This was of course overridable by using DumpValueObjectOptions, but the default should be saner and the previous behavior made for a few fun investigations....
rdar://problem/21065149
llvm-svn: 238961
Since interaction with the python interpreter is moving towards
being more isolated, we won't be able to include this header from
normal files anymore, all includes of it should be localized to
the python library which will live under source/bindings/API/Python
after a future patch.
None of the files that were including this header actually depended
on it anyway, so it was just a dead include in every single instance.
llvm-svn: 238581
And they also do not have a thread/frame attached to them
That makes dynamic and synthetic values attached to them impossible to update - which, among other things, makes it impossible to properly display persistent variables of types that could have such dynamic/persistent values
Fix this by making it so that a ValueObject can control its constantness (hint: dynamic and synthetic values cannot be constant) and whether it wants to let itself be updated when an invalid thread is around
llvm-svn: 237504
Summary:
After r236447, ValueObject::GetAddressOf returns LLDB_INVALID_ADDRESS
when the value type is eValueHostAddress. For such a case, clients of
GetAddressOf should get the address from the scalar part of the value
instead of using the value returned by GetAddressOf directly.
This change also makes ValueObject::GetAddressOf set the address type to
eAddressTypeHost for values of eValueHostAddress so that clients can
recognize that they need to fetch the address from the scalar part
of the value.
Test Plan: ninja check-lldb on linux
Reviewers: clayborg, ovyalov
Reviewed By: ovyalov
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9490
llvm-svn: 236473
Summary:
This fixes TestRegisterVariables for clang and hence it is enabled in this commit.
Test Plan: dotest.py -C clang -p TestRegisterVariables
Reviewers: clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9421
llvm-svn: 236447
Summary:
The code for GetSyntheticArrayMemberFromPointer and
GetSyntheticArrayMemberFromArray was identical, so just collapse the
the methods into one.
Reviewers: granata.enrico, clayborg
Reviewed By: clayborg
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D7911
llvm-svn: 230708
There was a test in the test suite that was triggering the backtrace logging output that requested that the client pass an execution context. Sometimes we need the process for Objective C types because our static notion of the type might not align with the reality when being run in a live runtime.
Switched from an "ExecutionContext *" to an "ExecutionContextScope *" for greater ease of use.
llvm-svn: 228892
A runtime support value is a ValueObject whose only purpose is to support some language runtime's operation, but it does not directly provide any user-visible benefit
As such, unless the user is working on the runtime support, it is mostly safe for them not to see such a value when debugging
It is a language runtime's job to check whether a ValueObject is a support value, and that - in conjunction with a target setting - is used by frame variable and target variable
SBFrame::GetVariables gets a new overload with yet another flag to dictate whether to return those support values to the caller - that which defaults to the setting's value
rdar://problem/15539930
llvm-svn: 228791
And since enough of these are doing the right thing, add a test case to verify we are doing the right thing with freeze drying ObjC object types
Fixes rdar://18092770
llvm-svn: 227282
This is necessary because the byte size of an ObjC class type is not reliably statically knowable (e.g. because superclasses sit deep in frameworks that we have no debug info for)
The lack of reliable size info is a problem when trying to freeze-dry an ObjC instance (not the pointer, the pointee)
This commit lays the foundation for having language runtimes help in figuring out byte sizes, and having ClangASTType ask for runtime help
No feature change as no runtime actually implements the logic, and nowhere is an ExecutionContext passed in yet
llvm-svn: 227274
Most of the time, we can use context information just fine to choose a language (i.e. the language of the frame that the root object was defined in, if any); but in some cases, synthetic children may be fabricated as root frame-less entities, and then we wouldn't know any better
This patch allows (internal) synthetic child providers to set a display language on the children they generate, should they so choose
llvm-svn: 226634
It also comes with a (rudimentary) test case that gets itself in a failed update scenario, and checks that we don't crash
This is the easiest case I could think of that forces the failed update case Zachary was seeing
llvm-svn: 225463
Function pointers had a summary generated for them bypassing formatters, directly as part of the ValueObject subsystem
This patch transitions that code into a hardcoded summary
llvm-svn: 223906
Because of the way they are created, synthetic children cannot (in general) have a sane expression path
A solution to this would be letting the parent front-end generate expression paths for its children
Doing so requires a significant amount of refactoring, and might not always lead to better results (esp. w.r.t. C++ templates)
This commit takes a simpler approach:
- if a synthetic child is of pointer type and it's a target pointer, then emit *((T)value)
- if a synthetic child is a non-pointer, but its location is in the target, then emit *((T*)loadAddr)
- if a synthetic child has a value, emit ((T)value)
- else, don't emit anything
Fixes rdar://18442386
llvm-svn: 223836
track of the checksum of the object so we can
track if it is modified. This fixes a testcase
(test/expression_command/issue_11588) on OS X.
