Summary:
By adding a hook to consume all tokens produced by the preprocessor.
The intention of this change is to make it possible to consume the
expanded tokens without re-runnig the preprocessor with minimal changes
to the preprocessor and minimal performance penalty when preprocessing
without recording the tokens.
The added hook is very low-level and reconstructing the expanded token
stream requires more work in the client code, the actual algorithm to
collect the tokens using this hook can be found in the follow-up change.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: eraman, nemanjai, kbarton, jsji, riccibruno, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59885
llvm-svn: 361007
Summary:
modernize-loop-convert was not detecting implicit casts to
const_iterator as convertible to range-based loops:
std::vector<int> vec{1,2,3,4}
for(std::vector<int>::const_iterator i = vec.begin();
i != vec.end();
++i) { }
Thanks to Don Hinton for advice.
As well, this change adds a note for this check's applicability to code
targeting OpenMP prior version 5 as this check will continue breaking
compilation with `-fopenmp`. Thanks to Roman Lebedev for pointing this
out.
Fixes PR#35082
Patch by Torbjörn Klatt!
Reviewed By: hintonda
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61827
llvm-svn: 360788
Summary:
modernize-loop-convert was not detecting implicit casts to
const_iterator as convertible to range-based loops:
std::vector<int> vec{1,2,3,4}
for(std::vector<int>::const_iterator i = vec.begin();
i != vec.end();
++i) { }
Thanks to Don Hinton for advice.
As well, this change adds a note for this check's applicability to code
targeting OpenMP prior to version 5 as this check will continue breaking
compilation with `-fopenmp`. Thanks to Roman Lebedev for pointing this
out.
Fixes PR#35082
Reviewed By: hintonda
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61827
llvm-svn: 360785
Add the modernize-use-trailing-return check to rewrite function signatures to use trailing return types.
Patch by Bernhard Manfred Gruber.
llvm-svn: 360438
Summary:
The case when initialize_list hides behind an implicit case was not
handled before.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61642
llvm-svn: 360231
It now comes with a follow-up fix for the clients of this API
in clangd and clang-tidy.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59977
llvm-svn: 359035
Fix the crash resulting from a careless use of getLocWithOffset. At the
beginning of a macro expansion it produces an invalid SourceLocation that causes
an assertion failure later on.
llvm-svn: 357312
Summary:
The usefulness of **modernize-use-override** can be reduced if you have to live in an environment where you support multiple compilers, some of which sadly are not yet fully C++11 compliant
some codebases have to use override as a macro OVERRIDE e.g.
```
// GCC 4.7 supports explicit virtual overrides when C++11 support is enabled.
```
This allows code to be compiled with C++11 compliant compilers and get warnings and errors that clang, MSVC,gcc can give, while still allowing other legacy pre C++11 compilers to compile the code. This can be an important step towards modernizing C++ code whilst living in a legacy codebase.
When it comes to clang tidy, the use of the **modernize-use-override** is one of the most useful checks, but the messages reported are inaccurate for that codebase if the standard approach is to use the macros OVERRIDE and/or FINAL.
When combined with fix-its that introduce the C++11 override keyword, they become fatal, resulting in the modernize-use-override check being turned off to prevent the introduction of such errors.
This revision, allows the possibility for the replacement **override **to be a macro instead, Allowing the clang-tidy check to be run on both pre and post C++11 code, and allowing fix-its to be applied.
Reviewers: alexfh, JonasToth, hokein, Eugene.Zelenko, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: alexfh, JonasToth
Subscribers: lewmpk, malcolm.parsons, jdoerfert, xazax.hun, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57087
llvm-svn: 355132
Summary:
The modernize-use-default-member-init check crashes when trying to
create an assignment value for a value-initialized enum because it isn't a
BuiltinType.
An enum cannot be initialized by assigning 0 to it unless a cast is added.
It could be initialized with an enumerator with the value 0, but there might not
be one.
Avoid these issues by ignoring the UseAssignment setting for value-initialized
enums.
