Summary:
SExprBuilder::translateDeclRefExpr was only looking at FunctionDecl and not also looking at ObjCMethodDecl. It should consider both because the attributes can be used on Objective-C as well.
<rdar://problem/48941331>
Reviewers: dexonsmith, erik.pilkington
Subscribers: jkorous, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59523
llvm-svn: 356940
When searching for construction contexts, i.e. figuring out which statements
define the object that is constructed by each construct-expression, ignore
transparent init-list expressions because they don't add anything to the
context. This allows the Static Analyzer to model construction, destruction,
materialization, lifetime extension correctly in more cases. Also fixes
a crash caused by incorrectly evaluating initial values of variables
initialized with such expressions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59573
llvm-svn: 356634
Summary:
Similar to D56967, we add the existing diag::note_locked_here to tell
the user where we saw the locking that isn't matched correctly.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59455
llvm-svn: 356427
Don't crash when a function has a name that starts with "CF" and ends with
"Retain" but takes 0 arguments. In particular, don't try to treat it as if
it returns its first argument.
These problems are inevitable because the checker is naming-convention-based,
but at least we shouldn't crash.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59123
llvm-svn: 356223
We should track mutation of a variable within a comma operator expression.
Current code in ExprMutationAnalyzer does not handle it.
This will handle cases like:
(a, b) ++ < == b is modified
(a, b) = c < == b is modifed
Patch by Djordje Todorovic.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58894
llvm-svn: 355605
Summary:
The idea is that the code here isn't written, so doesn't indicate a bug.
Similar to code expanded from macros.
This means the warning no longer fires on this code:
for (auto C : collection) {
process(C);
return;
}
handleEmptyCollection();
Unclear whether this is more often a bug or not in practice, I think it's a
reasonable idiom in some cases.
Either way, if we want to warn on "loop that doesn't loop", I think it should be
a separate warning, and catch `while(1) break;`
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58134
llvm-svn: 354102
The description of what the various Expr::Ignore* do has drifted from the
actual implementation.
Inspection reveals that IgnoreParenImpCasts() is not equivalent to doing
IgnoreParens() + IgnoreImpCasts() until reaching a fixed point, but
IgnoreParenCasts() is equivalent to doing IgnoreParens() + IgnoreCasts()
until reaching a fixed point. There is also a fair amount of duplication
in the various Expr::Ignore* functions which increase the chance of further
future inconsistencies. In preparation for the next patch which will factor
out the implementation of the various Expr::Ignore*, do the following cleanups:
Remove Stmt::IgnoreImplicit, in favor of Expr::IgnoreImplicit. IgnoreImplicit
is the only function among all of the Expr::Ignore* which is available in Stmt.
There are only a few users of Stmt::IgnoreImplicit. They can just use instead
Expr::IgnoreImplicit like they have to do for the other Ignore*.
Move Expr::IgnoreImpCasts() from Expr.h to Expr.cpp. This made no difference
in the run-time with my usual benchmark (-fsyntax-only on all of Boost).
While we are at it, make IgnoreParenNoopCasts take a const reference to the
ASTContext for const correctness.
Update the comments to match what the Expr::Ignore* are actually doing.
I am not sure that listing exactly what each Expr::Ignore* do is optimal,
but it certainly looks better than the current state which is in my opinion
between misleading and just plain wrong.
The whole patch is NFC (if you count removing Stmt::IgnoreImplicit as NFC).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57266
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
llvm-svn: 353006
This builtin has the same UI as __builtin_object_size, but has the
potential to be evaluated dynamically. It is meant to be used as a
drop-in replacement for libraries that use __builtin_object_size when
a dynamic checking mode is enabled. For instance,
__builtin_object_size fails to provide any extra checking in the
following function:
void f(size_t alloc) {
char* p = malloc(alloc);
strcpy(p, "foobar"); // expands to __builtin___strcpy_chk(p, "foobar", __builtin_object_size(p, 0))
}
This is an overflow if alloc < 7, but because LLVM can't fold the
object size intrinsic statically, it folds __builtin_object_size to
-1. With __builtin_dynamic_object_size, alloc is passed through to
__builtin___strcpy_chk.
rdar://32212419
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56760
llvm-svn: 352665
Summary:
We use the existing diag::note_locked_here to tell the user where we saw
the first locking.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56967
llvm-svn: 352549
Track them for ISL/OS objects by default, and for NS/CF under a flag.
rdar://47536377
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57356
llvm-svn: 352534
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
If a property is defined with a custom getter, we should not behave as if
the getter simply returns an instance variable. We don't support setters,
so they aren't affected.
On top of being the right thing to do, this also fixes a crash on
the newly added test - in which a property and its getter are defined
in two separate categories.
rdar://problem/47051544
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56823
llvm-svn: 351609
Summary:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54862 removed the usages of `ASTContext&` from
within the `CXXMethodDecl::getThisType` method. Remove the parameter
altogether, as well as all usages of it. This does not result in any
functional change because the parameter was unused since
https://reviews.llvm.org/D54862.