Patch by Enrico Granata.
llvm-svn: 223830
- adds a new flag to mark ValueObjects as "synthetic children generated"
- vends new Create functions as part of the SyntheticChildrenFrontEnd that set the flag automatically
- moves synthetic child providers over to using these new functions
No visible feature change, but preparatory work for feature change
llvm-svn: 223819
Such a persisted version is equivalent to evaluating the value via the expression evaluator, and holding on to the $n result of the expression, except this API can be used on SBValues that do not obviously come from an expression (e.g. are the result of a memory lookup)
Expose this via SBValue::Persist() in our public API layer, and ValueObject::Persist() in the lldb_private layer
Includes testcase
Fixes rdar://19136664
llvm-svn: 223711
Two flags are introduced:
- preferred display language (as in, ObjC vs. C++)
- summary capping (as in, should a limit be put to the amount of data retrieved)
The meaning - if any - of these options is for individual formatters to establish
The topic of a subsequent commit will be to actually wire these through to individual data formatters
llvm-svn: 221482
The recent StringPrinter changes made this behavior the default, and the setting defaults to yes
If you want to change this behavior and see non-printables unescaped (e.g. "a\tb" as "a b"), set it to false
Fixes rdar://12969594
llvm-svn: 221399
The way to do this is to write a synthetic child provider for your type, and have it vend the (optional) get_value function.
If get_value is defined, and it returns a valid SBValue, that SBValue's value (as in lldb_private::Value) will be used as the synthetic ValueObject's Value
The rationale for doing things this way is twofold:
- there are many possible ways to define a "value" (SBData, a Python number, ...) but SBValue seems general enough as a thing that stores a "value", so we just trade values that way and that keeps our currency trivial
- we could introduce a new level of layering (ValueObjectSyntheticValue), a new kind of formatter (synthetic value producer), but that would complicate the model (can I have a dynamic with no synthetic children but synthetic value? synthetic value with synthetic children but no dynamic?), and I really couldn't see much benefit to be reaped from this added complexity in the matrix
On the other hand, just defining a synthetic child provider with a get_value but returning no actual children is easy enough that it's not a significant road-block to adoption of this feature
Comes with a test case
llvm-svn: 219330
Rationale:
Pretty simply, the idea is that sometimes type names are way too long and contain way too many details for the average developer to care about. For instance, a plain ol' vector of int might be shown as
std::__1::vector<int, std::__1::allocator<....
rather than the much simpler std::vector<int> form, which is what most developers would actually type in their code
Proposed solution:
Introduce a notion of "display name" and a corresponding API GetDisplayTypeName() to return such a crafted for visual representation type name
Obviously, the display name and the fully qualified (or "true") name are not necessarily the same - that's the whole point
LLDB could choose to pick the "display name" as its one true notion of a type name, and if somebody really needs the fully qualified version of it, let them deal with the problem
Or, LLDB could rename what it currently calls the "type name" to be the "display name", and add new APIs for the fully qualified name, making the display name the default choice
The choice that I am making here is that the type name will keep meaning the same, and people who want a type name suited for display will explicitly ask for one
It is the less risky/disruptive choice - and it should eventually make it fairly obvious when someone is asking for the wrong type
Caveats:
- for now, GetDisplayTypeName() == GetTypeName(), there is no logic to produce customized display type names yet.
- while the fully-qualified type name is still the main key to the kingdom of data formatters, if we start showing custom names to people, those should match formatters
llvm-svn: 209072
Set the correct FormatManager revision before starting to figure out the new formatters
This can avoid entering some corner cases where as part of figuring out formatters we try to figure out dynamic types, and in turn that causes us to go back in trying to fetch new formatters - it is not only a futile exercise, it's also prone to endless recursion
This would only cause a behavior change if getting this chain started would eventually cause something to run and alter the formatters, a very unlikely if at all possible sequence of events
llvm-svn: 205928
This is a purely mechanical change explicitly casting any parameters for printf
style conversion. This cleans up the warnings emitted by gcc 4.8 on Linux.
llvm-svn: 205607
For some reason, the libc++ vector<bool> data formatter was essentially a costly no-up, doing everything required of it, except actually generating the child values!
This restores its functionality
llvm-svn: 205259
read during materialization. First of all, report
if we can't read the data for some reason. Second,
consult the ValueObject's error and report that if
there's some problem.
<rdar://problem/16074201>
llvm-svn: 202552
Revert the spirit of r199857 - a convincing case can be made that overriding a summary's format markers behind its back is not the right thing to do
This commit reverts the behavior of the code to the previous model, and changes the test case to validate the opposite of what it was validating before
llvm-svn: 201455
The many many benefits include:
1 - Input/Output/Error streams are now handled as real streams not a push style input
2 - auto completion in python embedded interpreter
3 - multi-line input for "script" and "expression" commands now allow you to edit previous/next lines using up and down arrow keys and this makes multi-line input actually a viable thing to use
4 - it is now possible to use curses to drive LLDB (please try the "gui" command)
We will need to deal with and fix any buildbot failures and tests and arise now that input/output and error are correctly hooked up in all cases.
llvm-svn: 200263
Pavel Labath