Fixes PR35050.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, JonasToth
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57852
llvm-svn: 353554
Summary:
The check should ignore the main function, the program entry point.
It is not possible to use `std::array<>` for the `argv`.
The alternative is to use `char** argv`.
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40604 | PR40604 ]]
Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, hans, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57787
llvm-svn: 353327
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
Correct the case of the local variables..
Rational:
I want to be able to run clang-tidy on new clang-tidy checker code prior to creating a review (to demonstrate we should dog food our own tools during development, not my suggestion but @Eugene.Zelenko)
To this end I am running the following in a script, prior to make a change.
```
tidy:
@for source in $$(git status -suno | grep ".cpp$$" | cut -c4-) ;\
do \
clang-tidy -quiet $$source -- $(TIDY_FLAGS);\
done
```
I then want to go through the checkers and see which checkers most closely match the review style of the reviewers
```
---
Checks: '
-clang-diagnostic-*,
readability-identifier-naming,
llvm-header-guard
'
WarningsAsErrors: ''
HeaderFilterRegex: ''
AnalyzeTemporaryDtors: false
FormatStyle: LLVM
CheckOptions:
- key: readability-identifier-naming.IgnoreFailedSplit
value: '0'
- key: readability-identifier-naming.VariableCase
value: 'CamelCase'
- key: readability-identifier-naming.LocalVariableCase
value: 'CamelCase'
...
```
Unfortunately in doing so, I have identified that my previous review {D55433} it violates what looks like to be the convention of local variables being in CamelCase.
Sending this small review in the hope it can be corrected.
Patch by MyDeveloperDay.
Reviewers: JonasToth, Eugene.Zelenko
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: xazax.hun, Eugene.Zelenko
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56536
llvm-svn: 350814
Summary: Adds a checker to clang-tidy to warn when a non void const member function, taking only parameters passed by value or const reference could be marked as '[[nodiscard]]'
Patch by MyDeveloperDay.
Reviewers: alexfh, stephenkelly, curdeius, aaron.ballman, hokein, JonasToth
Reviewed By: curdeius, JonasToth
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, lefticus, lebedev.ri, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55433
llvm-svn: 350760
Summary: The fix for `auto` new expression is illegal.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54832
llvm-svn: 347551
Summary:
The fix for aggregate initialization (`std::make_unique<Foo>(Foo {1, 2})` needs
to see Foo copy constructor, otherwise we will have a compiler error. So we
only emit the check warning.
Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54745
llvm-svn: 347537
Removed the uses of the allOf() matcher inside node matchers that are implicit
allOf(). Replaced uses of allOf() with the explicit node matcher where it makes
matchers more readable. Replace anyOf(hasName(), hasName(), ...) with the more
efficient and readable hasAnyName().
llvm-svn: 347520
The test I'm adding passes without the change due to the deduplication logic in
ClangTidyDiagnosticConsumer::take(). However this bug manifests in our internal
integration with clang-tidy.
I've verified the fix by locally changing LessClangTidyError to consider
replacements.
llvm-svn: 347470
Summary:
Currently the smart_ptr check (modernize-make-unique) generates the
fixes that cannot compile for cases like below -- because brace list can
not be deduced in `make_unique`.
```
struct Bar { int a, b; };
struct Foo { Foo(Bar); };
auto foo = std::unique_ptr<Foo>(new Foo({1, 2}));
```
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54704
llvm-svn: 347315
Summary:
[[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39224 | PR39224 ]]
As discussed, we can't always do the transform automatically due to that array-to-pointer decay of C array.
In order to detect whether we can do said transform, we'd need to be able to see all usages of said array,
which is, i would say, rather impossible if e.g. it is in the header.
Thus right now no fixit exists.
Exceptions: `extern "C"` code.
