Summary:
Replace a LEA instruction of the form 'lea (%esp), %ebx' --> 'mov %esp, %ebx'
MOV is preferable over LEA because usually there are more issue-slots available to execute MOVs than LEAs. Latest processors also support zero-latency MOVs.
Fixes pr29022.
Reviewers: hfinkel, delena, igorb, myatsina, mkuper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24705
llvm-svn: 282385
This patch extends clang-tidy's readability-redundant-smartptr-get to produce
warnings for previously unsupported cases:
```
std::unique_ptr<void> ptr;
if (ptr.get())
if (ptr.get() == NULL)
if (ptr.get() != NULL)
```
This is intended to fix https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25804, a bug
report opened by @Eugene.Zelenko.
However, there still are cases not detected by the check. They can be found in
`void Negative()` function defined in
test/clang-tidy/readability-redundant-smartptr-get.cpp.
llvm-svn: 282382
Avoid failing in the backend when the rewrite map does not exist. Rather check
that the map exists in the frontend before handing it off to the backend. Add
the missing rewrite maps that the tests were referencing.
llvm-svn: 282379
a function pass nested inside of a CGSCC pass manager.
This is very similar to the previous unittest but makes sure the
invalidation logic works across all the layers here.
llvm-svn: 282378
This reinstates r280447. Original commit log:
This wasn't really well explicitly tested with a nice unittest before.
It seems good to have reasonably broken out unittests for this kind of
functionality as I'm workin go other invalidation features to make sure
none of the existing ones regress.
This still has too much duplicated code, I plan to factor that out in
a subsequent commit to use common helpers for repeated parts of this.
llvm-svn: 282377
In a previous change I collapsed two different caches into one. When
doing that I noticed that ScalarEvolution's move constructor was not
moving those caches.
To keep the previous change simple, I've moved that bugfix into this
separate change.
llvm-svn: 282376
Both `loopHasNoSideEffects` and `loopHasNoAbnormalExits` involve walking
the loop and maintaining similar sorts of caches. This commit changes
SCEV to compute both the predicates via a single walk, and maintain a
single cache instead of two.
llvm-svn: 282375
__attribute__((amdgpu_flat_work_group_size(<min>, <max>))) - request minimum and maximum flat work group size
__attribute__((amdgpu_waves_per_eu(<min>[, <max>]))) - request minimum and/or maximum waves per execution unit
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24513
llvm-svn: 282371
This change simplifies a data structure optimization in the
`BackedgeTakenInfo` class for loops with exactly one computable exit.
I've sanity checked that this does not regress compile time performance,
using sqlite3's amalgamated build.
llvm-svn: 282365
Summary:
Libc++ still uses per-feature configuration macros when configuring for C++11. However libc++ requires a feature-complete C++11 compiler so there is no reason to check individual features. This patch starts the process of removing the feature specific macros and replacing their usage with `_LIBCPP_CXX03_LANG`.
This patch removes the __config macros:
* _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_TRAILING_RETURN
* _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_TEMPLATE_ALIASES
* _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_ADVANCED_SFINAE
* _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_DEFAULT_FUNCTION_TEMPLATE_ARGS
* _LIBCPP_HAS_NO_STATIC_ASSERT
As a drive I also changed our C++03 static_assert to use _Static_assert if available.
I plan to commit this without review if nobody voices an objection.
Reviewers: mclow.lists
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24895
llvm-svn: 282347
This adds 4 new functions to StringRef, which can be used to
take or drop characters while a certain condition is met, or
until a certain condition is met. They are:
take_while - Return characters until a condition is not met.
take_until - Return characters until a condition is met.
drop_while - Remove characters until a condition is not met.
drop_until - Remove characters until a condition is met.
Internally, all of these functions delegate to two additional
helper functions which can be used to search for the position
of a character meeting or not meeting a condition, which are:
find_if - Find the first character matching a predicate.
find_if_not - Find the first character not matching a predicate.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24842
llvm-svn: 282346
Summary:
This patch has been a long time coming (Thanks @eugenis). It changes `_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY` to use `__attribute__((internal_linkage))` instead of `__attribute__((visibility("hidden"), always_inline))`.
The point of `_LIBCPP_INLINE_VISIBILITY` is to prevent inline functions from being exported from both the libc++ library and from user libraries. This helps libc++ better manage it's ABI.
Previously this was done by forcing inlining and modifying the symbols visibility. However inlining isn't guaranteed and symbol visibility only affects shared libraries making this an imperfect solution. `internal_linkage` improves this situation by making all symbols local to the TU they are emitted in, regardless of inlining or visibility. IIRC the effect of applying `__attribute__((internal_linkage))` to an inline function is the same as applying `static`.
For more information about the attribute see: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2015-October/045580.html
Most of the work for this patch was done by @eugenis.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, eugenis
Subscribers: eugenis, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24642
llvm-svn: 282345
Stop looking at users of UndefValue and ConstantPointerNull in the
objective C ARC optimizers. The other users aren't actually
interesting, since they're not pointing at a particular object. I
imagine these calls could be optimized through -instcombine... maybe
they already are?
These early returns will be required at some point in the future, with a
WIP patch that asserts when someone accesses a use-list on ConstantData.
llvm-svn: 282338
There is no benefit in looking through assumptions on UndefValue to
guess known bits. Return early to avoid walking their use-lists, and
assert that all instances of ConstantData are handled here for similar
reasons (UndefValue was the only integer/pointer holdout).
llvm-svn: 282337
I found out this wasn't tested when looking at Vedant's coverage bot
numbers, so, thanks to him. While I'm here, switch the error message
to be lld-compliant (first letter lowercase).
llvm-svn: 282335
Assumptions on UndefValue and ConstantPointerNull aren't relevant to
other users. Ignore them entirely to avoid wasting cycles walking
through their (possibly extremely extensive (cross-module)) use-lists.
It wasn't clear how to add a specific test for this, and it'll be
covered anyway by an eventual patch that asserts when trying to access
the use-list of an instance of ConstantData.
llvm-svn: 282334
Zvi Rackover