When emitting coverage mappings for functions with local linkage and an
unknown filename, we use "<unknown>:func" for the PGO function name. The
problem is that we don't strip "<unknown>" from the name when loading
coverage data, like we do for other file names. Fix that and add a test.
llvm-svn: 264559
Add an option to llvm-profdata merge for writing out sparse indexed
profiles. These profiles omit InstrProfRecords for functions which are
never executed.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16727
llvm-svn: 259258
Add support to the indexed instrprof reader and writer for the format
that will be used for value profiling.
Patch by Betul Buyukkurt, with minor modifications.
llvm-svn: 248833
If we have a coverage mapping but no profile data for a function,
calling it mismatched is misleading. This can just as easily be
unreachable code that was stripped from the binary. Instead, treat
these the same as functions where we have an explicit "zero" coverage
map by setting the count to zero for each mapped region.
llvm-svn: 237298
This was leading to duplicate counts when a code region happened to
overlap exactly with an expansion. The combining behaviour only makes
sense for code regions.
llvm-svn: 229723
This comes up when we generate coverage for a function but don't end
up emitting the function at all - dead static functions or inline
functions that aren't referenced in a particular TU, for example. In
these cases we'd like to show that the function was never called,
which is trivially true.
llvm-svn: 229717
Make CoverageMapping easier to create, so that we can write targeted
unit tests for its internals, and add a some infrastructure to write
these tests. Finally, add a simple unit test for basic functionality.
llvm-svn: 229709
This time we use a helper to format the assertion so we can just use
ASSERT_TRUE instead of relying on ASSERT_EQ being able to deal with
conversions between enum types.
This reverts r229496, re-applying r229473.
llvm-svn: 229547
The llvm-level tests for coverage mapping need a binary input file,
which means they're hard to understand, hard to update, and it's
difficult to add new ones. By adding some unit tests that build up the
coverage data structures in C++, we can write more meaningful and
targeted tests.
llvm-svn: 228084
Igor Kudrin