References:
* [[ https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#es27-use-stdarray-or-stack_array-for-arrays-on-the-stack | CPPCG ES.27: Use std::array or stack_array for arrays on the stack ]]
* [[ https://isocpp.github.io/CppCoreGuidelines/CppCoreGuidelines#slcon1-prefer-using-stl-array-or-vector-instead-of-a-c-array | CPPCG SL.con.1: Prefer using STL array or vector instead of a C array ]]
* HICPP `4.1.1 Ensure that a function argument does not undergo an array-to-pointer conversion`
* MISRA `5-2-12 An identifier with array type passed as a function argument shall not decay to a pointer`
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, JonasToth, alexfh, hokein, xazax.hun
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53771
llvm-svn: 346835
Summary:
Previously, ptr.reset(new char[5]) will be replaced with `p =
make_unique<char[]>(5)`, the fix has side effect -- doing
default initialization, it may cause performace regression (we are
bitten by this rececntly)
The check should be conservative for these cases.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53377
llvm-svn: 344733
And also enable it by default to be consistent with e.g. modernize-use-using.
This improves consistency inside the check itself as well: both checks are now
disabled in macros by default.
This helps e.g. when running this check on client code where the macro is
provided by the system, so there is no easy way to modify it.
Reviewed By: alexfh
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D53217
llvm-svn: 344440
Summary:
Extra parentheses around a new expression result in incorrect code
after applying fixes.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52989
llvm-svn: 344058
The std::array create multiple StringRef but did not wrap
them in braces. Some compilers warned for that. Adding the
braces is not possible and result in a compilation error.
This commit changes the array to vector which works without warning.
llvm-svn: 344046
This check warns the uses of the deprecated member types of std::ios_base
and replaces those that have a non-deprecated equivalent.
Patch by andobence!
Reviewd by: alexfh
Revision ID: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51332
llvm-svn: 343848
Summary:
Finds instances of namespaces concatenated using explicit syntax, such as `namespace a { namespace b { [...] }}` and offers fix to glue it to `namespace a::b { [...] }`.
Properly handles `inline` and unnamed namespaces. ~~Also, detects empty blocks in nested namespaces and offers to remove them.~~
Test with common use cases included.
I ran the check against entire llvm repository. Except for expected `nested namespace definitions only available with -std=c++17 or -std=gnu++17` warnings I noticed no issues when the check was performed.
Example:
```
namespace a { namespace b {
void test();
}}
```
can become
```
namespace a::b {
void test();
}
```
Patch by wgml!
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: JonasToth, Eugene.Zelenko, lebedev.ri, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52136
llvm-svn: 343000
Summary:
Hello, i would like to suggest a fix for one of the checks in clang-tidy.The bug was reported in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32575 where you can find more information.
For example:
```
template <typename T0>
struct S {
template <typename T>
void g() const {
int a;
(void)a;
}
};
void f() {
S<int>().g<int>();
}
```
this piece of code should not trigger any warning by the check modernize-redundant-void-arg but when we execute the following command
```
clang_tidy -checks=-*,modernize-redundant-void-arg test.cpp -- -std=c++11
```
we obtain the following warning:
/Users/eco419/Desktop/clang-tidy.project/void-redundand_2/test.cpp:6:6: warning: redundant void argument list in function declaration [modernize-redundant-void-arg]
(void)a;
^~~~
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, hokein, alexfh, JonasToth
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, JonasToth
Subscribers: JonasToth, lebedev.ri, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D52135
llvm-svn: 342388
Summary:
Hello, i would like to suggest a fix for one of the checks in clang-tidy.
The bug was reported in https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38039 where you can find more information.
```
struct UOB{
UOB(const UOB &Other):j{Other.j}{}
int j;
};
```
In this case the check modernize-use-equals-default does not detect copy constructors that can be defaulted; that should be:
```
struct UOB{
UOB(const UOB &Other) = default;
int j;
};
```
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, hokein, alexfh
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49356
llvm-svn: 337286
This commit relands r331905.
r331904 added SrcMgr::CharacteristicKind to the InclusionDirective
callback, this revision updates instances of it in clang-tools-extra.
llvm-svn: 332023
Ilya Biryukov