Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tony Jiang 2d9c5f3b8b [PowerPC Peephole] Constants into a join add, use ADDI over LI/ADD.
Two blocks prior to the join each perform an li and the the join block has an
add using the initialized register. Optimize each predecessor block to instead
use addi and delete the li's and add.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36734

llvm-svn: 313639
2017-09-19 16:14:37 +00:00
Hiroshi Inoue 614453b797 [PowerPC] eliminate redundant compare instruction
If multiple conditional branches are executed based on the same comparison, we can execute multiple conditional branches based on the result of one comparison on PPC. For example,

if (a == 0) { ... }
else if (a < 0) { ... }

can be executed by one compare and two conditional branches instead of two pairs of a compare and a conditional branch.

This patch identifies a code sequence of the two pairs of a compare and a conditional branch and merge the compares if possible.
To maximize the opportunity, we do canonicalization of code sequence before merging compares.
For the above example, the input for this pass looks like:

cmplwi r3, 0
beq    0, .LBB0_3
cmpwi  r3, -1
bgt    0, .LBB0_4

So, before merging two compares, we canonicalize it as

cmpwi  r3, 0       ; cmplwi and cmpwi yield same result for beq
beq    0, .LBB0_3
cmpwi  r3, 0       ; greather than -1 means greater or equal to 0
bge    0, .LBB0_4

The generated code should be

cmpwi  r3, 0
beq    0, .LBB0_3
bge    0, .LBB0_4

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37211

llvm-svn: 312514
2017-09-05 04:15:17 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 6bda14b313 Sort the remaining #include lines in include/... and lib/....
I did this a long time ago with a janky python script, but now
clang-format has built-in support for this. I fed clang-format every
line with a #include and let it re-sort things according to the precise
LLVM rules for include ordering baked into clang-format these days.

I've reverted a number of files where the results of sorting includes
isn't healthy. Either places where we have legacy code relying on
particular include ordering (where possible, I'll fix these separately)
or where we have particular formatting around #include lines that
I didn't want to disturb in this patch.

This patch is *entirely* mechanical. If you get merge conflicts or
anything, just ignore the changes in this patch and run clang-format
over your #include lines in the files.

Sorry for any noise here, but it is important to keep these things
stable. I was seeing an increasing number of patches with irrelevant
re-ordering of #include lines because clang-format was used. This patch
at least isolates that churn, makes it easy to skip when resolving
conflicts, and gets us to a clean baseline (again).

llvm-svn: 304787
2017-06-06 11:49:48 +00:00
Diana Picus 116bbab4e4 [CodeGen] Rename MachineInstrBuilder::addOperand. NFC
Rename from addOperand to just add, to match the other method that has been
added to MachineInstrBuilder for adding more than just 1 operand.

See https://reviews.llvm.org/D28057 for the whole discussion.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28556

llvm-svn: 291891
2017-01-13 09:58:52 +00:00
Nemanja Ivanovic 15748f4921 [PowerPC] Improvements for BUILD_VECTOR Vol. 4
This is the final patch in the series of patches that improves
BUILD_VECTOR handling on PowerPC. This adds a few peephole optimizations
to remove redundant instructions. It also adds a large test case which
encompasses a large set of code patterns that build vectors - this test
case was the motivator for this series of patches.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26066

llvm-svn: 288800
2016-12-06 11:47:14 +00:00
Tim Shen 4ff62b187e [PPCMIPeephole] Fix splat elimination
Summary:
In PPCMIPeephole, when we see two splat instructions, we can't simply do the following transformation:
  B = Splat A
  C = Splat B
=>
  C = Splat A
because B may still be used between these two instructions. Instead, we should make the second Splat a PPC::COPY and let later passes decide whether to remove it or not:
  B = Splat A
  C = Splat B
=>
  B = Splat A
  C = COPY B

Fixes PR30663.

Reviewers: echristo, iteratee, kbarton, nemanjai

Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25493

llvm-svn: 283961
2016-10-12 00:48:25 +00:00
Nemanja Ivanovic 11049f8f07 [Power9] Part-word VSX integer scalar loads/stores and sign extend instructions
This patch corresponds to review:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D23155

This patch removes the VSHRC register class (based on D20310) and adds
exploitation of the Power9 sub-word integer loads into VSX registers as well
as vector sign extensions.
The new instructions are useful for a few purposes:

    Int to Fp conversions of 1 or 2-byte values loaded from memory
    Building vectors of 1 or 2-byte integers with values loaded from memory
    Storing individual 1 or 2-byte elements from integer vectors

This patch implements all of those uses.

llvm-svn: 283190
2016-10-04 06:59:23 +00:00
Andrew Kaylor 289bd5f684 Add optimization bisect opt-in calls for PowerPC passes
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19554

llvm-svn: 267769
2016-04-27 19:39:32 +00:00
Bill Schmidt 34af5e1c76 [PowerPC] Add an MI SSA peephole pass.
This patch adds a pass for doing PowerPC peephole optimizations at the
MI level while the code is still in SSA form.  This allows for easy
modifications to the instructions while depending on a subsequent pass
of DCE.  Both passes are very fast due to the characteristics of SSA.

At this time, the only peepholes added are for cleaning up various
redundancies involving the XXPERMDI instruction.  However, I would
expect this will be a useful place to add more peepholes for
inefficiencies generated during instruction selection.  The pass is
placed after VSX swap optimization, as it is best to let that pass
remove unnecessary swaps before performing any remaining clean-ups.

The utility of these clean-ups are demonstrated by changes to four
existing test cases, all of which now have tighter expected code
generation.  I've also added Eric Schweiz's bugpoint-reduced test from
PR25157, for which we now generate tight code.  One other test started
failing for me, and I've fixed it
(test/Transforms/PlaceSafepoints/finite-loops.ll) as well; this is not
related to my changes, and I'm not sure why it works before and not
after.  The problem is that the CHECK-NOT: of "statepoint" from test1
fails because of the "statepoint" in test2, and so forth.  Adding a
CHECK-LABEL in between keeps the different occurrences of that string
properly scoped.

llvm-svn: 252651
2015-11-10 21:38:26 +00:00