The DAGCombiner created illegal BUILD_VECTOR operations.
The patch added a check that either illegal operations are
allowed or that the created operation is legal.
llvm-svn: 125435
In the bottom-up selection DAG scheduling, handle two-address
instructions that read/write unspillable registers. Treat
the entire chain of two-address nodes as a single live range.
llvm-svn: 122472
sequence of loads and stores was being generated to perform the
copy on the x86 targets if the parameter was less than 4 byte
aligned, causing llc to use up vast amounts of memory and time.
Use a "rep movs" form instead. PR7170.
llvm-svn: 118260
expansion is the same as that used by LegalizeDAG.
The resulting code sucks in terms of performance/codesize on x86-32 for a
64-bit operation; I haven't looked into whether different expansions might be
better in general.
llvm-svn: 105378
otherwise the SmallVector it contains doesn't free its memory.
In most cases LiveIntervalAnalysis could get away by not calling the destructor,
because VNInfos are bumpptr-allocated, and smallvectors usually don't grow.
However when the SmallVector does grow it always leaks.
This is the valgrind shown leak from the original testcase:
==8206== 18,304 bytes in 151 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 164 of 164
==8206== at 0x4A079C7: operator new(unsigned long) (vg_replace_malloc.c:220)
==8206== by 0x4DB7A7E: llvm::SmallVectorBase::grow_pod(unsigned long, unsigned long) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/defaul
t/libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4F90382: llvm::VNInfo::addKill(llvm::SlotIndex) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.libs/libcl
amav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x5126B5C: llvm::LiveIntervals::handleVirtualRegisterDef(llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::M
achineInstr>, llvm::SlotIndex, llvm::MachineOperand&, unsigned int, llvm::LiveInterval&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/defau
lt/libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x512725E: llvm::LiveIntervals::handleRegisterDef(llvm::MachineBasicBlock*, llvm::ilist_iterator<llvm::MachineI
nstr>, llvm::SlotIndex, llvm::MachineOperand&, unsigned int) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.libs/libclamav
.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x51278A8: llvm::LiveIntervals::computeIntervals() (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.libs/libc
lamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x5127CB4: llvm::LiveIntervals::runOnMachineFunction(llvm::MachineFunction&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/de
fault/libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4DAE935: llvm::FPPassManager::runOnFunction(llvm::Function&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclama
v/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4DAEB10: llvm::FunctionPassManagerImpl::run(llvm::Function&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclama
v/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4DAED3D: llvm::FunctionPassManager::run(llvm::Function&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.l
ibs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4D8BE8E: llvm::JIT::runJITOnFunctionUnlocked(llvm::Function*, llvm::MutexGuard const&) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
==8206== by 0x4D8CA72: llvm::JIT::getPointerToFunction(llvm::Function*) (in /home/edwin/clam/git/builds/default/libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so.6.1.0)
llvm-svn: 99400
to LLVM IR changes with addr label weirdness. In the testcase, we
generate references to the two bb's when codegen'ing the first
function:
_test1: ## @test1
leaq Ltmp0(%rip), %rax
..
leaq Ltmp1(%rip), %rax
Then continue to codegen the second function where the blocks
get merged. We're now smart enough to emit both labels, producing
this code:
_test_fun: ## @test_fun
## BB#0: ## %entry
Ltmp1: ## Block address taken
Ltmp0:
## BB#1: ## %ret
movl $-1, %eax
ret
Rejoice.
llvm-svn: 98595
label is generated, but then the block is deleted. Since the
value is undefined, we just emit the label right after the entry
label of the function. It might matter that the label is in the
same section as the function was afterall.
llvm-svn: 98579
the problem only shows for msp430 and pic16 which is why it specifies
them using -march. But it is wrong to put such tests in CodeGen/Generic,
since not everyone builds these targets. Put a copy of the test in each
of the target test directories.
llvm-svn: 90005
Stuart Hastings