Summary:
Remove the call to DiagnoseUseOfDecl in LookupMemberExpr because:
1. LookupMemberExpr eagerly lookup both getter and setter, reguardless
if they are used or not. It causes wrong diagnostics if you are only
using getter.
2. LookupMemberExpr only diagnoses getter, but not setter.
3. ObjCPropertyOpBuilder already DiagnoseUseOfDecl when building getter
and setter. Doing it again in LookupMemberExpr causes duplicated
diagnostics.
rdar://problem/38479756
Reviewers: erik.pilkington, arphaman, doug.gregor
Reviewed By: arphaman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47280
llvm-svn: 333148
For 'x::template y', consistently give a "no member named 'y' in 'x'"
diagnostic if there is no such member, and give a 'template keyword not
followed by a template' name error if there is such a member but it's not a
template. In the latter case, add a note pointing at the non-template.
Don't suggest inserting a 'template' keyword in 'X::Y<' if X is dependent
if the lookup of X::Y was actually not a dependent lookup and found only
non-templates.
llvm-svn: 332076
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
template arguments.
This fixes some cases where we'd incorrectly accept "A::template B" when B is a
kind of template that requires template arguments (in particular, a variable
template or a concept).
llvm-svn: 331013
Summary:
Currently clang doesn't do qualified lookup when building indirect field decl references. This causes ambiguity when the field is in a base class to which there are multiple valid paths even though a qualified name is used.
For example:
```
class B {
protected:
int i;
union { int j; };
};
class X : public B { };
class Y : public B { };
class Z : public X, public Y {
int a() { return X::i; } // works
int b() { return X::j; } // fails
};
```
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45411
llvm-svn: 329521
Summary:
Currently clang doesn't do qualified lookup when building indirect field decl references. This causes ambiguity when the field is in a base class to which there are multiple valid paths even though a qualified name is used.
For example:
```
class B {
protected:
int i;
union { int j; };
};
class X : public B { };
class Y : public B { };
class Z : public X, public Y {
int a() { return X::i; } // works
int b() { return X::j; } // fails
};
```
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45411
llvm-svn: 329519
Summary:
This patch cleans up a bunch of dead or unused code in BuildAnonymousStructUnionMemberReference.
The dead code was a branch that built a new CXXThisExpr when we weren't given a base object expression or base variable.
However, BuildAnonymousFoo has only two callers. One of which always builds a base object expression first, the second only calls when the IndirectFieldDecl is not a C++ class member. Even within C this branch seems entirely unused.
I tried diligently to write a test which hit it with no success.
This patch removes the branch and replaces it with an assertion that we were given either a base object expression or a base variable.
Reviewers: rsmith, aaron.ballman, majnemer, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45410
llvm-svn: 329518
When we have a category implementation without a corresponding interface
(which is an error by itself), semantic checks for property accesses
will attempt to access a null interface declaration and then segfault.
Error out in such cases instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44916
llvm-svn: 328654
Summary:
This provides no measurable build speedup, but it reinstates an
optimization from r112038 that was lost in r179618. It requires moving
CapturedScopeInfo::Capture out to clang::sema, which might be too
general since we have plenty of other Capture records in BlockDecl and
other AST nodes.
Reviewers: rjmccall
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44221
llvm-svn: 326957
Changes behavior introduced in r298369 to only error out on
vector component invalid length access on OpenCL mode.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38868
rdar://problem/33568748
llvm-svn: 316016
When declaring an entity in the "purview" of a module, it's never a
redeclaration of an entity in the purview of a default module or in no module
("in the global module"). Don't consider those other declarations as possible
redeclaration targets if they're not visible, and reject any cases where we
pick a prior visible declaration that violates this rule.
This reinstates r315251 and r315256, reverted in r315309 and r315308
respectively, tweaked to avoid triggering a linkage calculation when declaring
implicit special members (this exposed our pre-existing issue with typedef
names for linkage changing the linkage of types whose linkage has already been
computed and cached in more cases). A testcase for that regression has been
added in r315366.
llvm-svn: 315379
When declaring an entity in the "purview" of a module, it's never a
redeclaration of an entity in the purview of a default module or in no module
("in the global module"). Don't consider those other declarations as possible
redeclaration targets if they're not visible, and reject any cases where we
pick a prior visible declaration that violates this rule.
llvm-svn: 315251
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34266
For e.g.
struct A {
void f(int);
static void f(char);
};
struct B {
auto foo() {
return [&] (auto a) {
A::f(a); // this should not cause a capture of '*this'
};
}
};
The patch does the following:
1) It moves the check to attempt an implicit capture of '*this' by reference into the more logical location of when the call is actually built within ActOnCallExpr (as opposed to when the unresolved-member-lookup node is created).
