We already prohibited this in most cases (in r130710), but had some bugs in our
enforcement of this rule. Specifically, this prevents the following
combinations:
* -x c -std=clN.M, which would previously effectively act as if -x cl were
used, despite the input being a C source file. (-x cl -std=cNN continues
to be disallowed.)
* -x c++ -std=cuda, which would previously select C++98 + CUDA, despite that
not being a C++ standard. (-x cuda -std=c++NN is still permitted, and
selects CUDA with the given C++ standard as its base language.
-x cuda -std=cuda is still supported with the meaning of CUDA + C++98.)
* -x renderscript -std=c++NN, which would previously form a hybrid "C++ with
RenderScript extensions" language. We could support such a thing, but
shouldn't do so by accident.
llvm-svn: 301497
Previously we were setting LangOptions::GNUInline (which controls whether we
use traditional GNU inline semantics) if the language did not have the C99
feature flag set. The trouble with this is that C++ family languages also
do not have that flag set, so we ended up setting this flag in C++ modes
(and working around it in a few places downstream by also checking CPlusPlus).
The fix is to check whether the C89 flag is set for the target language,
rather than whether the C99 flag is cleared. This also lets us remove most
CPlusPlus checks. We continue to test CPlusPlus when deciding whether to
pre-define the __GNUC_GNU_INLINE__ macro for consistency with GCC.
There is a change in semantics in two other places
where we weren't checking both CPlusPlus and GNUInline
(FunctionDecl::doesDeclarationForceExternallyVisibleDefinition and
FunctionDecl::isInlineDefinitionExternallyVisible), but this change seems to
put us back into line with GCC's semantics (test case: test/CodeGen/inline.c).
While at it, forbid -fgnu89-inline in C++ modes, as GCC doesn't support it,
it didn't have any effect before, and supporting it just makes things more
complicated.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9333
llvm-svn: 237299
Richard Smith