1) PR25154. This is basically a repeat of PR18102, which was fixed in
r200201, and broken again by r234430. The latter changed which of the
store nodes was merged into from the first to the last. Thus, we now
also need to prefer merging a later store at a given address into the
target node, instead of an earlier one.
2) While investigating that, I also realized I'd introduced a bug in
r236850. There, I removed a check for alignment -- not realizing that
nothing except the alignment check was ensuring that none of the stores
were overlapping! This is a really bogus way to ensure there's no
aliased stores.
A better solution to both of these issues is likely to always use the
code added in the 'if (UseAA)' branches which rearrange the chain based
on a more principled analysis. I'll look into whether that can be used
always, but in the interest of getting things back to working, I think a
minimal change makes sense.
llvm-svn: 251816
Use and check the 'IsFast' optional parameter to TLI.allowsMemoryAccess() any time
we have a merged access candidate. Without this patch, we were generating unaligned
16-byte (SSE) memops for x86 targets where those accesses are slow.
This change was mentioned in:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10662 and
http://reviews.llvm.org/D10905
and will help solve PR21711.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D12573
llvm-svn: 246771
James Y Knight