- Reminder: A capture of '*this' by value has to always be an explicit capture.
2) It additionally checks whether the naming class of the UnresolvedMemberExpr ('A' in the example above) is related to the enclosing class ('B' above).
P.S. If you have access to ISO-C++'s CWG reflector, see this thread for some potentially related discussion: http://lists.isocpp.org/core/2017/08/2851.php
llvm-svn: 313487
Prior to this patch clang would not error here:
template <class T> struct B;
template <class T> struct A {
void foo();
void foo2();
void test1() {
B<T>::foo(); // OK, foo is declared in A<int> - matches type of 'this'.
B<T>::foo2(); // This should be an error!
// foo2 is found in B<int>, 'base unrelated' to 'this'.
}
};
template <class T> struct B : A<T> {
using A<T>::foo2;
};
llvm-svn: 311851
Prior to this patch, clang would do the wrong thing here (see inline comments for pre-patch behavior):
struct A {
void bar(int) { }
static void bar(double) { }
void g(int*);
static void g(char *);
};
struct B {
void f() {
A::bar(3); // selects (double) ??!!
A::g((int*)0); // Instead of no object argument, states conversion error?!!
}
};
The fix is as follows: When we detect that what appears to be an implicit member function call (A::bar) is actually a call to a member of a class (A) unrelated to the type (B) that contains the member function (B::f) from which the call is being made, don't treat it (A::bar) as an Implicit Member Call Expression.
P.S. I wonder if there is an existing bug report related to this? (Surprisingly, a cursory search did not find one).
llvm-svn: 311839
If the member declaration is captured in the OMPCapturedExprDecl, we may
loose data-sharing attribute info for this declaration. Patch fixes this
bug.
llvm-svn: 308629
In the OpenMP mode, we don't need to call BuildMemberExpr() only to discard its
return value. BuildDeclRefExpr() is called instead.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35201
llvm-svn: 307697
- also replace direct equality checks against the ConstantEvaluated enumerator with isConstantEvaluted(), in anticipation of adding finer granularity to the various ConstantEvaluated contexts and reinstating certain restrictions on where lambda expressions can occur in C++17.
- update the clang tablegen backend that uses these Enumerators, and add the relevant scope where needed.
llvm-svn: 299316
Summary: -Warc-repeated-use-of-weak should produce the same warnings with -fobjc-weak as it does with -objc-arc. Also check for ObjCWeak along with ObjCAutoRefCount when recording the use of an evaluated weak variable. Add a -fobjc-weak run to the existing arc-repeated-weak test case and adapt it slightly to work in both modes.
Reviewers: rsmith, doug.gregor, jordan_rose, rjmccall
Reviewed By: rjmccall
Subscribers: arphaman, rjmccall, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31005
llvm-svn: 299011
Summary:
This patch adds passing a coroutine_handle object to await_suspend calls.
It builds the coroutine_handle using coroutine_handle<PromiseType>::from_address(__builtin_coro_frame()).
(a revision of https://reviews.llvm.org/D26316 that for some reason refuses to apply via arc patch)
Reviewers: GorNishanov
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, cfe-commits, EricWF
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30769
llvm-svn: 297356
This implements something like the current direction of DR1581: we use a narrow
syntactic check to determine the set of places where a constant expression
could be evaluated, and only instantiate a constexpr function or variable if
it's referenced in one of those contexts, or is odr-used.
It's not yet clear whether this is the right set of syntactic locations; we
currently consider all contexts within templates that would result in odr-uses
after instantiation, and contexts within list-initialization (narrowing
conversions take another victim...), as requiring instantiation. We could in
principle restrict the former cases more (only const integral / reference
variable initializers, and contexts in which a constant expression is required,
perhaps). However, this is sufficient to allow us to accept libstdc++ code,
which relies on GCC's behavior (which appears to be somewhat similar to this
approach).
llvm-svn: 291318
The previous typo correction handling assumed that ivars are only declared in
the interface declaration rather than as a private ivar in the implementation.
Adjust the handling to permit both interfaces. Assert earlier that the
interface has been acquired to ensure that we can identify when both possible
casts have failed.
