merged type info names.
Previously std::type_info always expected type info string to be unique.
But this isn't always the case. Like when -Bsymbolic is passed to the
linker or due to llvm.org/PR37398.
This patch adds the LIBCXX_HAS_MERGED_TYPEINFO_NAMES_DEFAULT CMake
option which, when specified, overrides the default configuration for
the library.
The current defaults still assume unique names even though this isn't
strictly correct for ELF binaries. We should consider changing the
default in a follow up commit.
llvm-svn: 361913
Summary:
This provides the `std::destroying_delete_t` declaration in C++2a and after. (Even when the compiler doesn't support the language feature).
However, the feature test macro `__cpp_lib_destroying_delete` is only defined when we have both language support and C++2a.
Reviewers: ldionne, ckennelly, serge-sans-paille, EricWF
Reviewed By: EricWF
Subscribers: dexonsmith, riccibruno, christof, jwakely, jdoerfert, mclow.lists, ldionne, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55840
llvm-svn: 361572
Summary: On some platforms C++ headers are packaged with the compiler not the sysroot. If you don't copy C++ headers into the build include directory during configuraiton of the outer build the C++ check during the runtime configuration may get inaccurate results.
Reviewers: phosek, compnerd, smeenai, EricWF
Reviewed By: compnerd
Subscribers: EricWF, christof, libcxx-commits, mgorny, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm, #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62155
llvm-svn: 361513
The `using namespace std;` opens us up to ambiguity
when any of the std:: names are also present in the global namespace.
Instead we should properly qualify names we use from std::.
llvm-svn: 361074
This adds explicit support for the WASI platform to libcxx.
WASI libc uses some components from musl, however it's not fully compatible
with musl, so we're planning to stop using _LIBCPP_HAS_MUSL_LIBC and
customize for WASI libc specifically.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61336
Reviewers: sbc100, ldionne
llvm-svn: 359703
Summary:
The current implementation of aligned storage was written before we had `alignas`, so it used a list of builtin types to force the alignment. But this doesn't work overaligned requests.
This patch adds a fallback case supporting over-alignment. It only affects case that were previously ill-formed.
Reviewers: rsmith, ldionne, dlj, mclow.lists
Reviewed By: mclow.lists
Subscribers: mclow.lists, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61301
llvm-svn: 359596
When the arguments to tuple cat were const, the const was incorrectly
propagated into the type of the resulting tuple. For example:
const std::tuple<int> t(42);
auto r = std::tuple_cat(t, t);
// Incorrect! should be std::tuple<int, int>.
static_assert(is_same_v<decltype(r), std::tuple<const int, const int>>);
llvm-svn: 359255
libc++ ABI v1 provides three valarray symbols as part of the shared library:
valarray<size_t>::valarray(size_t)
valarray<size_t>::~valarray()
valarray<size_t>::resize(size_t, size_t)
The first two of these are intended to be removed in V2 of the ABI: they're
attributed _LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI_AFTER_V1, and it appears that the intention
is that these symbols from the library are not used even when building using
the V1 ABI. However, there are explicit instantiation declarations for all
three symbols in the header, which are not correct as we do not intend to find
an instantiation of these functions that is provided elsewhere.
(A recent change to clang to properly diagnose explicit instantiation
declarations of internal linkage functions -- required by [temp.explicit]p13 --
had to be rolled back because it diagnosed these explicit instantiations.)
Remove the explicit instantiation declarations, and remove the explicit
instantiation definitions for V2 of the libc++ ABI onwards.
llvm-svn: 359243
std::mutex was not actually is_nothrow_default_constructible in C++98/C++03,
because the variable declaration
std::mutex M;
... could throw an exception from the mutex destructor. Fix it by marking the
destructor as non-throwing. This has no effect in C++11 onwards, because
destructors are non-throwing by default in those language modes.
llvm-svn: 359229
Contrary to MSVC, MinGW compilers wants the dllexport attribute on
the declaration of an explicit template instantiation, not on the
definition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61123
llvm-svn: 359227
Teach libcxx to stop using various deprecated __has_* type traits, in favor of
the ("modern", C++11 era) __is_* type traits.
This is mostly just a simplification, but fixes at least one bug: _Atomic T
should be considered trivially-destructible, but is not considered to be POD by
Clang, and __has_trivial_destructor is specified in the GCC documentation as
returning false for non-POD non-class types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48292
llvm-svn: 359159
Summary:
All overloads of `::abs` and `std::abs` must be present in both `<cmath>` and `<cstdlib>`. This is problematic to implement because C defines `fabs` in `math.h` and `labs` in `stdlib.h`. This introduces a circular dependency between the two headers.
This patch implements that requirement by moving `abs` into `math.h` and making `stdlib.h` include `math.h`. In order to get the underlying C declarations from the "real" `stdlib.h` inside our `math.h` we need some trickery. Specifically we need to make `stdlib.h` include next itself.
Suggestions for a cleaner implementation are welcome.
Reviewers: mclow.lists, ldionne
Reviewed By: ldionne
Subscribers: krytarowski, fedor.sergeev, dexonsmith, jdoerfert, jsji, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60097
llvm-svn: 359020
This is a followup to [1] which added a new `__debug_less::operator()` overload.
[2] added `_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_AFTER_CXX17` to the original
`__debug_less::operator()` between the time of writing [1] and landing it. This
change adds `_LIBCPP_CONSTEXPR_AFTER_CXX17` to the new overload too.
