Previously we would cut off the source file buffer at the code-completion
point; this impeded code-completion inside C++ inline methods and,
recently, with buffering ObjC methods.
Have the code-completion inserted into the source buffer so that it can
be buffered along with a method body. When we actually hit the code-completion
point the cut-off lexing or parsing.
Fixes rdar://10056932&8319466
llvm-svn: 139086
and does the Sema on their body after the entire
class/category @implementation is seen. This change allows messaging
of forward private methods, as well as, access to
synthesized ivars of properties with foward synthesize
declarations; among others. In effect, this patch removes
several restrictions placed on objective-c due to in-place
semantics processing of methods.
This is part of // rdar://8843851.
llvm-svn: 138865
type matches have a bigger impact. The impetus for this change was
that, when initializing an enumeration value, we want enumerators of
that enumeration type to have a higher priority than, e.g., unrelated
local variables.
llvm-svn: 116774
clang_codeCompleteAt(). This uncovered a few issues with the latter:
- ASTUnit wasn't saving/restoring diagnostic state appropriately between
reparses and code completions.
- "Overload" completions weren't being passed through to the client
llvm-svn: 116241
of a binary expression, continue on and parse the right-hand side of
the binary expression anyway, but don't call the semantic actions to
type-check. Previously, we would see the error and then, effectively,
skip tokens until the end of the statement.
The result should be more useful recovery, both in the normal case
(we'll actually see errors beyond the first one in a statement), but
it also helps code completion do a much better job, because we do
"real" code completion on the right-hand side of an invalid binary
expression rather than completing with the recovery completion. For
example, given
x = p->y
if there is no variable named "x", we can still complete after the p->
as a member expression. Along the recovery path, we would have
completed after the "->" as if we were in an expression context, which
is mostly useless.
llvm-svn: 114225
1) Suppress diagnostics as soon as we form the code-completion
token, so we don't get any error/warning spew from the early
end-of-file.
2) If we consume a code-completion token when we weren't expecting
one, go into a code-completion recovery path that produces the best
results it can based on the context that the parser is in.
llvm-svn: 104585
Vassil Vassilev