Summary:
This change allows to perform corpus merging in two steps. This is useful when
the user wants to address the following two points simultaneously:
1) Get trustworthy incremental stats for the coverage and corpus size changes
when adding new corpus units.
2) Make sure the shorter units will be preferred when two or more units give the
same unique signal (equivalent to the `REDUCE` logic).
This solution was brainstormed together with @kcc, hopefully it looks good to
the other people too. The proposed use case scenario:
1) We have a `fuzz_target` binary and `existing_corpus` directory.
2) We do fuzzing and write new units into the `new_corpus` directory.
3) We want to merge the new corpus into the existing corpus and satisfy the
points mentioned above.
4) We create an empty directory `merged_corpus` and run the first merge step:
`
./fuzz_target -merge=1 -merge_control_file=MCF ./merged_corpus ./existing_corpus
`
this provides the initial stats for `existing_corpus`, e.g. from the output:
`
MERGE-OUTER: 3 new files with 11 new features added; 11 new coverage edges
`
5) We recreate `merged_corpus` directory and run the second merge step:
`
./fuzz_target -merge=1 -merge_control_file=MCF ./merged_corpus ./existing_corpus ./new_corpus
`
this provides the final stats for the merged corpus, e.g. from the output:
`
MERGE-OUTER: 6 new files with 14 new features added; 14 new coverage edges
`
Alternative solutions to this approach are:
A) Store precise coverage information for every unit (not only unique signal).
B) Execute the same two steps without reusing the control file.
Either of these would be suboptimal as it would impose an extra disk or CPU load
respectively, which is bad given the quadratic complexity in the worst case.
Tested on Linux, Mac, Windows.
Reviewers: morehouse, metzman, hctim, kcc
Reviewed By: morehouse
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, delcypher, mgrang, #sanitizers, llvm-commits, kcc
Tags: #llvm, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66107
llvm-svn: 371620
Summary:
The purpose is to be able to extract the number of new edges added to
the original (i.e. output) corpus directory after doing the merge. Use case
example: in ClusterFuzz, we do merge after every fuzzing session, to avoid
uploading too many corpus files, and we also record coverage stats at that
point. Having a separate line indicating stats after reading the initial output
corpus directory would make the stats extraction easier for both humans and
parsing scripts.
Context: https://github.com/google/clusterfuzz/issues/802.
Reviewers: morehouse, hctim
Reviewed By: hctim
Subscribers: delcypher, #sanitizers, llvm-commits, kcc
Tags: #llvm, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66020
llvm-svn: 368461
Summary:
Port libFuzzer's fork mode to Windows.
Implement Windows versions of MkDir, RmDir, and IterateDirRecursive to do this.
Don't print error messages under new normal uses of FileSize (on a non-existent file).
Implement portable way of piping output to /dev/null.
Fix test for Windows and comment fork-sigusr.test on why it won't be ported to Win.
Reviewers: zturner
Reviewed By: zturner
Subscribers: kcc, zturner, jdoerfert, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Tags: #sanitizers, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58513
llvm-svn: 355019
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
r327219 added wrappers to std::sort which randomly shuffle the container before sorting.
This will help in uncovering non-determinism caused due to undefined sorting
order of objects having the same key.
To make use of that infrastructure we need to invoke llvm::sort instead of std::sort.
Reviewers: kcc, rsmith, RKSimon, eugenis
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: efriedma, kubamracek, dberris, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44360
llvm-svn: 327929
Summary:
To be more portable (especially w.r.t. platforms without system()),
commands should be managed programmatically rather than via string
manipulation on the command line. This change introduces
Fuzzer::Command, with methods to manage arguments and flags, set output
options, and execute the command.
Patch By: aarongreen
Reviewers: kcc, morehouse
Reviewed By: kcc, morehouse
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40103
llvm-svn: 319680
Resulting library binaries will be named libclang_rt.fuzzer*, and will
be placed in Clang toolchain, allowing redistribution.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36908
llvm-svn: 311407
Max Moroz