[1] https://reviews.llvm.org/rL358423
[2] https://reviews.llvm.org/rL358252
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60724
llvm-svn: 358725
This used to be guarded on whether the deployment target was greater
than macosx10.8, however testing against the dylibs for 10.8 and earlier
with the function enabled works too. The revision that introduced
__pad_and_output is r164241 and it does not mention a reason for the
guard.
llvm-svn: 358677
Summary:
Otherwise, we can run into problems when the program has static variables
that need to use the debug database during their deinitialization, if
the debug DB has already been deinitialized.
Reviewers: EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60830
llvm-svn: 358602
There are many STL algorithms (such as lexicographical_compare) that compare
values pointed to by iterators like so:
__comp(*it1, *it2);
When building with `_LIBCPP_DEBUG=0`, comparators are wrapped in `__debug_less`
which does some additional validation. But `__debug_less::operator()` takes
non-const references, so if the type of `*it1` is int, not int&, then the build
will fail.
This change adds a `const&` overload for `operator()` to fix the build.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60592
llvm-svn: 358423
Instead of having an `#if` block in every algorithm using a debug
comparator, this patch introduces the __comp_ref_type trait that
selects __debug_less in debug mode and _Comp& otherwise.
This patch should have no observable functionality change.
llvm-svn: 358252
Summary:
In r348529, I improved the library-defined diagnostic for using containers
with a non-const comparator/hasher. However, the check is now performed
too early, which leads to the diagnostic being emitted in cases where it
shouldn't. See PR41360 for details.
This patch moves the diagnostic to the destructor of the containers, which
means that the diagnostic will only be emitted when the container is instantiated
at a point where the comparator and the key/value are required to be complete.
We still retain better diagnostics than before r348529, because the diagnostics
are performed in the containers themselves instead of __tree and __hash_table.
As a drive-by fix, I improved the diagnostic to mention that we can't find
a _viable_ const call operator, as suggested by EricWF in PR41360.
Reviewers: EricWF, mclow.lists
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits, zoecarver
Tags: #libc
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60540
llvm-svn: 358189
Summary:
This is a re-application of r357533 and r357531. They had been reverted
because we thought the commits broke the LLDB data formatters, but it
turns out this was because only r357531 had been included in the CI
run.
Before this patch, we would only ever throw an exception if the badbit
was set on the stream. The Standard is currently very unclear on how
exceptions should be propagated and what error flags should be set by
the input stream operations. This commit changes libc++ to behave under
a different (but valid) interpretation of the Standard. This interpretation
of the Standard matches what other implementations are doing.
This effectively implements the wording in p1264r0. It hasn't been voted
into the Standard yet, however there is wide agreement that the fix is
correct and it's just a matter of time before the fix is standardized.
PR21586
PR15949
rdar://problem/15347558
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49863
llvm-svn: 357775
This builds on the work done in r342808 and adds _LIBCPP_NODISCARD_EXT
to 37 more functions, namely:
adjacent_find, all_of, any_of, binary_search, clamp, count_if, count,
equal_range, equal, find_end, find_first_not_of, find_first_of, find_if,
find, includes, is_heap_until, is_heap, is_partitioned, is_permutation,
is_sorted_until, is_sorted, lexicographical_compare, lower_bound,
max_element, max, min_element, min, minmax_element, minmax, mismatch,
none_of, remove_if, remove, search_n, search, unique, upper_bound
The motivation here is that we noticed that find_if is nodiscard with
Visual Studio's standard library, and we deemed that useful
(https://crbug.com/948122).
https://devblogs.microsoft.com/cppblog/c17-progress-in-vs-2017-15-5-and-15-6/
says "Our criteria for emitting the warning are: discarding the return
value is a guaranteed leak [...], discarding the return value is
near-guaranteed to be incorrect (e.g. remove()/remove_if()/unique()), or
the function is essentially a pure observer (e.g. vector::empty() and
std::is_sorted())." so I went through algorithm and tried to apply these
criteria.
Some of these, like vector::empty() are already nodiscard per C++
standard and didn't need changing.
I didn't (yet?) go over std::string::find* methods which should probably
have _LIBCPP_NODISCARD_EXT too (but not as part of this change).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60145
llvm-svn: 357619
Summary:
Otherwise, std::is_pointer<id __strong> works, but std::is_pointer<id __weak>
(and others) don't work as expected.
The previous patch (r357517) had to be reverted in r357569 because it
broke the Chromium build. This patch shouldn't have the same problem.
rdar://problem/49126333
Reviewers: ahatanak, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, jkorous, dexonsmith, libcxx-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60087
llvm-svn: 357586
This reverts commits r357533 and r357531, which broke the LLDB
data formatters. I'll hold off until we know how to fix the data
formatters accordingly.
llvm-svn: 357536
Summary:
Before this patch, we would only ever throw an exception if the badbit
was set on the stream. The Standard is currently very unclear on how
exceptions should be propagated and what error flags should be set by
the input stream operations. This commit changes libc++ to behave under
a different (but valid) interpretation of the Standard. This interpretation
of the Standard matches what other implementations are doing.
I will submit a paper in San Diego to clarify the Standard such that the
interpretation used in this commit (and other implementations) is the only
possible one.
PR21586
PR15949
rdar://problem/15347558
Reviewers: mclow.lists, EricWF
Subscribers: christof, dexonsmith, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49863
llvm-svn: 357531
The current definitions were entirely broken. They didn't call any
existing constructor and the forgot to friend the expression types they
were trying to construct.
llvm-svn: 357453
Louis Dionne