Addresses PR31040!
llvm-svn: 287238
Summary:
This patch enables .rgba accessors to ext_vector_type types and adds
tests for syntax validation and code generation.
'a' and 'b' can appear either in the point access mode or the numeric
access mode (for indices 10 and 11). To disambiguate between the two
usages, the accessor type is explicitly passed to relevant methods.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: Anastasia, bader, srhines, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D20602
llvm-svn: 276455
OpenMP 4.5 allows to privatize non-static data members of current class
in non-static member functions. Patch supports codegen for non-static
data members in 'reduction' clauses.
llvm-svn: 262460
(within the DeclRefExpr Node) when creating AST nodes that reference specializations of static data member templates. While we pass the template args through for all non-instance members, they should only be relevant (i.e. non-null) for variable template ids (assertion added for that assumption)
Also preserve the FoundDecl that refers to the canonical Decl (the primary VarTemplateDecl for a variable template specialization) that we are referencing in our DeclRefExpr. Not sure why this was not being done for non-variable template-ids.
No functionality change - so no tests added.
Thanks to Richard Smith for drawing my attention to this!
llvm-svn: 261823
OpenMP 4.5 introduces privatization of non-static data members of current class in non-static member functions.
To correctly handle such kind of privatization a new (pseudo)declaration VarDecl-based node is added. It allows to reuse an existing code for capturing variables in Lambdas/Block/Captured blocks of code for correct privatization and codegen.
llvm-svn: 260077
Add "enum ObjCPropertyQueryKind" to a few APIs that used to only take the name
of the property: ObjCPropertyDecl::findPropertyDecl,
ObjCContainerDecl::FindPropertyDeclaration,
ObjCInterfaceDecl::FindPropertyVisibleInPrimaryClass,
ObjCImplDecl::FindPropertyImplDecl, and Sema::ActOnPropertyImplDecl.
ObjCPropertyQueryKind currently has 3 values:
OBJC_PR_query_unknown, OBJC_PR_query_instance, OBJC_PR_query_class
This extra parameter specifies that we are looking for an instance property with
the given name, or a class property with the given name, or any property with
the given name (if both exist, the instance property will be returned).
rdar://23891898
llvm-svn: 259070
Clang will now accept this valid C++11 code:
struct A { int field; };
struct B : A {
using A::field;
enum { TheSize = sizeof(field) };
};
Previously we would classify the 'field' reference as something other
than a field, and then forget to apply the C++11 rule to allow
non-static data member references in unevaluated contexts.
This usually arises in class templates that want to reference fields of
a dependent base in an unevaluated context outside of an instance
method. Such contexts do not allow references to 'this', so the only way
to access the field is with a using decl and an implicit member
reference.
llvm-svn: 250839
This reverts commit r250592.
It has issues around unevaluated contexts, like this:
template <class T> struct A { T i; };
template <class T>
struct B : A<T> {
using A<T>::i;
typedef decltype(i) U;
};
template struct B<int>;
llvm-svn: 250774
During the initial template parse for this code, 'member' is unresolved
and we don't know anything about it:
struct A { int member };
template <typename T>
struct B : public T {
using T::member;
static void f() {
(void)member; // Could be static or non-static.
}
};
template class B<A>;
The pattern declaration contains an UnresolvedLookupExpr rather than an
UnresolvedMemberExpr because `f` is static, and `member` should never be
a field. However, if the code is invalid, it may become a field, in
which case we should diagnose it.
Reviewers: rjmccall, rsmith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D6700
llvm-svn: 250592
LookupResult should not be copyable, it's not readily copyable and can
only be copied when it's in specific states (in a query state, without
any results, basically). Instead, just extract the /query/ state and
pass that across the copy boundary, then build a new LookupResult on the
other side.
I wonder if a better API (one in which the query state is separate from
the result state - essentialyl making QueryState a first class part of
the Lookup API - pass a QueryState, get a LookupResult, rather than
mutating the LookupResult in place (LookupResult could contain a
QueryState if it's particularly helpful to be able to observe the query
parameters while also examining the result)) might be a good idea here.
Future patches will probably make LookupResult actually non-copyable
(transition the CXXBasePaths to unique_ptr, for example) and hopefully
we'll enable -Wdeprecated in LLVM soon to avoid issues like this.
llvm-svn: 248761
This lets us pass functors (and lambdas) without void * tricks. On the
downside we can't pass CXXRecordDecl's Find* members (which are now type
safe) to lookupInBases directly, but a lambda trampoline is a small
price to pay. No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 243217
Steven Wu