svn: 162616
statement starts with an identifier for which name lookup will fail either way,
look at later tokens to disambiguate in order to improve error recovery.
llvm-svn: 162464
The old error message stating that 'begin' was an undeclared identifier
is replaced with a new message explaining that the error is in the range
expression, along with which of the begin() and end() functions was
problematic if relevant.
Additionally, if the range was a pointer type or defines operator*,
attempt to dereference the range, and offer a FixIt if the modified range
works.
llvm-svn: 162248
things going on here that were problematic:
- We were missing the actual access check, or rather, it was suppressed
on account of being a redeclaration lookup.
- The access check would naturally happen during delay, which isn't
appropriate in this case.
- We weren't actually emitting dependent diagnostics associated with
class templates, which was unfortunate.
- Access was being propagated incorrectly for friend method declarations
that couldn't be matched at parse-time.
llvm-svn: 161652
we know whether the function is virtual. But check it as soon as we do know;
in some cases we don't need to wait for an instantiation.
llvm-svn: 161316
a defaulted special member function until the exception specification is needed
(using the same criteria used for the delayed instantiation of exception
specifications for function temploids).
EST_Delayed is now EST_Unevaluated (using 1330's terminology), and, like
EST_Uninstantiated, carries a pointer to the FunctionDecl which will be used to
resolve the exception specification.
This is enabled for all C++ modes: it's a little faster in the case where the
exception specification isn't used, allows our C++11-in-C++98 extensions to
work, and is still correct for C++98, since in that mode the computation of the
exception specification can't fail.
The diagnostics here aren't great (in particular, we should include implicit
evaluation of exception specifications for defaulted special members in the
template instantiation backtraces), but they're not much worse than before.
Our approach to the problem of cycles between in-class initializers and the
exception specification for a defaulted default constructor is modified a
little by this change -- we now reject any odr-use of a defaulted default
constructor if that constructor uses an in-class initializer and the use is in
an in-class initialzer which is declared lexically earlier. This is a closer
approximation to the current draft solution in core issue 1351, but isn't an
exact match (but the current draft wording isn't reasonable, so that's to be
expected).
llvm-svn: 160847
Rather than adding a ContainsUnexpandedParameterPack bit to essentially every
AST node, we tunnel the bit directly up to the surrounding lambda expression
when we reach a context where an unexpanded pack can not normally appear.
Thus any statement or declaration within a lambda can now potentially contain
an unexpanded parameter pack.
llvm-svn: 160705
be defined as deleted, take cv-qualifiers on class members into account when
looking up the copy or move constructor or assignment operator which will be
used for them.
llvm-svn: 160418
and a function template instantiation, if there's a parameter pack in the
declaration and one at the same place in the instantiation, don't assume that
the pack wasn't expanded -- it may have expanded to nothing. Instead, go ahead
and check whether the parameter pack was expandable. We can do this as a
side-effect of the work we'd need to do anyway, to find how many parameters
were produced.
llvm-svn: 160416
Alp Toker