Test Plan: check-clang
Reviewers: akyrtzi, mikael
Reviewed By: mikael
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56509
llvm-svn: 350914
Since CallExpr::setNumArgs has been removed, it is now possible to store the
callee expression and the argument expressions of CallExpr in a trailing array.
This saves one pointer per CallExpr, CXXOperatorCallExpr, CXXMemberCallExpr,
CUDAKernelCallExpr and UserDefinedLiteral.
Given that CallExpr is used as a base of the above classes we cannot use
llvm::TrailingObjects. Instead we store the offset in bytes from the this pointer
to the start of the trailing objects and manually do the casts + arithmetic.
Some notes:
1.) I did not try to fit the number of arguments in the bit-fields of Stmt.
This leaves some space for future additions and avoid the discussion about
whether x bits are sufficient to hold the number of arguments.
2.) It would be perfectly possible to recompute the offset to the trailing
objects before accessing the trailing objects. However the trailing objects
are frequently accessed and benchmarks show that it is slightly faster to
just load the offset from the bit-fields. Additionally, because of 1),
we have plenty of space in the bit-fields of Stmt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55771
Reviewed By: rjmccall
llvm-svn: 349910
All of the other constructors already take a reference to the AST context.
This avoids calling Decl::getASTContext in most cases. Additionally move
the definition of the constructor from Expr.h to Expr.cpp since it is calling
DeclRefExpr::computeDependence. NFC.
llvm-svn: 349901
StaticAnalyzer uses the CFG-based RelaxedLiveVariables analysis in order to,
in particular, figure out values of which expressions are still needed.
When the expression becomes "dead", it is garbage-collected during
the dead binding scan.
Expressions that constitute branches/bodies of control flow statements,
eg. `E1' in `if (C1) E1;' but not `E2' in `if (C2) { E2; }', were kept alive
for too long. This caused false positives in MoveChecker because it relies
on cleaning up loop-local variables when they go out of scope, but some of those
live-for-too-long expressions were keeping a reference to those variables.
Fix liveness analysis to correctly mark these expressions as dead.
Add a debug checker, debug.DumpLiveStmts, in order to test expressions liveness.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55566
llvm-svn: 349320
Summary:
The pattern is problematic with C++ exceptions, and not as widespread as
scoped locks, but it's still used by some, for example Chromium.
We are a bit stricter here at join points, patterns that are allowed for
scoped locks aren't allowed here. That could still be changed in the
future, but I'd argue we should only relax this if people ask for it.
Fixes PR36162.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, pwnall
Reviewed By: delesley, pwnall
Subscribers: pwnall, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52578
llvm-svn: 349300
CallGraph previously would just show the normal name of a function,
which gets really confusing when using it on large C++ projects. This
patch switches the printName call to a printQualifiedName, so that the
namespaces are included.
Change-Id: Ie086d863f6b2251be92109ea1b0946825b28b49a
llvm-svn: 348950
It seems the two failing tests can be simply fixed after r348037
Fix 3 cases in Analysis/builtin-functions.cpp
Delete the bad CodeGen/builtin-constant-p.c for now
llvm-svn: 348053
Kept the "indirect_builtin_constant_p" test case in test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx1y.cpp
while we are investigating why the following snippet fails:
extern char extern_var;
struct { int a; } a = {__builtin_constant_p(extern_var)};
llvm-svn: 348039
This was reverted in r347656 due to me thinking it caused a miscompile of
Chromium. Turns out it was the Chromium code that was broken.
llvm-svn: 347756
This caused a miscompile in Chrome (see crbug.com/908372) that's
illustrated by this small reduction:
static bool f(int *a, int *b) {
return !__builtin_constant_p(b - a) || (!(b - a));
}
int arr[] = {1,2,3};
bool g() {
return f(arr, arr + 3);
}
$ clang -O2 -S -emit-llvm a.cc -o -
g() should return true, but after r347417 it became false for some reason.
This also reverts the follow-up commits.
r347417:
> Re-Reinstate 347294 with a fix for the failures.
>
> Don't try to emit a scalar expression for a non-scalar argument to
> __builtin_constant_p().
>
> Third time's a charm!
r347446:
> The result of is.constant() is unsigned.
r347480:
> A __builtin_constant_p() returns 0 with a function type.
r347512:
> isEvaluatable() implies a constant context.
>
> Assume that we're in a constant context if we're asking if the expression can
> be compiled into a constant initializer. This fixes the issue where a
> __builtin_constant_p() in a compound literal was diagnosed as not being
> constant, even though it's always possible to convert the builtin into a
> constant.
r347531:
> A "constexpr" is evaluated in a constant context. Make sure this is reflected
> if a __builtin_constant_p() is a part of a constexpr.
llvm-svn: 347656
Summary:
Compound literals, enums, file-scoped arrays, etc. require their
initializers and size specifiers to be constant. Wrap the initializer
expressions in a ConstantExpr so that we can easily check for this later
on.
