This renames the function for checking FP function attribute values and also
adds more build attribute tests (which are in separate files because build
attributes are set per file).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25625
llvm-svn: 284571
msc18 doesn't recognize "using BaseT::BaseT;"
llvm\include\llvm/ADT/DenseSet.h(213) : error C2875: using-declaration causes a multiple declaration of 'BaseT'
llvm\include\llvm/ADT/DenseSet.h(214) : see reference to class template instantiation 'llvm::DenseSet<ValueT,ValueInfoT>' being compiled
llvm\include\llvm/ADT/DenseSet.h(231) : error C2875: using-declaration causes a multiple declaration of 'BaseT'
llvm\include\llvm/ADT/DenseSet.h(232) : see reference to class template instantiation 'llvm::SmallDenseSet<ValueT,InlineBuckets,ValueInfoT>' being compiled
llvm-svn: 284570
Summary:
This allows us to create broadcasts of 128-bit vector loads into 512-bit vectors.
New patterns added to support 8-bit and 16-bit vector types and v2f64/v2i64->v8f64/v8i64 without DQI instructions.
There also fallback patterns when the load can't be folded. These patterns are a little complex as we first need to insert the lower 128-bits into the second 128-bits using a zmm subvector insert instruction. We need to use a zmm insert in case VLX isn't available. Then use another zmm sub vector insert to take those 256-bits and insert them into the upper bits. Since we used a zmm insert to create the 256-bits we also need to do a extract_subreg to get just the lower 256-bits to pass to the second insert.
The outer insert for the fallback patterns should have its type correct because eventually we should also supported masked operations here too. So we need a DQI and a NoDQI version of the v16f32/v16i32 patterns.
Reviewers: RKSimon, delena, igorb
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25651
llvm-svn: 284567
Example of output:
COVERAGE:
COVERED: in DSO2(int) /pathto/DSO2.cpp:6
COVERED: in DSO2(int) /pathto/DSO2.cpp:8
COVERED: in DSO1(int) /pathto/DSO1.cpp:6
COVERED: in DSO1(int) /pathto/DSO1.cpp:8
COVERED: in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput /pathto/DSOTestMain.cpp:16
COVERED: in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput /pathto/DSOTestMain.cpp:19
COVERED: in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput /pathto/DSOTestMain.cpp:25
COVERED: in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput /pathto/DSOTestMain.cpp:26
MODULE_WITH_COVERAGE: /pathto/libLLVMFuzzer-DSO1.so
UNCOVERED_LINE: in DSO1(int) /pathto/DSO1.cpp:9
UNCOVERED_FUNC: in Uncovered1()
MODULE_WITH_COVERAGE: /pathto/libLLVMFuzzer-DSO2.so
UNCOVERED_LINE: in DSO2(int) /pathto/DSO2.cpp:9
UNCOVERED_FUNC: in Uncovered2()
MODULE_WITH_COVERAGE: /pathto/LLVMFuzzer-DSOTest
UNCOVERED_LINE: in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput /pathto/DSOTestMain.cpp:21
UNCOVERED_LINE: in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput /pathto/DSOTestMain.cpp:27
UNCOVERED_FILE: /pathto/DSOTestExtra.cpp
Several things are not perfect here:
* we are using objdump+awk instead of sancov because sancov does not support DSOs yet.
* this breaks in the presence of ASAN_OPTIONS=strip_path_prefix=...
(need to implement another API to get the module name by PC)
llvm-svn: 284554
Summary:
The original heuristic to break critical edge during machine sink is relatively conservertive: when there is only one instruction sinkable to the critical edge, it is likely that the machine sink pass will not break the critical edge. This leads to many speculative instructions executed at runtime. However, with profile info, we could model the splitting benefits: if the critical edge has 50% taken rate, it would always be beneficial to split the critical edge to avoid the speculated runtime instructions. This patch uses profile to guide critical edge splitting in machine sink pass.
The performance impact on speccpu2006 on Intel sandybridge machines:
spec/2006/fp/C++/444.namd 25.3 +0.26%
spec/2006/fp/C++/447.dealII 45.96 -0.10%
spec/2006/fp/C++/450.soplex 41.97 +1.49%
spec/2006/fp/C++/453.povray 36.83 -0.96%
spec/2006/fp/C/433.milc 23.81 +0.32%
spec/2006/fp/C/470.lbm 41.17 +0.34%
spec/2006/fp/C/482.sphinx3 48.13 +0.69%
spec/2006/int/C++/471.omnetpp 22.45 +3.25%
spec/2006/int/C++/473.astar 21.35 -2.06%
spec/2006/int/C++/483.xalancbmk 36.02 -2.39%
spec/2006/int/C/400.perlbench 33.7 -0.17%
spec/2006/int/C/401.bzip2 22.9 +0.52%
spec/2006/int/C/403.gcc 32.42 -0.54%
spec/2006/int/C/429.mcf 39.59 +0.19%
spec/2006/int/C/445.gobmk 26.98 -0.00%
spec/2006/int/C/456.hmmer 24.52 -0.18%
spec/2006/int/C/458.sjeng 28.26 +0.02%
spec/2006/int/C/462.libquantum 55.44 +3.74%
spec/2006/int/C/464.h264ref 46.67 -0.39%
geometric mean +0.20%
Manually checked 473 and 471 to verify the diff is in the noise range.
Reviewers: rengolin, davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24818
llvm-svn: 284545
Summary:
This pass shrink-wraps a condition to some library calls where the call
result is not used. For example:
sqrt(val);
is transformed to
if (val < 0)
sqrt(val);
Even if the result of library call is not being used, the compiler cannot
safely delete the call because the function can set errno on error
conditions.
