Implement SBTarget::CreateValueFromAddress() with a behavior equivalent to SBValue::CreateValueFromAddress()
(but without the need to grab an SBValue first just as a starting point to make up another SBValue out of whole cloth)
llvm-svn: 192239
Formats (as in "type format") are now included in categories
The only bit missing is caching formats along with synthetic children and summaries, which might be now desirable
llvm-svn: 192217
This radar extends the notion of one-liner summaries to automagically apply in a few interesting cases
More specifically, this checkin changes the printout of ValueObjects to print on one-line (as if type summary add -c had been applied) iff:
this ValueObject does not have a summary
its children have no synthetic children
its children are not a non-empty base class without a summary
its children do not have a summary that asks for children to show up
the aggregate length of all the names of all the children is <= 50 characters
you did not ask to see the types during a printout
your pointer depth is 0
This is meant to simplify the way LLDB shows data on screen for small structs and similarly compact data types (e.g. std::pair<int,int> anyone?)
Feedback is especially welcome on how the feature feels and corner cases where we should apply this printout and don't (or viceversa, we are applying it when we shouldn't be)
llvm-svn: 191996
that all clients use them explicitly. This will hopefully
prevent any future confusion where things get cast to types
we don't expect.
<rdar://problem/15146458>
llvm-svn: 191984
to be explicit, to prevent horrid things like
std::string a = ConstString("foo")
from taking the path ConstString -> bool -> char
-> std::string.
This fixes, among other things, ClangFunction.
<rdar://problem/15137989>
llvm-svn: 191934
DumpValueObject() 2.0
This checkin restores pre-Xcode5 functionality to the "po" (expr -O) command:
- expr now has a new --description-verbosity (-v) argument, which takes either compact or full as a value (-v is the same as -vfull)
When the full mode is on, "po" will show the extended output with type name, persistent variable name and value, as in
(lldb) expr -O -v -- foo
(id) $0 = 0x000000010010baf0 {
1 = 2;
2 = 3;
}
When -v is omitted, or -vcompact is passed, the Xcode5-style output will be shown, as in
(lldb) expr -O -- foo
{
1 = 2;
2 = 3;
}
- for a non-ObjectiveC object, LLDB will still try to retrieve a summary and/or value to display
(lldb) po 5
5
-v also works in this mode
(lldb) expr -O -vfull -- 5
(int) $4 = 5
On top of that, this is a major refactoring of the ValueObject printing code. The functionality is now factored into a ValueObjectPrinter class for easier maintenance in the future
DumpValueObject() was turned into an instance method ValueObject::Dump() which simply calls through to the printer code, Dump_Impl has been removed
Test case to follow
llvm-svn: 191694
scan-build was complaining about:
The return value from the call to 'setgid' is not checked. If an error occurs in 'setgid', the following code may execute with unexpected privileges
llvm-svn: 191618
line breakpoints past the prologue of functions so it can be shared between the
file & line breakpoint resolver, and the source pattern breakpoint resolver,
and then share it.
llvm-svn: 191478
not have breakpoints set on it inserted into code that does have a valid line number. So allow
that line number, and the ThreadPlanStepRange should just continue stepping over 0 line ranges
as if they had the same line number as whatever we were previously stepping through.
llvm-svn: 191477
- Removes the block in UnwindLLDB::AddOneMoreFrame that tests for a bad stack setup,
since it is neither correct (tests the FP GPR), complete (doesn't consider multi-frame
cycles), nor reachable (the construction of RegisterContextLLDB will fail in the case
where either of the two (why just two?) previous frames have the same canonical frame
address as the frame that we propose adding to the stack).
llvm-svn: 191430
Enrico Granata