Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Teresa Johnson 02e98331c0 [ThinLTO] Use valueid instead of bitcode offsets in combined index file
Summary:
With the removal of support for lazy parsing of combined index summary
records (e.g. r267344), we no longer need to include the summary record
bitcode offset in the VST entries for definitions. Change the combined
index format to be similar to the per-module index format in using value
ids to cross-reference from the summary record to the VST entry (rather
than the summary record bitcode offset to cross-reference in the other
direction).

The visible changes are:
1) Add the value id to the combined summary records
2) Remove the summary offset from the combined VST records, which has
the following effects:
- No longer need the VST_CODE_COMBINED_GVDEFENTRY record, as all
  combined index VST entries now only contain the value id and
  corresponding GUID.
- No longer have duplicate VST entries in the case where there are
  multiple definitions of a symbol (e.g. weak/linkonce), as they all
  have the same value id and GUID.

An implication of #2 above is that in order to hook up an alias to the
correct aliasee based on the value id of the aliasee recorded in the
combined index alias record, we need to scan the entries in the index
for that GUID to find the one from the same module (i.e. the case where
there are multiple entries for the aliasee). But the reader no longer
has to maintain a special map to hook up the alias/aliasee.

Reviewers: joker.eph

Subscribers: joker.eph, llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19481

llvm-svn: 267712
2016-04-27 13:28:35 +00:00
Mehdi Amini 8fe6936e18 Add a version field in the bitcode for the summary
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19456

From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 267318
2016-04-24 03:18:11 +00:00
Mehdi Amini 2d28f7aa07 ThinLTO: Make aliases explicit in the summary
To be able to work accurately on the reference graph when taking
decision about internalizing, promoting, renaming, etc. We need
to have the alias information explicit.

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18836

From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266517
2016-04-16 06:56:44 +00:00
Mehdi Amini b5b289339b Revert "Make aliases explicit in the summary"
Inadvertently commited...

This reverts commit e618ec93786d99df2ddf280ad2d5e02f5516cecf.

From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266215
2016-04-13 17:20:07 +00:00
Mehdi Amini ce744a95fd Make aliases explicit in the summary
Summary:
To be able to work accurately on the reference graph when taking decision
about internalizing, promoting, renaming, etc. We need to have the alias
information explicit.

Reviewers: tejohnson

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18836

From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 266214
2016-04-13 17:18:42 +00:00