Note in many functions, the error condition solely depends on the incoming
parameter. In this optimization, we can generate the condition can lead to
the errno to shrink-wrap the call. Since the chances of hitting the error
condition is low, the runtime call is effectively eliminated.
These partially dead calls are usually results of C++ abstraction penalty
exposed by inlining. This optimization hits 108 times in 19 C/C++ programs
in SPEC2006.
Reviewers: hfinkel, mehdi_amini, davidxl
Subscribers: modocache, mgorny, mehdi_amini, xur, llvm-commits, beanz
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24414
llvm-svn: 284542
Summary:
The original heuristic to break critical edge during machine sink is relatively conservertive: when there is only one instruction sinkable to the critical edge, it is likely that the machine sink pass will not break the critical edge. This leads to many speculative instructions executed at runtime. However, with profile info, we could model the splitting benefits: if the critical edge has 50% taken rate, it would always be beneficial to split the critical edge to avoid the speculated runtime instructions. This patch uses profile to guide critical edge splitting in machine sink pass.
The performance impact on speccpu2006 on Intel sandybridge machines:
spec/2006/fp/C++/444.namd 25.3 +0.26%
spec/2006/fp/C++/447.dealII 45.96 -0.10%
spec/2006/fp/C++/450.soplex 41.97 +1.49%
spec/2006/fp/C++/453.povray 36.83 -0.96%
spec/2006/fp/C/433.milc 23.81 +0.32%
spec/2006/fp/C/470.lbm 41.17 +0.34%
spec/2006/fp/C/482.sphinx3 48.13 +0.69%
spec/2006/int/C++/471.omnetpp 22.45 +3.25%
spec/2006/int/C++/473.astar 21.35 -2.06%
spec/2006/int/C++/483.xalancbmk 36.02 -2.39%
spec/2006/int/C/400.perlbench 33.7 -0.17%
spec/2006/int/C/401.bzip2 22.9 +0.52%
spec/2006/int/C/403.gcc 32.42 -0.54%
spec/2006/int/C/429.mcf 39.59 +0.19%
spec/2006/int/C/445.gobmk 26.98 -0.00%
spec/2006/int/C/456.hmmer 24.52 -0.18%
spec/2006/int/C/458.sjeng 28.26 +0.02%
spec/2006/int/C/462.libquantum 55.44 +3.74%
spec/2006/int/C/464.h264ref 46.67 -0.39%
geometric mean +0.20%
Manually checked 473 and 471 to verify the diff is in the noise range.
Reviewers: rengolin, davidxl
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24818
llvm-svn: 284541
This is just a quick utility handy for getting rough summaries of types
in a given object or dwo file. I've been using it to investigate the
amount of type info redundancy across a project build, for example.
llvm-svn: 284537
The custom lowering is pretty straightforward: basically, just AND
together the two halves of a <4 x i32> compare.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25713
llvm-svn: 284536
Summary:
The original implementation is in r261607, which was reverted in r269726 to accomendate the ProfileSummaryInfo analysis pass. The new implementation:
1. add a new metadata for function section prefix
2. query against ProfileSummaryInfo in CGP to set the correct section prefix for each function
3. output the section prefix set by CGP
Reviewers: davidxl, eraman
Subscribers: vsk, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24989
llvm-svn: 284533
Transform `a == 0.0 ? 0.0 : x` to `a == 0.0 ? a : x` and `a != 0.0 ? x : 0.0`
to `a != 0.0 ? x : a` to avoid materializing 0.0 for FCSEL, since it does not
have to be materialized beforehand for FCMP, as it has a form that has 0.0
as an implicit operand.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24808
llvm-svn: 284531
load command that use the MachO:: linkedit_data_command
type but is not used in llvm libObject code but used in llvm tool code.
This is for the LC_CODE_SIGNATURE load command.
llvm-svn: 284529
AArch64 actually supports many 8-bit operations under the definition used by
GlobalISel: the designated information-carrying bits of a GPR32 get the right
value if you just use the normal 32-bit instruction.
llvm-svn: 284526
This doesn't cover all combines in DAGCombiner::visitSRL/visitSHL yet, but identifies several cases where we fail to combine vectors (or non-splatted) vectors
llvm-svn: 284518
load commands that use the MachO::routines_command and
and MachO::routines_command_64 types but are not used in llvm
libObject code but used in llvm tool code.
This includes the LC_ROUTINES and LC_ROUTINES_64
load commands.
llvm-svn: 284504
This doesn't cover all combines in DAGCombiner::visitSRA yet, but identifies several cases where we fail to combine vectors (or non-splatted) vectors
llvm-svn: 284498
Summary:
The RFC proposal sent to increase the minimum required GCC version
to 4.8 received a lot of support. See the following thread:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-October/105955.html,
This patch implements that by updating the docs. I believe the
references to libstdc++ 4.7 issues can be removed as well, please
let me know if that is not the case or if they should be updated
a different way.
Reviewers: rengolin
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25683
llvm-svn: 284497
This is a follow-up to D24816 - where we changed reciprocal estimates to be function attributes
rather than TargetOptions.
This patch is intended to be a structural, but not functional change. By moving all of the
TargetRecip functionality into TargetLowering, we can remove all of the reciprocal estimate
state, shield the callers from the string format implementation, and simplify/localize the
logic needed for a target to enable this.
If a function has a "reciprocal-estimates" attribute, those settings may override the target's
default reciprocal preferences for whatever operation and data type we're trying to optimize.
If there's no attribute string or specific setting for the op/type pair, just use the target
default settings.
As noted earlier, a better solution would be to move the reciprocal estimate settings to IR
instructions and SDNodes rather than function attributes, but that's a multi-step job that
requires infrastructure improvements. I intend to work on that, but it's not clear how long
it will take to get all the pieces in place.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25440
llvm-svn: 284495
Simon Pilgrim