specialization is known to be incomplete. If we're asked to try to
complete it, don't attempt to instantiate it again -- that can lead
to stack overflow, and to rejects-valids if the class being incomplete
is not an error.
llvm-svn: 153236
non-constant value encountered. This allows the evaluator to deduce that
expressions like (x < 5 || true) is equal to true. Previously, it would visit
x and determined that the entire expression is could not evaluated to a
constant.
This fixes PR12318.
llvm-svn: 153226
Specifically, we use the last store of the leaked symbol in the leak diagnostic.
(No support for struct fields since the malloc checker doesn't track those
yet.)
+ Infrastructure to track the regions used in store evaluations.
This approach is more precise than iterating the store to
obtain the region bound to the symbol, which is used in RetainCount
checker. The region corresponds to what is uttered in the code in the
last store and we do not rely on the store implementation to support
this functionality.
llvm-svn: 153212
The getARMTargetCPU and getLLVMArchSuffixForARM functions exist in both
Toolchain.cpp and Tools.cpp. This stuff needs a thorough overhaul. In the
meantime, this patch at least makes them consistent. One version had been
converted to use StringSwitch, and the other version had new Cortex M-series
processors added.
llvm-svn: 153202
On Darwin the architecture and the corresponding Mach-O slice is typically
specified with -arch. If not, it defaults to the current host architecture.
Do not use -mcpu to override the -arch value. This is only an issue when
people need to use specialized code for a non-default CPU (hopefully guarded
by run-time checks to detect the current processor). The -mcpu option is
still used for the -target-cpu option to clang, but this patch causes it to
not be used to set the architecture in the target triple.
llvm-svn: 153197
in vtable layout where virtual methods inherited from virtual bases
could be assigned the same vcall adjustment slot if they shared
a name and parameter signature but differed in their
cv-qualification. The code was already trying to handle this
case, but unfortunately used the ordinary type qualifiers
(which are always empty here) instead of the method qualifiers.
This seems like something that the API should discourage, but
I don't know how to carry that principle out in this instance.
Eliminate this function's need for an ASTContext while we're at it.
This bug affects the ABI, and fixing it brings us into accord with
the Itanium ABI (and GCC's implementation of it), but, obviously,
technically breaks full compatibility with previous releases of Clang.
Just letting you know.
llvm-svn: 153168
From the Intel Optimization Reference Manual, Section 11.6.2. When data cannot
be aligned or alignment is not known, 16-byte memory accesses may provide better
performance.
rdar://11076953
llvm-svn: 153091
This is accomplished by calling markInteresting /during/ path diagnostic generation, and as such relies on deterministic ordering of BugReporterVisitors -- namely, that BugReporterVisitors are run in /reverse/ order from how they are added. (Right now that's a consequence of storing visitors in an ImmutableList, where new items are added to the front.) It's a little hacky, but it works for now.
I think this is the best we can do without storing the relation between the old and new symbols, and that would be a hit whether or not there ends up being an error.
llvm-svn: 153010
Instead of suggesting " = 0" for "char c();", suggest " = '\0'", and similarly
for other char types (wide, 16, and 32). Add tests for all these, and since
this means testing such hints under C++0x, add tests for some untested C++0x
hint cases in the existing code, including suggesting nullptr for pointer
initialization.
This sets up the initialization helper to provide better type fidelity that
will be especially helpful for non-assignment cases (such as fixit-correcting
NULL usage in function calls (eg: foo(char) + foo(NULL) => foo('\0') instead
of the less informative foo(0)))
llvm-svn: 153008
I tried to test the effects of this change on memory usage and run time, but what I saw on retain-release.m was indistinguishable from noise (debug and release builds). Even so, some caveman profiling showed 101 cache hits that we would have generated new summaries for before (i.e. not default or stop summaries), and the more code we analyze, the more memory we should save.
Maybe we should have a standard project for benchmarking the retain count checker's memory and time?
llvm-svn: 153007
The one difference between ObjCMethodDecl::getMethodFamily and Selector::getMethodFamily is that the former will do some additional sanity checking, and since CoreFoundation types don't look like Objective-C objects, an otherwise interesting method will get a method family of OMF_None. Future clients that use method families should consider how they want to handle CF types.
llvm-svn: 153000
The cocoa::deriveNamingConventions helper is just using method families anyway now, and the way RetainSummaryTemplate works means we're allocating an extra summary for every method with a relevant family.
Also, fix RetainSummaryTemplate to do the right thing w/r/t annotating an /existing/ summary. This was probably the real cause of <rdar://problem/10824732> and the fix in r152448.
llvm-svn: 152998
writing @synchronized statement; do not call locking
expression more than once and support early exits in
@synchronized's statement block (such as return).
llvm-svn: 152993
Richard Smith