Reviewers: rsmith, shafik
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, jyknight, nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53921
llvm-svn: 346455
Summary:
The test case added in this diff would incorrectly warn that control
flow may fall through without returning. Here's a standalone example:
https://godbolt.org/z/dCwXEi
The same program, but using `return` instead of `co_return`, does not
produce a warning: https://godbolt.org/z/mVldqQ
The issue was in how Clang analysis would structure its representation
of the control-flow graph. Specifically, when constructing the CFG,
`CFGBuilder::Visit` had special handling of a `ReturnStmt`, in which it
would place object destructors in the same CFG block as a `return` statement,
immediately after it. Doing so would allow the logic in
`lib/Sema/AnalysisBasedWarning.cpp` `CheckFallThrough` to work properly in the
program that used `return`, correctly determining that no "plain edges" preceded
the exit block of the function.
Because a `co_return` statement would not enjoy the same treatment when
it was being built into the control-flow graph, object destructors
would not be placed in the same CFG block as the `co_return`, thus
resulting in a "plain edge" preceding the exit block of the function,
and so the warning logic would be triggered.
Add special casing for `co_return` to Clang analysis, thereby
remedying the mistaken warning.
Test Plan: `check-clang`
Reviewers: GorNishanov, tks2103, rsmith
Reviewed By: GorNishanov
Subscribers: EricWF, lewissbaker, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54075
llvm-svn: 346074
The size of an os_log buffer is known at any stage of compilation, so making it
a constant expression means that the common idiom of declaring a buffer for it
won't result in a VLA. That allows the compiler to skip saving and restoring
the stack pointer around such buffers.
This also moves the OSLog and other FormatString helpers from
libclangAnalysis to libclangAST to avoid a circular dependency.
llvm-svn: 345971
This patch should not introduce any behavior changes. It consists of
mostly one of two changes:
1. Replacing fall through comments with the LLVM_FALLTHROUGH macro
2. Inserting 'break' before falling through into a case block consisting
of only 'break'.
We were already using this warning with GCC, but its warning behaves
slightly differently. In this patch, the following differences are
relevant:
1. GCC recognizes comments that say "fall through" as annotations, clang
doesn't
2. GCC doesn't warn on "case N: foo(); default: break;", clang does
3. GCC doesn't warn when the case contains a switch, but falls through
the outer case.
I will enable the warning separately in a follow-up patch so that it can
be cleanly reverted if necessary.
Reviewers: alexfh, rsmith, lattner, rtrieu, EricWF, bollu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53950
llvm-svn: 345882
The size of an os_log buffer is known at any stage of compilation, so making it
a constant expression means that the common idiom of declaring a buffer for it
won't result in a VLA. That allows the compiler to skip saving and restoring
the stack pointer around such buffers.
This also moves the OSLog helpers from libclangAnalysis to libclangAST
to avoid a circular dependency.
llvm-svn: 345866
A ConstantExpr class represents a full expression that's in a context where a
constant expression is required. This class reflects the path the evaluator
took to reach the expression rather than the syntactic context in which the
expression occurs.
In the future, the class will be expanded to cache the result of the evaluated
expression so that it's not needlessly re-evaluated
Reviewed By: rsmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53475
llvm-svn: 345692
We haven't supported compiling ObjC1 for a long time (and never will again), so
there isn't any reason to keep these separate. This patch replaces
LangOpts::ObjC1 and LangOpts::ObjC2 with LangOpts::ObjC.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53547
llvm-svn: 345637
Only store the NRVO candidate if needed in ReturnStmt.
A good chuck of all of the ReturnStmt have no NRVO candidate
(more than half when parsing all of Boost). For all of them
this saves one pointer. This has no impact on children().
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53716
Reviewed By: rsmith
llvm-svn: 345605
Only store the needed data in IfStmt. This cuts the size of IfStmt
by up to 3 pointers + 1 SourceLocation. The order of the children
is intentionally kept the same even though it would be more
convenient to put the optional trailing objects last. Additionally
use the newly available space in the bit-fields of Stmt to store
the location of the "if".
The result of this is that for the common case of an
if statement of the form:
if (some_cond)
some_statement
the size of IfStmt is brought down to 8 bytes + 2 pointers,
instead of 8 bytes + 5 pointers + 2 SourceLocation.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53607
Reviewed By: rjmccall
llvm-svn: 345464
Summary:
We unwrap conditional expressions containing try-lock functions.
Additionally we don't acquire on conditional expression branches, since
that is usually not helpful. When joining the branches we would almost
certainly get a warning then.
Hopefully fixes an issue that was raised in D52398.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley, hokein
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52888
llvm-svn: 343902
Summary:
Instead of only examining call arguments, we also examine constructor
arguments applying the same rules.
That was an opportunity for refactoring the examination procedure to
work with iterators instead of integer indices. For the case of
CallExprs no functional change is intended.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley
Reviewed By: delesley
Subscribers: JonasToth, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52443
llvm-svn: 343831
Summary:
When people are really sure they'll get the lock they sometimes use
__builtin_expect. It's also used by some assertion implementations.
Asserting that try-lock succeeded is basically the same as asserting
that the lock is not held by anyone else (and acquiring it).
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, delesley
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: kristina, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52398
llvm-svn: 343681
JF Bastien